Quotes of the day
posted at 10:47 pm on November 15, 2012 by Allahpundit
The polite praise initially showered upon Mitt Romney for having waged a good fight against President Obama has given way to a plea from some Republicans: Please stop talking.
A week after the election, as Republicans examine how to recalibrate and regain their footing, Mr. Romney’s suggestion that he lost the race because of the “gifts” that Mr. Obama gave to black, Latino and young voters did not sit well with some party leaders gathered here for a meeting of the Republican Governors Association.
A handful of prominent Republicans criticized Mitt Romney for his disparaging remarks about President Barack Obama’s “gifts” to core constituencies, saying that it was the wrong message to send voters as the party tries to rebuild itself after a bruising defeat.
“I don’t think it’s helpful,” Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad told POLITICO at the Republican Governors Association conference on Thursday. “I guess my feeling is that we need to turn the page, and we need to focus on the future and not make excuses for the past.”
In Las Vegas to attend the RGA conference, Florida Gov. Rick Scott called Romney’s comments “inappropriate.”
“It’s wrong, it’s not true,” Scott told POLITICO, adding: “What we’ve got to do is say we want every vote, we want to take care of every citizen in our state.”
“I don’t want to rebut him point by point,” Rubio said of Romney. “I would just say to you, I don’t believe that we have millions and millions of people in this country that don’t want to work. I’m not saying that’s what he said. I think we have millions of people in this country that are out of work and are dependent on the government because they can’t find a job.”
Rubio added that the economy is not producing jobs and many unemployed workers don’t have the required skills for vacant positions, “and therein lies the challenge for the conservative movement; how do our ideas help change that.”
The White House today said Mitt Romney is “at odds with the truth” for the belief, as he told donors on a call, that “extraordinary financial gifts” from the administration to minority voters won the election for President Obama…
“Making it easier for Americans to go to college, that’s good for America. It’s good for all Americans. It’s good for the economy,” Carney said. “Making health care available to young people who can stay on their parents’ plans. That’s good for those families it’s good for those young people so they aren’t bankrupted in their 20s by an illness.
“The president pursues policies that have at their core a desire to build the middle class, strengthen the middle class, make the middle class more secure because that’s what makes America more secure,” said Carney. “It’s just not the view we take about the decision the American people made last week.”
Most everybody agrees that Obama’s decision to exempt young illegal immigrants from deportation helped him win a massive victory among Latinos. But Romney’s inartful comment about “gifts” belies a more serious long-term problem for the GOP in appealing to Latinos.
The problem: Whether you call them “gifts” or “government services,” they are very popular with Latinos. And that doesn’t jibe with the core principles of the Republican Party…
This is a big reason why we’ve seen such a swift GOP backlash against Romney for his comments. The “47 percent” and “gifts” rhetoric can be hugely harmful to this effort, and Republicans want to put it behind them in a hurry.
The GOP may correct its course on immigration reform in the coming weeks and months; convincing Latinos to buy into its small-government philosophy will take considerably more time.
The conference call underlined what I have been saying for well over a year: that Mr. Romney has no idea what conservatism offers 100 percent of Americans who believe that freedom leads to prosperity and centralized planning is a road to serfdom. That message led Margaret Thatcher to an unlikely victory in 1979 and Ronald Reagan to a historical landslide a year later. And if Mr. Romney believes that message is no longer relevant to Hispanics and African-Americans, he should’ve stayed in La Jolla to oversee the building of his car elevator.
The future belongs to conservatism. It’s time Republicans start electing leaders who actually believe it
1. Stop looking backward. We have to boldly show what the future can look like with the free market policies that we believe in. Conservative ideals are aspirational, and our country is aspirational.
2. Compete for every single vote. The 47% and the 53%. And any other combination of numbers that adds up to 100 percent. President Barack Obama and the Democrats can continue trying to divide America into groups of warring communities with competing interests, but we will have none of it. We are going after every vote as we try to unite all Americans…
6. Quit “big.” We are not the party of big business, big banks, big Wall Street bailouts, big corporate loopholes, or big anything. We must not be the party that simply protects the well off so they can keep their toys. We have to be the party that shows all Americans how they can thrive. We are the party whose ideas will help the middle class, and help more folks join the middle class. We are a populist party and need to make that clear.
Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Related Posts:








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
I’ve had it with the eight gangsters and all the other rhinos in congress
newportmike on May 9, 2013 at 8:02 PM
Just when you think you couldn’t hate these rat f*ck bastards any more…
I’m completely serious when I say that these and the other amnesty shills are guilty of actively working to destroy this country. If it’s not ‘treason’, I’m not sure what the technical term would be, but it is effectively what they’re doing.
Midas on May 9, 2013 at 8:11 PM
I quite frankly am getting sick of Levin, screaming like a mental patient with Tourettes about obama bin laden, and then playing endless frickin audio clips of him. And if he’s not doing that he’s taking calls from his lifelong butt-buddy Sean Hannity.
Go shit on a fish stick, Mark!!! You’re not a conservative , you’re just a phony mouthpiece!
cableguy615 on May 9, 2013 at 8:12 PM
I’ll raise you a Fawlty Towers marathon. With Manuel, it just about covers the spectrum. :)
AllahsNippleHair on May 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM
I imagine he wasn’t tasting anything, merely willing to lose a foot rather than his life. This happens all the time where animals are trapped. I grieve for them.
avagreen on May 9, 2013 at 8:41 PM
Didn’t get posted. Will try again.
I imagine he wasn’t thinking of how anything tasted other than trying to get out of the trap, being willing to lose a foot rather than a life.
This happens all the time where animals are trapped. I grieve for them.
avagreen on May 9, 2013 at 8:44 PM
Yep, I’ve had it happen a couple of times. I refreshed the page and it corrected. Weird.
lynncgb on May 9, 2013 at 9:06 PM
I hope they all spontaneously combust, right bef. they all go to Hades.
Schadenfreude on May 9, 2013 at 9:30 PM
K. Thanks. First time it happened, I thought I might be getting a little weird. :) Second time, felt better. And now I’m good.
Axe on May 9, 2013 at 9:44 PM
There is not much in that US Senate that even resembles an American these days. They have all violated their oath of office and their only loyalty is to themselves. The Constitution is nothing more then an old piece of parchment that does not fit their modern needs. If you wonder why the country is in such sad shape, just look what we elected to run it.
savage24 on May 9, 2013 at 10:20 PM
Traitors are the biggest crop that Obama has sown.
profitsbeard on May 10, 2013 at 12:40 AM
Ted Cruz wants to double the cap from 600,000 odd to 1.3 million legals a year.
That’s fine for saying “I’m compassionate.”
But it’s devastating for the interests of white people who are being flooded with non-white immigrants – legal and illegal – and forced to integrated with them. The effect of that is that there won’t be any white people at all in the long run. Technically that’s known as genocide – when you use policy (violently or not) to wipe away an identifiable part of the population, including a racial minority, which whites are becoming. (And already are in the youngest age brackets.)
As collateral damage, there won’t be any conservative politics. The conservative base is white, and the Republican Party gets 90% of its votes from whites. (While the Democratic Party gets 80% of the non-white vote.) Under the rules established in 1965, immigration into America is about 90% non-white. This means a million new Democrats a year, a small minority of potential Republican voters, and every red state turning purple then blue.
David Blue on May 10, 2013 at 5:37 AM
End the GOP. If they don’t care if they stay in business in the long run – and that’s what continued mass immigration implies – why should anyone else care if they stay in business?
David Blue on May 10, 2013 at 5:43 AM
Following the link on the ‘voting no’ part I find the original article where it states:
– emphasis mine.
Ukiah on May 10, 2013 at 8:40 AM
This is the absolute proof that not 1 d@mn politician in Washington is serious about wanting to secure our borders, prevent an influx of millions more Illegals over the next decade, and stop the massive financial drain on this nation’s economy.
The bottom line is POLITICS and the politics of party/self-preservation. God forbid, the GOP is fearful that they will be branded as Anti-Hispanic for daring to put the nation’s security above rewarding criminals who have been allowed to flood into this nation to ‘get what they can get’ rather than becoming a contributing member of American society as a citizen of the U.S.
Several years ago, if anyone remembers – or cares to remember – Hispanics took to the streets 2 weekends in a row to March. The reason for the March was to show American citizens just how many Illegals were in the country & show just how much we ‘need’ them. The 1st march was a disaster for the Illegal community, as the media showed the millions of marchers across the US carrying hate-filled signs that read things like, “We don’t want citizenship – we’re here for the money’, and ‘We don’t want to be Americans – give us Texas back’, etc. The American mood was rather negative…and growing…so an organizer quickly called for another march & urged Illegals/Marchers to put on ‘a different face’. The next weekend came & Marchers carried more Pro-American flags…guess they got the message that you don’t bite the hand that is feeding you. During those marches many people just didn’t show up for work & the government even went after several doctors who were handing out the fake ‘sick notes’.
Again, bottom line, politicians are protecting their jobs & are putting rewarding criminals for breaking our laws, putting the ability to do that ahead of securing our borders & keeping Americans safe. As Benghazi showed, putting their re-elections comes before saving / protecting Americans’ lives!
easyt65 on May 10, 2013 at 8:49 AM
AP, don’t you mean voting YES in the last paragraph? Grassley voted no on his own amendment!
Nutstuyu on May 10, 2013 at 9:08 AM
No. I think the domestic drones are already committed for deployment against the bitter clingers.
What we really need is to build a concrete-block building the entire length of the border to house all US prisoners. The ‘yard’ being on the US side with a fence running the entire length. On the other side of the fence is a live-fire zone for military training.
Visualize it and its many intrinsic security features. It’s a self-correcting system.
Tsar of Earth on May 10, 2013 at 11:04 AM
I can see 2014 from my house.
Dexter_Alarius on May 10, 2013 at 11:46 AM
Graham was already contaminated but this Jeff Flake’s name keeps popping up as though he’s some kind of player. He looks to be a third wheel in McCain and Grahams creepy relationship. We don’t need anymore RINO’s Flake, we need Conservatives and that my friend is non negotiable. Internet tax, amnesty without securing our borders? Your writing big checks our party is not going to cash Flake, no? Oh yeah…..
Tangerinesong on May 10, 2013 at 1:07 PM
These people in the GOP touting the amnesty bill aren’t even trying anymore to couch this in terms of securing the border.All they want is a share of these god knows how many tens of millions of illegal future voters.Think they are morons for thinking they will get more than a handful,but that’s what it is all about.Judas betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver.Rubio has betrayed America for 30 illegals!
redware on May 10, 2013 at 1:35 PM
He ran on one set of promises. He began producing speeches and essays arguing it was immoral to oppose amnesty. At some point unknown to us, he joined the Gang and works with them in their back room meetings with the powerbrokers of amnesty. He is the star of commercials misrepresenting the amnesty bill. He keeps changing his arguments for the bill. He is not listening to those who elected him but he pretends to be one with them
The story matches, only the names and amounts are changed
entagor on May 11, 2013 at 12:59 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2