Again I ask how many careers of people did they end that did the same thing.

Christ, you’re a terrible writer…

tommyhawk on November 14, 2012 at 2:48 PM

Speaking of which, that’s not the correct use of an ellipsis.

“When you critique someone’s writing, make sure your own sentence structure is not lacking. Otherwise, you look like a dumb ass.”

“When you critique someone’s writing, make sure your own sentence structure is not lacking. Otherwise …”

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1967867965001/petraeus-scandal-spreads/?playlist_id=903226511001

Susan Rice was merely poll-parroting the WH talking points of misleading (actually wrong) information.

onlineanalyst on November 14, 2012 at 5:14 PM

I want to know who set up and scripted Susan Rice. I’m betting on Axelrod or Jarrett. Somebody in the WH, probably not anyone from State or Intelligence. Point the big guns on whomever scripted Susan Rice.

I believe Rice knew or had reason to know that the attack was not caused by some obscure YouTube trailer, she knew (like Petraeus) the YouTube thingy was just the party line, but elected to repeat the party line on TV that Sunday to score points with Obama. The bigger guns, though, need to be aimed at the WH person(s) who sucked Rice into fronting and deflecting, and scripted her to put out the party line, when Shillary was no where to be found, probably too politically savvy to fall into this trap.

Rice that Sunday was an opportunist, dishonest patsy. But the one(s) who contrived this lie are an evil threat to the Republic.

Both Kerry and Rice are far lefties. For me the idolology between them is a toss-up. Who’s farther left, or who hate the military more, or maybe even who’s more pro-Palestinian.

For me, the ideological thing is pretty much a wash.

The key, after ideology, is integrity. Rice made a bad mistake by lying to us about Benghazi. Kerry has been lying to us and undermining this country all his life.

Christ, you’re a terrible writer…

tommyhawk on November 14, 2012 at 2:48 PM

Been reading Dreams From My Father, huh?

I wonder what the usual know-nothing CBS viewer took away from that interview, what with the firm language from McCain and the non-protestations from the erstwhile news duo, that I’d almost guarantee those CBS viewers hadn’t seen before?

I wonder if it’s starting to penetrate their conscience that there is something there?

“Watergate?” they’re thinking. “This is …Watergate? But worse?”

Interesting times, much?

davisbr on November 14, 2012 at 2:44 PM

We need to support these guys so they don’t go all wobbly.

monalisa on November 14, 2012 at 3:01 PM

These guys were brought up politically when compromise with blue dog democrats was the way politics worked.

Today, they are having to work with or put up with radical marxists. It takes awhile to get up to speed with this crime ridden administration; noone wants to believe this could happen.

These two guys have been around a long time. They know a traitor when they see one. And they are old patriots no matter what else we might disagree with them about.

I say give them a chance….along with Feinstein….who also is
a patriot, no matter her left leaning viewpoints.

One other thing….they are older….they don’t have decades
left to play the game. And when one gets older, one doesn’t have
the patience to deal with fools. That is the beauty of getting
older; one doesn’t care about political correctness.

I was driving with my mother on the tollway over the weekend and
we were at an exit ramp where some guy had his “homeless” sign,
pandering for donations. She knows that I am always a sucker and
usually give them $20.00. She grabbed my arm and said, “don’t you
dare give him any money”. Then she rolled down her window and shouted, “What’s the matter, didn’t Obama return your phone call?”
She turned to look at me and said, “I’ve had it”.

I think many of us, including McCain and Graham “have had it”.

Graham: I’m “dead set” against promoting anyone involved in Benghazi debacle

That’s great, except he thinks BENGHAZI is Mexican for “border fence”.

So is he admitting to lying to the UN Amassador?

D-fusit on November 14, 2012 at 3:32 PM

Your highlighted parts of Obysmal’s remarks are significant. Susan Rice was merely poll-parroting the WH talking points of misleading (actually wrong) information.

The WH and its cabinet members are answerable to the American people, not to or by a UN representative. Obysmal is delegating more authority to the UN and its flunkies than to our nation’s Constitutional government and its accountability.

The GOP establishment have betrayed the rank and file before (think Fat and furious)
SWalker on November 14, 2012 at 2:15 PM

+1 for the utterly random reference to Chris Christie.

I mean … if we had a GOP that had nuts and would play harball – we could always start fu$king with funding all over the place because we control the House – where funding starts.

But we don’t have a GOP with balls.

I think we really hit a nerve with this whole Rice thing. Obama doth protest too much. Maybe it’s Benghazi, maybe it’s that he knows she is unqualified. Either way, we need to dig deeper.

weaselyone on November 14, 2012 at 3:40 PM

And it may just be that Rice is not the one d’ohbama actually wants to be SoS – but is simply a stalking horse.
If the senate rejects Rice, whoever lil barry puts up next will be approved automatically – whoever they are.
Just to show bipartisanship.

We’re asked to believe that the FBI investigation into the general’s affair, with its enormous national-security implications, was conducted over a period of weeks and the president was never told anything about it until Mr. Petraeus submitted his resignation. A half-dozen government agencies, in this fanciful telling of the story, treated the president as if he were a virgin in a bordello, all to preserve his “innocence” in the final weeks of a bitter election campaign. If the president didn’t know what was going on upstairs, this is incompetence bordering on criminal malfeasance.

With no facts, we have only the tangled web of lies in the changing official stories. Was the general intimidated — if not blackmailed — into joining the president, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice in their ridiculous story, told over and over, that the Benghazi attack was set off by demonstrations protesting that obscure video? Mr. Petraeus supported the president’s story about the video in testimony to Congress shortly after the assassination of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. He surely knew better.

By all accounts David Petraeus was and is a man of honor and integrity, now disgraced and broken by a familiar indiscretion born of human frailty. Looking to Congress for brave men and women who can unravel this web of deceit, a web perhaps woven of high crimes and misdemeanors, is usually a fool’s errand. But Congress is all we’ve got.

IlikedAUH2O on November 14, 2012 at 2:51 PM

You can’t possibly think I was serious.

ctmom on November 14, 2012 at 3:00 PM

Tensions seem to be running rather high yet. And perhaps clouded the ability of some to appreciate satire or sarcasm.

Perhaps sarcasm should be labeled as such for a while. :)

I see lots of rants and negativity. What solutions do you present? What are you advocating FOR? We certainly know you are against basically everything that has been attempted. What would you do differently to hold Holder accountable with a Democrat President and Democrat controlled Senate? What would you do to get to the bottom of Benghazi when they people investigating and answering the questions are all from the same side? What would you do?

weaselyone on November 14, 2012 at 3:50 PM

How about congress employ 18 USC 1512b or 18 USC 1505 and start slapping people in jail. Harry Reid has refused to bring a budget to the floor, you really think the GOP couldn’t start impeachment proceeding against Harry Reid if that had the balls to do so? You really think that Boenher couldn’t push impeachment hearings against Obama through the House if he had the balls to do so?

Would they pass the senate, probably not. But if Fast and Furious and Benghazi were cited as the reasons they would force a FULL and complete public Discovery of everything that transpired.

Trusting the Benghazi investigations to a senile RINO McCain, a bipolar RINO Graham, and a RINO assimilated ex-cheerleader sounds like a winning strategy to get right to the bottom of this!

http://www.paratisiusa.blogspot.com

God Bless America!

The Department of Defense will more than disappointed in having Senator John Kerry being promoted or is that demoted to being Secretary of Defense. Did he really ever get back all those medal he received in Vietnam after throwing them over the White House fence?

Costa Rica here I come.

SC.Charlie on November 14, 2012 at 2:21 PM

John (the coward) kerry threw someone else’s medals over that fence. He still has all the medals that he put himself in for.

“When they go after the UN ambassador, apparently because they think she’s an easy target, then they’ve got a problem with me,”

He’s trying to make the opposition to Rice a continuation of “the GOP’s war on women.” That is why he omitted the name of the third Senator, who joined McCain and Graham in opposition:

Senator Kelly Ayotte

In addition to the race card, MSNBC will be playing the WOW card 24/7 (well, 24 hours minus MSNBC’s daily allotment of prison shows/7) and Capitol Hill police will be arresting scores of wimmenens in big, fuzzy, Code-Pink-pink vajayjay costumes until the first blizzard snatches victimhood from the snatc…

I’d better stop right there…