Quotes of the day
posted at 8:01 pm on November 11, 2012 by Allahpundit
The FBI and prosecutors in Florida and North Carolina began investigating the possibility of email hacking, because at least some of the emails sent by Ms. Broadwell to the other woman included contents of messages that appeared to come from Mr. Petraeus’s own account, these people said. The Justice Department and high-level officials, including Attorney General Eric Holder, were aware of the investigation for months, having to approve certain parts of the investigation.
Over the course of the probe, prosecutors realized there wasn’t a cyber-breach. Instead, Mr. Petraeus had shared some access to the account with Ms. Broadwell, possibly to exchange messages, these people said.
After examining Ms. Broadwell’s emails, they instead began investigating the possibility that Mr. Petraeus had shared classified information with Ms. Broadwell, which proved not to be the case, these people said.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) says he was told in late October about allegations that then-CIA Director David Petraeus was having an extramarital affair…
“I was contacted by an F.B.I. employee concerned that sensitive, classified information may have been compromised and made certain [FBI] Director [Robert] Mueller was aware of these serious allegations and the potential risk to our national security,” said Cantor in a statement to the Times.
The report says Cantor spoke to the FBI employee after being told by Rep. Dave Reichert (R-Wash.) that someone at the agency had concerns about national security and wanted to speak to a congressional leader about the allegations.
A senior intelligence official said Saturday that Mr. Clapper had learned of Mr. Petraeus’s situation only when the F.B.I. notified him, about 5 p.m. on Tuesday, election night…
If the investigation had uncovered serious security breaches or other grave problems, [a government official] said, the notifications would have been immediate. As it was, however, the matter seemed to involve private relationships with little implication for national security…
White House officials said they were informed on Wednesday night that Mr. Petraeus was considering resigning because of an extramarital affair. On Thursday morning, just before a staff meeting at the White House, President Obama was told.
The White House says no one there knew about the Petraeus situation before Wednesday and the president himself was informed Thursday. But if the story had broken a week earlier, those headlines would have overtaken much of the president’s message about the middle class and his work in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. Who made the decision to wait, and why, is going to be the subject of scrutiny as this scandal continues to unfold…
Petraeus appears to have successfully kept the situation quiet for months, if not longer. He had known for all that time that he was violating the moral and professional code that he cited in his message to CIA employees Friday. And he knew for weeks that the FBI was looking into the situation.
But something made him come forward now.
Gen. David Petraeus told friends his affair with his biographer, Paula Broadwell, began after the four-star general left the army in August 2011, sources told ABC News.
Petraeus is said to have been the one to have broken off the extramarital affair…
Investigators uncovered no compromising of classified information or criminal activity, sources familiar with the probe said, adding that all that was found was a lot of “human drama.”
CIA officers long had expressed concern about Broadwell’s unprecedented access to the director. She frequently visited the spy agency’s headquarters in Langley, Va., to meet Petraeus in his office, accompanied him on morning runs around the CIA grounds and often attended public functions as his guest, according to two former intelligence officials.
Petraeus’ staff when he was overseeing the war in Afghanistan similarly had been concerned about the time she spent with their boss.
News of the affair did not come as a total surprise—not to those who saw Petraeus and “the woman in the case,” Paula Broadwell, together in Kabul during Petraeus’s final year in command there through July 2011. Broadwell had been working for some time on a biography of Petraeus. He had agreed to aid her project: giving long interviews, allowing his staff to talk to her, clearing the path to colleagues and mentors from earlier in his career. By that last year in Kabul, it was clear to all who saw them that the pair had established a close relationship…
Petraeus’s staff-group in Kabul was intensely loyal to him. Some had been with him virtually since the invasion of Iraq in 2003. They knew that Petraeus had been deployed for three-fourths of the time since then. By this final tour, he was close to exhaustion. If Broadwell’s company—and transparent admiration— eased Petraeus’s burdens, so be it. When an inquiring reporter asked about Broadwell, late of an evening, a raised eyebrow and a shrug were as far as one staff-officer would go. One of Petraeus’ mentors, a retired army general, did allow that he had cautioned Petraeus. He was sure nothing was out of line, he hastened to say, but “appearances matter.”
“I found her relationship with him to be disconcerting,” said a former aide to Petraeus, one of several who insisted on anonymity in order to speak candidly about his former boss. “Those who worked for him never tried to leverage our relationship with him. It seemed to a lot of us that she didn’t have that filter.”…
“She was relentlessly pro-Petraeus,” said a longtime Afghan policy expert who met Broadwell in Kabul. “There was no room for a conversation of shortcomings of the Petraeus theology. She wasn’t a reporter. She struck me as an acolyte.”…
Officers close to Petraeus grew concerned about her posts on Facebook, which they believed sometimes divulged sensitive operational details. The posts, intended for friends back home, were often playfully written and aimed at showing off her adventures in the war zone.
As a military expert with ties around the world, Paula Broadwell kept a busy schedule packed with writing, teaching and helping wounded soldiers, leaving little time for the married mother to commit “indiscretions,” a friend told ABC News.
“I have some serious questions about who is connecting these dots and how. … Paula Broadwell is not the type … she isn’t,” said David Bixler, an active duty double amputee who met Broadwell though a charity foundation in 2010…
People close to Petraeus told ABC News they found Broadwell too “gushy” about the general, whom she viewed as a mentor, and commented to each other that they believed the 40-year-old was “in love with him.”
Though Petraeus is not expected to testify at the committee’s closed-door hearing [at Benghazi] next week, Chambliss said on ABC’s This Week that Petraeus’s testimony will likely happen later. “He’s trying to put his life back together right now and that’s what he needs to focus on,” Chambliss said.
Speaking on Fox News Sunday, Senator Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who chairs the committee, also said Petraeus would likely testify eventually.
Speaking on CBS’s Face the Nation, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who has been among Republican senators loudly urging hearings on Benghazi, called it “absolutely essential.”
“I don’t know (the) exact date of when all of this process began and what took place there, but we’re — we’re confident that David Petraeus was very straight up with us during the confirmation hearings,” said Chambliss, the vice chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, who said he learned of the FBI investigation that uncovered the alleged affair on Friday.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Menendez – Looks like we don’t have the votes for that immigration bill after all

America in decline – Bars selling rubbing alcohol as “scotch”






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Not if the incumbents can have their challengers audited….
/S
viking01 on May 22, 2013 at 8:06 PM
Just wait until the GOP bails Obama out by passing amnesty… therefore depressing their base. (A good ruling on Fisher v Texas may soften the blow a little bit)
I quite honestly they(our Republicans) know this. Doing immigration reform from a position of weakness is pointless.
ninjapirate on May 22, 2013 at 8:11 PM
For the first time in my life, I am proud of 0bama, and his reliability to go too far.
cozmo on May 22, 2013 at 8:13 PM
Amnesty means I vote against the perp whoever he is, even if I have to write in Rush Limbaugh’s name.
txhsmom on May 22, 2013 at 8:13 PM
As multiple scandals unfold in the Obama administration, Congressional Democrats must decide between:
1) Standing for open, honest, transparent, accountable government, or
2) Protecting this pResident, his administration, and his culture of corruption.
They really can’t have it both ways. They either stand up and say that the Benghazi, IRS, DOJ, etc. scandals are worth investigating and exposing the truth, or the Congress member will be seen as complicit with the culture of corruption.
Trying to shield this administration now could very well spell the end of the Congress member’s political career.
I think many Democrats will care more about their own careers than about taking one for team Obama.
ITguy on May 22, 2013 at 8:13 PM
Make it happen!
Bob's Kid on May 22, 2013 at 8:13 PM
Forecasting elections this far out is like trying to pick next year’s final NFL standings.
myiq2xu on May 22, 2013 at 8:13 PM
I’m not so sure Conservatives are forgetting about amnesty, and that the Pubs sitting in Congress now have much wiggle room. If anything and speaking for myself, they better not blow it in any way on any issues. They’re more under a microscope now, I think, because we don’t trust the RINOs. If the Pubs want to keep whatever remains of the Conservatives, they better do right while they have the chance.
We WILL help primary many of them out of the running, and they can’t count on our votes any longer like they used to. The Party heads better also realize we’re not going to be ignored like Rove and McCain want and still vote for their chosen candidates.
The Pubs don’t necessarily have to lose seats. But they can expect a fight so that many in those seats now are kicked out during primaries.
I live in a bluer-than-blue state, so I have no Republican to contact. But if I did, and he botched the investigations or votes for amnesty, I’ll sit home Election Day 2014. Having a Dem replacing a RINO is no different to me than keeping the RINO.
The Pubs need to be very careful here. We Conservatives are watching everything close as we can.
Liam on May 22, 2013 at 8:15 PM
Only the GOP could possibly manage to screw this up – and give Obama his legacy – with an amnesty deal.
aquaviva on May 22, 2013 at 8:16 PM
Exactly.
You think this IRS scandal is a bad as it can get? You’re crazy. If people don’t go to jail it’ll be the good ol days. This will look like a teen slumber party compared to what they’ll be doing a couple years from now.
JellyToast on May 22, 2013 at 8:16 PM
This is what primaries are for. That is how Ted Cruz beat out Dewhurst in the Texas primaries; people were afraid that Dewhurst was a squish. If they pass shamnesty, then it will be open season on RINOs in red states as well as Dems in purple states.
bitsy on May 22, 2013 at 8:19 PM
Wow…the above analysis is quite a tormented Hamster Habitat sort of thing. May as well consult the writings of Paracelsus and get the tea leafs out. LOL
Maybe, just maybe if these scandals aren’t allowed to die on the desks of the various “press” organizations, then there may be something to all this.
But, I tend to think that most voters either haven’t heard about all this, don’t want to pay attention, or are simply shrugging it off. After all, these scandals may stick to Obama and seeing how this is (I hope) his last term, he can be allowed to take a PR-popularity contest hit without it trickling down to the Democratic Party as a whole.
Dr. ZhivBlago on May 22, 2013 at 8:19 PM
LoL
bitsy on May 22, 2013 at 8:21 PM
“Green shoots!!”
What sort of idiot would be optimistic about the economic future? Interest rates will have to return to normal eventually – and they will blow by normal, then, and run right up to 1970s levels and worse. For those who are too young or just don’t remember, the prime rate hit 21% in the 70s.
The real estate market is currently being kept afloat by the unnaturally low interest rates. A house that is worth $300,000 at a 3.5% mortgage is only worth about $175,000 at a 7% mortgage and when mortgage rates go double digit that house won’t be worth much of anything. This is an expensive illusion we have around us at this point. It isn’t permanent and will crumble some time in the near future. Who the heck would be optimistic about anything related to this?
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on May 22, 2013 at 8:29 PM
What are the primary deadlines in the six states? I personally welcome a primary to my senator Cornyn and will gladly vote against him.
txmomof6 on May 22, 2013 at 8:30 PM
It’s early, way early. And the GOP likely made 2014 an impossible hurdle when they threw away easy wins last year in Missouri, Indiana, North Dakota.
Winning a net of 3 seats in 2014 would have been easy. Winning a net of 6 is a much different task.
matthew8787 on May 22, 2013 at 8:30 PM
It’s not pointless. The GOP wants to commit political suicide. That is the point. They’re dying to be dead. This new move to represent illegals and all non-citizens at the expense of America and the American citizenry is an intentional move on the GOP leadership’s part to finish the political sepuku that they pursued from 2006-2008.
As for me, I’ve been a solid GOP vote for decades but I’m done with them, now. 2012 was it. The last time. I wish the GOP a swift and complete death as soon as possible so that a party which will actually represent America, and not the American Socialist Superstate which is property of the world, can be given a chance.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on May 22, 2013 at 8:33 PM
If Renee Ellmers runs against Key Hagan, Hagan is burnt toast. She’s toast either way, but burnt toast would be the best kind for that low-life, Schumer undergrad.
SouthernGent on May 22, 2013 at 8:34 PM
In light of recent events I wonder if those red state democrats are reconsidering their amnesty vote. Those retiring will probably vote yes, but maybe not the others. If 4 vote against the bill then Reid needs 9 Republicans to vote in favor to reach 60.
Wigglesworth on May 22, 2013 at 8:37 PM
Even when they’re a minority part and don’t control the White House, they still get invited to parties, meet rich and famous people, get feted by lobbyists and scratch more than enough backs to make sure their nests are feathered should they get voted out or retire.
It’s only we that think in terms of winning and losing. Professional politicians always win regardless of what the ballots say. The only ones I can really stomach are some of the House GOP Reps…same thing back in the ’90s under Slick.
Dr. ZhivBlago on May 22, 2013 at 8:39 PM
Don’t worry – the Senate GOP will screw it up so bad, Dingy Harry gets his 61 (and more importantly, a quorum of Democrats before they judge the returns of the 2016 elections).
Steve Eggleston on May 22, 2013 at 8:40 PM
November 2014 is a long time from now. Much can happen between now and then. By this time next year ObamaCare will make millions of people very unhappy and a lot of them unemployed. Come November, someone will be held responsible for that.
And of course there’s always the unpredictable events that change the course of politics.
Curtiss on May 22, 2013 at 8:44 PM
Scandalmania needs to be dealt with in full, but if amnesty passes then I am done with the GOP. I won’t get stabbed in the back again. I will vote in primaries against the incumbent and write in a candidate in the general election. If I am really angry I may vote for the dem as a big F U to Republicans.
Wigglesworth on May 22, 2013 at 8:45 PM
Nothing a few truckloads of lost military and conservative distirict votes can’t solve. Add in dead, multiple, illegal aliens and felons and it’s a super majority for the dems.
acyl72 on May 22, 2013 at 8:48 PM
Quiz of the day:
Which word does not fit?
Alabama Infidel on May 22, 2013 at 8:53 PM
in any case Hagan is gone …. she is trying to act like a republican
and that is pissing off her base … and no one on the right believes her….
conservative tarheel on May 22, 2013 at 8:57 PM
I expect The One to follow his hard-hat, con-boss Chicago instincts. Meaning, he will double down, probably demanding the passage. I expect him to start barnstorming the country again, as he did for Manchin-Toomey, except with even more vicious attacks on anyone he defines as an opponent.
It’s all he knows. He is utterly convinced of his own perfection, and that the ends justify the means. The end in this case being the utter destruction of not just the GOP, but anyone who would ever dare to oppose his worldview. He would see nothing wrong with making the Democratic Party the only legal one in the United States- Independents please note.
And millions of “undocumented voters” are what he expects to replace unions as the base of that party’s power. Meaning, voters beholden to him, personally, and his minions, not a union boss who may or may not be trustworthy (i.e., stay bought).
If “immigration reform” fails, look for him to spend the rest of his term, or maybe the rest of his life, getting payback. Not all of it even close to legal.
After all, the First Commandment in Chicago is, “Thou shalt not f**k with the Boss”.
What this means is that he will very likely do even more to punish, marginalize, and ultimately destroy his opponents in the short term. He knows by now he can’t “get a deal” which would pass the House, and he also must know that whether the LSM likes it or not, the STASI-like tactics of the IRS & Co. have created a scandal that “has legs” in Flyover Country.
By now I assume at least one Democrat in the DC headshed has summoned up the nerve to tell His Oneness that this sheep-screw will almost certainly cost them control of the Senate in ’14. Meaning, at best he can expect to rule by EO after that. At worst- Richard Nixon revivimus, if more “inconvenient truths” about Benghazi, IRS, etc., can’t be kept quiet.
I expect him to task his “brain trust” (Jarrett, etc.) with damage control in DC, while he gets on with “cementing Democratic power for eternity”. (Yes, I believe this man thinks in such terms.) Look for lots of speeches- in between golf dates, naturally.
Just don’t look for him to moderate his behavior. Or anything else. And considering his “adverse reaction” to losing on M-T, if he loses on immigration, or the scandals, look for him to lose it, period.
That would be people openly defying his divinity. And his ego just won’t tolerate it.
clear ether
eon
eon on May 22, 2013 at 9:03 PM
Voting for amnesty will mean a whole passel of challenges in the GOP primary. Challengers might not win, but the challenge will extract blood and treasure from the incumbents, making them vulnerable in the general election.
Besides, what will it matter if the government is corrupt if the government gives the country away???
CJ on May 22, 2013 at 9:10 PM
Que the Alaskan chillbilly. Time for her to sacrifice again and go up against Begich. Easy for me to say…
Based on recent polling, she would win. All of the states that are senate toss ups, would include a great deal of like minded conservatives as well as those that fear the IRS. She would have a megaphone and the potential to HELP carry the other toss up states if the candidates are at all decent.
Oh, and a Paul, Cruz, Walker, Jindhal grouping on top for ’16, if we get there. I left off Palin on the top ticket for ’16 for fear of flaring gills.
CTSherman on May 22, 2013 at 9:14 PM
You touch on an interesting thought. Polling is one thing, but to at least some degree, coat tails are another. I keep hearing that people “Like” Bambi, hence the positive polls, yet not so happy with how he acts, also reflected in some polls. I think that may mean, as you mention, that the down ticket pols may have no choice but to at least distance themselves.
JusDreamin on May 22, 2013 at 9:14 PM
I wouldn’t get too excited about the possibility of taking the Senate. The reelection rate in the Senate has been north of 90% forever. Once elected, it’s pretty much a life time appointment. Might as well be a Royal family. Even when you have a well-funded decent guy running again the dirt-bag incumbent, like in McCain’s last race, it’s a bridge too far.
Alabama Infidel on May 22, 2013 at 9:18 PM
I happened 2010, it’s going to happen again.
CTSherman on May 22, 2013 at 9:19 PM
I agree. She may be trying to act “moderate” now, but she voted for Obama’s agenda down-the-line. Stimulus, Obamacare . . . her votes were never even in doubt.
TarheelBen on May 22, 2013 at 9:24 PM
Is it not amazing how these D’s vote Obama’s agenda each time and then come election campaign time want him no where around. Idiotic voters.
hillsoftx on May 22, 2013 at 9:34 PM
Mary Landrieu (D- Harrah’s Casino New Orleans) pretty much has depended upon that city’s corrupt politics and courts (also see: Daddy Moon Landrieu former mayor and “judge” in New Orleans and brother Mitch Landrieu, current mayor of New Orleans.)
Most of that state has changed politically with Gov. Bobby Jindal being a prime example.
The James O’Keefe success necessitating a crooked judge to make him the scapegoat (and destroy O’Keefe’s video evidence) hasn’t been forgotten by those outside NOLA.
I tried to call Sen. Landrieu’s office again for comment but her phone line, as has been the case for several years now, was busy, as usual.
viking01 on May 22, 2013 at 9:41 PM
Find a way to hit the emotional pressure points of our LIVs while demoralizing and disillusioning theirs. Do what Romney wouldn’t: go negative. Hard and unrelenting. Make it nasty, make it multiple. Make it about Obama and the Left. Make it about the Democratic Party.
SAMinVA on May 22, 2013 at 9:44 PM
Jeff Flake better be prepared for the major BLOW BACK he is going to receive from Arizona – he does not have the gravitas to survive like McCain has … and good riddance – we need a real conservative to represent us.
cdtaxlady on May 22, 2013 at 9:47 PM
I’m with you txmom. I don’t know if you’ve been tracking the state legislature, but I’ve been encouraging Steve Toth to primary Cornyn. Toth is a solid conservative and wouldn’t let us down. I know him personally. I want Cornyn gone so bad I can taste it.
texasmagnolia on May 22, 2013 at 9:53 PM
Here is a handy list of the U.S. Senators who are up for re-election in 2014.
Check to see if your Senator is running for re-election and then find out who is running against him/her.
Early support from Voluteeers and Donors will be the key to Republicans winning a Senate majority in 2014.
wren on May 22, 2013 at 9:55 PM
Surely the Republicans should be able to find a candidate who can defeat Senator Al Franken in Minnesota, right? Right?
Come on Minnesota! Please do not return Al Franken to the Senate in 2014!
wren on May 22, 2013 at 9:57 PM
Last November was the Republicans best chance to take back the Senate and they didn’t. One has to wonder how much the hiding of these scandals had to play into the total election strategy of the Democrats. I find it really difficult to believe there were no strategy meetings where these things came up. The fact is they were known about, not so much by the voters, but the Democrat political establishment had to know.
If those scandals coming out now cost them the Senate, I’ll also be surprised. This is, in reality, the perfect time for them to come out because they have over a year to overcome them, especially if they get a special prosecutor involved. A special prosecutor will drag these things beyond the election and the Democrats could easily say, “Well I certainly am against this but we still don’t know all the details yet so, until the special prosecutor makes his findings known I can’t comment on it.
I wouldn’t put it past the Democrats to do something like this so, don’t be counting those chickens just yet.
bflat879 on May 22, 2013 at 9:57 PM
Maybe if we all wish real hard. . .
flataffect on May 22, 2013 at 10:16 PM
Thanks, Interesting list.
I could see MT, IA, SD, and WV changing from D to R with their Dem incumbents retiring. There is a good bit of resentment over The One’s antics, and now IRS etc., in those areas. So that could be four pickups right there.
I could also see Graham being primaried in SC, which would be about the same thing as another R pickup.
Two more D to R switches, and The One has the same situation GWB had in his last two years; a Congress controlled by the other party.
The difference is of course that R’s lack D fanaticism. Of the “Judge Dredd Futzie” school. (“I want to Establish World Peace, Free All The Umpty Candies, and KILL EVERYBODY!!!”)
Even if the Senate changes hands, look for the assaults on the Constitution, and common sense, to continue. At least until more of the RINOs get “gerrymandered” by Old Father Time.
Yes, it is generational. The younger Republicans are more rational than the present power structure, and less willing to be the “junior partners” in making the world safe for socialism. Which is why the old dogs will fight tooth and nail to keep them out of power within the party. Just as the old mutts in the Democratic party are doing, even though their pups are at least as devoted to their dogmas as they are.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the new slogan in the younger set isn’t “Two Terms and Go Home”. And the old lags won’t take that sitting down, either.
clear ether
eon
eon on May 22, 2013 at 11:14 PM
I have to wonder if Obama and Holder have something on these RINOs. What other reason would there be for ANY repub to even consider much less be fully on board for amnesty in the middle of this economic mess? There is zero chance that these millions of illegals will vote R. They want the government cheese as much as the Dems do. What is the reason for this idiocy? If the Repubs pass this Im done with the GOP and so help me G-d I will work hard to help form the conservative party. Even if Dems are in power for the next 20 years while we are building this party up. The GOP will be a permanent minority. McCain, Graham, Rubio are you listening?
neyney on May 22, 2013 at 11:59 PM
How about we primary the heck out of the swishes, then get huge turnout to vote out the dem?
Vince on May 23, 2013 at 12:32 AM
Nobody is accounting for vote fraud, which is like doubling the Democrat vote.
I know that here in Colorado Udall is a lock for reelection. Not because he is worth a bucket of warm spit, but because the Colorado Republican party will find somebody that the Republican base hates and force him/her onto the ballot.
Add to that the new election laws just passed by the Democrat legislature and signed by the Democrat governor, making all elections mail in and allowing election day registration; and there will not be an honest election in Colorado ever again.
Subotai Bahadur on May 23, 2013 at 12:42 AM
Must kill 8 Gangster Amnesty. That simple.
DaMav on May 23, 2013 at 1:25 AM
NO AMNESTY.
Any republican who votes for this bill should be voted out of office.
TX-96 on May 23, 2013 at 6:11 AM
Gonna be tough to put together good campaigns when your donors and bundlers are running scared from the IRS.
And no, I don’t expect that to improve meaningfully, regardless of the current kabuki drama. The criminality is too deeply entrenched in the NTEU drones that populate the civil service; a few losses, even arrests, at the top won’t change that quickly or meaningfully enough.
bofh on May 23, 2013 at 8:20 AM
Can you imagine Dems “backing off” because no one was interested in Watergate? Working people are hustling to make a living etc. to worry about politicians coming and goings.
Herb on May 23, 2013 at 9:11 AM
Here is a litmus test for ANY seat in the Senate MUST include the canidates stand toward REPEALING OBAMACARE. Immediately BEFORE the friggin’ bureacracy created by OBAMACARE gets its fangs into the blood of the government exchequer. Once that happens the leach will live forever. And our health care system will sink into oblivion.
At that point, Michael Moore will share his wonderful experience with the Cuban medical health care system with America.
Missilengr on May 23, 2013 at 12:53 PM
I have written Minnesota off already…must be something in the water that makes them goofy and sends them to Wisconsin for weekends (I94 is 95% SodaCracker plates on any given day and they can’t all be involved in running drugs to/from Chicago). So I fear you are stuck with Franken (maybe the traffic is them running ballots from Chicago where they already have enough Dem voters)?
teejk on May 23, 2013 at 5:52 PM