<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White House: Obama not planning to propose a carbon tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:35:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bulletchaser</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6498830</link>
		<dc:creator>Bulletchaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6498830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We will still be laughing when Obama runs again in 2016 for a Third term.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will still be laughing when Obama runs again in 2016 for a Third term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Danish</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6498433</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6498433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long Live the Sage Grouse! Suck it humans!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long Live the Sage Grouse! Suck it humans!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kettlewell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6498224</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kettlewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 06:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6498224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good, cause conservative market tax wonks would support it..ala Laffer.

As for the Lands issue, the States merely need to assert their powers within their borders. There is no general confiscatory Power of Congress except for a Capitol. Otherwise within the paradigm at the extreme is confiscating in entirety all Lands of the States; if you reject that then you reject what they have done currently.

summary: the States belong to the States.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, cause conservative market tax wonks would support it..ala Laffer.</p>
<p>As for the Lands issue, the States merely need to assert their powers within their borders. There is no general confiscatory Power of Congress except for a Capitol. Otherwise within the paradigm at the extreme is confiscating in entirety all Lands of the States; if you reject that then you reject what they have done currently.</p>
<p>summary: the States belong to the States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petefrt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6497629</link>
		<dc:creator>petefrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6497629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things we can count on Obama to shut down in his second term:

1. Energy. Oil, Gas and Coal. When prices skyrocket, gubmint will issue energy coupons like food stamps to redistribute wealth.

2. Second Amendment, via UN Treaty and EPA regs on ammunition. Back door gun control.

3. First Amendment. 

~Free speech via FCC shutting down talk radio and assaults on FNC.

~ Gubmint control over Internet. Another FCC initiative, bolstered by UN treaty.

~ Assault on religion. Starting with ObamaCare.

Just for openers.

(Never mind the Tenth Amendment.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things we can count on Obama to shut down in his second term:</p>
<p>1. Energy. Oil, Gas and Coal. When prices skyrocket, gubmint will issue energy coupons like food stamps to redistribute wealth.</p>
<p>2. Second Amendment, via UN Treaty and EPA regs on ammunition. Back door gun control.</p>
<p>3. First Amendment. </p>
<p>~Free speech via FCC shutting down talk radio and assaults on FNC.</p>
<p>~ Gubmint control over Internet. Another FCC initiative, bolstered by UN treaty.</p>
<p>~ Assault on religion. Starting with ObamaCare.</p>
<p>Just for openers.</p>
<p>(Never mind the Tenth Amendment.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Jericho</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6497024</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Jericho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 23:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6497024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We need the CEOs of Shell, BP, Texaco, Chesapeake, Devon, Enervest &lt;em&gt;et al&lt;/em&gt; to give Obama an open invitation to go out to a drilling rig.  Go to the places where they are drilling.  Meet the people.  Don&#039;t let up until Obama comes.  Demagogue him.  Turn the limelight to oil and gas drilling.  The truth will be known about oil and gas drilling and the pressure will be on the President to reverse his policies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need the CEOs of Shell, BP, Texaco, Chesapeake, Devon, Enervest <em>et al</em> to give Obama an open invitation to go out to a drilling rig.  Go to the places where they are drilling.  Meet the people.  Don&#8217;t let up until Obama comes.  Demagogue him.  Turn the limelight to oil and gas drilling.  The truth will be known about oil and gas drilling and the pressure will be on the President to reverse his policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickwillie2001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6497021</link>
		<dc:creator>slickwillie2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 23:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6497021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the way the low-information democratic voter sees the world:

Carbon Tax? That&#039;s a tax on those filthy rich oil and power companies right? Do it.

Clinton Tax rates &gt;$250K? That&#039;s a tax on those filthy rich people right? Do it.

Frank and Dodd? That&#039;s regulations on those filthy rich Wall Street types right? Do it.

Anything else?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the way the low-information democratic voter sees the world:</p>
<p>Carbon Tax? That&#8217;s a tax on those filthy rich oil and power companies right? Do it.</p>
<p>Clinton Tax rates &gt;$250K? That&#8217;s a tax on those filthy rich people right? Do it.</p>
<p>Frank and Dodd? That&#8217;s regulations on those filthy rich Wall Street types right? Do it.</p>
<p>Anything else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickwillie2001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496986</link>
		<dc:creator>slickwillie2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 23:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone believe that? Thought so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone believe that? Thought so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HarryBackside</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496924</link>
		<dc:creator>HarryBackside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 23:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one seems pretty simple. Obama&#039;s EPA issues regulations crippling domestic energy producers. Energy prices sky rocket, at which point Obama asks energy producers to make a deal with the devil: in exchange for supporting a carbon tax, he will pull back regulations preventing domestic energy. Having no choice, producers will cave and get on board the Obama train. The added supply will cause prices to drop, however the new taxes will make up the difference. See, a carbon tax that doesn&#039;t raise prices for consumers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one seems pretty simple. Obama&#8217;s EPA issues regulations crippling domestic energy producers. Energy prices sky rocket, at which point Obama asks energy producers to make a deal with the devil: in exchange for supporting a carbon tax, he will pull back regulations preventing domestic energy. Having no choice, producers will cave and get on board the Obama train. The added supply will cause prices to drop, however the new taxes will make up the difference. See, a carbon tax that doesn&#8217;t raise prices for consumers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Jericho</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496899</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Jericho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 23:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;White House: Obama not planning to &lt;em&gt;propose&lt;/em&gt; a carbon tax, &lt;strong&gt;he&#039;s planning to &lt;em&gt;dictate&lt;/em&gt; a carbon tax.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Fixed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>White House: Obama not planning to <em>propose</em> a carbon tax, <strong>he&#8217;s planning to <em>dictate</em> a carbon tax.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberta_Patriot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496868</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberta_Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 23:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;(A quick word to the wise, by the way: A carbon tax does not mean greedy oil executives will be deprived of their ostensibly ill-begotten and immoral profits, or wherever it is proponents claim the money will come from; a carbon tax is a tax on your usage of electricity and gas, and your bills will get more expensive.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Would the Obama administration recognize that nuclear power plants should be exempt from carbon taxes (carbon dioxide is an inevitable result of burning hydrocarbons in an oxygen atmosphere, however carbon is not a daughter product of nuclear fission)?

Or will they smite nuclear users out of some misguided sense of fairness and scientific ignorance?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>(A quick word to the wise, by the way: A carbon tax does not mean greedy oil executives will be deprived of their ostensibly ill-begotten and immoral profits, or wherever it is proponents claim the money will come from; a carbon tax is a tax on your usage of electricity and gas, and your bills will get more expensive.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Would the Obama administration recognize that nuclear power plants should be exempt from carbon taxes (carbon dioxide is an inevitable result of burning hydrocarbons in an oxygen atmosphere, however carbon is not a daughter product of nuclear fission)?</p>
<p>Or will they smite nuclear users out of some misguided sense of fairness and scientific ignorance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlaMurph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496835</link>
		<dc:creator>FlaMurph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;HE WONT EFF UP 2014 MidTerms LIKE HE DID 2010&lt;/strong&gt;

2015- the communist will put the hammer down !!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>HE WONT EFF UP 2014 MidTerms LIKE HE DID 2010</strong></p>
<p>2015- the communist will put the hammer down !!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squint</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496788</link>
		<dc:creator>squint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Let him propose all he wants, he doesn’t control the House. We do.

Charlemagne on November 9, 2012 at 5:34 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know whether to laugh or cry at that. Probably one, then the other, then the first one again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Let him propose all he wants, he doesn’t control the House. We do.</p>
<p>Charlemagne on November 9, 2012 at 5:34 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know whether to laugh or cry at that. Probably one, then the other, then the first one again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HitNRun</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496786</link>
		<dc:creator>HitNRun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Think about it. If you taxed a product at 100%, would the company just pass the tax onto the consumer? If they tried, no one would buy their product, and the company would go bankrupt.

jd3181 on November 9, 2012 at 5:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, they would pass on the tax. They would do nothing else. It&#039;s not a competition issue: the entire industry gets the same tax. If they passed a tax on basket-weaving, all the basket weavers would likely close because people would no longer buy their product. So that would be an industry eliminated by government meddling.

But in the case of carbon, what are people going to do? Not drive? They would cut back in response to the price, hurting the economy, but only in response to the price. We don&#039;t care about the gas company&#039;s taxes any more than they care about our wallets. Business is business. The economy, meanwhile, would suffer from decreased consumption and decreased transportation.

More to the point, all taxes are &quot;passed on.&quot; Where else is the business going to get the money to pay the tax? Are they going to borrow it from Obama&#039;s stash? Taking less profit is never an option. It&#039;s a business. The goal is always to make the most money.

Democrats live in a fantasy world where heroic Dem legislators pass taxes and, in response, monocle-clad Republican businessmen jump up and down on their top hats in frustration in another victory for the people. In the real world, Atlas shrugs and the consumer pays.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Think about it. If you taxed a product at 100%, would the company just pass the tax onto the consumer? If they tried, no one would buy their product, and the company would go bankrupt.</p>
<p>jd3181 on November 9, 2012 at 5:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, they would pass on the tax. They would do nothing else. It&#8217;s not a competition issue: the entire industry gets the same tax. If they passed a tax on basket-weaving, all the basket weavers would likely close because people would no longer buy their product. So that would be an industry eliminated by government meddling.</p>
<p>But in the case of carbon, what are people going to do? Not drive? They would cut back in response to the price, hurting the economy, but only in response to the price. We don&#8217;t care about the gas company&#8217;s taxes any more than they care about our wallets. Business is business. The economy, meanwhile, would suffer from decreased consumption and decreased transportation.</p>
<p>More to the point, all taxes are &#8220;passed on.&#8221; Where else is the business going to get the money to pay the tax? Are they going to borrow it from Obama&#8217;s stash? Taking less profit is never an option. It&#8217;s a business. The goal is always to make the most money.</p>
<p>Democrats live in a fantasy world where heroic Dem legislators pass taxes and, in response, monocle-clad Republican businessmen jump up and down on their top hats in frustration in another victory for the people. In the real world, Atlas shrugs and the consumer pays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disa</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496785</link>
		<dc:creator>disa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AND my way, Obama doesn&#039;t get to blame the Republicans for bringing us into another &quot;crisis&quot; and downgrade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AND my way, Obama doesn&#8217;t get to blame the Republicans for bringing us into another &#8220;crisis&#8221; and downgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Eaton</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496770</link>
		<dc:creator>William Eaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have one thing in our favor that might yet save the country...

Obama is lazy. 

Lazy people don&#039;t do much but talk. That is why he is jetting off to Asia when he should be getting to work on important domestic economic issues facing this country. The harder we make him work the less likely he will actually do it.

The House GOP maybe should take this road...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have one thing in our favor that might yet save the country&#8230;</p>
<p>Obama is lazy. </p>
<p>Lazy people don&#8217;t do much but talk. That is why he is jetting off to Asia when he should be getting to work on important domestic economic issues facing this country. The harder we make him work the less likely he will actually do it.</p>
<p>The House GOP maybe should take this road&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txhsmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496765</link>
		<dc:creator>txhsmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Let him propose all he wants, he doesn’t control the House. We do.

Charlemagne on November 9, 2012 at 5:34 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Hasn&#039;t really stopped him yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Let him propose all he wants, he doesn’t control the House. We do.</p>
<p>Charlemagne on November 9, 2012 at 5:34 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Hasn&#8217;t really stopped him yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M240H</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496763</link>
		<dc:creator>M240H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; “The Administration has not proposed nor is planning to propose a carbon tax,” [a White House] official said&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course not- Senator-Elect Tammy Baldwin is going to do that for them.  Mark my words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> “The Administration has not proposed nor is planning to propose a carbon tax,” [a White House] official said</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course not- Senator-Elect Tammy Baldwin is going to do that for them.  Mark my words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clippermiami</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496761</link>
		<dc:creator>clippermiami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ll pardon me if I&#039;m skeptical.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll pardon me if I&#8217;m skeptical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Eggleston</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496754</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Eggleston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Washington Fancy on November 9, 2012 at 5:12 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Those fields, 30 years ago, were supposed to be profitable with oil trading at $30/barrel.  With the Obama lock-up, they won&#039;t be developed at $30/bbl, $150/bbl, or $1,500,000/bbl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Washington Fancy on November 9, 2012 at 5:12 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>Those fields, 30 years ago, were supposed to be profitable with oil trading at $30/barrel.  With the Obama lock-up, they won&#8217;t be developed at $30/bbl, $150/bbl, or $1,500,000/bbl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fallon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496749</link>
		<dc:creator>Fallon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You just never know when another crisis might rear its ugly head...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>You just never know when another crisis might rear its ugly head&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disa</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496745</link>
		<dc:creator>disa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Give the people what they want!

HitNRun on November 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I hear you!

Just as a parent has to kick the little birds out of the nest, and let them experience the consequences of their actions, so must we stop shielding these idiots from running out into the street chasing their balls.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Give the people what they want!</p>
<p>HitNRun on November 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>I hear you!</p>
<p>Just as a parent has to kick the little birds out of the nest, and let them experience the consequences of their actions, so must we stop shielding these idiots from running out into the street chasing their balls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galt2009</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496742</link>
		<dc:creator>Galt2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interior proposal would block oil shale development on federal lands in West&lt;/strong&gt;
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/267095-interior-proposes-shielding-federal-lands-in-west-from-drilling

The Interior Department on Friday issued a final plan to close 1.6 million acres of federal land in the West originally slated for oil shale development.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Interior proposal would block oil shale development on federal lands in West</strong><br />
<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/267095-interior-proposes-shielding-federal-lands-in-west-from-drilling" rel="nofollow">http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/267095-interior-proposes-shielding-federal-lands-in-west-from-drilling</a></p>
<p>The Interior Department on Friday issued a final plan to close 1.6 million acres of federal land in the West originally slated for oil shale development.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeachBum</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496735</link>
		<dc:creator>BeachBum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares, I&#039;m done. Just do it. They voted for this. As others have been saying around here. Let It Burn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares, I&#8217;m done. Just do it. They voted for this. As others have been saying around here. Let It Burn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disa</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496725</link>
		<dc:creator>disa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like a thread to discuss the following proposition:  that John Boehner should acceed to Obama&#039;s tax increase on the &quot;rich&quot; (but using $500K as the cutoff).  My reasoning is thus:  

1) we can&#039;t keep doing the same thing and expect different results.

2) let&#039;s demonstrate how little tax revenue will be generated. Watch how the millionaires disappear into thin air.

3) Then Obama will come after the next layer of earners. Boehner (or whoever is Speaker by that time) will counter with &quot;Why not tax wealth instead?&quot;  There&#039;s pots of billionaires in the US - grab a chunk of theirs.

4) isn&#039;t it better to get it over with, while we still remember what we&#039;re fighting for (liberty and all of its sweetness)?

Fiscal cliff time is happening real soon, and Obama has supported pretty much every dime of spending that brought us here, whether as a senator or as prez.  He will have to own this. His voters will be the first ones to suffer, rich and poor.  Hollywood celebs et al.  Then we can watch how they all proceed to scramble and hide their money from Obama - offshore.

I dunno, I need something to look forward to.  Watching the Dems rip into America would give me perverse pleasure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like a thread to discuss the following proposition:  that John Boehner should acceed to Obama&#8217;s tax increase on the &#8220;rich&#8221; (but using $500K as the cutoff).  My reasoning is thus:  </p>
<p>1) we can&#8217;t keep doing the same thing and expect different results.</p>
<p>2) let&#8217;s demonstrate how little tax revenue will be generated. Watch how the millionaires disappear into thin air.</p>
<p>3) Then Obama will come after the next layer of earners. Boehner (or whoever is Speaker by that time) will counter with &#8220;Why not tax wealth instead?&#8221;  There&#8217;s pots of billionaires in the US &#8211; grab a chunk of theirs.</p>
<p>4) isn&#8217;t it better to get it over with, while we still remember what we&#8217;re fighting for (liberty and all of its sweetness)?</p>
<p>Fiscal cliff time is happening real soon, and Obama has supported pretty much every dime of spending that brought us here, whether as a senator or as prez.  He will have to own this. His voters will be the first ones to suffer, rich and poor.  Hollywood celebs et al.  Then we can watch how they all proceed to scramble and hide their money from Obama &#8211; offshore.</p>
<p>I dunno, I need something to look forward to.  Watching the Dems rip into America would give me perverse pleasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlemagne</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/09/white-house-obama-not-planning-to-propose-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6496718</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlemagne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229327#comment-6496718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let him propose all he wants, he doesn&#039;t control the House. We do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let him propose all he wants, he doesn&#8217;t control the House. We do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>