Breaking: Petraeus submits resignation as CIA director

posted at 3:16 pm on November 9, 2012 by Allahpundit

A total bombshell, breaking right now on Fox. Catherine Herridge says the only explanation given so far is “personal reasons,” but notes that he met personally with Obama yesterday and wonders if it may have had to do with the CIA releasing that timeline on Benghazi last week. That was my gut instinct too — either this is fallout from Benghazi or there really is something personal going on.

Judging from this tidbit, it’s at least partly personal:

Why would an affair mean that he couldn’t run the CIA anymore? Was he being blackmailed? Or is there more to it than this? Stand by for updates.

Update: His statement:

“Yesterday afternoon, I went to the White House and asked the President to be allowed, for personal reasons, to resign from my position as D/CIA,” Petraeus said in a statement to CIA staff. “After being married for over 37 years, I showed extremely poor judgment by engaging in an extramarital affair. Such behavior is unacceptable, both as a husband and as the leader of an organization such as ours.”

If you’d have asked me to list 100 possible reasons why David Petraeus would eventually quit public service, having an affair would have been number 100. If it made the list at all.

Update: NBC says deputy CIA director Mike Morrell is likely to be named interim director, and may well end up being elevated to permanent status.

Update: As for the timing, I assume Petraeus intended to do this for awhile but held off until after the election so that it wouldn’t end up influencing the vote. The media spotlight on the campaign would have only drawn more attention to his predicament and magnified the embarrassment.

Which makes me wonder: If he did fear being blackmailed, why didn’t some potential blackmailer use the campaign as leverage, threatening to push this out there before the big vote if he didn’t pay up?

Update: I’m seriously shocked. The last thing I’d expect from him is a breakdown in personal discipline.

Update: For what it’s worth, Andrea Mitchell and MSNBC are hearing that Petraeus’s resignation really doesn’t have anything to do with Benghazi.

Update: I’m already getting e-mails speculating that the administration wanted him out over Benghazi and that they were the ones who forced his hand by threatening to expose his affair if he didn’t quit. I don’t follow the logic there. If that were true, the ultimatum would have been that he could either resign and keep the affair secret to avoid disgrace or have the affair exposed and then inevitably be pressured to resign anyway. Makes no sense for him to resign before the affair’s been revealed and then admit to it in his resignation.

Besides, would the White House really dare try to strongarm David Petraeus, of all people, that way? He’s probably the most widely esteemed member of Obama’s administration. If they used sleazy tactics to try to force him out, they’d live in mortal terror of him revealing the blackmail attempt and using it to turn the public against O. Just makes no sense to me.

Update: Reader “Flip” makes a nice catch. Petraeus’s resignation letter says, “After being married for over 37 years, I showed extremely poor judgment by engaging in an extramarital affair.” But Petraeus has actually been married for more than 38 years; the wedding was on July 6, 1974. In other words, if you read the resignation letter carefully, he’s telling you that this happened sometime between July 2011 and July 2012, not recently. Why didn’t he resign sooner? Or, on the flip side, why didn’t he try to hang on longer if he’d held on this long already?

Update: Hmmmmmmmm:

Again, though — if this was actually engineered by the administration to force him out, why wouldn’t Petraeus reveal that publicly? After all of his service, he deserves better than to be blackmailed, even if he’s guilty of a major lapse in judgment.

Update: Obama’s statement:

David Petraeus has provided extraordinary service to the United States for decades. By any measure, he was one of the outstanding General officers of his generation, helping our military adapt to new challenges, and leading our men and women in uniform through a remarkable period of service in Iraq and Afghanistan, where he helped our nation put those wars on a path to a responsible end. As Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, he has continued to serve with characteristic intellectual rigor, dedication, and patriotism. By any measure, through his lifetime of service David Petraeus has made our country safer and stronger.

Today, I accepted his resignation as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. I am completely confident that the CIA will continue to thrive and carry out its essential mission, and I have the utmost confidence in Acting Director Michael Morell and the men and women of the CIA who work every day to keep our nation safe. Going forward, my thoughts and prayers are with Dave and Holly Petraeus, who has done so much to help military families through her own work. I wish them the very best at this difficult time.

Update: Some of Petraeus’s former aides tell Danger Room they’re just as shocked as the rest of us.

Update: Now might be a good time to read (or re-read) the Journal’s story from eight days ago about the massive miscommunication between the CIA and State over who was supposed to be protecting the consulate in Benghazi. Title: “CIA Takes Heat for Role in Libya.”

Update: Note to Congress: Subpoena the general.

Update: Speaking of Benghazi-related political clusterfarks, word on the street is that John Kerry might be passed over as the next Secretary of State in favor of — ta da — Susan Rice, the face of the White House’s initial nonsense about the attack. (GOP senators are already warning O to think again.) Rice’s now infamous appearance on the Sunday shows was actually informed by early CIA “talking points,” so there’s another reason to think that the agency’s performance might have somehow influenced Petraeus’s departure today.

Update: Annnnd the hits just keep on coming. There’s no stopping this Friday-news-dump train!

Update: A parting thought, for now: If the affair didn’t happen recently, why didn’t he hold off on revealing it and resigning for another week, until after he was done testifying to Congress about Benghazi?

Update: Fred Kaplan, Slate’s plugged-in military reporter, says he knows who Petraeus had an affair with. The photo of the book cover at the top of Drudge right now has more meaning than you think.

Update: Oh boy. Starting to become clear why this affair required a resignation:

Update: Note the author and the date. And rule number five.

Update: Here’s a fun contest for readers. Try to reconcile these two statements. Statement one:

The biographer for resigning CIA Director David Petraeus is under FBI investigation for improperly trying to access his email and possibly gaining access to classified information, law enforcement officials told NBC News on Friday.

Statement two:

The law enforcement officials said they do not believe the FBI investigation will result in any criminal charges.

“Improperly” trying to read the DCIA’s e-mail isn’t a federal offense?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 9 10 11

Maybe he was just hiking on the Appalachian Trail.

texacalirose on November 10, 2012 at 12:31 PM

I hope that he doesn’t commit suicide or have an accident before he is called to testify.

As a side not, I think that the “guy that killed bin Laden” should continue to alienate as many generals, SEALs and other military members as much as he possibly can.

justltl on November 10, 2012 at 12:35 PM

Could Petraeus’s resignation be the payoff for Bill Clinton’s support of Obama during the election? All through the election, we’ve wondered why BJ was so willing to electioneer for Obama, and we’ve frequently speculated that the end object was Obama’s support for Hilary to run in ’16.

Petraeus’s name has been bandied about as a possible presidential contender, and Petraeus is very popular with many Americans because of his prosecution of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Knocking Petraeus out of the running and totally tarnishing his reputation this early in the game would begin the process of clearing the table for Hilary — with the added bonus attraction of “disappearing” a potential black eye to Obama.

Finding and releasing the details of sexual misdeeds is the hallmark of Obama and his Chicago thug-buddies. It’s how he became a state legislator and how he won the Democratic primary to become the Democaratic nominee for the US Senate. How did Herman Cain get knocked out of the plrimary? Anita Dunn was long before Obama’s time, but it was the same tactic: Smearing a good man with accusations of sexual misconduct.

catsandbooks on November 10, 2012 at 12:42 PM

He was quiet about the CIA compound and Benghazi in order to save himself some shame? Get 0 re-elected and all would be ok? clnurnberg on November 10, 2012 at 11:31 AM

He issued a statement that the CIA did not, at any level, order anyone in Benghazi to stand down.

Becoming an obot, was our first clue. clnurnberg on November 10, 2012 at 11:25 AM

Being a patriot, he took the job rather than potentially seeing it go to whatever unknown libweasel Obooba might have had in mind as his second choice.

Akzed on November 10, 2012 at 12:44 PM

It is a legit scandal, its also completely run its course. Indeed, we all already know what happened… What more do we need to know?
 
libfreeordie on June 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM

rogerb on November 10, 2012 at 12:54 PM

It is a legit scandal, its also completely run its course. Indeed, we all already know what happened… What more do we need to know?

libfreeordie on June 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM

rogerb on November 10, 2012 at 12:54 PM

Now THAT’S Chicago politics for you. A year old affair right before Benghazi testimony? Don’t buy it for one second. Haha! This Administration may actually be about to show us what Chicago White House politics looks like *grabs the popcorn*

libfreeordie on November 9, 2012 at 5:37 PM

In this very thread.

Schadenfreude on November 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM

Patraeus-gate is likely part of Benghazi-gate which must somehow be tied to Fast and Furious-gate which SURELY happened because Obama is hiding his college records and lastly his REAL birth certificate…gate..?
We must DEMAND that super-patriot Allen West get to the bottom of this super scandal when he returns to the hill.
oh…wait….
nevermind

greataunty on November 10, 2012 at 7:01 PM

greataunty on November 10, 2012 at 7:01 PM

Are you related to Big Brother?

Mitsouko on November 10, 2012 at 8:10 PM

Roses are red
Violets are blue
David’s all in
How bout you?

Bradky on November 10, 2012 at 10:59 PM

I guess when Obama said there was a war on women he was really referring to the General and the Journalist.

Bradky on November 10, 2012 at 11:01 PM

Media have already covered Petraus infidelity more than the Benghazi incident and it’s only been a few days.

LaughterJones on November 11, 2012 at 11:17 PM

Comment pages: 1 9 10 11