Rasmussen in Ohio: 49/49 tie

posted at 12:41 pm on November 5, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

The Buckeye State continues to be the focus of the media and both presidential campaigns — and two new polls out today show Ohio a dead heat.  Rasmussen’s latest poll shows a 49/49 tie, in a series that has shown the state a virtual tie since the general-election campaign began last spring:

The final Election 2012 Rasmussen Reports survey of Likely Ohio Voters shows Mitt Romney and President Obama each earning 49% support. One percent (1%) favors some other candidate in the race, and another one percent (1%) is undecided. …

The race in Ohio was tied late last week after Romney posted a slight 50% to 48% advantage a few days earlier. The candidates have been within two percentage points of one another or less in every survey in Ohio since May.

The bad news for Romney?  According to Rasmussen’s poll, Obama has a 23-point lead among those who have already voted.  Those numbers don’t match up to the early-voting numbers shown by Ohio’s official reports, however, where Republicans have gained over 260,000 in the gap over 2008.  Regardless, Election Day voters are much more Republican; 71% of Republicans will go to the booth tomorrow, while slightly over half of all Democrats have already voted.  Among independents, 40% have voted early.

In Rasmussen’s poll, that may also be bad news for Romney, depending on which 60% of independents remain.  He trails among unaffiliated voters in this poll by eight, 50/42, although 17% say they could still change their minds.  However, the gender gap has been completely neutralized, with 52/45 splits among men and women breaking in opposite directions.  Obama has a favorable job approval rating, 51/48, in an R+2 sample (37/39/24).

The University of Cincinnati’s Ohio Poll shows Obama with a slight edge after allocating the leaners:

In the race for president, after allocation of undecided voters to the candidates they are most likely to support, the presidential race in Ohio stands at President Barack Obama 50.0 percent and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney 48.5 percent.  Other candidates on the ballot receive 1.5 percent.

UC didn’t supply any crosstabs or sample information.  Clearly, Ohio could go in either direction, and it will be the strength of the ground game that matters.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Romney losses Ohio, but then wins Pennsylvania?

Oil Can on November 5, 2012 at 12:43 PM

I can’t stand Obama’s face. Please, God, let Romney win!

clnurnberg on November 5, 2012 at 12:43 PM

It is all about turnout…..and Trollcott!

Animal60 on November 5, 2012 at 12:43 PM

Still have not heard…with Romney having a double digit lead in independents, where does Obama make up those points?

What group? Minorities, seniors, women, college, business?

What group steps up and fills that 10%+ void?

right2bright on November 5, 2012 at 12:44 PM

You think they’ll write articles like this about Romney if he wins?

There’s probably a reason they didn’t provide cross-tabs or sample information. Ahem.

DeathtotheSwiss on November 5, 2012 at 12:44 PM

Ed,

You might do one last reality check on the polls.

What percentage of respondents are they seeing in this last week?

Is it still 9%?

PolAgnostic on November 5, 2012 at 12:44 PM

Rasmussen reported that Republicans have a party ID advantage of 5.8 for October 2012.

Link

Nick_Angel on November 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM

Rasmussen’s latest Party Id: R+5.8% (all time record)

The media is going to be stunned come 10PM Tuesday evening.

kevinkristy on November 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM

Turnout Turnout Turnout

El_Terrible on November 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM

We got this.

Gonna be 1980 redux.

donkichi on November 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM

Still have not heard…with Romney having a double digit lead in independents, where does Obama make up those points?

What group? Minorities, seniors, women, college, business?

What group steps up and fills that 10%+ void?

right2bright on November 5, 2012 at 12:44 PM

My guess is the Amish.

Oil Can on November 5, 2012 at 12:46 PM

The presidential election of 2012 is a con job being perpetrated on the American people by the ruling class. It’s not a conspiracy; it’s a natural attribute of the human condition that absolute power corrupts absolutely. Interests that are vested in preserving and growing the rapidly escalating totalitarian state literally own the media and buy our government. They have dictated that this election be a choice between the top two authoritarian statist politicians in American history, one of which has magically transformed himself into the opposite in the past few years thanks to a billion dollars worth of propaganda and shutting out other candidates that offer a real choice.

The founding fathers knew that this would happen and tried their best to guard against it and warn future Americans that this sort of thing would happen.

The America that was is no more; the government is no longer of, by and for the people.

So ask yourself, what would the founding fathers do?

Please vote for Gary Johnson.

FloatingRock on November 5, 2012 at 12:46 PM

GOTV OHIO

cmsinaz on November 5, 2012 at 12:46 PM

Barack Obama’s current Facebook status…

Your friends need to know that the choice in this election is between strengthening the middle class or returning to the failed policies that crashed our economy…

Yes, Mr. President. You’ve finally got it. And that’s why I’m voting for Mitt Romney tomorrow.

aunursa on November 5, 2012 at 12:46 PM

Come on Ohio. Be smart here!

mrscullen on November 5, 2012 at 12:46 PM

New Rasmussen party affiliation numbers have been released:

Oct R-39.1% D-33.3% I-27.5%, for a Republican advantage of +5.8%.

Going back to 2004, they have been pretty darn accurate with this. Right before 2008 it was D+7.6, and 2010 numbers were close to even.

TarheelBen on November 5, 2012 at 12:47 PM

According to Rasmussen’s poll, Obama has a 23-point lead among those who have already voted.

Yeah, but how does Rasmussen know exactly how those people voted?

He doesn’t.

Stop the insanity of trying to make an unknown a known.

JPeterman on November 5, 2012 at 12:47 PM

If these OH polls are accurate, it looks like a close Romney loss. BUT, Ras also came out with a new party ID poll that shows Republicans at +6. His numbers matched up pretty well before in predicting the electorate, so if he’s close to right again this thing will be a blowout for Romnney.

changer1701 on November 5, 2012 at 12:47 PM

The election comes down to a couple of neighbors on a cul-de-sac in Lima, Ohio.

DanMan on November 5, 2012 at 12:48 PM

Please vote for Gary Johnson.

FloatingRock on November 5, 2012 at 12:46 PM

it’s your vote, do with it what you will

cmsinaz on November 5, 2012 at 12:49 PM

Another pile of crapola.

rayra on November 5, 2012 at 12:49 PM

JPeterman on November 5, 2012 at 12:47 PM

Exit-polling?

Capitalist Hog on November 5, 2012 at 12:49 PM

The Boss is on a tax payer funded ride along on Air Force One today, and will make an Oiho appearance – so that should clinch it for Oliar.

FlaMurph on November 5, 2012 at 12:49 PM

Ed: No mention of Ras’s new party ID survey? R+6…

wargamer6 on November 5, 2012 at 12:49 PM

Romney losses Ohio, but then wins Pennsylvania?

Oil Can on November 5, 2012 at 12:43 PM

The reverse would be more helpful. :)

Capitalist Hog on November 5, 2012 at 12:50 PM

I have to ask – Is Floatingcrock a troll?

FirstBoot on November 5, 2012 at 12:50 PM

FlaMurph on November 5, 2012 at 12:49 PM

Meh. I don’t really get the whole Springsteen obsession.

Capitalist Hog on November 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM

My guess is the Amish.

Oil Can on November 5, 2012 at 12:46 PM

Serious question. Do the Amish vote?

JPeterman on November 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM

Howard Johnson is offering a free two-night stay at any of his hotels if you vote for him.

Bishop on November 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM

I have to ask – Is Floatingcrock a troll?

FirstBoot on November 5, 2012 at 12:50 PM

A “True Conservative” or Libertarian who refuses to support a RINO

El_Terrible on November 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM

Ed,

You might do one last reality check on the polls.

What percentage of respondents are they seeing in this last week?

Is it still 9%?

PolAgnostic on November 5, 2012 at 12:44 PM

BINGO!!

We have been bombarded with calls all weekend..did not
answer one.

To quote Sylvester Marcus in “it’s a mad mad mad world”

“You’re really bugging me man!!

ToddPA on November 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM

Nick_Angel on November 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM

Interesting. With a six point swing in party affiliation how can any of the “polls” suggest a D+ sample. Seems even a R+2 may be conservative. Add in enthusiasm and you have a landslide.

HoustonRight on November 5, 2012 at 12:52 PM

If the incumbent can’t garner a lead the day before the election in a relatively Blue State that went for him handily four years ago – the fat lady has sung.

catmman on November 5, 2012 at 12:53 PM

Ed, this Rasmussen data indicates that even Rasmussen’s own poll of Ohio is off the mark. A Romney blowout is the only likely outcome tomorrow.

NotCoach on November 5, 2012 at 12:53 PM

My guess is the Amish.

Oil Can on November 5, 2012 at 12:46 PM

Serious question. Do the Amish vote?

JPeterman on November 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM

Why yes, yes they do….to them there is only
ONE PARTY. Democrats need not apply.

ToddPA on November 5, 2012 at 12:54 PM

c’mon OIHO!!!!

ted c on November 5, 2012 at 12:54 PM

I have to ask – Is Floatingcrock a troll?

FirstBoot on November 5, 2012 at 12:50 PM

Good question. Based on the number of carpet-bombed threads over the last 6 months, I’d vote yes, but that’s just me.

oldroy on November 5, 2012 at 12:54 PM

I have to ask – Is Floatingcrock a troll?

FirstBoot on November 5, 2012 at 12:50 PM

Paulbot, lost in the Wilderness of their mind.

Norky on November 5, 2012 at 12:54 PM

Yeah, but how does Rasmussen know exactly how those people voted?

He doesn’t.

Stop the insanity of trying to make an unknown a known.

JPeterman on November 5, 2012 at 12:47 PM

Is he counting people who have voted and said they voted for obama, or people who are registered democrats?

neuquenguy on November 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM

Ed, this Rasmussen data indicates that even Rasmussen’s own poll of Ohio is off the mark. A Romney blowout is the only likely outcome tomorrow.

NotCoach on November 5, 2012 at 12:53 PM

Not if you include the extras from “The Walking Dead”.

Those aren’t people in make-up but actual demorat voters.

Bishop on November 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM

Ed, I hope all your naysaying is just to rally the people to get out and vote Obama out tomorrow.

Sterling Holobyte on November 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM

When even the incumbent loses.

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM

If the incumbent can’t garner a lead the day before the election in a relatively Blue State that went for him handily four years ago – the fat lady has sung.

catmman on November 5, 2012 at 12:53 PM

Yes what do all these polls have in common? Obama is below 50 as the incumbent = loss

Conservative4ev on November 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM

Says a poll to which only 9% of the people respond and admittedly lie.

davidk on November 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM

Remember the voting scenes the the movie ‘Gangs of NewYork”? About to be repeated in Ohio. (“They’ve run out of ballots!” “Keep counting anyway; it’s the counts that matter!”)

michaelo on November 5, 2012 at 12:56 PM

FirstBoot on November 5, 2012 at 12:50 PM

no need to ask, he also posts under a similar name like gravity stone or something like that

DanMan on November 5, 2012 at 12:56 PM

is Ohio the only state that has Obama winning independents?

bannor on November 5, 2012 at 12:56 PM

Obama Legacy, a perfect depiction.

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM

Oct R-39.1% D-33.3% I-27.5%, for a Republican advantage of +5.8%.

Rasmussen in Ohio: 49/49 tie

jus’ sayin’: It appears the Left is pulling the Limbaugh 2008 ‘Operation Chaos’ strategy…

socalcon on November 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM

Completely agree with everyone’s confusion.

Changes in early voting, changes in Independent support, changes in enthusiasm. How the hell is this still “tied”.

They say where there’s smoke there’s fire, dear lord there enough smoke that this could be a raging 20 alarm fire, yet everyone shows tied or Obama winning?!?

nextgen_repub on November 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM

Why yes, yes they do….to them there is only
ONE PARTY. Democrats need not apply.

ToddPA on November 5, 2012 at 12:54 PM

Thanks for the answer. The only knowledge I really have of the Amish is from watching the movie “Witness”.

JPeterman on November 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM

After the election, you will hear a lot of pollsters saying they can only report the results of those who answer the phone. And that you can only get a picture of what the splits are and only a picture of what the turnouts will be. And that to actually predict the outcome you have to weight the splits with the expected turnout.

The media will blame the pollsters, the pollsters will explain that the media should know better than to jump to conclusions, and the National Guard will be busy putting out the fires in Detroit, Oakland, LA, Philly, etc. etc. etc.

oldroy on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

Not if you include the extras from “The Walking Dead”.

Those aren’t people in make-up but actual demorat voters.

Bishop on November 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM

Heh. But at least THEY have an actual JOB!

ToddPA on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

Breaking news : Gallup just announced their latest poll …. Romney49 President Obama 48 …the five to six point Gallup lead for Romney has disappeared in one week …. Momentum … Gallup Style President Obama

U2denver on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

Bruce Springsteen is another uneducated elitist liberal celebrity who doesn’t live in reality, but feels guilty about his wealth. So, to make himself feel better about it he backs socialists who he thinks will will give the unwashed masses free stuff to ease his guilty conscience. Government is his idea of charity.

Rockshine on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

Has anyone spotted G & P today?

It’s a serious question?

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

Good question. Based on the number of carpet-bombed threads over the last 6 months, I’d vote yes, but that’s just me.

oldroy on November 5, 2012 at 12:54 PM

..same here. I counsel for a TROLLCOT policy like this!

The War Planner on November 5, 2012 at 12:59 PM

When the numbers are even, the incumbent loses!!!

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 12:59 PM

O/T
This is a beautiful picture of the day of Mitt and Ann. Our future president and first lady!

http://twitchy.com/2012/11/05/photo-of-the-day-the-kiss-featuring-mitt-and-ann-romney/
L

letget on November 5, 2012 at 12:59 PM

Thanks for the answer. The only knowledge I really have of the Amish is from watching the movie “Witness”.

JPeterman on November 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM

That was one lame azz movie….aside from Kelly McGillis
looking hotter than any Amish girl I’ve come across….

ToddPA on November 5, 2012 at 12:59 PM

FR is NOT a troll.

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 1:00 PM

http://www.270towin.com/1980_Election/

The United States presidential election of 1980 featured a contest between incumbent
Democrat Jimmy Carter and his Republican opponent, Ronald Reagan, as well as
Republican Congressman John B. Anderson, who ran as an independent. Reagan,
aided by the Iran hostage crisis and a worsening economy at home, won the
election in a landslide. Carter, after defeating Ted Kennedy for the Democratic
nomination, attacked Reagan as a dangerous right-wing radical. For his part,
Reagan, the former Governor of California, repeatedly ridiculed Carter, and won
a decisive victory; in the simultaneous Congressional elections, Republicans won
control of the United States Senate for the first time in 28 years. This
election marked the beginning of what is popularly called the “Reagan
Revolution.”

Forward to 2012:
The United States presidential election of 2012 featured a contest between incumbent Democrat Barack Obama and his Republican opponent, Mitt Romney. Romney, aided by the Benghazi crisis, a stagnant economy at home, and Hurricane Sandy, won the election in a landslide. Obama, after defeating Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination, attacked Reagan as a dangerous right-wing radical, liar, and bloodthirsty venture capitalist. For his part, Romney, the former Governor of Massachusets, repeatedly called for bipartisanship, repealing and replacing Obamacare or government-run unversal healthcare, reduced big government and more power to the states, laid out plans for invigorating the economy, and won a decisive victory; in the simultaneous Congressional elections, Republicans won control of the United States Senate and then had control of both houses of Congress. This election marked the beginning of what is popularly called the “Romney Revolution”.

Tenwheeler on November 5, 2012 at 1:01 PM

They say where there’s smoke there’s fire, dear lord there enough smoke that this could be a raging 20 alarm fire, yet everyone shows tied or Obama winning?!?

nextgen_repub on November 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM

*waves fingers*

These are not the jam packed Romney/Ryan rallies you are looking for.

NotCoach on November 5, 2012 at 1:01 PM

It’s a serious question?

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

Yes, all over the other poll threads from today.

neuquenguy on November 5, 2012 at 1:01 PM

Yeah, but how does Rasmussen know exactly how those people voted?

He doesn’t.

Stop the insanity of trying to make an unknown a known.

JPeterman on November 5, 2012 at 12:47 PM

Is he counting people who have voted and said they voted for obama, or people who are registered democrats?

neuquenguy on November 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM

They are not registered by party affiliation in OH.

jimver on November 5, 2012 at 1:02 PM

Rockshine on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

The publicity does not hurt, either.

IlikedAUH2O on November 5, 2012 at 1:02 PM

Please vote for Gary Johnson.

FloatingRock on November 5, 2012 at 12:46 PM

Support some of his ideas? Yes. Vote for similar candidates in State/Local elections where they have a chance of winning? Yes.

Throw away my vote on a guaranteed looser because the R candidate that actually has a chance to beat the worst leftist President in my lifetime isn’t conservative enough?

Not the slightest chance.

peski on November 5, 2012 at 1:03 PM

The dems in the media will try to suppress the vote with stories for the next two days to be sure.

tomas on November 5, 2012 at 1:03 PM

Bruce Springsteen is another uneducated elitist liberal celebrity who doesn’t live in reality, but feels guilty about his wealth. So, to make himself feel better about it he backs socialists who he thinks will will give the unwashed masses free stuff to ease his guilty conscience. Government is his idea of charity.

Rockshine on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

Here is my take

Look at the 2 past democrates presidential losses. Gore and Kerry, what are they doing that Obama is doing right now. Having a concert to get people. It’s a sign of losing

Conservative4ev on November 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM

Romney is going to win Ohio… When the early/absentee votes in Ohio (actual votes) show a net loss of 260,000 votes for Obama in Ohio which is equivalent to Obama vote victory in 2008 then Obama is going to lose Ohio for certain…

mnjg on November 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM

Trollcott. Also, Rasmussen highest republican affiliation ever polled!

happytobehere on November 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM

Not good for the Prince of Darkness.

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM

I’m getting an ulcer.

portlandon on November 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM

Good grief…I want to vomit. In fact, I think tomorrow night I’ll just sleep at the foot of the throne with my pillow and blanket.

sandlin71 on November 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM

I am now officially taking the TNP approach to this election!

Trust
No
Poll!

pilamaye on November 5, 2012 at 1:05 PM

Incumbent at 48 national is a loser all the polls showing he is below 50 Romney wins

Conservative4ev on November 5, 2012 at 1:05 PM

I’m getting an ulcer.

portlandon on November 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM

Lay off the White Russian’s.

JPeterman on November 5, 2012 at 1:05 PM

Please vote for Gary Johnson.
FloatingRock on November 5, 2012 at 12:46 PM

If all that you said is true, why would they let Gary Johnson win?

Third Party is a synomym for Third Place.

Akzed on November 5, 2012 at 1:06 PM

is Ohio the only state that has Obama winning independents?

bannor on November 5, 2012 at 12:56 PM

Pretty much which is strange. Don’t know what ‘s happening in Va! though. Some mentioned that that there is movement there too, for O, could be Sandy effects, don’t know, if he’s gaining indies there too. But so far, yes, OH looks singular in that, which makes absoluely no sense. What’s so special about the OH independents :).

jimver on November 5, 2012 at 1:06 PM

They are not registered by party affiliation in OH.

jimver on November 5, 2012 at 1:02 PM

So that means that the Obama 23% lead in early voting reported by Rassmusen is sort of an exit poll where people tell who they voted for?

neuquenguy on November 5, 2012 at 1:06 PM

Has anyone spotted G & P today?

It’s a serious question?

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

No. Do you think he’s finally realized he’s not wanted here?

……naaahhhh………

UpTheCreek on November 5, 2012 at 1:06 PM

The media will blame the pollsters, the pollsters will explain that the media should know better than to jump to conclusions, and the National Guard will be busy putting out the fires in Detroit, Oakland, LA, Philly, etc. etc. etc.

oldroy on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

Let. It. Burn.

HomeoftheBrave on November 5, 2012 at 1:06 PM

Breaking news : Gallup just announced their latest poll …. Romney49 President Obama 48 …the five to six point Gallup lead for Romney has disappeared in one week …. Momentum … Gallup Style President Obama

U2denver on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

Obama at 48% in Gallup means that he is going to lose the elections… You are delusional to think otherwise…

mnjg on November 5, 2012 at 1:06 PM

I’m getting an ulcer.

portlandon on November 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM

Lay off the White Russian’s.

JPeterman on November 5, 2012 at 1:05 PM

Oh, man, that thing way too sweet, and…milky :)…

jimver on November 5, 2012 at 1:07 PM

The dems in the media will try to suppress the vote with stories for the next two days to be sure.

tomas on November 5, 2012 at 1:03 PM

You turn on the news and you see it’s tied in Oiho; are you really going to stay home?

Rasmussen is afraid to use his own party affiliation numbers because they are unprecedented. Most other pollsters are playing a game, some in league with Obama. Showing a close race is a desperate attempt to motivate Obama’s base.

NotCoach on November 5, 2012 at 1:07 PM

neuquenguy on November 5, 2012 at 1:01 PM

Thanks, sad as it is for HA not following their own anti-trolling guidelines.

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 1:07 PM

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM

He/she/it was here earlier, got mad at Trollcott, and left.

kingsjester on November 5, 2012 at 1:08 PM

May the best poll win!

verbaluce on November 5, 2012 at 1:08 PM

TROLLCOT almost not needed on this thread :)… I’s like self-banning day for trolls, after the meltdown of the canadian member of parliament on the other thread :)

jimver on November 5, 2012 at 1:08 PM

What kind of dunces vote third party and hand the election to Obama? Damn fools for Johnson.

clnurnberg on November 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM

Oil Can on November 5, 2012 at 12:46 PM

Serious question. Do the Amish vote?

JPeterman on November 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM

Why yes, yes they do….to them there is only
ONE PARTY. Democrats need not apply.

ToddPA on November 5, 2012 at 12:54 PM

I wonder how many of those conservative folks CNN reached by phone? ;)

kcd on November 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM

A “True Conservative” or Libertarian who refuses to support a RINO

El_Terrible on November 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM

I used to call myself an independent conservative, then switched to conservative leaning libertarian because it’s more specific. I’ve never claimed to be a “true conservative”. I think in the future maybe I’ll start calling myself an independent libertarian.

FloatingRock on November 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM

I have a question. These people are voting, but no one knows who the voters voted for. They just tabulate X Democrats, Y Republican and I independents. Is it assumed that all early votes placed by Democrats are votes for Obama? Conversely, all the republican voters voted for Romney? I know more democrats that are voting Romney than republican voting for Obama. Fact is, I don’t know any republicans voting for Obama, but I do know democrats that have voted for Romney.

PrettyD_Vicious on November 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM

Obama at 48% in Gallup means that he is going to lose the elections… You are delusional to think otherwise…

mnjg on November 5, 2012 at 1:06 PM

Drop 1% Obama is at 47

Indys going to mitt = win

Conservative4ev on November 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM

Let. It. Burn.

HomeoftheBrave on November 5, 2012 at 1:06 PM

Heh, my Schadenfreude will burn them plenty. I need a new heart. The original will not be able to handle the Schadenfreude at the Europeans and the US weenies.

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM

Remember the polls before the last Scott Walker recall????

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_WI_6312.pdf

PPP had Walker up by 3 – he won by 14

Obama and Romney even in all national polls now???

What does that tell you?

Tells me the MSM is hedging it’s bets…..

redguy on November 5, 2012 at 1:11 PM

Romney will take OH. I still stand by, 0 taking no more then 18 states, 45% tops.

Bmore on November 5, 2012 at 1:11 PM

I need a new heart.

Schadenfreude on November 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM

Your heart is just fine. ; )

Bmore on November 5, 2012 at 1:12 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3