The state of the Senate race

posted at 8:31 am on November 3, 2012 by Jazz Shaw

We’re coming down to the wire in the 2012 election, and being a presidential year most eyes are trained on the race to the finish between Mitt Romney and President Obama. But control of both chambers in the legislative branch are on the line as well, and as we all know, Congress can do a lot more (or a lot less) in terms of effecting change than the chief executive. Last night, The Ish took a look at the state of the House races and didn’t see much of a change on the horizon. That’s not terribly surprising, given how each state gerrymanders their districts. But the Senate runs on a harder to bump, state by state basis and has some potential volatility built in. Today we’ll take a quick look at what’s coming up there. (Don’t take this as “final predictions” which we’ll be doing closer to Tuesday.)

Of the 100 seats in the Senate, there are less than a dozen that we really need to bother looking at. The GOP is sitting on 42 which are either not up for reelection or so safe that it’s not worth discussing. The Democrats have 44 in those same categories. (And I’m sorry to say to my fellow New Yorkers, our seat in this mix is in that category. It’s just not on the table.) For the record, that Democrat number includes Sanders and Lieberman, who are technically independent, but caucus with the Dems. It also includes Angus King in Maine, who will almost without a doubt follow suit and may soon make some of you pine for the days of Olympia Snowe, who was successfully hounded out of the running.

Still technically in the “leaner” category, but quickly sailing over the event horizon of reasonable chances are three others:

Nebraska: This one should go to Deb Fischer, bringing the Republican “comfortable” total to 43, but we’ll pretend for now that Bob Kerry still has a chance.

Florida: I know people are still holding out hope for Connie Mack, but Bill Nelson holds varying leads in every poll you can find not conducted exclusively among people with the surname of Mack. But much like the presidential numbers, these shift on a daily basis. The Democrats could still take a beating up and down the ticket if the turnout is seriously large.

Pennsylvania: Tom Smith has run a great race, but even Rasmussen has him losing to Bob Casey, bringing the Donkey Party to a likely buffer of 46. This leaves us with a rather shockingly juicy group of eleven seats which may still be in contention, some more than others.

THE FINALISTS (In alphabetical order for lack of any other ranking)

Arizona: This one won’t be a blowout, but Jeff Flake is still up outside the margins in Rasmussen’s last numbers and he should sneak in over the finish line.

Connecticut: This is Linda McMahon’s second bite at the apple, but every late poll has Chris Murphy looking like he’ll send her packing in back to back tries.

Indiana: One of the media’s favorite races. I haven’t spoken to a single non-invested party who thinks this would even have been a race if Lugar was running, but Richard Mourdock managed to trip over his own shoelaces with the finish line in site and Ras has Joe Donnelly up by a slim margin in the final week. It could still go either way, though, and this one is definitely too close to call.

Massachusetts: The race most likely to start a flame war on any blog, Scott Brown became a GOP Rock Star of sorts when he seized a seat in Taxachusetts. But despite Elizabeth Warren’s best efforts to take herself out of the race repeatedly, Obama has some long coattails in the Kennedy’s home town and most polling outlets weren’t holding out much hope for Brown. But just this weekend we saw another shift, and incumbency always carries a certain advantage. Brown may still hold on to this one.

Missouri: Another odds on favorite to fan flame wars, Todd Akin managed to take one of the most likely GOP pickup seats and put it back in play. Rasmussen currently has Claire McCaskill up by nearly double digits, and not one other outlet shows a lead for Akin with three days to go.

Montana: I have no idea why I don’t see this race on the morning talk shows more often. Jon Tester is being challenged by Republican Denny Rehberg and there’s no use linking any single poll on the contest. Everyone has it as pretty much a fifty fifty shot. That’s a GOP pickup waiting to happen if you can turn out a couple hundred extra people in a few precincts.

Nevada: Much like Arizona, I’m not sure if this should be a toss-up race. Even NBC gives Dean Heller a pretty good shot at winning and the rest of the pollsters follow suit. He should deny Shelley Berkley’s bid unless something goes seriously amiss.

North Dakota: Republican Rick Berg should nail this one down pretty early on Tuesday night and send Heidi Heitkamp looking for other employment.

Ohio: Another high strung, tight wire act here. But the consensus of pollsters has Sherrod Brown leading Josh Mandel outside the margins. Sorry, sports fans, but Josh has some tough sledding to pull this one out.

Virginia: George Allen has overcome some early polling deficits and is now in a nail biter with Tim Kaine. It’s not a given by any means, but the momentum seems to be on Allen’s side coming into the home stretch.

Wisconsin: This is shaping up to be another incredibly close one, like most in Wisconsin. Tammy Baldwin (D) and Tommy Thompson (R) have been trading the lead back and forth for a while. This is another one that may just come down to coat tails.

All in all, there is the possibility of a wave in either direction with this many close races. But looking at the trends this week, it may turn out to be something of a split much like the House races. There’s really only three races where I would bet large on the Republicans right now and a couple where I’d wager on the Democrats. This doesn’t stack up like a high chance of the GOP retaking the Senate, but there’s plenty of reason to break out the popcorn on Tuesday.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Uncle Sugar will figure out a way to Fast-n-FallingOver the situation to blame America and tax the hellouttait anyway.

Limerick on May 12, 2013 at 6:35 PM

Even a blind pig…

Cleombrotus on May 12, 2013 at 6:37 PM

I like girls who drink beer.” – Toby Keith

myiq2xu on May 12, 2013 at 6:37 PM

This is what senators are worried about — the excise tax on beer?

Liam on May 12, 2013 at 6:42 PM

These bills have been around for a few years, but the problem is that the explosive growth of this industry will make lessening the tax — at least in Congress’s books — more expensive.

Finding a pay for that both sides can agree on will be difficult.

bomble on May 12, 2013 at 6:46 PM

Its a good move since the blossoming up of home-brew has been great for this nation, but my understanding of the issue is that many big brewers own smaller craft brews, so they will qualify as well. Of course its all good if you think about it.

rob verdi on May 12, 2013 at 6:47 PM

This is great news!

Those White house beer summits will be cheaper…

Electrongod on May 12, 2013 at 6:50 PM

Bi-partisan? BS.

Craft beer appeals to blue-staters and the “smart growth” crowd which is why you see a guy like Schumer, who normally can’t find a tax he doesn’t like, suddenly so hot to reduce taxes on “craft beer”.

A lot of these small breweries, like the ones in my Upstate NY town already receive a ton of tax incentives and property tax breaks to locate in downtown areas. Guess who pays for that? The property taxpayers like me, who pay the full tax on my own property.

Don’t worry, old Chuckie, I’m sure, is quick working on a way to make up for the lost revenue, particularly in NY State where everything that moves is already taxed. And I’m sure I’ll get screwed over, like always.

Dreadnought on May 12, 2013 at 6:50 PM

Sounds like a good time for HA to supplement its offerings by starting up its own trademark HA micro-brew.

WhatSlushfund on May 12, 2013 at 6:51 PM

Those White house beer summits will be cheaper…

Electrongod on May 12, 2013 at 6:50 PM

Oh no. Those we want to tax the living crud out of.

Limerick on May 12, 2013 at 6:52 PM

Bayam should be along any minute to defend Big Beer like Budweiser, while denigrating craft beer.

tom daschle concerned on May 12, 2013 at 6:53 PM

That is absolutely brilliant!

Right now the beer market is almost a full blown duopoly, where Anheuser-Busch InBev and Miller-Coors own 90%+ of the market.

It is only possibly through the states and federal government’s regulation of alcohol distribution. Breweries are almost wholly banned from selling directly to taverns/bars and grocery stores, because the government requires them to sell through a middle-mad (distributor).

AB InBev and Miller-Coors went after the distributors by either buying them out or contracting them, forcing all of the small breweries fight over whatever distribution is left for them. Any change to the three-tiered distribution system is decried and virtually shut down by their lobbyists.

Anyhow, the slashing of the excise tax would be an absolute boon to the small business craft brewers.

ZachV on May 12, 2013 at 6:54 PM

Red Stripe is some horrid beer, but they had some great commercials.

HOORAY BEER!

Steve Eggleston on May 12, 2013 at 6:58 PM

Don’t worry, old Chuckie, I’m sure, is quick working on a way to make up for the lost revenue, particularly in NY State where everything that moves is already taxed. And I’m sure I’ll get screwed over, like always.

Dreadnought on May 12, 2013 at 6:50 PM

Glad to see an HA conservative finally agree that these perpetual tax cuts for the so called small businesses/ job creators are truly paid for by the working American..

HotAirLib on May 12, 2013 at 6:59 PM

Bread, beer, and circuses.

MelonCollie on May 12, 2013 at 7:04 PM

Don’t worry, old Chuckie, I’m sure, is quick working on a way to make up for the lost revenue, particularly in NY State where everything that moves is already taxed. And I’m sure I’ll get screwed over, like always.

Dreadnought on May 12, 2013 at 6:50 PM

Glad to see an HA conservative finally agree that these perpetual tax cuts for the so called small businesses/ job creators are truly paid for by the working American..

HotAirLib on May 12, 2013 at 6:59 PM

Rule of thumb: If Schumer is for it, I’m sure to get screwed.

And yes Mr. (or Ms.) Lib. You and I do agree on targeted tax breaks. Crony capitalism at its finest, which every conservative
should be against, whether it involves beer or not.

Dreadnought on May 12, 2013 at 7:07 PM

There was a nice article recently saying that American craft beers were even making headway in Germany. They noted that many of the German brands taste similar due to 500 year old German beer purity laws that force standardized ingredients and brewing processes.

BohicaTwentyTwo on May 12, 2013 at 7:09 PM

And yes Mr. (or Ms.) Lib. You and I do agree on targeted tax breaks. Crony capitalism at its finest, which every conservative
should be against, whether it involves beer or not.

Dreadnought on May 12, 2013 at 7:07 PM

Wow. We agree again. Wall Street/I am for everything BIbi is for Schumer is far from any politician I like.

HotAirLib on May 12, 2013 at 7:18 PM

Red Stripe is some horrid beer, but they had some great commercials.

HOORAY BEER!

Steve Eggleston on May 12, 2013 at 6:58 PM

You think so? I’ve always really liked Red Stripe. But, then again, I have plebian beer tastes. My usual go-to is Bud Light.

My theory is that Red Stripe was brewed to work together nicely with ganja.

WhatSlushfund on May 12, 2013 at 7:23 PM

If only this could make up for all of Sen. Collins’ wrongdoings this year. Unfortunately, I can’t afford the volume of Shipyard Summer Ale that it’d require to make me forgive and forget her RINO stance on nearly every important issue recently, of which none are more important than her embrace of the Manchin/Toomey bill. It’s time for her to come home and get a real job. Baxter IPA for ftw!

Birchbark on May 12, 2013 at 7:49 PM

‘Murika.

Hate to pop your stereotype, Erika, but craft brewers don’t use the term.

AshleyTKing on May 12, 2013 at 7:50 PM

I’m OK with anything that makes Stone Brewery and Heavy Seas cheaper and easier to get hold of.

Sgt Steve on May 12, 2013 at 7:55 PM

This is what senators are worried about — the excise tax on beer?

Liam on May 12, 2013 at 6:42 PM

…they want to keep us drunk!

KOOLAID2 on May 12, 2013 at 7:55 PM

This might be the first worthwhile thing Washington has done in…….. ever? Or at least since 1976 with the last beer tax cut. It’s such a good idea that even Schumer can figure it out!

alchemist19 on May 12, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Bi-partisan? BS.

Craft beer appeals to blue-staters and the “smart growth” crowd which is why you see a guy like Schumer, who normally can’t find a tax he doesn’t like, suddenly so hot to reduce taxes on “craft beer”.

Dreadnought on May 12, 2013 at 6:50 PM

It’s not one’s fault but yours that you don’t like beer that actually tastes good. :-)

alchemist19 on May 12, 2013 at 8:04 PM

Complaints about local property tax incentives, as above, aside, I am glad that any aspect of the Federal beast recognizes that lowering taxes is a logical move for stimulating growth.

And Anheiser and Miller products blow.

M240H on May 12, 2013 at 8:10 PM

Maybe I’m missing something, but why exactly is there an excise tax on beer? Does anyone know the rationale, other than “the government wants more money”?

NorthernCross on May 12, 2013 at 8:19 PM

Why don’t the lawmakers end the 3-tier distribution system instead? That is the real culprit that prevents smaller breweries from getting their beer out there. I live in the midwest and I can’t get Russian River, Dogfish head, and other popular craft breweries because the big distributors don’t want the competition.

Erika, I am disappointed you didn’t focus on the distribution racket and instead this obscure tax cut.

nazo311 on May 12, 2013 at 8:42 PM

States vary a lot too.

AshleyTKing on May 12, 2013 at 8:57 PM

Oh good, my son is brewing beer.

Cindy Munford on May 12, 2013 at 9:02 PM

Maybe I’m missing something, but why exactly is there an excise tax on beer? Does anyone know the rationale, other than “the government wants more money”?

NorthernCross on May 12, 2013 at 8:19 PM

I think it’s a holdover from the prohibition-era Volstead Act.

gryphon202 on May 12, 2013 at 9:47 PM

Love the photo – Three Floyds is one of the best breweries in the country and their Rye Da Tiger and Alpha Klaus are awesome beers.

bound4er on May 12, 2013 at 10:17 PM

I’m OK with anything that makes Stone Brewery and Heavy Seas cheaper and easier to get hold of.

Sgt Steve on May 12, 2013 at 7:55 PM

+1

AshleyTKing on May 12, 2013 at 10:21 PM

I have no problem with rolling back Prohibition-era laws against home-brewing and small-scale brewing like Alabama recently did. Nor do I mind streamlining the bureaucracy for small brewers (where I am, all breweries are classified as “light industrial” and thus have a hard time getting decent zoning space outside of office parks). Even giving special tax treatment to start-ups sounds fine to me, which seems to be what this bill is about.

On the other hand, some places have tried to get too involved. One city out here decided to buy a restaurant space in its downtown, purchase a ton of brewery equipment, and then hand it all over to some random brothers who didn’t know what they were doing. Not surprisingly, that brewery attempt spectacularly failed and the city was left on the very large financial hook. It’s strange that they thought they needed to do that since all around them breweries are popping up left and right, but hey, some politician got to trumpet that they “helped small business in the downtown” (for a bit).

Streamline the regulations, especially for the little guys, and let the free market do its wonderful (and delicious in this case) work.

HayekFriendlyCon on May 12, 2013 at 11:15 PM

Hillary’s going to need a keg or two before what is brewing with Benghazi comes to a head.

profitsbeard on May 12, 2013 at 11:31 PM

As my moniker attests, I’ve been brewing at home for some time. Inexpensive and better than 90% of the biers I can buy. Plus…no tax to the Feds!

BierManVA on May 13, 2013 at 6:10 AM

Excellent news: Bipartisan senators

i don’t know of any bipartisan senators.

sesquipedalian on May 13, 2013 at 6:24 AM

Love the photo – Three Floyds is one of the best breweries in the country and their Rye Da Tiger and Alpha Klaus are awesome beers.

bound4er on May 12, 2013 at 10:17 PM

…and I live a stone’s throw from the brewery. Happy times! Perfect picture.

tdarrington on May 13, 2013 at 7:09 AM

This is a great step, but what we truly need to see our craft beer market “really” flourish is for the government to get out of the distribution mandating business. The government’s forced distribution (3-tier system) plan enables companies like (the owners of) Miller, Busch, Coors, Bud, etc… to have a stranglehold on the competition. It’s government forced monopoly.
The system was established to help the little guy but actually has done the opposite over the last 10-20 years… and while beer drinking in America has never been better… it could actually be better! Just get the government out.

therambler on May 13, 2013 at 7:48 AM

Hmmmm. Is it time to follow the senator’s investments?

Don L on May 13, 2013 at 8:00 AM

“Yeah, what’s wrong with the beer we got?!”

-Alvin Holmes, Alabama State Representative

Nick_Angel on May 13, 2013 at 9:58 AM

HotAirLib on May 12, 2013 at 6:59 PM

I would love to see a streamlined process for lowering all of myriad of tax laws into something coherant and understandable. If this act is including all breweres regardless of size then it isn’t crony capitalism per se – but I would like to see a real effort to study the tax code – see how much streamlining would really cost – look to cut spending along with it,utilize some real non-static costing and come up with something that helps more than just brewers.

Zomcon JEM on May 13, 2013 at 10:42 AM

While I am for the lowering and elimination of many taxes, don’t we have bigger issues to deal with than this?

Klem Kadiddlehopper on May 13, 2013 at 11:11 AM