I agree this was a planned hit, but disagree on the reason. Not hostage taking, this was to get rid of Stevens and tie up loose ends.

riddick on November 2, 2012 at 11:44 PM

And what about all the new “loose ends” that would have been created?

People would have to help Obama accomplish this, and the murder of an Ambassador is a much more damning thing that running arms to islamic radicals.

Would Obama have killed the people that knew that he killed the Ambassador?

If so, would Obama have killed the people that knew that he killed the people that knew he killed the Ambassador? And so one?

The “loose ends” never ends. Your hypothesis is stupid. You couldn’t think your way out of a paper bag.

rodguy911 on November 2, 2012 at 10:02 PM

I agree this was a planned hit, but disagree on the reason. Not hostage taking, this was to get rid of Stevens and tie up loose ends. Stevens was running guns to Al Qaeda, on our dime. And to the terror group that Hussein keeps touting as “on the run and done”. Not only do we supply the sworn enemies with sophisticated arms in Libya and Syria now, but we do it with the money we are borrowing from China.

Stevens was supposed to be wiped out, too bad the idiots in WH dod not count on Navy SEALs to take matters into their own hands.

talkingpoints on November 2, 2012 at 5:31 PM

Believe it or not the terror types were supposed to be under the control of obama! That’s why no hit was ordered on them. Why hit your own terror types? The plan was to kidnap Stevens and let obama rescue him but the AQ guys got wise to the plan and got tired of being used all the time. So they did what good solid terrorist do they killed infidels.
Things stated to go south early for the regime.They tried to bribe 20 or so youthful benghazians to protest the video but no one would sign up.
Bad sign.
Later on the AQ types double crossed the regime and did what they do to all gay ambassadors even though Stevens was probably dead from smoke inhalation.
Stevens knew waay too much. He was in on weapons to Libya’s terror types and then to Syrians as well.
The whole thing had become a cluster.
Now obama has to explain the unexplainable.

http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/26/unraveling-the-video-the-so-called-triggerfuse-of-libyan-egyptian-islamic-rage-sweeping-the-globe-northeast-intelligence-network-walid-shoebat-too-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

2.Huma Abedin link–Hillary’s assistant– MB link

http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/18/hillary-takes-the-fall-for-the-potus-in-bengazigate-but-there-is-a-silver-lining-shining-the-spotlight-on-huma-abedin-addendum-to-uncovering-the-tip-of-huma-abedins-spear-the-house-of-al-sa/

There are a bunch of links within links all throughout these two above. They lead to many of the answers about Benghazi.

Where’s Newt’s and Beck’s bombshell? …[snip]

spiritof61 on November 2, 2012 at 1:38 PM

They hit their targets, obviously.

Right after Newt’s statement Beck then said that unless the 2 news sources release info they have he will expose them after the election for the scum they are if this helps Hussein win.

Right after CBS started singing…

riddick on November 2, 2012 at 5:26 PM

Newt said that networks had “stand down” emails from Obama’s NSA. CBS’ singing had nothing to do with that.

Pretty sure folks were saying the same about F&F – a very long time ago.

Midas on November 2, 2012 at 5:48 PM

Sadly so. GOP Congress is either too stupid to do the right thing, or simply complicit via their inaction to take serious steps and prosecute.

The cover-up won’t last much longer.

Pretty sure folks were saying the same about F&F – a very long time ago.

Th planned kidnapping theory would also explain why American forces were told to stand down.

talkingpoints on November 2, 2012 at 5:34 PM

And an interesting side-issue is then whether Amb. Stevens knew about it or was himself in the dark.

Seriously, did Obama WANT Stevens to die?!

Doughboy on November 2, 2012 at 10:48 AM
I have to wonder if in some way Stevens had become a problem, because I see no other explanation for the callous disregard for his life.

slickwillie2001 on November 2, 2012 at 12:05 PM

I had posted something along those lines a while ago. Just this past week someone offered an alternate explanation that is even worse. Stevens was supposed to be kidnapped and then a hostage exchange was to take place, timed to help Obama surge in the election. Unfortunately,Stevens was killed instead, and Obama and those who were in on the plan didn’t have a cover story for that scenario-hence the rapidly changing lies from the Obama administration.

There is clearly an Obama cover-up. Is it a cover-up of incompetence, negligence or treason?

Where’s Newt’s and Beck’s bombshell? …[snip]

spiritof61 on November 2, 2012 at 1:38 PM

They hit their targets, obviously.

Right after Newt’s statement Beck then said that unless the 2 news sources release info they have he will expose them after the election for the scum they are if this helps Hussein win.

Right after CBS started singing…

And WaPo released their “CIA timeline” , as full of question marks it is, but at least a start.

Newt and Beck did way more in a day than all of GOP Congress put together in the past 7 weeks.

Romney should take NV despite liberals’ insistence on not.