Video: Hungry New Yorkers dumpster-diving for food as power to lower Manhattan remains off

posted at 9:51 pm on November 1, 2012 by Allahpundit

You’ve seen it already on Drudge but I feel obliged to post, just to keep today’s running theme of Obama’s omnicompetence going. I won’t bother delving into how the media would handle this if a Republican were in office; you can tell that story as well as I can. Instead, let me give you Walter Russell Mead on the genius of the nanny state:

Admittedly, getting public support and finding the money for flood protection would be hard, but it is exactly that kind of hard job that governments are supposed to do. Leadership is getting the important things done, not looking busy on secondary tasks while the real needs of the city go quietly unmet.

The problem with nanny state governance isn’t just that it’s intrusive. It isn’t just that it stifles business with over-regulation, and it isn’t just that it empowers busybodies and costs money. It’s that it distracts government from the really big jobs that it ought to be doing.

Mayor Bloomberg has done an admirable job under great pressure as the city reels from Sandy’s attack. But an ounce of prevention beats a pound of cure. The city needed flood protection for its subways and electricity grid—and it didn’t get it. If the Mayor had spent less time and less of his political capital focusing on minutiae, this storm could have played out very differently.

Yeah, how is it that a guy who’s willing to let climate-change policy determine his vote for president chose to leave the country’s most populous city underprepared for weather disasters? Whether global warming contributed to Sandy or not, an AGW true believer in a position of power should have had special concerns about flooding and protecting infrastructure. To preach it and not act is as silly as a guy running for reelection on his terrorist ass-kicking credentials refusing to consult his counterterror team during a terrorist attack. But then, this is the myth of Bloomberg the visionary manager. The days-long power outage in Queens that I endured six years ago also happened on his watch; he could have used that as a catalyst to make upgrading the city’s old power grid his cause celebre, but he’s much more of a guns-and-Big-Gulps sort of “visionary” than a guy concerned with keeping the lights on and the trains running. Hence Mead’s point.

Go read Breitbart’s Twitter round-up of the state of play right now in New York and New Jersey when it comes to finding gas. There’s actually plenty of it nearby; there’s just no way to get it flowing again until the lights come back on.

Update: Via Gothamist, here’s how things looked downtown as of yesterday morning. If people are eating out of garbage bins today, I’m guessing that the situation hasn’t improved much:

6) I did not witness a single Red Cross Truck or FEMA Vehicle or in lower Manhattan. Recall the assistance these agencies provided after 9/11 – this is NOT HAPPENING. There are bound to be hundreds of elderly people, rich and poor, who live on the upper floors of buildings with elevators that are now disabled. IF POWER IS NOT RESTORED, THIS WILL MOVE FROM BEING AN ECONOMIC DISASTER TO A HUMANITARIAN DISASTER…

8) The substation responsible for the outage is a huge facility. It spans an entire avenue from Avenue C to D and a length of street from 13th to 14th. If crews have to inspect every coil and wire, it might be MORE THAN THREE DAYS UNTIL POWER IS RESTORED. Additionally, the site did not appear staffed with many Con Ed workers. As a note, the 2003 blackout lasted 15 hours.

9) The water from the storm surge was invariably contaminated – floating garbage, wood pieces from the dock, and possibly sewage. One Nuyorican woman who lived on Avenue C near 12th street noted the water level peaked above her waist. She was still visibly shaken this afternoon. She also recalled a huge noise at 8 pm when the substation failed. The sky, in her words, turned from black to green

View more videos at: http://nbcnewyork.com.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Primary Rubio!
Primary Toomey!

What short memories people have. They’ve been in office 2 years. Out of their elected 6.

I’m curious – can someone give me an example of a Republican Senator who ran and was ever replaced by another Republican from the same state?

Marcus on April 11, 2013 at 9:27 AM

I’m curious – can someone give me an example of a Republican Senator who ran and was ever replaced by another Republican from the same state?

Marcus on April 11, 2013 at 9:27 AM

Senator Bob Bennett lost to now Senator Mike Lee (not that I’m advocating a primary challenge to Toomey…yet).

crrr6 on April 11, 2013 at 9:53 AM

crrr6 on April 11, 2013 at 9:53 AM

Good example. And a very red state. Which neither Pennsylvania or Florida are.

Marcus on April 11, 2013 at 10:07 AM

I guess now that McConnell’s #1 priority failed and is moot, the Repubs now have some time to put towards other objectives.

verbaluce on April 11, 2013 at 10:09 AM

Are you implying that if Toomey really had some principles, he sold them out for favorable publicity from Bloomberg. If true, how shallow our elected officials are.

savage24 on April 11, 2013 at 10:18 AM

Senator Bob Bennett lost to now Senator Mike Lee (not that I’m advocating a primary challenge to Toomey…yet).

crrr6 on April 11, 2013 at 9:53 AM

I’m not sure as I see the point in more primary challenges. Nearly everyone we pinned our hopes on in 2010 has gone off the rails. Realistically, how much more likely are we to find someone better than Toomey that won’t rush to join McConnell in working for higher taxes, more debt, gun control, amnesty, etc? I’ve basically abandoned hopes for internal reform of the Republican Party at this point and am just waiting for it to collapse.

Are you implying that if Toomey really had some principles, he sold them out for favorable publicity from Bloomberg. If true, how shallow our elected officials are.

savage24 on April 11, 2013 at 10:18 AM

The advertising from Bloomberg seems like a weak tea excuse to me, given that he won’t be facing election for years yet. I think it’s much more likely his cooperation on this issue was arranged at the dinner with Obama during the time of the Paul filibuster, or shortly thereafter.

Doomberg on April 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM

BTW, more than 80% of gun owners support background checks…that might not be 80% of the TruCon bloggers…but they in turn do not represent as many people as they think they do.

Terrye on April 11, 2013 at 6:25 AM

And since when did you become a fascist troll?

Go piss up a rope.

Dunedainn on April 11, 2013 at 10:33 AM

I live in PA and I can tell you based on the last Senate election – we do not have a deep bench of GOP candidates to primary Toomey. And absolutely no one with his credentials and following. No one, no one will be able to primary him. If anyone is getting primaried it will be Tom Corbett for Governor – and that WILL NOT HAPPEN either. PA is a light blue state – Ron Paul-type candidates do not get elected here. I am surprised Toomey cut a deal – but we are in a war of attrition right now – things happen.

PhillyUnion on April 11, 2013 at 11:12 AM

PhillyUnion on April 11, 2013 at 11:12 AM

You make good points. I’m just surprised Toomey staked out this issue (a big voting issue that always favors us) vs wedge issues that seem to favor the bad guys. His election turned out to be a nailbiter in 2010 (of all years), so I think he will have a hard time holding that seat in 2016. And, I don’t see how this really helps him.

Oh well. Here’s hoping his incumbency and the reduction in fraud with voter ID laws will help hold the seat.

crrr6 on April 11, 2013 at 11:50 AM

The reason so many people support the concept of a background check is that no one has explained exactly what would constitute a “background check”.

So, I put it to Terrye and KingGold:

“Do you favor a requirement that private citizens notify the Federal Government when and to whom they sell a firearm, including the serial number of the firearm sold?”

Because that is what a background check will be.

One more Sandy Hook and they’ll start collecting ‘em.

chigger76 on April 11, 2013 at 12:05 PM

Politically dead man walking!

Mr. Grump on April 12, 2013 at 8:10 PM

Comment pages: 1 2