<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ADP report shows 158K private-sector jobs added</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: xblade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6450011</link>
		<dc:creator>xblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6450011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7.4%. 

Whatever the number ultimately is, there&#039;s no way in hell it will be an increase. If it were, the number wouldn&#039;t come out tomorrow due to Hurricane Sandy. The fix is in, and that fix will be good to Obama, make no mistake about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7.4%. </p>
<p>Whatever the number ultimately is, there&#8217;s no way in hell it will be an increase. If it were, the number wouldn&#8217;t come out tomorrow due to Hurricane Sandy. The fix is in, and that fix will be good to Obama, make no mistake about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BemusedMalkinite</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6449920</link>
		<dc:creator>BemusedMalkinite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6449920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This report was debunked - the ACTUAL numbers before ADP&#039;s rejiggering (to help The One) show 365,000 jobs LOST from what was expected for 2012.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-10-31/adp-cancels-365000-private-jobs-created-2012&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt; A week ago, ADP announced that going forward it would coordinate with Moody&#039;s (yes, that Moody&#039;s), and especially its chief economist, SecTres hopeful (InTrade odds of actually attain that post: 0.00) Mark Zandi, to fudge adjust its data going forward. The data revision was supposed to be publicly disclosed tomorrow when the official October ADP number was released. Well, just like today&#039;s Chicago PMI, and so many other data points recently, this too was released early. What the early release allowed us to promptly calculate is that using the historically revised numbers, and comparing those based on the original methodology, in 2012 alone, the US would have lost a whopping... 365,000 private jobs! Putting thus number in context, according to the revised methodology, the US has generated only 1.172MM jobs in 2012 through September, or in other words, a statistical &quot;fix&quot; magically eliminated over 30% of what the market had previously expected were job gains, a number which the incumbent president has certain taken advantage of on more than one occasions while campaigning. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This report was debunked &#8211; the ACTUAL numbers before ADP&#8217;s rejiggering (to help The One) show 365,000 jobs LOST from what was expected for 2012.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-10-31/adp-cancels-365000-private-jobs-created-2012" rel="nofollow"></p>
<blockquote><p> A week ago, ADP announced that going forward it would coordinate with Moody&#8217;s (yes, that Moody&#8217;s), and especially its chief economist, SecTres hopeful (InTrade odds of actually attain that post: 0.00) Mark Zandi, to fudge adjust its data going forward. The data revision was supposed to be publicly disclosed tomorrow when the official October ADP number was released. Well, just like today&#8217;s Chicago PMI, and so many other data points recently, this too was released early. What the early release allowed us to promptly calculate is that using the historically revised numbers, and comparing those based on the original methodology, in 2012 alone, the US would have lost a whopping&#8230; 365,000 private jobs! Putting thus number in context, according to the revised methodology, the US has generated only 1.172MM jobs in 2012 through September, or in other words, a statistical &#8220;fix&#8221; magically eliminated over 30% of what the market had previously expected were job gains, a number which the incumbent president has certain taken advantage of on more than one occasions while campaigning. </p></blockquote>
<p></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natasha333</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6449622</link>
		<dc:creator>natasha333</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 18:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6449622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed, Midas.  Nothing must stop The One]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Midas.  Nothing must stop The One</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midas</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6449606</link>
		<dc:creator>Midas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 18:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6449606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no way they&#039;re going to release a report that has numbers that put unemployment at or above 8%.  Simply not going to happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no way they&#8217;re going to release a report that has numbers that put unemployment at or above 8%.  Simply not going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom daschle concerned</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6449429</link>
		<dc:creator>tom daschle concerned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6449429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearly we need an Equalization of Opportunity act.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly we need an Equalization of Opportunity act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeathtotheSwiss</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6449223</link>
		<dc:creator>DeathtotheSwiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6449223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/11/back-to-8-why-the-october-job-number-might-be-a-november-surprise/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Back to 8%?  Why the October unemployment rate might be a November surprise&lt;/a&gt; by James Pethokoukis

&lt;blockquote&gt;There’s little time left in the 2012 presidential campaign for a momentum-shifting “game changer.” But tomorrow’s job report might be just such an event. The major — and somewhat mysterious — drop in the unemployment rate last month, to 7.8% from 8.1%, gave a much-needed political boost to the Obama campaign. On the surface, it showed a labor market suddenly gaining Wolverinesque healing abilities. It also stripped GOPers of great talking point.

But what if the data tomorrow show the September number to be an anomaly? It could happen, says Stephen Oliner, an AEI economist and former Federal Reserve senior adviser:

&lt;em&gt;Payroll employment likely continued to grow slowly in October, posting a gain of about 125,000. In the separate survey of households, I expect the puzzling surge in employment that was reported last month to be followed by a decline in October. Similarly, &lt;strong&gt;I anticipate that the unemployment rate will move back up to 8 percent after the surprising drop in September.&lt;/strong&gt; Overall, the report will portray a labor market that remains weak.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/11/back-to-8-why-the-october-job-number-might-be-a-november-surprise/" rel="nofollow">Back to 8%?  Why the October unemployment rate might be a November surprise</a> by James Pethokoukis</p>
<blockquote><p>There’s little time left in the 2012 presidential campaign for a momentum-shifting “game changer.” But tomorrow’s job report might be just such an event. The major — and somewhat mysterious — drop in the unemployment rate last month, to 7.8% from 8.1%, gave a much-needed political boost to the Obama campaign. On the surface, it showed a labor market suddenly gaining Wolverinesque healing abilities. It also stripped GOPers of great talking point.</p>
<p>But what if the data tomorrow show the September number to be an anomaly? It could happen, says Stephen Oliner, an AEI economist and former Federal Reserve senior adviser:</p>
<p><em>Payroll employment likely continued to grow slowly in October, posting a gain of about 125,000. In the separate survey of households, I expect the puzzling surge in employment that was reported last month to be followed by a decline in October. Similarly, <strong>I anticipate that the unemployment rate will move back up to 8 percent after the surprising drop in September.</strong> Overall, the report will portray a labor market that remains weak.</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riddick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6449202</link>
		<dc:creator>riddick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6449202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[360K number does not include NJ and DC? Add them in and what do you get?

Defense contractors will be laying people off. So will Bank of America, UBS and most others out there. Add in coal companies. And the economy is judged as &quot;improving&quot;? Where, in China?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>360K number does not include NJ and DC? Add them in and what do you get?</p>
<p>Defense contractors will be laying people off. So will Bank of America, UBS and most others out there. Add in coal companies. And the economy is judged as &#8220;improving&#8221;? Where, in China?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The War Planner</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6449026</link>
		<dc:creator>The War Planner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6449026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[..it&#039;s simple really. The more absurd the job numbers/book cooking the more in panic mode the Crapsack campaign is. If we get another Neutron Jack tweet, Romney will run the table.

But the bottom line is that the bad economy is baked in the cake and those of us who fear for our jobs and/or those of us who are out of work/unemployed --all 23 million of us --know who we are and know who is largely responsible.

We all got our old football kneepads and are prepared to crawl across broken glass to dump this pole of shitt. Me? I am putting on my gasoline suit now and will appear at the gates of Hell on 6 November 
--  ready to rumble.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..it&#8217;s simple really. The more absurd the job numbers/book cooking the more in panic mode the Crapsack campaign is. If we get another Neutron Jack tweet, Romney will run the table.</p>
<p>But the bottom line is that the bad economy is baked in the cake and those of us who fear for our jobs and/or those of us who are out of work/unemployed &#8211;all 23 million of us &#8211;know who we are and know who is largely responsible.</p>
<p>We all got our old football kneepads and are prepared to crawl across broken glass to dump this pole of shitt. Me? I am putting on my gasoline suit now and will appear at the gates of Hell on 6 November<br />
&#8211;  ready to rumble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catmman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6449011</link>
		<dc:creator>catmman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6449011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So we added a million jobs in September (snort) and we barely reach 10% of that a month later?

Bet the unemployment number goes down again.  Just because.

They are NOT going to let there be a big jump back up to the 8% range after all the crowing the administration did last month.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we added a million jobs in September (snort) and we barely reach 10% of that a month later?</p>
<p>Bet the unemployment number goes down again.  Just because.</p>
<p>They are NOT going to let there be a big jump back up to the 8% range after all the crowing the administration did last month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandee</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448993</link>
		<dc:creator>sandee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I expect 150,000 and 7.5... Forward baby!

  heaven help us..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect 150,000 and 7.5&#8230; Forward baby!</p>
<p>  heaven help us..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Munford</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448959</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Munford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t even guess what tomorrow&#039;s jobs number will be but it is a lead pipe cinch that it will be a benefit for The Won.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t even guess what tomorrow&#8217;s jobs number will be but it is a lead pipe cinch that it will be a benefit for The Won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: portlandon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448799</link>
		<dc:creator>portlandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Tomorrow&#039;s net job growth number will be ...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;500,000,000,000 new jobs!&quot;

-Uncle Joe Biden]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tomorrow&#8217;s net job growth number will be &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;500,000,000,000 new jobs!&#8221;</p>
<p>-Uncle Joe Biden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bmore</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448720</link>
		<dc:creator>Bmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There must be a lot of jobs out there. The lines to get one of them are so long and all. You know this to be the case. One job offered, hundreds and hundreds of applicants, it&#039;s a ratio thingy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There must be a lot of jobs out there. The lines to get one of them are so long and all. You know this to be the case. One job offered, hundreds and hundreds of applicants, it&#8217;s a ratio thingy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mimzey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448709</link>
		<dc:creator>Mimzey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;natasha333 on November 1, 2012 at 10:43 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Pretty much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>natasha333 on November 1, 2012 at 10:43 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Pretty much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natasha333</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448681</link>
		<dc:creator>natasha333</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are still people out there who voted for Obama in 2008, who know in their hearts that he&#039;s screwed up the past four years but who don&#039;t want to admit &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; are the ones who made a mistake by falling for his hoo-doo BS when they voted for him back then.  So any little move towards re-justifying their badly misplaced faith in him in 2008 may be enough to get them to vote for him again.  That way, they don&#039;t have to feel like suckers -- &quot;See!  See! I &lt;em&gt;knew&lt;/em&gt; he was presidential!!!  Look at him handle the hurricane!  Watch him create non-existent jobs!  Hear him say he will leave &#039;no American behind!&#039;  Golly gee - he &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; be my guy again!!!!  Oh, and I can also reaffirm my lack of racism.  Wheeeee!!!!&quot;  

The only problem with that -- and it&#039;s a whopper -- is that Obama remains as unqualified, incompetent, arrogant, clueless and corrupt as ever and all of that will only be magnified in his second term.

God help us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are still people out there who voted for Obama in 2008, who know in their hearts that he&#8217;s screwed up the past four years but who don&#8217;t want to admit <em>they</em> are the ones who made a mistake by falling for his hoo-doo BS when they voted for him back then.  So any little move towards re-justifying their badly misplaced faith in him in 2008 may be enough to get them to vote for him again.  That way, they don&#8217;t have to feel like suckers &#8212; &#8220;See!  See! I <em>knew</em> he was presidential!!!  Look at him handle the hurricane!  Watch him create non-existent jobs!  Hear him say he will leave &#8216;no American behind!&#8217;  Golly gee &#8211; he <em>can</em> be my guy again!!!!  Oh, and I can also reaffirm my lack of racism.  Wheeeee!!!!&#8221;  </p>
<p>The only problem with that &#8212; and it&#8217;s a whopper &#8212; is that Obama remains as unqualified, incompetent, arrogant, clueless and corrupt as ever and all of that will only be magnified in his second term.</p>
<p>God help us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good Lt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448659</link>
		<dc:creator>Good Lt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Good Grief, did you even read the blog post. Why quote an article with outdated numbers? That number was revised back up to over 110,000 today.

gumbyandpokey on November 1, 2012 at 9:34 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;Your President promised 5% unemployment with his &#039;stimulus&#039; - Bush-level numbers. Also a halved deficit. 

You dolts complained about unemployment levels of 5.5% during the Bush years, calling them too high and repeating the phrase : the worst economy since the Great Depression&quot; throughout the 2004 campaign. 

Any reason why you&#039;re arguing the exact opposite with crappier numbers now besides the fact that you&#039;re a partisan hack who isn&#039;t even aware of what he was saying when the shoe was on the other foot?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Good Grief, did you even read the blog post. Why quote an article with outdated numbers? That number was revised back up to over 110,000 today.</p>
<p>gumbyandpokey on November 1, 2012 at 9:34 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Your President promised 5% unemployment with his &#8216;stimulus&#8217; &#8211; Bush-level numbers. Also a halved deficit. </p>
<p>You dolts complained about unemployment levels of 5.5% during the Bush years, calling them too high and repeating the phrase : the worst economy since the Great Depression&#8221; throughout the 2004 campaign. </p>
<p>Any reason why you&#8217;re arguing the exact opposite with crappier numbers now besides the fact that you&#8217;re a partisan hack who isn&#8217;t even aware of what he was saying when the shoe was on the other foot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickwillie2001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448658</link>
		<dc:creator>slickwillie2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I expect that after the election, the numbers all the way back to August will be revised to worse figures, and it will all be a big joke. On us that is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect that after the election, the numbers all the way back to August will be revised to worse figures, and it will all be a big joke. On us that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mimzey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448654</link>
		<dc:creator>Mimzey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The numbers are bogus.
Why do people still believe there is even a hint of honesty coming from this administration?
Remember the CBO and estimates of Obamacare costs? Just change the way of calculating the numbers. The powers that be changed the definition of &quot;full time&quot; workers to 34? hours. Why?..they can claim that many more &quot;full time&quot; jobs created and it closes the window a bit for employers to sidestep the the Obamacare mandate.
Inflation rate?..eliminate fixed costs for everyone by not counting food, energy etc. Why?..it makes their policies look better and programs like SS etc that are tied to inflation increases see lower adjustments to their checks, leaving more money in the government pot to spend on turtle tunnels and salary and benefit increases for themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers are bogus.<br />
Why do people still believe there is even a hint of honesty coming from this administration?<br />
Remember the CBO and estimates of Obamacare costs? Just change the way of calculating the numbers. The powers that be changed the definition of &#8220;full time&#8221; workers to 34? hours. Why?..they can claim that many more &#8220;full time&#8221; jobs created and it closes the window a bit for employers to sidestep the the Obamacare mandate.<br />
Inflation rate?..eliminate fixed costs for everyone by not counting food, energy etc. Why?..it makes their policies look better and programs like SS etc that are tied to inflation increases see lower adjustments to their checks, leaving more money in the government pot to spend on turtle tunnels and salary and benefit increases for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natasha333</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448647</link>
		<dc:creator>natasha333</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I recall this number to be 200K jobs…not 125K.

Buck_Nekkid on November 1, 2012 at 10:28 AM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think the 125K is to keep up with population growth; the 200-250K is to do that and recover all the jobs that have been lost under King Putt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I recall this number to be 200K jobs…not 125K.</p>
<p>Buck_Nekkid on November 1, 2012 at 10:28 AM </p></blockquote>
<p>I think the 125K is to keep up with population growth; the 200-250K is to do that and recover all the jobs that have been lost under King Putt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobs1196</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448642</link>
		<dc:creator>bobs1196</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I&#039;m not mistaken, Ed has said that at some point the Gallup unemployment number and the BLS number will coincide.

Well, Gallup&#039;s at 7.1. So why shouldn&#039;t we expect a decline tomorrow?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken, Ed has said that at some point the Gallup unemployment number and the BLS number will coincide.</p>
<p>Well, Gallup&#8217;s at 7.1. So why shouldn&#8217;t we expect a decline tomorrow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natasha333</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448640</link>
		<dc:creator>natasha333</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not for one second do I believe that we&#039;ll see any kind of number that damages Obama come out tomorrow.  After all, he&#039;s now in the process of healing the eastern seaboard with the fabulous job he&#039;s doing (thank you for nothing, Gov. Christie) and he&#039;s finally &quot;acting&quot; presidential - acting being the key word.  But apparently &quot;pretending&quot; to be president while not really doing the job is enough for a great number of voters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not for one second do I believe that we&#8217;ll see any kind of number that damages Obama come out tomorrow.  After all, he&#8217;s now in the process of healing the eastern seaboard with the fabulous job he&#8217;s doing (thank you for nothing, Gov. Christie) and he&#8217;s finally &#8220;acting&#8221; presidential &#8211; acting being the key word.  But apparently &#8220;pretending&#8221; to be president while not really doing the job is enough for a great number of voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWalker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448618</link>
		<dc:creator>SWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[6 million new jobs created and a new totally expected unemployment rate of 2.3%..... o_O]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6 million new jobs created and a new totally expected unemployment rate of 2.3%&#8230;.. o_O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck_Nekkid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448599</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck_Nekkid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Generally speaking, the economy has to add 125,000 jobs each month just to keep up with population growth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I recall this number to be 200K jobs...not 125K.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Generally speaking, the economy has to add 125,000 jobs each month just to keep up with population growth.</p></blockquote>
<p>I recall this number to be 200K jobs&#8230;not 125K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justltl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448561</link>
		<dc:creator>justltl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m expecting reports of 500 trillion jobs created or saved.
And Benghazi to be eliminated from any new maps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m expecting reports of 500 trillion jobs created or saved.<br />
And Benghazi to be eliminated from any new maps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOOLAID2</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/01/adp-report-shows-158k-private-sector-jobs-added/comment-page-1/#comment-6448540</link>
		<dc:creator>KOOLAID2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=227389#comment-6448540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...not much being reported on the &quot;correction&quot; of last months numbers...so hey...lets fudge them even more!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;not much being reported on the &#8220;correction&#8221; of last months numbers&#8230;so hey&#8230;lets fudge them even more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>