Dept. of Energy e-mails contradict Obama denials on another green energy failure
posted at 2:01 pm on October 29, 2012 by Mary Katharine Ham
President Obama said Friday the decision to give millions in taxpayer money to a now bankrupt solar company in Colorado “was made by the Department of Energy,” and had “nothing to do with politics.”
But e-mails published by Colorado reporter Todd Shepherd reveal Department of Energy officials pushing the loan to Abound Solar based on pressure from the White House. Complete Colorado has the full e-mail exchanges:
DOE loan executive Jonathan Silver tells DOE credit advisor Jim McCrea, “You better let him know the WH wants to move Abound forward.” It appears to be a mild scolding to a Treasury advisor, Ian Samuels, who is not moving fast enough to schedule calls regarding Abound.
The second page of the email thread makes mention of “…transaction pressure under which we are all now operating…” This entire email thread happened just a few days before President Obama would hail the government-backed loans as a job creator for Colorado.
Abound Solar, which counts major Obama bundler Pat Stryker among its early backers, is now under criminal investigation for misleading investors. It went bankrupt in mid-2012, leaving employees out of work and taxpayers with the bill. The company had gone through $70 million of a federal loan guarantee worth $400 million. It was supposed to create 1,500 permanent jobs, according to the president’s 2010 announcement of the loan.
Upon its closing in June, Rep. Darrell Issa, the head of the House Oversight Committee, suggested Abound’s weak financials at the time of its loan suggested political motivations over taxpayer protection:
As part of its examination of President Obama’s failed green energy agenda and botched loan program, the Oversight Committee spotlighted in January the very real risks to taxpayers from Abound’s weak balance sheet. Abound received a junk credit rating of B, below that of the failed Solyndra
Today, that risk has become a reality, demonstrating yet again that taxpayers pay the price when the Obama Administration makes politically-motivated decisions as part of its failed green energy agenda.
Stryker’s involvement wasn’t the only evidence of political cronyism surrounding Abound, as The Weekly Standard reported in 2010.
The Huffington Post noted at the time that Abound received $3 million from DOE under President George W. Bush, and has been backed by Republican politicians, particularly in Indiana, where the company has another plant.
Here’s President Obama, speaking with local Denver TV reporter Kyle Clark Friday:
KYLE CLARK: In a national address, you touted the stimulus money going to Abound Solar – a Colorado company connected to one of your billionaire fundraisers. Now, as you may know, Abound Solar is out of business and under criminal investigation. The jobs are gone and taxpayers are out about 60 million dollars. How do you answer critics who see Abound Solar as Colorado’s Solyndra – a politically connected clean energy company that went under and took our money with it?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: (Laughs) Well, Kyle, I think that if you look at our record that these loans that are given out by the Department of Energy for clean energy have created jobs all across the country and only about four percent of these loans were going to some very cutting-edge industries that are going to allow us to figure out how to produce energy in a clean, renewable way in the future and create jobs in Colorado and all around the country. And some of them have failed but the vast majority of them are pushing us forward into a clean energy direction. And that’s good for Colorado and good for the country. And these are decisions, by the way, that are made by the Department of Energy, they have nothing to do with politics.
Other DOE e-mails unearthed in October reveal just how risky some officials thought these loans were:
“l really cannot fathom how one figures out whether a loan to a PV manufacturer is being made to one that will survive. Everything about the business argues for the failure of many lf not most of the suppliers.”
The “PV” reference is to photovoltaic solar panel manufacturing technology. Solyndra and Abound Solar both used PV technology.
The writer, a senior DOE official, concludes, “All in all in the solar field, l think it is extremely easy to pick losers and l really do not know how to pick winners.”
No wonder the White House pretends not to know about any of this.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Libs/Dems will NEVER understand the words “unintended consequences”, “irony”, or “hypocrisy”.
dentarthurdent on February 26, 2013 at 4:45 PM
Oooohhhh – and BISHOP!!
dentarthurdent on February 26, 2013 at 4:46 PM
Sounds exactly like what happened to Solyndra.
I don’t think Irony is the word you are looking for here Ed. Words like collusion or conspiracy would appear to be a better fit.
SWalker on February 26, 2013 at 4:48 PM
it gets even better folks one of the VP’s at Abound was a guy named kanjorski ….his uncle was congressman paul e kanjorski ….here’s a little of paulie’s history ….first he was member then ranking member then head of the congressional sub committee tasked with the regulation of fannie and freddie before they craped out ….he was 5′th all time on their money shower …obama was 3′rd all time …. he also manage to get 11,000,000 for a company run by the above nephew ….when they went bankrupt the feds could not find enough equipment or supplies to sell to buy a stamp…. the nephew then wound up out in CO as VP at Abound …. oh and yes of course they are democrats
Aggie95 on February 26, 2013 at 4:55 PM
Progress as perpetrated by progressives is confiscating money from the productive to mal invest with rent seekers and the politically connected with no desire to truly solve or fix any problem while ignoring all unforeseen consequences.
grand.
tom daschle concerned on February 26, 2013 at 4:57 PM
Since when are puppies and sunshine toxic waste?!
Snowblind on February 26, 2013 at 5:01 PM
And of course Abound Solar will hire Abound Solar Clean Up Inc to clean it up, which will bill the Government.
portlandon on February 26, 2013 at 5:03 PM
Oh man, this happened in the beloved Soviet Union, too! Counterrevolutionaries and anti-Soviet agitators, destroying the progress of the Worker’s Utopia!
You see, there were always excuses for failure, never an admission of failure.
I keep posting this, and it just might become a part of America’s Criminal [Excuse] Code:
Article 58
OhEssYouCowboys on February 26, 2013 at 5:04 PM
Cadmium kills people. People are polluters.
Cadmium kills polluters.
Cadmium is good for the earth.
/Libtard
SparkPlug on February 26, 2013 at 5:05 PM
The “green” in green energy refers to the billions of dollars worth of greenbacks that find their way into the bank (and off-shore) accounts of Obama friends and supporters.
It’s good to be king. Especially when the media, which is supposed to hold the king accountable, is so far up the king’s azz that he can spend $1.4 billion of the taxpayers’ dollars every year to keep himself and his family living in a manner that real royalty can only dream about, and pizz away many billions more of taxpayers’ dollars paying off his supporters, and his “watchdogs” in the media do nothing but beg to be the next in line to hump the king’s leg.
AZCoyote on February 26, 2013 at 5:06 PM
Amerika just beeld newer and beeter traktor faktory.
- Commander Transparent
OhEssYouCowboys on February 26, 2013 at 5:07 PM
It’s also a neutron absorber used in the control rods of nuclear power plants. Too bad we’re not building many of those these days or some utility might take it off their hands.
Oldnuke on February 26, 2013 at 5:21 PM
But the jobs cleaning up the toxic waste are still considered “green jobs”, right?
trubble on February 26, 2013 at 5:21 PM
Right now, it is all play or monopoly money to President Obama, many Democrats, and, at least, elements of the Green energy movement. Since the money or guarantees are not coming out of their pockets — in a way that would make the losses painful to them — the consequences, even if it does eventually affect them, will be far down the road and of a personally manageable scale, assuming they foresaw any negative consequences to begin with.
Russ808 on February 26, 2013 at 5:21 PM
Yes, but only qualified union workers may apply. Or, recently released illegals paid under the table cash to do it.
hawkeye54 on February 26, 2013 at 5:34 PM
First and primary goal of diverting tax dollars to alternate energy schemes. And the cleanup consequences? Yet another opportunity to divert more of the “green” to the well connected friends and supporters of King Barry.
hawkeye54 on February 26, 2013 at 5:37 PM
Did the panels hold more than 16ozs?That’s whats important here.
docflash on February 26, 2013 at 5:51 PM
Green energy failures are another area where Romney could have aggressively attacked Obama, but didn’t.
bw222 on February 26, 2013 at 5:54 PM
Just another WINNER selected by The Loser in Chief.
GarandFan on February 26, 2013 at 7:57 PM
Fixed it.
Actually, it’s not a subsidy, either…just one cog in a huge money-laundering operation.
Dr. ZhivBlago on February 26, 2013 at 8:57 PM
Heavy metal contamination, bad.
Nothing says ‘green’ like heavy metals! LMBO
GeeWhiz on February 26, 2013 at 10:16 PM
As is now apparent, GREEN IS THE COLOR OF SEWAGE!!!
Someone needs to make sure that those who take federal funds know what kind of green they are trying to achieve.
And every new “green” project should be required to include budget items for fraud investigators, grand juries, toxic waste clean-up, and extended room and board for the principals in our most secure federal prisons.
landlines on February 26, 2013 at 10:54 PM
Where is Erin Brockovich when we need her?
Steve Z on February 27, 2013 at 10:22 AM