http://www.humanevents.com/2012/10/21/iranian-regime-obama-sent-secret-message-recognizing-our-nuclear-rights/

If this is for real, Obama may have just committed an act of treason.

Thanks for the heads up, Jazz. I never, EVER. click on the NYT. The NYT is a den of scoundrels and traitors to American citizens at home and abroad. I remember that just hours after the atrocity of 9/11, the NYT was right out of the gate pitching the “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom-fighter” meme. And then after that we had their ridiculous obsession with Abu Grahib (how many U.S.-troop endangering articles did they publish on that? — a few thousand?); followed by their fleet of “whistle-blowing” exposes on the tactics that U.S. intelligence services were using to track al Qaeda money transfers both at home in the USA and abroad.

What a GREAT newspaper! They despise everything that America was founded on, along with everything American patriots have fought and died for. … So, yeah, I *never* click on a NYT story. I make a point of it.

The reality is we’ve had direct negotiations with Iran since the 1979 hostage crisis, they’ve all been unofficial, that’s all. So yeah, question the timing.

And also ask yourself: when have sanctions EVER modified the behavior of the mad mullahs? EVER?

What principle of mine that I asserted is that, pray tell?

Bmore on October 21, 2012 at 4:22 PM

I wasn’t talking about your principles.

Bmore on October 21, 2012 at 10:24 AM

Your inability in understanding a principle and applying that principle consistently, which is evident in your questions.

Dante on October 21, 2012 at 2:33 PM

What principle of mine that I asserted is that, pray tell?

I was going to rebuff this sort of stupidity and then realized that it wasn’t worth the time.

DevilsPrinciple on October 21, 2012 at 7:06 AM

The only stupidity here is that our nation can’t decide wether to fish or cut bait on Iran. If we’re not going to stop them from acquiring nukes by force, may I ask what you think is stupid about just admitting that fact openly?

Why would you suggest that I am confused?

Bmore on October 21, 2012 at 10:24 AM

Your inability in understanding a principle and applying that principle consistently, which is evident in your questions.

ShadowsPawn, LOL. You crack me up. Must be a liberal.

Philly on October 21, 2012 at 11:03 AM

Yeah, I’m a liberal, keep thinking that.

Iran may be forced into sham talks and they may even be forced into some faux inspections and if Obama’s the next President both sides with use the opportunity to aggrandize themselves while Iran builds a bomb, and Barack will stroke his ego in public.

What this development portends beyond a desire to perform these theatrics with a willing liberal President, is nothing good, this means they’re close.

(Part of the negotiations will be finding a place for Jimmy Carter as Ambasssador to Iran.)

Dante, if you had knowledge that Iranian agents had infiltrating the borders and were here in this country to plot a attack, would coercive techniques on our governments part against the Iranian government be acceptable then?

Bmore on October 21, 2012 at 12:31 AM

Of course. In this example, we are responding, not intiating. Self defense in response to an attack or threat of imminent attack is perfectly acceptable. What, exactly, are you confused about?

Dante on October 21, 2012 at 12:43 AM

Why would you suggest that I am confused? What do you not understand? What is it that leaves you thinking me confused?