Halperin: So where was the second-term agenda?
posted at 10:01 am on October 17, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
Call this a buzz-kill moment for the Left, especially as it comes on MSNBC, where most of them will flock to bask in the glow of a candidate who bothered to show up for a debate. Time’s Mark Halperin notes what I pointed out on NRA News and the Hugh Hewitt Show last night — that the agenda debate took place entirely in terms of Mitt Romney. Barack Obama never mentioned anything about a second-term agenda, and its MIA status is a big, big problem for an incumbent arguing for a second term:
At least in the first polls taken after the debate, voters weren’t fooled. Obama won a narrow edge on overall performance of two points across these polls, National Journal reports, but Romney won large margins on the issues:
Despite Obama’s slight edge overall, Romney was seen as better able to handle most issues.
The trend was most notable in the CNN poll: he had an 18-point edge among registered voters on the economy (58 percent to Obama’s 40 percent ); a 3-point edge on health care (49 percent to 46 percent); a 7-point edge on taxes (51 percent to 44 percent); and, largest of all, a 23-point edge on the deficit (59 percent to 36 percent).
Obama’s only lead in the CNN poll was a slim one on foreign policy: 2 percent more of the registered voters who watched the debate said he would handle the issue better (49 percent to 47 percent for Romney).
In the CBS poll, 65 percent of respondents also said Romney would handle the economy better after the debate (though that decreased from 71 percent before the debate). Only 34 percent said Obama would handle the economy better, but that was a jump of 7 percentage points.
As I wrote earlier, Obama and his team still believe they can win the election by simply being the anti-Romney — without putting an agenda on the table for voters to see and support. That strategy was doomed to failure in the first debate anyway, but the stark contrast two weeks ago between a very presidential Romney and a disengaged and apathetic Obama magnified that effect and impact. Obama seemed to pretend last night like that never happened, which as Halperin notes could be a fatal flaw in their final three weeks.
Most voters aren’t going to go into voting booths to choose the best debater. They’re going to choose the candidate that they trust more on the issues. Obama lost the first debate by virtual default, and he’s going to lose the election the same way unless he can launch a second-term agenda in less than three weeks.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Bobby Jindal: Paternalistic, big-government liberalism is the biggest loser here

Super Nannies: EU bans olive oils, Germany ponders Autobahn speed limit






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Galt2009 on October 17, 2012 at 12:01 PM
Posted elsewhere:
Why can’t any of the Leftists answer these questions?
Galt2009 on October 17, 2012 at 12:03 PM
These important issues are simply being politicized by Romney. That’s the answer.
However it works out, Romney can survive last night being basically a draw. Obama can’t.
Liam on October 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM
matt – I made a similar point in a previous thread….
I agree with you completely. No way this wasn’t planned. It has setup written all over it.
texasmagnolia on October 17, 2012 at 12:12 PM
Why can’t any of the Leftists answer these questions?
Galt2009 on October 17, 2012 at 12:03 PM
These important issues are simply being politicized by Romney. That’s the answer.
However it works out, Romney can survive last night being basically a draw. Obama can’t.
Liam on October 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM
Yup – that would be their non-answer.
People are noticing that the dear leader is a dear liar.
Why would anyone want to support a liar like that?
Galt2009 on October 17, 2012 at 12:16 PM
One flesh one bone
One true religion
One voice one hope
One real decision
Gimme one light, yeah
Gimme one hope, hey
Just gimme, ah
One man one man
One bar one night
One day hey hey
Just gimme gimme gimme gimme
Fried chicken
J_Crater on October 17, 2012 at 12:50 PM
Well, it’s not like we don’t know what his agenda is. More of the same except without having his hands tied by having to run for office again. The economy will be in the tank, due to the over regulation of industries like energy & medicine. Get more people on the Govt. dole. Over Tax companies, so they won’t hire or invest in America. Why would anyone think he would do anything different?
Update on:How to take on the Enemy media & Win: http://paratisiusa.blogspot.com/2012/09/an-open-letter-to-those-who-should-know.html?spref=tw
God Bless America!
paratisi on October 17, 2012 at 1:16 PM
Well said. Except how is he going to do that? Who is going to buy this new agenda, cooked up in the final weeks of a campaign? The ship has sailed on that. He couldn’t possibly reinvent his campaign at this point. He’s down to “Mitt is evil.” Good luck with that.
MJBrutus on October 17, 2012 at 2:39 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2