Gingrich: Biden’s Benghazi response will “haunt” Obama

posted at 12:01 pm on October 12, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

It takes Newt Gingrich a little while to get his edge in this clip from his appearance on CBS News this morning with former Michigan governor Jennifer Granholm, but when Granholm offers Gingrich an opening, he becomes the quintessential Newt.  Gingrich provides analysis of the debate, noting that Ryan had his first experience on a truly national stage last night against a deeply experienced politician, and offers a fairly balanced perspective on how each succeeded in their strategies.  However, he tells CBS that Biden’s deception on Benghazi will “haunt” Barack Obama in the final three weeks:

Gingrich, who appeared on “CBS This Morning” alongside Democratic former Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, accused the Obama administration of knowingly misleading the American public with regard to the consulate attack in Libya, and argued that Biden continued to propagate falsehoods on the subject last night.

“Biden on Benghazi was so wrong last night it will haunt them,” Gingrich told CTM hosts Norah O’Donnell and Charlie Rose. “The vice president of the United States doubled down on a president who for three weeks misled the American people … The State Department said flatly this week [the violence] never related to the video, it was related to terrorism.”

“As recently as last night the vice president of the United States misinformed the American people for, I presume, political purposes,” he said.

Granholm pushed back against this analysis, stating that voters probably aren’t going to take the Benghazi attack and the administration’s response into account when they vote.  They’ll focus more on economic issues, she tells Gingrich — and she may have been right about that, but then she offered a wide opening for Gingrich to do some dot-connecting:

GRANHOLM: You know, I think in regards to the debate and the election, I don’t think people are going to be voting on Benghazi.  I think they are going to be voting on “who do you trust?” And when Joe Biden looked in the camera and said, “Who do you trust on these issues?”, people felt like he’s right.  Yes, the situation is evolving, and he acknowledged that the situation is evolving, and they’re doing an investigation.  But for this election, what’s most important is how — how are these plans going to help me as a person in this economy.  And those segments on the economy last night were fabulous.

GINGRICH: Let me just say — Governor Granholm just put her finger on a key word.  “Who do you trust?” The Vice President of the United States doubled down on the President, who has for three weeks now methodically misled the American people.

GRANHOLM: That’s not true.

GINGRICH: That is true. The State Department said flatly this week they never thought it related to the video, they always thought it was terrorism.  The State Department said they asked for the security.  The Ambassador’s own diary says that he had asked for the security.  You want to talk about trust?  Having an American ambassodor and three other Americans killed while the President lies to you is a pretty big question.

I wrote before the first debate that Team Romney had to tread carefully on the Benghazi issue, and that it alone wouldn’t make the difference for voters. However, if they can weave it into a larger argument about incompetence and dishonesty that ties together with Obama’s stewardship of the economy, it might bolster a very powerful narrative — and Biden handed Team Romney plenty of ammunition for that strategy.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

let me get my popcorn!!!

GhoulAid on October 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM

Lying liars always lie.

Electrongod on October 12, 2012 at 12:05 PM

However, he tells CBS that Biden’s deception on Benghazi will “haunt” Barack Obama in the final three weeks

Indeed it will. Trick or treat, Barry.

petefrt on October 12, 2012 at 12:05 PM

Newt against Granholm. Seems a bit unfair.

a capella on October 12, 2012 at 12:05 PM

October surprise?

Electrongod on October 12, 2012 at 12:06 PM

May Benghazi destroy Obama/Biden/Hillary.

May Intelligence throw them into oblivion, mocked for ineptness or malicious intent toward the US and her poeple and officials.

Here is the main question to ask – WHY was Stevens in Benghazi that day?

Schadenfreude on October 12, 2012 at 12:06 PM

October surprise?

Electrongod on October 12, 2012 at 12:06 PM

Sure, bombing a few neighborhoods in Benghazi, a few ships in the Hormuz, or some such.

If you then don’t vote for the “CiC in war” you are a “racist”.

They fancy the US population as mainly moronic. I believe this time aruond they are not there yet and the good people will send them packing.

Schadenfreude on October 12, 2012 at 12:08 PM

If Benghazi destroys these oafs it will be the ultimate irony and Schadenfreude.

Schadenfreude on October 12, 2012 at 12:08 PM

If they are still lying about Benghazi… Who can u trust?

southernms on October 12, 2012 at 12:09 PM

Lying or incompetent.

Either way is horrifying.

tru2tx on October 12, 2012 at 12:10 PM

Granholm’s right. Biden’s lies won’t matter and Romney/Ryan won’t dare call them lies.

rrpjr on October 12, 2012 at 12:10 PM

Gingrich: Biden’s Benghazi response will “haunt” Obama

Haunt, no. Obama has no moral compass, dog him is perhaps a better description. And we all know what Obama does to dogs…

Joe Biden, Paul Ryan and Bibi’s “Red Line” time line.

SWalker on October 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM

Yes, it is part of a larger narrative of incompetence and ice-cold blood running through their veins as he trots off to Vegas.

John the Libertarian on October 12, 2012 at 12:12 PM

Terrorism is bad for the economy.

Blake on October 12, 2012 at 12:12 PM

They admit that they are stupid, though I believe this is a lie too.

Schadenfreude on October 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM

Why the H E Double Elle is Granholm on ANY talk show? She ran my state of Michigan into the ground after eight years of disasterous policies.

Seriously, can anyone tell me what her qualifications are?

GadsdenRattlers on October 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM

Granholm? She of the deranged DNC speech in which she channeled Howard Dean? She’s defending Biden’s deranged performance? Sensing a Dem trend here? YARGHHHH!!!

obladioblada on October 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM

The Clintons will vote for Romney.

Schadenfreude on October 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM

I wish I could remember who said it so I could give credit (somebady help me):

People died.

Obama lied.

Biden laughed.

davidk on October 12, 2012 at 12:16 PM

Let’s pretend there WAS a spontaneous protest. What is the ONE day a competant admin would be the most prepared for it?

9/11

GardenGnome on October 12, 2012 at 12:16 PM

Yes, it is part of a larger narrative of incompetence and ice-cold blood running through their veins as he trots off to Vegas.

John the Libertarian on October 12, 2012 at 12:12 PM

And like the Navy Seal, Sean Smith’s, mom crying on Obama’s shoulder and then she said, he just stared off into space.

I’m sure he was just wondering, “how does this effect my election.” The man is evil.

magicbeans on October 12, 2012 at 12:18 PM

Ah Newt. When he’s on he’s on. Nothing like watching him burn down someone’s argument around their ears with complete fearlessness when they serve him up a softball.

Tacitus on October 12, 2012 at 12:19 PM

The Clintons will vote for Romney.

Schadenfreude on October 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM

At this point, the Clinton’s would probably vote for a Ham sandwich…

SWalker on October 12, 2012 at 12:19 PM

Why the H E Double Elle is Granholm on ANY talk show? She ran my state of Michigan into the ground after eight years of disasterous policies.

Seriously, can anyone tell me what her qualifications are?

GadsdenRattlers on October 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM

Have you forgotten the iconic appearance on “The Dating Game”? If that’s not qualification enough, I don’t know what is. /s (Do I really need that?)

totherightofthem on October 12, 2012 at 12:21 PM

The man is evil.

magicbeans on October 12, 2012 at 12:18 PM

It’s helpful to keep in mind that the Progressive movement is the wellspring of eugenics, late-term abortion and the Nazis.

John the Libertarian on October 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM

Granholm’s right. Biden’s lies won’t matter and Romney/Ryan won’t dare call them lies.

rrpjr on October 12, 2012 at 12:10 PM

The third debate will be interesting. If it ever happens. My guess is if Obama loses badly in #2 and/or Obama’s poll numbers remain bad then they’ll find some way to cancel the third debate. If I were Iran or Libya I would be very nervous right now as Obama is looking for a dog that needs wagging.

Happy Nomad on October 12, 2012 at 12:23 PM

If Romney wins, he couldn’t pick a better Press Secretary than Newt.

Old eagle on October 12, 2012 at 12:23 PM

Sure.

Bmore on October 12, 2012 at 12:24 PM

Granholm pushed back against this analysis, stating that voters probably aren’t going to take the Benghazi attack and the administration’s response into account when they vote.

That may be true of your typical uninformed Democrat voter, which I’m sure Grandholm knows well. But people who have been following the story will be thinking about this until Election day.

UltimateBob on October 12, 2012 at 12:25 PM

The Obama Team:

An empty chair and a whoopie cushion.

AubieJon on October 12, 2012 at 12:25 PM

I hope it isn’t too late. If Obama wins, his second term will be engulfed by this scandal the way Nixon’s was with Watergate. And it’s conceivable that it could end the same way, with a President resigning after insurmountable evidence is presented that he lied to the American people and left four great Americans unprotected in the face of known danger.

Democrats are really whistling past the graveyard if they think this will all blow over after the election, or if it doesn’t that it won’t be that bad. This could ruin all of them for a generation, the way Watergate ruined the Republican Party. The Republicans were already in the minority in 1974 but they lost over 20 more House seats and several Senate seats because of Watergate, even after Nixon had resigned.

rockmom on October 12, 2012 at 12:25 PM

CBS will look across the networks- see that no one else is looking at this very hard- and cycle it out of primetime, and let FOX pick away until Nov. 6th.

Nothing to see here, once VP debate discussion cycles out.

FlaMurph on October 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM

Had Bill not been the highlight of the DNC, Hillary would already be under the bus. Bill saved her in the short term, but her political aspirations for the White House will never overcome her shortcomings at State.

So now, it seems, the fall guy will be another potential rival to the Democrat machine, Gen. David Petraeus. This isn’t surprising but if anyone was considering him a potential VP pick in ’16 or ’20, Obama’s people are in the process of terminating that threat.

BKeyser on October 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM

You want to talk about trust? Having an American ambassodor and three other Americans killed while the President lies to you is a pretty big question.

Newt is right….it IS a big question, and if the administration wants to continue their narrative, it will play directly in to “who do you trust”.

Rice and Granholm are just like peas and carrots, parroting the liberal meme.

Rovin on October 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM


Lying or incompetent.

Either way is horrifying

And both together is what we have!

txdoc on October 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM

Is that the Lass of Dating Game fame?

Bmore on October 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM

I half way expected Granholm to go into her World Wrestling routine…was she on sedatives?

d1carter on October 12, 2012 at 12:27 PM

And those segments on the economy last night were fabulous.

Fabulous? Fabulous?

Seriously, fabulous?

JPeterman on October 12, 2012 at 12:29 PM

Rice and Granholm are just like peas and carrots, parroting the liberal meme.

Rovin on October 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM

Peas and carrots protest… Whether you like them or not (I don’t particularly care for either) they are actually good for you. Rice and Granholm are not good for anyone…

SWalker on October 12, 2012 at 12:29 PM

Just for 0. He seems to have a tough time understanding this. Same applies to Joe and most all Dims.

Bmore on October 12, 2012 at 12:30 PM

If I were Iran or Libya I would be very nervous right now as Obama is looking for a dog that needs wagging.

Happy Nomad on October 12, 2012 at 12:23 PM

Then obozo will learn the hard way that you can’t wag a dog and eat it too.

Flange on October 12, 2012 at 12:31 PM

So now, it seems, the fall guy will be another potential rival to the Democrat machine, Gen. David Petraeus. This isn’t surprising but if anyone was considering him a potential VP pick in ’16 or ’20, Obama’s people are in the process of terminating that threat.

BKeyser on October 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM

This is a possible scenario BK, only if Petraeus sits back and lets the administration throw him and the CIA under the proverbial bus. Personally, I don’t see the general sitting back on his heels and taking this BS.

Rovin on October 12, 2012 at 12:31 PM

And like the Navy Seal, Sean Smith’s, mom crying on Obama’s shoulder and then she said, he just stared off into space.
I’m sure he was just wondering, “how does this effect my election.” The man is evil.
magicbeans on October 12, 2012 at 12:18 PM

I liked how she ALSO told Zero “you f’d up !!”

Nice job, Newt.

pambi on October 12, 2012 at 12:31 PM

Why the H E Double Elle is Granholm on ANY talk show? She ran my state of Michigan into the ground after eight years of disasterous policies.

Seriously, can anyone tell me what her qualifications are?

GadsdenRattlers on October 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM

And Obama tapped her to be on his economic transition team after she destroyed MI. It’s almost like he wanted to hurt the economy.

txhsmom on October 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM

The current administration dishonest?

GASP!

GarandFan on October 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM

WH covering up the senseless murders of those 4 in the American Embassy- meh, not such a big deal…..

Peeing on dead battlefield terrorists- now THATs a BFD !!!

Priorities.

FlaMurph on October 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM

I hope it isn’t too late. If Obama wins, his second term will be engulfed by this scandal the way Nixon’s was with Watergate. And it’s conceivable that it could end the same way, with a President resigning after insurmountable evidence is presented that he lied to the American people and left four great Americans unprotected in the face of known danger.

Democrats are really whistling past the graveyard if they think this will all blow over after the election, or if it doesn’t that it won’t be that bad. This could ruin all of them for a generation, the way Watergate ruined the Republican Party. The Republicans were already in the minority in 1974 but they lost over 20 more House seats and several Senate seats because of Watergate, even after Nixon had resigned.

rockmom on October 12, 2012 at 12:25 PM

If Romney wins I expect this to pretty much go away “for the good
of the country”. Isn’t that what they always do? Generally speaking, most of the repubs have seldom shown us any spine.

Amjean on October 12, 2012 at 12:35 PM

Guess they missed another intelligence briefing.

pat on October 12, 2012 at 12:35 PM

You want to talk about trust? Having an American ambassodor and three other Americans killed while the President lies to you is a pretty big question.

Case closed

DaveDief on October 12, 2012 at 12:35 PM

For Mitt’s Press Secretary, someone like the classy, intelligent Tony Snow would be a welcome change.

I would like Newt given some kind of post…like dismantling the Board of Education and Moochelle’s food wars with our kids at school.

Give them back their Cheetos, for Christ sakes. (They’ve even messed with our Cheetos, they don’t taste as good as they used to.)

Typicalwhitewoman on October 12, 2012 at 12:35 PM

I wrote before the first debate that Team Romney had to tread carefully on the Benghazi issue, and that it alone wouldn’t make the difference for voters. However, if they can weave it into a larger argument about incompetence and dishonesty that ties together with Obama’s stewardship of the economy, it might bolster a very powerful narrative — and Biden handed Team Romney plenty of ammunition for that strategy.

So let some of the PACs do the heavy lifting on this. Crossroads has been doing some really strong ads lately. They should hammer this from now until the election. Stevens died, Obama lied, and went on Letterman. BOOM!

smellthecoffee on October 12, 2012 at 12:36 PM

Rice and Granholm are just like peas and carrots, parroting the liberal meme.
Rovin on October 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM
Peas and carrots protest… Whether you like them or not (I don’t particularly care for either) they are actually good for you. Rice and Granholm are not good for anyone…
SWalker on October 12, 2012 at 12:29 PM

Wrong comparison on my part. Should have said Thelma and Louise, since their party insist on going over a cliff.

Rovin on October 12, 2012 at 12:36 PM

Romney should go after Obama by saying he wouldn’t “accuse him of lying (as Obama would him), just of being incompetent”.

Tater Salad on October 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM

SWalker on October 12, 2012 at 12:29 PM

Wrong comparison on my part. Should have said Thelma and Louise, since their party insist on going over a cliff.

Rovin on October 12, 2012 at 12:36 PM

ROTFLMAO… OK, now you have found the perfect analogy… ;)

SWalker on October 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM

Don’t believe a word Carney said.

He makes Goebbels shine. He’s intermarried in the DC clusterfark. May all who are suffocate from what they eat, Obama’s sh*t, which is NOT Beluga caviar.

They all lie and people die.

May Benghazi destroy the Obama cabal, all of it, incl. Hillary. She’s as dumb at 3:00a.m. as Obama.

It will be the ultimate irony and Schadenfreude if Libya will obliterate this circus of an administration.

Shame on you America for allowing such to ‘lead’ you. They lead you into the shame of the world.

Schadenfreude on October 12, 2012 at 12:38 PM

If Romney wins I expect this to pretty much go away “for the good
of the country”. Isn’t that what they always do? Generally speaking, most of the repubs have seldom shown us any spine.

Amjean on October 12, 2012 at 12:35 PM

Generally speaking, most libs have seldom shown us any spine…or intelligence, for that matter.

Just saying, is all.

LizardLips on October 12, 2012 at 12:38 PM

Romney should go after Obama by saying he wouldn’t “accuse him of lying (as Obama would him), just of being incompetent”.

Tater Salad on October 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM

Ahhhh, the ole Reagan “I won’t hold my opponents youth and inexperience against him” eh???

SWalker on October 12, 2012 at 12:38 PM

Ah Newt. When he’s on he’s on. Nothing like watching him burn down someone’s argument around their ears with complete fearlessness when they serve him up a softball.

Tacitus on October 12, 2012 at 12:19 PM

What position should Newt have in the Romney administration?

pseudonominus on October 12, 2012 at 12:43 PM

Wrong comparison on my part. Should have said Thelma and Louise, since their party insist on going over a cliff.

Rovin on October 12, 2012 at 12:36 PM

Got one for that too.

Or if you prefer.

Or.

Bmore on October 12, 2012 at 12:43 PM

Joe claims it was just gross incompetence on the part of the administration and not deceitfulness. I’m inclined to take him at his word on the first half of his argument.

R Square on October 12, 2012 at 12:46 PM

Oh, lookie, the blonde is the psychedelic woman who was given the same hallucinogens (mushrooms??) like Biden before her convention speech…she’s pretty tame in this video though…

jimver on October 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM

Ah, who do you trust?

The Administration: We’ll know when Iran has a nuclear weapon (thanks Joe). But, we don’t know when our own diplomats request more security, or that our own diplomats were murdered in a pre-planned terrorist attack rather than a trumped up story regarding a Youtube clip and a sponateous mob attack at 10 p.m.

parke on October 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM

What position should Newt have in the Romney administration?

pseudonominus on October 12, 2012 at 12:43 PM

Let him make up his own job as long as it involves being on TV a great deal. Secretary of Liberal Media Smackdowns

Mitsouko on October 12, 2012 at 12:49 PM

If Romney wins I expect this to pretty much go away “for the good
of the country”. Isn’t that what they always do? Generally speaking, most of the repubs have seldom shown us any spine.

Amjean on October 12, 2012 at 12:35 PM

You couldn’t be more right. There will be absolutely no follow-up to any of Obama’s illegal ravages. Romney will trip over himself to put all this behind him.

rrpjr on October 12, 2012 at 12:49 PM

The bump in the road turned out to be a andmine.

R Square on October 12, 2012 at 12:49 PM

Oh, lookie, the blonde is the psychedelic woman who was given the same hallucinogens (mushrooms??) like Biden before her convention speech…she’s pretty tame in this video though…

jimver on October 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM

She’s fabulous/

JPeterman on October 12, 2012 at 12:57 PM

HANG IN THERE NEWT…!!!

:)

Seven Percent Solution on October 12, 2012 at 1:04 PM

http://news.yahoo.com/body-language-love-hate-him-joe-080333145–election.html

Yahoo News singing the praises of Biden.

If someone has an account that they can comment on this tripe, it would help influence the debate with these lunchtime people out looking at the news.

Maybe posting some of Newts comments or even using a humorous Obamaphone viewpoint to make the point.

PappyD61 on October 12, 2012 at 1:08 PM

Let Newt make up his own job as long as it involves being on TV a great deal. Secretary of Liberal Media Smackdowns

Mitsouko on October 12, 2012 at 12:49 PM

Why is it that Newt is about the only prominent Republican who will get in there and call the libs on their BS…

pseudonominus on October 12, 2012 at 1:09 PM

tru2tx on October 12, 2012 at 12:10 PM

AND

antisocial on October 12, 2012 at 1:10 PM

I don’t think people are going to be voting on Benghazi.

Wait until Romney demolishes Bams at the foreign policy debate.

PattyJ on October 12, 2012 at 1:24 PM

Why is it that Newt is about the only prominent Republican who will get in there and call the libs on their BS…

pseudonominus on October 12, 2012 at 1:09 PM

Because he’s the Honey Badger.

LoganSix on October 12, 2012 at 1:25 PM

And yet Jennifer Granholm is one of a very few Democrat women who don’t look like a horse pile. Go figure! Certainly not a reason to give her any political credibility, but if I have to listen to a liberal loon, I’d rather that loon looked like her.

Archivarix on October 12, 2012 at 1:30 PM

Notice how the liberals, as Raddatz displayed last night, always try to cut conservatives off when they are about to make a very strong point?

OxyCon on October 12, 2012 at 1:30 PM

Wait until Romney demolishes Bams at the foreign policy debate.

PattyJ on October 12, 2012 at 1:24 PM

Who’s the moderator? Jim Lehrer? No? Oops. Better adjust your expectations.

rrpjr on October 12, 2012 at 1:41 PM

The Obama Team:

An empty chair and a whoopie cushion.

AubieJon on October 12, 2012 at 12:25 PM

Good one, if you can get a whoopee cushion that laughs.

Don L on October 12, 2012 at 1:55 PM

rrpjr – I hope this bimbo babe does that one too. because Obama will lose just like Biden did – the only difference is that Obama doesn’t play the weird old uncle Joe routine with such skill.

Obama needs Romney to get hit by an asteroid – that is all he has left.

Zomcon JEM on October 12, 2012 at 1:59 PM

And yet Jennifer Granholm is one of a very few Democrat women who don’t look like a horse pile. Go figure! Certainly not a reason to give her any political credibility, but if I have to listen to a liberal loon, I’d rather that loon looked like her.

Archivarix on October 12, 2012 at 1:30 PM

It’s hard for me to look at her and not see anything but that mole that’s the size of a bran muffin.

slickwillie2001 on October 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM

If Romney wins, he couldn’t pick a better Press Secretary than Newt.

Old eagle on October 12, 2012 at 12:23 PM

That’s too rich for me to think about! :)

Anti-Control on October 12, 2012 at 2:15 PM

ED: I wrote before the first debate that Team Romney had to tread carefully on the Benghazi issue, and that it alone wouldn’t make the difference for voters. However, if they can weave it into a larger argument about incompetence and dishonesty that ties together with Obama’s stewardship of the economy, it might bolster a very powerful narrative

Ed I think you underestimate what this does to Obama. The Obama cult of Hope and Change is a con as we all know. Once people no longer TRUST the con man then all the other crap that WAS effective from lying about your opponent and strawmen to lying about the results of your own policies falls apart. You want to know WHY Obama’s numbers didn’t move till recently. They didn’t move because there are those who are stubborn to give up the idea that Obama is a different kind of politician.

If Libya blows up in their face these people can FINALLY see that Obama is a deceiver for political ends. That is very big for this election!

Conan on October 12, 2012 at 2:16 PM

What position should Newt have in the Romney administration?

pseudonominus on October 12, 2012 at 12:43 PM

Press secretary? Or is Anne Coulter better suited? (I would make popcorn to watch Anne take on liberal reporters!)

dominigan on October 12, 2012 at 2:18 PM

If Romney wins I expect this to pretty much go away “for the good of the country”. Isn’t that what they always do? Generally speaking, most of the repubs have seldom shown us any spine.

Amjean on October 12, 2012 at 12:35 PM

I don’t.

Can you imagine GWB pulling what Romney did in debate about “Sesame Street”? That was a nice shot across the bow! Romney’s no GWB, and I think he’ll tolerate less BS, and that he’s more serious about altering the landscape of the country.

Anti-Control on October 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM

rrpjr, I think Mitt knows how to handle mischievous children!

PattyJ on October 12, 2012 at 2:34 PM

Is that the Lass of Dating Game fame?

Bmore on October 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM

…yes…but her mole has changed!

.
.
.

HANG IN THERE NEWT…!!!

:)

Seven Percent Solution on October 12, 2012 at 1:04 PM

(:->)
(:->)

KOOLAID2 on October 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM

HANG IN THERE NEWT…!!!

:)

Seven Percent Solution on October 12, 2012 at 1:04 PM

:)

redridinghood on October 12, 2012 at 4:05 PM

Has it already been pointed out by the regular posters here that Newt looks like Captain Kangaroo? Anyone else notice that? Funny how Gingrich has the rep of being quite incisive with his words and “attacks” yet he looks like the friendly guy on PBS kid show from about 35 years ago. Ha! cool.

beselfish on October 12, 2012 at 4:07 PM

Granholm pitched a hanging curve ball and Gingrich knocked it out of the park.

topdog on October 12, 2012 at 4:20 PM

I hope it isn’t too late. If Obama wins, his second term will be engulfed by this scandal the way Nixon’s was with Watergate.
rockmom on October 12, 2012 at 12:25 PM

The Press worked against Nixon.

AesopFan on October 13, 2012 at 12:15 AM

Whoever the male host is, right at the end, when Newt is jackhammering home the point: “But…but…”

Dopenstrange on October 13, 2012 at 11:21 AM