Good news: IMF lowering expectations for global economic growth

posted at 2:41 pm on October 9, 2012 by Erika Johnsen

The International Monetary Fund is yet again lowering everybody’s already-lowered expectations for global economic growth. But, pourquoi?, you may very well ask. That would be because nobody in the developed world at this moment seems fully capable of getting their fiscal act together.

Shockingly, multiple European governments are still failing to meet the deficit-reduction targets they’re required to hit as part of their various agreements with the IMF and other bodies, reports the WSJ. Whoever could’ve seen this coming?

France, Spain and several other euro-zone governments won’t hit budget deficit targets agreed to with European authorities, the International Monetary Fund said Tuesday, setting the stage for a contentious debate over whether the governments should pursue more cuts or allow the targets to slip.

Governments across the European Union have been slashing spending and raising taxes to bring their deficits back in line with the bloc’s budget rules, which call for deficits to remain under 3% of gross domestic product. But anemic growth and recession, partly because of previous rounds of austerity, have made the deficit targets difficult to hit and sparked growing political discontent in many of the EU’s 27 member states.

France, Spain, and Italy are now all set to miss their target deficits in the next couple of years, and the IMF has upwardly revised their springtime projection for Greece’s total debt for this year from 153 percent of GDP to 171 percent. All of this is supposed to beg the question — should the euro-countries be required to stick to their still-not-even-a-real-solution targets, or should everybody just relax the rules and keep merrily skipping down the path of fiscal insolvency?

The world’s largest national economy and its current uncertainty-inducing administration, of course, is also a major offender, via The Hill:

The IMF now anticipates the global economy will grow 3.6 percent in 2013, down 0.3 percent from its July prediction, which was itself a downgrade from the April outlook. It anticipates the U.S. economy will grow 2.1 percent in 2013, a drop of 0.1 percent from July.

However, if Congress fails to avert the fiscal cliff, the tightening that would come from the automatic spending cuts and expiring tax cuts could throw the U.S. into a “full-fledged recession,” the IMF warned. And if that weren’t enough, that downturn would spill over into the global economy, as the blow to confidence would sink stock prices. Financial markets could also take another blow if Congress again pushes up against the brink on raising the debt ceiling, which is expected to be required early in 2013.

The uncertainty of the fiscal cliff’s fate is going to have a huge impact on markets in the near future here, but my real question is this: How is our election still looking so close when Europe’s proffered example — one of the unemployment, stagnation, shrinking incomes, and misery that ensues from huge governments spending too much money on entitlement and social programs — is smacking the rest of the world in the face?

The Office of Management and Budget recently predicted that, due to President Obama’s profligate spending habits, our national debt is projected to reach over 25 trillion dollars by 2022. The trend of our debt growing rapidly while our economic growth piddles along has got to end — we’ve only lasted this long because of the relative strength and hugeness of our economy, but with another four years of President Obama at the helm, we’re pretty much guaranteed to continue drifting through the economic doldrums. The power of Romney’s pro-growth message is practically laughable next to President Obama’s pro-fairness message — leastaways, it would be laughable, if we were making a strong stand against following Europe’s example instead of dithering with more of the same policies.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

KOOLAID2

angrymike on May 23, 2013 at 8:44 PM

Well, that money is going somewhere. Just re-direct to the poor, and Shangrila.

BobMbx on May 23, 2013 at 8:44 PM

Just think what our prices would be going down to if the statists running our country weren’t dedicated to killing coal for electricity generation.

karenhasfreedom on May 23, 2013 at 8:48 PM

Wind Powah!

Del Dolemonte on May 23, 2013 at 8:48 PM

And Japan’s energy cost hike is due to loss of nuclear capacity due to natural disaster — and the need to import energy otherwise. That is a worst case scenario — and Europe is still off the charts with respect to Japan.

65droptop on May 23, 2013 at 8:55 PM

“All leaders are aware that sustainable and affordable energy is key to keeping factories and jobs in Europe,” European President Herman Van Rompuy said.

Why in the hell would I care what a low-grade bank clerk thinks about energy production?

(Google “Low grade bank clerk”)…

JohnGalt23 on May 23, 2013 at 9:00 PM

France is not opposed REALLY for “environmental” reasons. They are opposed because they sell nuclear electricity to everyone else. If Germany and the UK develop shale gas, they will not buy as much French nuclear generated electricity.

crosspatch on May 23, 2013 at 9:03 PM

(Google “Low grade bank clerk”)…

JohnGalt23 on May 23, 2013 at 9:00 PM

Or save time and search “Nigel Farage” on youtube.

65droptop on May 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM

Good, let the Europeans squander their wealth in boondoggle “green” tech.

When the muslems take over, they’ll be conquering a continent with very little usable infrastructure.

Rebar on May 23, 2013 at 9:10 PM

The problem with these ‘renewables’ are that they are anything but. The capital costs of the windmills is enormous while the windmills themselves have never even lasted through the depreciation schedule without recapitalization. Even when manufactured in China. Likewise solar. Solar costs 4 times the kilowatt hour without subsidies, but the panels lose 50% of their electrical generation by years 6-7. Likewise battery storage technology.The infrastructure cost is far more substantial than is generally recognized with transformers necessary to handle the surge load and wear and tear on generators that must maintain a 100% backup capacity.
The only renewable technologies that are proving themselves have done so because they actually work.

Solar Hot Water Heaters
Waste Heat Pumps and Cogeneration
Agriculture waste incineration
Hydroelectric
Nuclear.

Only the latter two lend themselves to grid generation.

pat on May 23, 2013 at 9:18 PM

What a bunch of dumbasses.

forest on May 23, 2013 at 9:24 PM

Dear EU,

Sue Michael Mann, name the DNC and Obama as co-conspirtors.

It was/is fraud easy to win. http://www.wattsupwiththat.com

APACHEWHOKNOWS on May 23, 2013 at 9:30 PM

Sanity pops its head out in EU doesn’t like what it sees.

Slowburn on May 23, 2013 at 9:34 PM

So have the Germans shut down all their nuclear power plants yet? Didn’t Merkel vow to accelerate the phase-out after Japan?

I can’t begin to imagine paying those sorts of prices. Between the high tax rates, gas prices and the costs of electricity – I’m surprised more people aren’t living in cardboard boxes.

Hill60 on May 23, 2013 at 10:07 PM

Europe is such a weird place. All the labor laws that people can’t be fired, and there’s no mobility in the workforce, and they just can’t figure out how to be competitive. It’s not a dynamic place, reading about the travails of the tire factories in France, etc. No wonder the people are so blasé about their professions. They get stuck in the same job for 40 years. I can’t imagine anything worse. They really need to open up and be more dynamic and competitive.

Allahs vulva on May 23, 2013 at 10:14 PM

and yet somehow, it’s the United States that has lately been pretty darn successful at bringing down carbon emissions

Who gives a damn about carbon emissions? They have nothing to do with anything about the climate. Stop playing the lefty lines. Carbon emissions are BULLSH!T. Don’t even bother talking about them. It’s bad enought hat Barky and his retard junta are still trying to strangle us with the global warming mumbo jumbo.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on May 23, 2013 at 10:28 PM

What the Europeans really expected was that the US and Japan would follow them down the yellow brick road and raise our energy prices too. That way they wouldn’t have had any competitive disadvantage.

Steven Den Beste on May 23, 2013 at 10:59 PM

They were DESPERATELY hoping we’d agree to the madness that’s Cap-And-Trade, along with the Kyoto stupidity.

Interestingly, and not reported at all, is that we’re down to 1992 emission levels. NOT because of forcing industry to conform, but by the natural movement by the market to natural gas.

Europe’s only hope is in Eastern Europe, where a Poland or another country doesn’t sign off on this and has shale deposits to develop.

Other than that, they can simply keep complaining.

itsspideyman on May 23, 2013 at 11:02 PM

Them and us.

The liberals have a strict economic view of man when it suits them to show inequality.

The idea that producing more or living in a nation with a budget limit scares them.

The fact that we are hurting our people with DHS and TSA and thousands of agents and soldiers to waste both national and taxpayer treasure is the REAL inconvenient truth for us today. WW II cured Europe of desire for big war plans.

However, Europe never did master cost/benefit analysis but they are about to learn. We know better but keep electing the math and engineering challenged.

Detroit rots, kids are aborted, educations and research projects never finished while both we and Europe mess around on defense with a 14th century culture and shove electric mechanisms into cars before the technology has reasonable environmental benefits.

Europe will get very interesting when they discover they can’t afford to live on engineering which is easily stolen and energy plans which don’t make sense. We have that problem also but have an escape hatch with fossil fuels.

IlikedAUH2O on May 23, 2013 at 11:24 PM

Europe: Well-educated, risk-averse, no ideas.

virgo on May 24, 2013 at 1:50 AM

Cheap energy is what allowed this country to become a superpower. It is hard to believe that the libtards cannot see that cheap engergy = prosperity.

brtex on May 24, 2013 at 9:22 AM

IlikedAUH2O on May 23, 2013 at 11:24 PM
+1

The intellectuals in the western world came to believe they could survive on intellectual property. The Chinese and Koreans have put a big stick in the spokes of that idea.

brtex on May 24, 2013 at 9:25 AM

How much do they pay on average per kilowatt-hour over there, anyway? Consumers, and businesses? The latest deal I signed up for a couple of months ago is 8.1 cents per kWh.

Ward Cleaver on May 24, 2013 at 10:03 AM

What is so freaking irritating is that the US could be in the middle of a massive economic BOOM, instead of the stagnation we’re currently caught in!

So here we have evidence that European countries are looking at the US as a cheaper place to do business because of energy costs. And if it weren’t for the avalanche of rules, regulations and taxes… they would be seriously considering moving here! We could be to Europe what China is to us!

But no… government needs to control every aspect of every aspect and will not untie our hands to compete, and compete well, against the world. Clueless, power-hungry politicians…

dominigan on May 24, 2013 at 10:25 AM

Europe is the Pareto Principle (the 80/20 rule) fully exposed.

80% of the people on the planet are MORONS.
They are in control of the European Union…and many other governments.
They inhabit the UN.

The other 20% are busy learning, inventing and producing to support the 80%.

It won’t last much longer.
The US Government is now completely corrupted…and we know it.
We’re at risk, but so are they.

III/0317

dirtengineer on May 24, 2013 at 11:05 AM

Cheap energy is what allowed this country to become a superpower. It is hard to believe that the libtards cannot see that cheap energy = prosperity.

brtex on May 24, 2013 at 9:22 AM

Actually that’s the problem.

Slowburn on May 24, 2013 at 2:51 PM

My dad got a ground source heat pump… but to be fair to him when I asked:

How much do you save, and how much did it cost

I just wanted to see how one was put in, so I bought one

I think his ROI would be break even in about 100 years. But it’s his money.*

From what I read it might be a worthwhile investment IF you do it BEFORE the house is built (over the lifetime of the house). Otherwise it’s a costly toy.

*Mostly. I think he got a tax credit for some of it; so the green energy policy means some of it was your money.

gekkobear on May 24, 2013 at 4:36 PM