Good news: IMF lowering expectations for global economic growth
posted at 2:41 pm on October 9, 2012 by Erika Johnsen
The International Monetary Fund is yet again lowering everybody’s already-lowered expectations for global economic growth. But, pourquoi?, you may very well ask. That would be because nobody in the developed world at this moment seems fully capable of getting their fiscal act together.
Shockingly, multiple European governments are still failing to meet the deficit-reduction targets they’re required to hit as part of their various agreements with the IMF and other bodies, reports the WSJ. Whoever could’ve seen this coming?
France, Spain and several other euro-zone governments won’t hit budget deficit targets agreed to with European authorities, the International Monetary Fund said Tuesday, setting the stage for a contentious debate over whether the governments should pursue more cuts or allow the targets to slip.
Governments across the European Union have been slashing spending and raising taxes to bring their deficits back in line with the bloc’s budget rules, which call for deficits to remain under 3% of gross domestic product. But anemic growth and recession, partly because of previous rounds of austerity, have made the deficit targets difficult to hit and sparked growing political discontent in many of the EU’s 27 member states.
France, Spain, and Italy are now all set to miss their target deficits in the next couple of years, and the IMF has upwardly revised their springtime projection for Greece’s total debt for this year from 153 percent of GDP to 171 percent. All of this is supposed to beg the question — should the euro-countries be required to stick to their still-not-even-a-real-solution targets, or should everybody just relax the rules and keep merrily skipping down the path of fiscal insolvency?
The world’s largest national economy and its current uncertainty-inducing administration, of course, is also a major offender, via The Hill:
The IMF now anticipates the global economy will grow 3.6 percent in 2013, down 0.3 percent from its July prediction, which was itself a downgrade from the April outlook. It anticipates the U.S. economy will grow 2.1 percent in 2013, a drop of 0.1 percent from July.
However, if Congress fails to avert the fiscal cliff, the tightening that would come from the automatic spending cuts and expiring tax cuts could throw the U.S. into a “full-fledged recession,” the IMF warned. And if that weren’t enough, that downturn would spill over into the global economy, as the blow to confidence would sink stock prices. Financial markets could also take another blow if Congress again pushes up against the brink on raising the debt ceiling, which is expected to be required early in 2013.
The uncertainty of the fiscal cliff’s fate is going to have a huge impact on markets in the near future here, but my real question is this: How is our election still looking so close when Europe’s proffered example — one of the unemployment, stagnation, shrinking incomes, and misery that ensues from huge governments spending too much money on entitlement and social programs — is smacking the rest of the world in the face?
The Office of Management and Budget recently predicted that, due to President Obama’s profligate spending habits, our national debt is projected to reach over 25 trillion dollars by 2022. The trend of our debt growing rapidly while our economic growth piddles along has got to end — we’ve only lasted this long because of the relative strength and hugeness of our economy, but with another four years of President Obama at the helm, we’re pretty much guaranteed to continue drifting through the economic doldrums. The power of Romney’s pro-growth message is practically laughable next to President Obama’s pro-fairness message — leastaways, it would be laughable, if we were making a strong stand against following Europe’s example instead of dithering with more of the same policies.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Bobby Jindal: Paternalistic, big-government liberalism is the biggest loser here

Super Nannies: EU bans olive oils, Germany ponders Autobahn speed limit






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
As I just posted HotairLib has their whole head up their six o clock.
hamradio on May 24, 2013 at 2:43 PM
Who wrote the speech? Or are you just praising the messenger?
mixplix on May 24, 2013 at 2:57 PM
Connect the dots: journolist meeting by invitation only at the White House on, what Tuesday?, “big”speech by Obama on Thursday, lame stream media fawning over speech on Friday. Who would have seen that coming, huh?
parke on May 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM
They need the “war on terror” in order to further erode our Constitutional freedoms and to deflect criticism from the administration’s and Federal government’s ongoing corruption.
They are just trying to massage it so that they don’t offend the Muslims, international Libtards and their own sensibilities anymore than necessary.
A few Muslim terrorists here and there are quite expendable to this Administration despite their sympathies for them. These drone attacks also do much deflect any potential criticism that the Administration is weak in dealing with such matters.
Dr. ZhivBlago on May 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM
MSNBC is nothing but a left wing propaganda machine serving their master, Obama.
rplat on May 24, 2013 at 3:07 PM
I believe that he was officially nominated 10 days after he was sworn in. Wow! The WON really worked long hours that week and a half to earn that POS medal. During those ten days he ordered NO DRONE STRIKES to keep his peaceful record clean.
fred5678 on May 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM
Obama: Don’t worry about that Ben Ghazi guy. I killed Bin Laden, and Bush didn’t!
And Obummer still wants to close Gitmo? Good luck with that–not even Upchuck Schumer was willing to hold trials in New York!
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:24 PM
They just changed the definition of terrorist. They used to be jihadis from the Middle East–now they’re Minutemen in Arizona and Tea Partiers in Ohio.
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM
Erika, sometimes your writing shows signs of rivaling even the Master of Snark himself, Allahpundit. Good work!
KS Rex on May 24, 2013 at 3:45 PM
I love how crazy Al invoked the Nobel Peace Prize in praise of a speech that spoke about dropping bombs on people’s head. Maybe it was the “fewer” bombs than before that raised this to historic levels.
Do they even know or care that they are morons.
marnes on May 24, 2013 at 3:46 PM
His speech made less sense than Bluto’s Animal House Speech and was far less entertaining. Nothing less than base rallying time. Never thought I would say this, but Code Pink was the best part.
DDay on May 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM
Sperling posted this at the Examiner on May 23 about this “historic speech of Obysmal’s:
You see, we are just not working hard enough to “work with the Muslim American community” who are a “fundamental part of the American family.” Watch out, too, because Obysmal is again trying to limit the impact of the Internet.
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:22 PM
That Chris Hayes is a bit of a twink, isn’t he?
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM
Obama apparently gave two speeches yesterday and I watched the other one.
myiq2xu on May 24, 2013 at 5:03 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2