Quotes of the day

posted at 8:01 pm on October 7, 2012 by Allahpundit

Senior Obama campaign adviser Robert Gibbs on Sunday acknowledged that the president was unhappy with his performance in last week’s first debate.

“It’s not rocket science to believe that the president’s disappointed,” Gibbs said, in an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

***

President Barack Obama returns to Los Angeles Sunday for a star-bedecked celebrity concert and fundraising dinner. In the wake of his Denver debate troubles, however, the long scheduled visit has acquired another, equally urgent purpose—reassuring his Hollywood supporters that he’s fighting to win the race and he’s poised for a comeback in the next televised forum with former Gov. Mitt Romney…

“Everyone is in shock,” said one long-time Democratic activist. “No one can understand what happened.”

At the very least, several longtime Obama supporters told THR, the chief executive should expect some directorial notes on how to tailor his performance to television’s split screen. “Everyone with a connection to the president is reaching out to him,” said another veteran Dem. “At the end of the day, the best coach he has is himself.”

***

CBS’s “Face the Nation” host Bob Schieffer kicked off the conversation “with the obvious question — what happened?”

“The president showed up with the intent of answering questions and having a discussion, an honest discussion of where we will go as a country, and Romney showed up to deliver a performance, and he delivered a very good performance,” Axelrod said. “It was completely un-rooted in fact, it was completely un-rooted in the positions he’s taken before and he spent 90 minutes trying to undo two years of campaigning on that stage, but he did it very well.”…

Obama, Axelrod said, “was a little taken aback by the brazenness with which Gov. Romney walked away” from his past positions and his record.

***

Expectations have changed after the greatest audience in the history of presidential debates saw a veritable empty suit — or empty chair — on stage, without a helpful media follow-up question, or a “make no mistake about it” refrain to be had. Over 60 million now expect little at all from their president in the debate, so Obama will benefit from dismal expectations by just showing up as the incumbent and being addressed as “Mr. President.” The pressure on Romney to be even more impressive mounts. The realization that another rant by a liberal commentator could cement the reputation of Obama as an incompetent and add to the image of a hopelessly inept president will temper post-debate media anger. The moderator cannot afford to be laissez-faire in the fashion of Jim Lehrer, and will prove far more partisan. The media pressure to discount the importance of the debates themselves will increase.

But despite all that, the nation has now seen that the conservative critique of Barack Obama — fluff without substance — was frighteningly accurate.

***

The first, and the most dangerous threat to Obama’s re-election, is a critical mass of voters saying this: “Barack Obama, nice man, good father, great that we finally elected an African-American. He tried hard. But you know what? I just want to try something new, even if I don’t know it will work.”

That sentiment is deadly for Obama. As long as Romney didn’t seem like a credible alternative, Obama kept it at bay, even though the economy has stagnated. But Romney reawakened that mood by the confident and crisp way he talked about the mechanics of how jobs are created — through start-ups, small businesses and entrepreneurship — and the catalytic power of markets. His presentation crackled with a freshness and a sense of possibility that was completely missing in Obama’s monotone discussion of health care, deficits and government programs. And where Obama had a chance to talk about how his own green jobs initiative has actually spurred all kinds of innovations and start-ups, he whiffed. (As some have noted, it is too bad the debate rules didn’t allow him to phone a friend.)

***

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus expressed optimism that Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) would do well in Thursday night’s vice presidential debate, but sought to downplay expectations…

“Paul is going to do a great job, but also I think it’s very important that people understand that, people realize that Joe Biden is a gifted orator, is very good at rhetoric, is very relatable,” he added…

“Last week you saw the difference: an unfiltered Mitt Romney, an unfiltered Barack Obama,” he said of the debate. “You saw inspiration, heart, preparedness from Mitt Romney and you saw a president that came in unprepared and uninspiring.”

“You know what, maybe Clint Eastwood was right,” said Priebus.

***

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

***

Click the image to watch.



***

“It was one of the most inept performances by an incumbent president that I’ve ever seen,” said TIME Magazine columnist Joe Klein. He said that Obama’s performance was indicative of his deferential demeanor and his aversion towards public fights. However, Klein said that Obama opted for “unilateral disarmament” in the face of Romney’s attacks on his record.

MSNBC host S.E. Cupp said that her contacts within the Romney campaign see this debate as facilitating a reset of the campaign in three parts. First, they wanted a fight, which they got. Second, the debate ignited the attentions of marginally interested swing voters. Finally, they feel that the debate allowed disaffected Obama voters from 2008 the license to take a second look at Romney.

“They see this as a hat trick moving forward,” said Cupp.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 5 6 7

and Romney showed up to deliver a performance, and he delivered a very good performance,” Axelrod said. “It was completely un-rooted in fact

Lol. WOW! Is this chutzpah, or what? Delivering performances not based in fact is everything President EmptyChair has been about for the last four years!!

RedCrow on October 8, 2012 at 4:56 AM

The realization that another rant by a liberal commentator could cement the reputation of Obama as an incompetent and add to the image of a hopelessly inept president will temper post-debate media anger. The moderator cannot afford to be laissez-faire in the fashion of Jim Lehrer, and will prove far more partisan. The media pressure to discount the importance of the debates themselves will increase.

In other words: President Affirmative Action needs some help. (A lot of help.)

RedCrow on October 8, 2012 at 4:58 AM

The Paper of Idiocy–The New York Times.

Ah!…You morons never fail to amaze me:

Obama kept it at bay, even though the economy has stagnated. But Romney reawakened that mood by the confident and crisp way he talked about the mechanics of how jobs are created — through start-ups, small businesses and entrepreneurship — and the catalytic power of markets.

And, if you guys had an economist on board who knew anything, you’d know that government never creates jobs that grow the economy. Only the private sector can create wealth–and raise-up ALL of the people to better standards of living.

Instead, you coddle the Krugman’s of this world, so sheltered in their hollow cocoons.

And where Obama had a chance to talk about how his own green jobs initiative has actually spurred all kinds of innovations and start-ups, he whiffed.

He “whiffed” because it’s all a lie. Every one of Odumbo’s frivolous tossings has been a Solyndra. Romney ought to ask him (Friedman, you reprobate) if he couldn’t have invested his own GD money in these ludicrous ventures.

RedCrow on October 8, 2012 at 5:13 AM

LOL!

I mentioned Krugman’s difficulty with veracity before I knew he was actually involved…Go figure.

Oh, he’s so earnest in his desire to get to Romney’s “untruths”.

What a f***in’ fool that guy is. How can anyone take him seriously. It never ceases to amaze me. Really, Krugman is as dumb as rocks.

If I read the NYT, I’d stop subscribing just too rid myself of that awful moron.

RedCrow on October 8, 2012 at 5:22 AM

So funny to see Sam Donaldson shuffle his whole career down a filthy gutter (as a democrat shill) for such a lousy president.

Hope you’re proud, Sam.

RedCrow on October 8, 2012 at 5:31 AM

S.E. Cupp ought to have waited for FNC or even CNN to call her.

To go on BSNBC is sad.

(And I liked Cupp. But you can’t expect to be taken seriously while giving credence to a Clown College like MSNBC.)

(Sorry, clowns.)

RedCrow on October 8, 2012 at 5:37 AM

Good Lord, I feel much dumber after watching the MSNBC clip.

Resist, good people!

RedCrow on October 8, 2012 at 5:38 AM

Ok. Nighty-night.

(Please also see my rantings on the last page. I’ve been fortunate to enjoy an “open forum monopoly” for the past hour.)

I commented on almost all of the QOTDs, and I think that they’re all brilliant. Please point out any mistakes.

Smooches!

RedCrow on October 8, 2012 at 5:42 AM

I like this Red Crow fella. Like the way he thinks. Now, of we can just get 51% of the electorate to think likewise…

that, and pre-empt any attempts at voter fraud…

Cleombrotus on October 8, 2012 at 5:52 AM

Morning. Can’t believe I turned on Moaning Shmoe at 0500 and haven’t turned it off by now. Scarborough is suddenly amazed (after he admits he’s looked at every poll, and “the internals”) that anyone ever thought Romney would lose this. Now forget the Banjo Boy about a week ago laughing it was in the bag for Obama.

Schmoe never knows who to support until he knows who’ll win, then of course, he helped.
He’s rather OReillyish in that.

Marcus on October 8, 2012 at 6:32 AM

Schmoe never knows who to support until he knows who’ll win, then of course, he helped.
He’s rather OReillyish in that.

Marcus on October 8, 2012 at 6:32 AM

spot on marcus….

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 6:43 AM

There will be a lot of phonies like Scarborough jumping on the bandwagon, as BenghaziGate heats up, as well as ContributionGate.

My take.

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 6:43 AM

Let’s try that again. My take.

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 6:45 AM

I read a really excellent piece over at pjmedia by Tom Blumer on the on the jobs report and the talk of conspiracy:

While the Establishment Survey has been showing job growth plodding along at a mostly tepid pace, adding an average of 111,000 jobs a month during the past seven months, the Household Survey’s total employment figure has seen month-to-month differences varying from the Establishment Survey by several hundred thousand in both directions. That’s hardly “little change,” Hilda.

Of course, the press couldn’t resist reporting the highly unreliable figure. It made it into the second paragraph at the Associated Press, aka the Administration’s Press, while the Establishment Survey result got mentioned in paragraph 3. The New York Times saved the Household Survey’s 873,000 employment growth figure for a later paragraph, but implausibly claimed that “its credibility was bolstered by an unexpectedly robust rise in consumer confidence.” The confidence reference was to a Gallup poll which, as the Times acknowledged, attributed its rise “almost entirely to increased optimism among Democrats.” In other words, confidence is up because many Obama supporters recognize a duty to say that they’re confident even if they’re not.

To the AP’s credit, it noticed, though not until the 24th paragraph of its report, that most of the Household Survey’s employment pickup was in an unimpressive area: “582,000 more people reported that they were working part-time last month but wanted full-time jobs … the biggest increase in so-called underemployed Americans since February 2009.” This is exactly the kind of result Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney was thinking of when he said on Friday: “This is not what a real recovery looks like.”

Terrye on October 8, 2012 at 6:46 AM

Speaking of ContributionGate, has anything come out yet?

esr1951 on October 8, 2012 at 6:47 AM

esr1951 on October 8, 2012 at 6:47 AM

Not much. The MSM is trying desperately to keep a lid on it.

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 6:50 AM

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 6:45 AM

yepper KJ…

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 6:55 AM

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 6:50 AM

Do you have any details?

esr1951 on October 8, 2012 at 6:55 AM

We must get the Obama illegal foreign contribution story out there and make sure it reaches people beyond the regular partisan news junky types. I want jokes about the Obama illegal foreign contribution scandal on the late night comedy shows and I want the subject brought up before, during and after this week’s VP debate. It needs to become common knowledge that Obama is using illegal foreign campaign contributions to pay for tv ads attempting to assassinate Mitt Romney’s character and distract people from Obama’s disastrous economic record. Barack Obama’s “favorability” rating must take another big hit.

Listen up. We will beat Obama in November, but let’s make sure the result isn’t even close. Let’s not settle for a close win… let’s go for a knockout.

bluegill on October 8, 2012 at 6:56 AM

esr1951 on October 8, 2012 at 6:55 AM

Try this.

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 6:58 AM

the entire moaning joe crew weeping with joy at the jobs numbers and the overall improvement in the economy.

oh goody, those manhattan vacancy rates that reached a 3 year high, must been a mistake or something.

renalin on October 8, 2012 at 7:03 AM

I’ve always said if the numbers start looking dour enough, look for “Chicago guys” to pull the Michelle and the Girls card. If the three of them go on “The View” and the daughters cry, I will consider myself a psychic, better than Jean Dixon ever was, because I predicted that a year ago.

Marcus on October 8, 2012 at 7:04 AM

renalin on October 8, 2012 at 7:03 AM

funny how joe and willie were stunned and said it makes no sense on friday am…now they are joining this bandwagon about the bogus number

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 7:04 AM

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 7:04 AM

No, in the opening half hour Schmoe says you can guarantee in December they’ll say “whoops, this is what we meant…” Mika kept saying “the Republicans are spinning” and Schmoe said “no, Mika, they’re dancing….” He shut her down, lots of liberals probably turned it off instead of us.

Marcus on October 8, 2012 at 7:09 AM

Marcus on October 8, 2012 at 7:09 AM

thanks marcus, I came in during her morning must reads….he said nary a peep about the number

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 7:12 AM

Marcus on October 8, 2012 at 6:32 AM

Thanks for that report and you’re a better man than me Marcus. I cannot watch him. Hard to believe he was fighting as hard as he did in FL in 2000 to support the Bush Administration’s first win.

I do wonder that his motivation in telling his audience Mitt now has a chance, is him sounding the alarm for Donks to get their crap together. Just don’t trust him.

hawkdriver on October 8, 2012 at 7:13 AM

The good news about Joe and the gang, is that they only average 546,000 viewers, per Drudge.

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 7:17 AM

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 7:17 AM

:)

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 7:19 AM

mika not digging about mitt’s foreign policy talk today….

senor is AWESOME going up against her

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 7:20 AM

this looks like an attack doctrine
-mika

lololol, she’s scared

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 7:20 AM

I don’t trust Schmoe either, and don’t even WANT him on our side.

The following windsocks can go where the sun-don’t-shine permanently, because 24 hours before the debates they were practically WORKING for Obama:
Joe Schmoe
Peggy Noonan
David Brooks
Bill Kristol

And I’ve forgiven Peggy Noonan so many times I feel like a battered spouse. No more: out the door on your arse, witch.

Marcus on October 8, 2012 at 7:21 AM

Mitt needs to continue to hammer him today.

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 7:21 AM

Just don’t trust him.

hawkdriver on October 8, 2012 at 7:13 AM

its all about the joe

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 7:22 AM

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 7:21 AM

big time

Marcus on October 8, 2012 at 7:21 AM

agree…watched abc yesterday, mary was all by herself going up against professor dr krugman

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 7:24 AM

the Eagle and Orioles go down, keeping my record perfect. My record of fandom for teams that choke.

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 7:28 AM

this doesn’t bode well cause Romney/Ryan is my team…Caddel says the refs are sacking my quarterback, and calling 70 yard pass interference on my corners.

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 7:38 AM

Mitt takes a fifteen yard penalty cause even though Religious Freedom is important, free birth control is a no-brainer.

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 7:41 AM

Paul Ryan’s field goal attempt far right! (wing social engineering)

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 7:43 AM

I knew Joe Scarborough during his younger days and it was obvious even then that his “support” of Reagan was simply a gimmick to sneak himself into the limelight of the incomparable Ronaldus Magnus.

Maybe different politicians nowadays for Joe to peddle like a discount Bill O’Reilly/ Ted Baxter… but same old Joe.

viking01 on October 8, 2012 at 7:47 AM

joe asks salman rushdie his opinion the mohammed video that “set the middle east on fire”.

i just spit out my cheetos.

renalin on October 8, 2012 at 7:50 AM

bluegill on October 8, 2012 at 6:56 AM

.
Good luck with “Contributiongate” ……..

With an average donation of $53 – it’s all about the little people -

“Why do Romney supporters hate the 47% — the helpless little people? ” /

FlaMurph on October 8, 2012 at 7:51 AM

renalin on October 8, 2012 at 7:50 AM

wtf??????

what an idiot

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 7:53 AM

I’m interested in the donor scandal…maybe it’s my hail mary. That and Benghazi.

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 7:55 AM

joe asks salman rushdie his opinion the mohammed video that “set the middle east on fire”.

i just spit out my cheetos.

renalin on October 8, 2012 at 7:50 AM

.
Did they ask the Fatwahed one for his preview of Weinstein’s Nov 4th debut of his movie ” Obama killed Islam leader Osama been Laden- and we blew his head off and fed him to the fishes” and for his reaction of how well the football spiking theme will go over in AQ land once THIS MOVIE comes out?

Prolly not.

FlaMurph on October 8, 2012 at 8:00 AM

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 7:55 AM

if it comes out today, will the lsm cover that instead of mitt’s foreign policy speech or will they use mitt’s speech as cover for NOT talking about the donor scandal

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 8:01 AM

The future does not belong to those who slander child molesters

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 8:02 AM

If Mitt delivers a hard-hitting Foreign Policy Speech today, the Liberal whining will go on for days.

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 8:04 AM

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 8:01 AM

I’m guessing the latter because it benefits Obama more. Romney makes what they consider the “gaffiest gaffe ever gaffed out loud” – then the felony donor scandal dies quietly beneath the Emperor’s feet.

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 8:06 AM

We’ll see tomorrow in Rasmussen and Gallup how much of a “joke” the American public thinks the 7.8 number is.

gumbyandpokey on October 7, 2012 at 10:29 PM

October 8, 2012
Gallup: Romney ties Obama after scoring historic debate win

Flora Duh on October 8, 2012 at 8:07 AM

Anyone who votes based on a statistical outlier, as in 900,000 jobs in the home survey! that artificially lowers the unemployment rate along with frantic Gov. hires…

is an idiot

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 8:19 AM

I’m interested in the donor scandal…maybe it’s my hail mary. That and Benghazi.

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 7:55 AM

i would add fast and furious. but alas, nothing will be done till after the election.

i’m really starting to dislike boehner.

renalin on October 8, 2012 at 8:20 AM

the Future does not belong to those who vote for Dear Leader, because Chicago Jesus supports the prophet of Islam, pedophilia or not.

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 8:22 AM

You’re probably right slade

cmsinaz on October 8, 2012 at 8:24 AM

Obama fell apart for one reason, liberals. He has nothing to defend, and plenty to be ashamed of–ideology aside–he was merely the scolded school child who got caught doing something bad and was standing in the principal’s office getting read the riot act about the lousy manner he behaved in as he looked hopelessly on the floor.

No one, particularly the GOP, was previously bold enough to overcome the left’s racist game, the sole reason Obama was anointed their torchbearer. No one dared to take the simple risk of overcoming the fear of being called names.

The long awaited confrontation with the powerful, but plastic messiah that the base has been screaming for, finally took place and like the Wicked Witch of the East melted when a bucket of truth was finally splashed on him by Romney. And now, well the little winged flying press-monkeys are huddling, planning their next attack.

Will it matter much? Well, it’s a different and exposed messiah, now that the curtain has been pulled back and the world saw the inept pathetic phony that he is without his binky teleprompter..

Don L on October 8, 2012 at 8:29 AM

Aaaaaaand it begins.

Bombshell: Obama.com Owned by Bundler in Shanghai with Business Ties to Chinese Government

In an explosive report set to send shockwaves through official Washington, the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) President Peter Schweizer report on a new 108-page GAI investigation into the threat of foreign and fraudulent Internet campaign donations in U.S. federal elections.

Breitbart News obtained an advance copy of the bombshell report which reveals that the Obama.com website is not owned by the president’s campaign but rather by Obama bundler Robert Roche, a U.S. citizen living in Shanghai, China. Roche is the chairman of a Chinese infomercial company, Acorn International, with ties to state-controlled banks that allow it to “gain revenue through credit card transactions with Chinese banks.”

There’s more.

The unusual Obama.com website redirects traffic directly to a donation page on the Obama campaign’s official website, my.barackobama.com, which does not require donors tob enter their credit card security code (known as the CVV code), thereby increasing the likelihood of foreign or fraudulent donations. The website is managed by a small web development firm, Wicked Global, in Maine. One of Wicked Global’s employees, Greg Dorr, lists on his LinkedIn page his additional employment with Peace Action Maine and Maine Voices for Palestinian Rights. According to the GAI report, 68 percent of all Internet traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign visitors.

Flora Duh on October 8, 2012 at 8:30 AM

We have three more debates.

Ryan trounces Slow Joe, Mitt scores another two wins. Obama will lose because Capitalism always beats Marxism on stage, and the Wizard of UHHHHHHHHH’s has been exposed. Soaring rhetoric and captivating oratory come from teleprompters – not this Stuttering Clusterfark of a weed scholar. No amount of prep will help him overcome Mitt’s middling intellect, and that’s sad. He’s been reduced to running ads about how Mitt lied at the debate. No one likes a poor loser…ever since Kindergarten in Kenya.

Slade73 on October 8, 2012 at 8:42 AM

Henry KISSINGER. Former secretary of state. Current savant of the state of the world. Do not argue with Mr. Kissinger’s know-how. He already knows how.
Middle East horror. Democratic party dissing Jerusalem. DC’s anti-Israel mentality. Obama, busy raising re-election funds, no time for beleaguered Netanyahu. The Oval Office attitude versus the Red Line. Iran’s oath to destroy our only friend in that part of the world.
Reported to me, Henry Kissinger has stated — and I quote the statement word for word: “In 10 years, there will be no more Israel.”
I repeat: “In 10 years, there will be no more Israel.”

J_Crater on October 8, 2012 at 8:47 AM

Obama will lose because Capitalism always beats Marxism on stage

Period.
End of movie.

Marcus on October 8, 2012 at 8:59 AM

The good news about Joe and the gang, is that they only average 546,000 viewers, per Drudge.

kingsjester on October 8, 2012 at 7:17 AM

…how can they even stay on the air?
…that’s why I say when people talk boycott…they go after mommy!

KOOLAID2 on October 8, 2012 at 9:06 AM

Listen up. We will beat Obama in November, but let’s make sure the result isn’t even close. Let’s not settle for a close win… let’s go for a knockout.
bluegill on October 8, 2012 at 6:56 AM

I will not be satisfied with anything less than jail time. LOOOOOONG jail time.

Cleombrotus on October 8, 2012 at 9:07 AM

renalin on October 8, 2012 at 7:50 AM

What was Rushdie’s reply?

Cleombrotus on October 8, 2012 at 9:13 AM

J_Crater on October 8, 2012 at 8:47 AM

Always important to keep your eyes on Israel. It’s God’s timepiece.

Cleombrotus on October 8, 2012 at 9:18 AM

Flora Duh on October 8, 2012 at 8:30 AM

…gawd I love you!…I used to have to search like crazy to get certain kinds of stories I thought were on the horizon, to see who would report it…now I just wait for Duh !

KOOLAID2 on October 8, 2012 at 9:23 AM

Because I know our FB lobs would never click on Breitbart or Daily Caller link, I just posted this link to the foreign donations law, itself….. stated that the law is clear as a bell. If they read that first, and then they learn of the charges, who knows ??

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/2/14/I/441e

pambi on October 8, 2012 at 9:30 AM

LOL … FB LOBS !!! Sounds goofy enough to be a snark, but a mere typo.
LOL.

pambi on October 8, 2012 at 9:32 AM

The empty chair didn’t waste the effort to prep or to debate the issues because he knows the fix is in for his win. How else could he possibly be tied at 47%. He was at a fund raising event in LA yesterday claiming we had good news Friday, the economy is turning around, the unemployment went down from 10% to 7.8%. The crowd ate it up. Too bad they had to walk home since gas prices have necessarily skyrocketed and stations closed in CA.

Kissmygrits on October 8, 2012 at 9:47 AM

What was Rushdie’s reply?

Cleombrotus on October 8, 2012 at 9:13 AM

at 5:46 joe asks the question. rushdie said freedom of speech should be upheld. he bslapped joe and the fool didn’t even know it.

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/morning-joe/49327108/#49327108

renalin on October 8, 2012 at 10:19 AM

and Romney showed up to deliver a performance, and he delivered a very good performance,” Axelrod said. “It was completely un-rooted in fact

Obama and his gaggle of liberal slobs have lying and obfuscating for nearly four years and now all they have is trash talk and false accusations. His parasitic constituents will continue to follow him blindly but anyone with more than two functioning synapse connections will see him for the phony his is and drop him like a hot potato.

rplat on October 8, 2012 at 10:24 AM

Comment pages: 1 5 6 7