<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Campaign pollster under oath: Of course we spin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blink</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6323480</link>
		<dc:creator>blink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 04:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6323480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;It looks like the polls were a pretty accurate snapshot of the race, as they are now.

gumbyandpokey on October 2, 2012 at 5:09 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

On what basis are you claiming that the polls are a pretty accurate snapshot of the race?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It looks like the polls were a pretty accurate snapshot of the race, as they are now.</p>
<p>gumbyandpokey on October 2, 2012 at 5:09 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>On what basis are you claiming that the polls are a pretty accurate snapshot of the race?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gumbyandpokey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320692</link>
		<dc:creator>gumbyandpokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 21:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Thanks for providing the info that proves my comment to be correct. (When it learns about using links, it will really be hip to the whole internet thingee.)&quot;

Passed no judgement about your statement.  It looks like the polls were a pretty accurate snapshot of the race, as they are now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Thanks for providing the info that proves my comment to be correct. (When it learns about using links, it will really be hip to the whole internet thingee.)&#8221;</p>
<p>Passed no judgement about your statement.  It looks like the polls were a pretty accurate snapshot of the race, as they are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatcat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320576</link>
		<dc:creator>whatcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;“FOX News 10/30-10/31 2004 Kerry +2

For most of that summer Kerry was leading in almost every poll. With an 11% lead in one NBC poll, in fact.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hmmm…

It on October 2, 2012 at 4:32 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks for providing the info that proves my comment to be correct. (When it learns about using links, it will really be hip to the whole internet thingee.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>“FOX News 10/30-10/31 2004 Kerry +2</p>
<p>For most of that summer Kerry was leading in almost every poll. With an 11% lead in one NBC poll, in fact.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmmm…</p>
<p>It on October 2, 2012 at 4:32 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks for providing the info that proves my comment to be correct. (When it learns about using links, it will really be hip to the whole internet thingee.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gumbyandpokey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320550</link>
		<dc:creator>gumbyandpokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;FOX News 10/30-10/31 2004 Kerry +2

For most of that summer Kerry was leading in almost every poll. With an 11% lead in one NBC poll, in fact.&quot;

Hmmm...

Poll	Date	Sample	Bush (R)	Kerry (D)	Spread
Final Results	--	--	50.7	48.3	Bush +2.4
RCP Average	10/27 - 11/1	--	48.9	47.4	Bush +1.5
Marist	11/1 - 11/1	--	49	50	Kerry +1
GW/Battleground	10/31 - 11/1	--	50	46	Bush +4
IBD/TIPP	10/30 - 11/1	--	50.1	48	Bush +2.1
CBS News	10/29 - 11/1	--	49	47	Bush +2
Harris	10/29 - 11/1	--	49	48	Bush +1
FOX News	10/30 - 10/31	--	46	48	Kerry +2
Reuters/Zogby	10/29 - 10/31	--	48	47	Bush +1
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	10/29 - 10/31	--	49	49	Tie
NBC/WSJ	10/29 - 10/31	--	48	47	Bush +1
ABC/Wash Post	10/28 - 10/31	--	49	48	Bush +1
ARG	10/28 - 10/30	--	48	48	Tie
CBS News/NY Times	10/28 - 10/30	--	49	46	Bush +3
Pew Research	10/27 - 10/30	--	51	48	Bush +3
Newsweek	10/27 - 10/29	--	50	44	Bush +6
GW/Battleground	10/25 - 10/28	--	51	46	Bush +5
ICR	10/22 - 10/26	--	48	45	Bush +3
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	10/22 - 10/24	--	51	46	Bush +5
LA Times	10/21 - 10/24	--	48	48	Tie
Newsweek	10/21 - 10/22	--	48	46	Bush +2
Time	10/19 - 10/21	--	51	46	Bush +5
GW/Battleground	10/18 - 10/21	--	49	45	Bush +4
AP-Ipsos	10/18 - 10/20	--	46	49	Kerry +3
Marist	10/17 - 10/19	--	49	48	Bush +1
FOX News	10/17 - 10/18	--	49	42	Bush +7
Pew Research	10/15 - 10/19	--	47	47	Tie
ABC/Wash Post	10/16 - 10/18	--	51	46	Bush +5
NBC/WSJ	10/16 - 10/18	--	48	48	Tie
Harris	10/14 - 10/17	--	49.5	44.5	Bush +5
CBS News/NY Times	10/14 - 10/17	--	47	45	Bush +2
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	10/14 - 10/16	--	52	44	Bush +8
Time	10/14 - 10/15	--	48	47	Bush +1
Newsweek	10/14 - 10/15	--	50	44	Bush +6
GW/Battleground	10/11 - 10/14	--	49	46	Bush +3
ABC/Wash Post	10/11 - 10/13	--	48	48	Tie
Zogby	10/9 - 10/11	--	45	45	Tie
CBS News	10/9 - 10/11	--	48	45	Bush +3
ICR	10/9 - 10/11	--	48	43	Bush +5
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	10/9 - 10/10	--	48	49	Kerry +1
Time	10/6 - 10/7	--	46	45	Bush +1
GW/Battleground	10/3 - 10/7	--	49	46	Bush +3
AP-Ipsos	10/4 - 10/6	--	46	50	Kerry +4
Marist	10/4 - 10/5	--	49	46	Bush +3
FOX News	10/3 - 10/4	--	47	45	Bush +2
ICR	10/1 - 10/5	--	51	45	Bush +6
ARG	10/2 - 10/4	--	46	46	Tie
ABC News/Wash Post	10/1 - 10/3	--	51	46	Bush +5
CBS News/NY Times	10/1 - 10/3	--	47	47	Tie
Zogby	10/1 - 10/3	--	46	43	Bush +3
Pew Research	10/1 - 10/3	--	49	44	Bush +5
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	10/1 - 10/3	--	49	49	Tie
Newsweek	9/30 - 10/2	--	45	47	Kerry +2
Sacred Heart Univ	9/27 - 10/2	--	48	43	Bush +5
Battleground	9/27 - 9/30	--	51	44	Bush +7
LA Times	9/25 - 9/28	--	51	45	Bush +6
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	9/24 - 9/26	--	52	44	Bush +8
IBD/TIPP	9/22 - 9/27	--	45	45	Tie
ABC News/Wash Post	9/23 - 9/26	--	51	45	Bush +6
Pew Research	9/22 - 9/26	--	48	40	Bush +8
Time	9/21 - 9/23	--	48	42	Bush +6
FOX News	9/21 - 9/22	--	46	42	Bush +4
Battleground	9/20 - 9/23	--	50	45	Bush +5
Marist	9/20 - 9/22	--	50	44	Bush +6
CBS News	9/20 - 9/22	--	51	42	Bush +9
AP-Ipsos	9/20 - 9/22	--	52	45	Bush +7
Pew Research	9/17 - 9/21	--	45	42	Bush +3
NBC/WSJ	9/17 - 9/19	--	50	46	Bush +4
Zogby	9/17 - 9/19	--	46	43	Bush +3
IBD/TIPP	9/14 - 9/18	--	45	42	Bush +3
ARG	9/7 - 9/21	--	47	46	Bush +1
CBS News	9/12 - 9/16	--	50	41	Bush +9
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	9/13 - 9/15	--	54	40	Bush +14
Battleground	9/12 - 9/15	--	49	45	Bush +4
Pew Research	9/11 - 9/14	--	47	46	Bush +1
Harris	9/9 - 9/13	--	47	48	Kerry +1
Newsweek	9/9 - 9/10	--	49	43	Bush +6
IBD/TIPP	9/7 - 9/12	--	46	46	Tie
Zogby	9/8 - 9/9	--	46	42	Bush +4
Time	9/7 - 9/9	--	52	41	Bush +11
AP-Ipsos	9/7 - 9/9	--	51	46	Bush +5
FOX News	9/7 - 9/8	--	47	43	Bush +4
ABC News/Wash Post	9/6 - 9/8	--	52	43	Bush +9
Pew Research	9/8 - 9/10	--	54	38	Bush +16
CBS News	9/6 - 9/8	--	49	42	Bush +7
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	9/3 - 9/5	--	52	45	Bush +7
Newsweek	9/2 - 9/3	--	52	41	Bush +11
Time	8/31 - 9/2	--	52	41	Bush +11
Zogby	8/30 - 9/2	--	46	43	Bush +3
ARG	8/30 - 9/1	--	47	47	Tie
ABC News/Wash Post	8/26 - 8/29	--	48	48	Tie
Time	8/24 - 8/26	--	46	44	Bush +2
FOX News	8/24 - 8/25	--	43	44	Kerry +1
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	8/23 - 8/25	--	48	46	Bush +2
NBC/WSJ	8/23 - 8/25	--	47	45	Bush +2
NPR - POS/GQR	8/21 - 8/24	--	43	47	Kerry +4
LA Times	8/21 - 8/24	--	47	44	Bush +3
IBD/TIPP	8/17 - 8/23	--	43	43	Tie
Battleground	8/15 - 8/17	--	43	44	Kerry +1
CBS News	8/15 - 8/18	--	45	46	Kerry +1
Harris	8/10 - 8/15	--	47	47	Tie
Zogby	8/12 - 8/14	--	43	47	Kerry +4
Gallup	8/9 - 8/11	--	48	46	Bush +2
Pew Research	8/5 - 8/10	--	45	47	Kerry +2
Time	8/3 - 8/5	--	43	48	Kerry +5
AP-Ipsos	8/3 - 8/5	--	45	48	Kerry +3
Democracy Corps (D)	8/2 - 8/5	--	44	49	Kerry +5
IBD/TIPP	8/2 - 8/5	--	42	45	Kerry +3
FOX News	8/3 - 8/4	--	43	47	Kerry +4
Marist	7/30 - 8/2	--	47	47	Tie
CBS News	7/31 - 8/1	--	43	48	Kerry +5
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	7/30 - 8/1	--	51	45	Bush +6
ABC News/Wash Post	7/30 - 8/1	--	47	49	Kerry +2
ARG	7/30 - 8/1	--	45	49	Kerry +4
Newsweek	7/29 - 7/30	--	42	49	Kerry +7
ABC News/Wash Post	7/22 - 7/25	--	48	46	Bush +2
IBD/TIPP	7/19 - 7/24	--	42	44	Kerry +2
Time	7/20 - 7/22	--	43	46	Kerry +3
Quinnipiac	7/18 - 7/22	--	43	44	Kerry +1
FOX News	7/20 - 7/21	--	43	44	Kerry +1
NBC/WSJ	7/19 - 7/21	--	47	45	Bush +2
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	7/19 - 7/21	--	46	47	Kerry +1
LA Times	7/17 - 7/21	--	44	46	Kerry +2
Pew Research	7/8 - 7/18	--	44	46	Kerry +2
IBD/TIPP	7/12 - 7/17	--	40	42	Kerry +2
Marist	7/12 - 7/15	--	44	45	Kerry +1
CBS News/NY Times	7/11 - 7/15	--	42	45	Kerry +3
Democracy Corps (D)	7/10 - 7/13	--	45	48	Kerry +3
ABC News/Wash Post	7/8 - 7/11	--	46	46	Tie
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	7/8 - 7/11	--	45	50	Kerry +5
IBD/TIPP	7/6 - 7/10	--	43	47	Kerry +4
Newsweek	7/8 - 7/9	--	44	47	Kerry +3
Time	7/6 - 7/8	--	45	47	Kerry +2
Zogby	7/6 - 7/7	--	45	47	Kerry +2
AP-Ipsos	7/5 - 7/7	--	49	45	Bush +4
NBC/WSJ	7/6 - 7/6	--	41	49	Kerry +8
ARG	7/1 - 7/3	--	44	47	Kerry +3
NBC/WSJ	6/25 - 6/28	--	45	44	Bush +1
CBS News/NY Times	6/23 - 6/27	--	43	42	Bush +1
FOX News	6/22 - 6/23	--	47	40	Bush +7
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	6/21 - 6/23	--	48	47	Bush +1
Battleground	6/20 - 6/23	--	43	41	Bush +2
Gallup	6/9 - 6/30	--	45	44	Bush +1
ABC News/Wash Post	6/17 - 6/20	--	44	48	Kerry +4
IBD/TIPP	6/14 - 6/19	--	44	41	Bush +3
Harris	6/8 - 6/15	--	51	41	Bush +10
IBD/TIPP	6/8 - 6/13	--	43	40	Bush +3
Pew Research	6/3 - 6/13	--	46	42	Bush +4
AP-Ipsos	6/7 - 6/9	--	46	45	Bush +1
FOX News	6/8 - 6/9	--	42	42	Tie
LA Times	6/5 - 6/8	--	42	48	Kerry +6
Gallup	6/3 - 6/6	--	44	50	Kerry +6
IBD/TIPP	6/1 - 6/6	--	43	41	Bush +2
Zogby	6/2 - 6/5	--	42	44	Kerry +2
ARG	6/1 - 6/3	--	45	46	Kerry +1
Quinnipiac	5/18 - 5/24	--	43	42	Bush +1
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	5/21 - 5/23	--	46	47	Kerry +1
InsiderAdvantage	5/21 - 5/22	--	43	43	Tie
ABC News/Wash Post	5/20 - 5/23	--	46	46	Tie
CBS News	5/20 - 5/23	--	41	47	Kerry +6
FOX News	5/18 - 5/19	--	40	40	Tie
IBD/TIPP	5/12 - 5/18	--	42	41	Bush +1
Newsweek	5/13 - 5/14	--	42	43	Kerry +1
Democracy Corps (D)	5/10 - 5/13	--	45	46	Kerry +1
Zogby	5/10 - 5/13	--	42	47	Kerry +5
CNN	5/12 - 5/13	--	44	49	Kerry +5
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	5/7 - 5/9	--	47	45	Bush +2
Pew Research	5/3 - 5/9	--	43	46	Kerry +3
Ayres McHenry	5/3 - 5/6	--	45	41	Bush +4
ARG	5/3 - 5/3	--	44	45	Kerry +1
IBD/TIPP	5/2 - 5/8	--	46	41	Bush +5
AP-Ipsos	5/3 - 5/5	--	46	43	Bush +3
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	5/2 - 5/4	--	47	47	Tie
NBC/WSJ	5/1 - 5/3	--	46	42	Bush +4
Quinnipiac	4/26 - 5/3	--	43	40	Bush +3
Sacred Heart Univ	4/26 - 5/1	--	52	46	Bush +6
CBS News/NY Times	4/23 - 4/27	--	43	41	Bush +2
Marist	4/20 - 4/23	--	47	43	Bush +4
FOX News	4/21 - 4/22	--	42	40	Bush +2
Democracy Corps (D)	4/19 - 4/22	--	47	44	Bush +3
IBD/TIPP	4/14 - 4/19	--	44	40	Bush +4
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	4/16 - 4/18	--	50	44	Bush +6
ABC News/Wash Post	4/15 - 4/18	--	48	43	Bush +5
Zogby	4/15 - 4/17	--	44.7	45.3	Kerry +0.6
Harris	4/8 - 4/15	--	46	43	Bush +3
InsiderAdvantage	4/12 - 4/14	--	37	43	Kerry +6
Newsweek	4/8 - 4/9	--	42	46	Kerry +4
ARG	4/6 - 4/9	--	43	48	Kerry +5
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	4/5 - 4/8	--	47	43	Bush +4
FOX News	4/6 - 4/7	--	43	42	Bush +1
AP-Ipsos	4/5 - 4/7	--	45	44	Bush +1
Zogby	4/1 - 4/4	--	46	45	Bush +1
CBS News	3/30 - 4/1	--	43	48	Kerry +5
IBD/TIPP	3/29 - 4/3	--	43	45	Kerry +2
Battleground	3/28 - 3/31	--	43	39	Bush +4
LA Times	3/27 - 3/30	--	44	47	Kerry +3
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	3/26 - 3/28	--	49	45	Bush +4
Pew Research	3/22 - 3/28	--	44	43	Bush +1
Newsweek	3/25 - 3/26	--	45	43	Bush +2
FOX News	3/23 - 3/24	--	43	42	Bush +1
Quinnipiac	3/16 - 3/22	--	46	40	Bush +6
AP-Ipsos	3/19 - 3/21	--	46	43	Bush +3
Democracy Corps (D)	3/16 - 3/21	--	50	47	Bush +3
InsiderAdvantage	3/18 - 3/19	--	46	41	Bush +5
Zogby	3/17 - 3/19	--	46	46	Tie
Newsweek	3/18 - 3/19	--	45	43	Bush +2
CBS News/NY Times	3/10 - 3/14	--	46	38	Bush +8
ARG	3/9 - 3/11	--	42	48	Kerry +6
IBD/TIPP	3/8 - 3/11	--	45	40	Bush +5
NBC/WSJ	3/6 - 3/8	--	45	43	Bush +2
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	3/5 - 3/7	--	44	50	Kerry +6
ABC News/Wash Post	3/4 - 3/7	--	44	48	Kerry +4
IBD/TIPP	3/1 - 3/7	--	41	44	Kerry +3
FOX News	3/3 - 3/4	--	44	44	Tie
AP-Ipsos	3/1 - 3/3	--	46	45	Bush +1
NPR	2/26 - 9/25	--	47	45	Bush +2
Pew Research	2/24 - 2/29	--	44	48	Kerry +4
CBS News	2/24 - 2/27	--	46	47	Kerry +1
Newsweek	2/19 - 2/20	--	45	48	Kerry +3
FOX News	2/18 - 2/19	--	45	45	Tie
ARG	2/17 - 2/19	--	46	48	Kerry +2
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	2/16 - 2/17	--	43	55	Kerry +12
Rasmussen	2/15 - 2/17	--	48	43	Bush +5
Univ. of Connecticut	2/12 - 2/16	--	45	46	Kerry +1
Pew Research	2/11 - 2/16	--	47	47	Tie
CBS News	2/12 - 2/15	--	43	48	Kerry +5
ABC News/Wash Post	2/10 - 2/11	--	43	52	Kerry +9
Rasmussen	2/8 - 2/10	--	46	45	Bush +1
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	2/6 - 2/8	--	49	48	Bush +1
Time	2/5 - 2/6	--	50	48	Bush +2
Newsweek	2/5 - 2/6	--	45	50	Kerry +5
FOX News	2/4 - 2/5	--	47	43	Bush +4
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	1/29 - 2/1	--	46	53	Kerry +7
Rasmussen	1/29 - 1/31	--	43	46	Kerry +3
Quinnipiac	1/28 - 1/31	--	43	51	Kerry +8
SEARCH BY 2012 RACE

About Us &#124; Contact &#124; Advertise &#124; Privacy Policy         © RealClearPolitics 2012]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;FOX News 10/30-10/31 2004 Kerry +2</p>
<p>For most of that summer Kerry was leading in almost every poll. With an 11% lead in one NBC poll, in fact.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>Poll	Date	Sample	Bush (R)	Kerry (D)	Spread<br />
Final Results	&#8211;	&#8211;	50.7	48.3	Bush +2.4<br />
RCP Average	10/27 &#8211; 11/1	&#8211;	48.9	47.4	Bush +1.5<br />
Marist	11/1 &#8211; 11/1	&#8211;	49	50	Kerry +1<br />
GW/Battleground	10/31 &#8211; 11/1	&#8211;	50	46	Bush +4<br />
IBD/TIPP	10/30 &#8211; 11/1	&#8211;	50.1	48	Bush +2.1<br />
CBS News	10/29 &#8211; 11/1	&#8211;	49	47	Bush +2<br />
Harris	10/29 &#8211; 11/1	&#8211;	49	48	Bush +1<br />
FOX News	10/30 &#8211; 10/31	&#8211;	46	48	Kerry +2<br />
Reuters/Zogby	10/29 &#8211; 10/31	&#8211;	48	47	Bush +1<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	10/29 &#8211; 10/31	&#8211;	49	49	Tie<br />
NBC/WSJ	10/29 &#8211; 10/31	&#8211;	48	47	Bush +1<br />
ABC/Wash Post	10/28 &#8211; 10/31	&#8211;	49	48	Bush +1<br />
ARG	10/28 &#8211; 10/30	&#8211;	48	48	Tie<br />
CBS News/NY Times	10/28 &#8211; 10/30	&#8211;	49	46	Bush +3<br />
Pew Research	10/27 &#8211; 10/30	&#8211;	51	48	Bush +3<br />
Newsweek	10/27 &#8211; 10/29	&#8211;	50	44	Bush +6<br />
GW/Battleground	10/25 &#8211; 10/28	&#8211;	51	46	Bush +5<br />
ICR	10/22 &#8211; 10/26	&#8211;	48	45	Bush +3<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	10/22 &#8211; 10/24	&#8211;	51	46	Bush +5<br />
LA Times	10/21 &#8211; 10/24	&#8211;	48	48	Tie<br />
Newsweek	10/21 &#8211; 10/22	&#8211;	48	46	Bush +2<br />
Time	10/19 &#8211; 10/21	&#8211;	51	46	Bush +5<br />
GW/Battleground	10/18 &#8211; 10/21	&#8211;	49	45	Bush +4<br />
AP-Ipsos	10/18 &#8211; 10/20	&#8211;	46	49	Kerry +3<br />
Marist	10/17 &#8211; 10/19	&#8211;	49	48	Bush +1<br />
FOX News	10/17 &#8211; 10/18	&#8211;	49	42	Bush +7<br />
Pew Research	10/15 &#8211; 10/19	&#8211;	47	47	Tie<br />
ABC/Wash Post	10/16 &#8211; 10/18	&#8211;	51	46	Bush +5<br />
NBC/WSJ	10/16 &#8211; 10/18	&#8211;	48	48	Tie<br />
Harris	10/14 &#8211; 10/17	&#8211;	49.5	44.5	Bush +5<br />
CBS News/NY Times	10/14 &#8211; 10/17	&#8211;	47	45	Bush +2<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	10/14 &#8211; 10/16	&#8211;	52	44	Bush +8<br />
Time	10/14 &#8211; 10/15	&#8211;	48	47	Bush +1<br />
Newsweek	10/14 &#8211; 10/15	&#8211;	50	44	Bush +6<br />
GW/Battleground	10/11 &#8211; 10/14	&#8211;	49	46	Bush +3<br />
ABC/Wash Post	10/11 &#8211; 10/13	&#8211;	48	48	Tie<br />
Zogby	10/9 &#8211; 10/11	&#8211;	45	45	Tie<br />
CBS News	10/9 &#8211; 10/11	&#8211;	48	45	Bush +3<br />
ICR	10/9 &#8211; 10/11	&#8211;	48	43	Bush +5<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	10/9 &#8211; 10/10	&#8211;	48	49	Kerry +1<br />
Time	10/6 &#8211; 10/7	&#8211;	46	45	Bush +1<br />
GW/Battleground	10/3 &#8211; 10/7	&#8211;	49	46	Bush +3<br />
AP-Ipsos	10/4 &#8211; 10/6	&#8211;	46	50	Kerry +4<br />
Marist	10/4 &#8211; 10/5	&#8211;	49	46	Bush +3<br />
FOX News	10/3 &#8211; 10/4	&#8211;	47	45	Bush +2<br />
ICR	10/1 &#8211; 10/5	&#8211;	51	45	Bush +6<br />
ARG	10/2 &#8211; 10/4	&#8211;	46	46	Tie<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	10/1 &#8211; 10/3	&#8211;	51	46	Bush +5<br />
CBS News/NY Times	10/1 &#8211; 10/3	&#8211;	47	47	Tie<br />
Zogby	10/1 &#8211; 10/3	&#8211;	46	43	Bush +3<br />
Pew Research	10/1 &#8211; 10/3	&#8211;	49	44	Bush +5<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	10/1 &#8211; 10/3	&#8211;	49	49	Tie<br />
Newsweek	9/30 &#8211; 10/2	&#8211;	45	47	Kerry +2<br />
Sacred Heart Univ	9/27 &#8211; 10/2	&#8211;	48	43	Bush +5<br />
Battleground	9/27 &#8211; 9/30	&#8211;	51	44	Bush +7<br />
LA Times	9/25 &#8211; 9/28	&#8211;	51	45	Bush +6<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	9/24 &#8211; 9/26	&#8211;	52	44	Bush +8<br />
IBD/TIPP	9/22 &#8211; 9/27	&#8211;	45	45	Tie<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	9/23 &#8211; 9/26	&#8211;	51	45	Bush +6<br />
Pew Research	9/22 &#8211; 9/26	&#8211;	48	40	Bush +8<br />
Time	9/21 &#8211; 9/23	&#8211;	48	42	Bush +6<br />
FOX News	9/21 &#8211; 9/22	&#8211;	46	42	Bush +4<br />
Battleground	9/20 &#8211; 9/23	&#8211;	50	45	Bush +5<br />
Marist	9/20 &#8211; 9/22	&#8211;	50	44	Bush +6<br />
CBS News	9/20 &#8211; 9/22	&#8211;	51	42	Bush +9<br />
AP-Ipsos	9/20 &#8211; 9/22	&#8211;	52	45	Bush +7<br />
Pew Research	9/17 &#8211; 9/21	&#8211;	45	42	Bush +3<br />
NBC/WSJ	9/17 &#8211; 9/19	&#8211;	50	46	Bush +4<br />
Zogby	9/17 &#8211; 9/19	&#8211;	46	43	Bush +3<br />
IBD/TIPP	9/14 &#8211; 9/18	&#8211;	45	42	Bush +3<br />
ARG	9/7 &#8211; 9/21	&#8211;	47	46	Bush +1<br />
CBS News	9/12 &#8211; 9/16	&#8211;	50	41	Bush +9<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	9/13 &#8211; 9/15	&#8211;	54	40	Bush +14<br />
Battleground	9/12 &#8211; 9/15	&#8211;	49	45	Bush +4<br />
Pew Research	9/11 &#8211; 9/14	&#8211;	47	46	Bush +1<br />
Harris	9/9 &#8211; 9/13	&#8211;	47	48	Kerry +1<br />
Newsweek	9/9 &#8211; 9/10	&#8211;	49	43	Bush +6<br />
IBD/TIPP	9/7 &#8211; 9/12	&#8211;	46	46	Tie<br />
Zogby	9/8 &#8211; 9/9	&#8211;	46	42	Bush +4<br />
Time	9/7 &#8211; 9/9	&#8211;	52	41	Bush +11<br />
AP-Ipsos	9/7 &#8211; 9/9	&#8211;	51	46	Bush +5<br />
FOX News	9/7 &#8211; 9/8	&#8211;	47	43	Bush +4<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	9/6 &#8211; 9/8	&#8211;	52	43	Bush +9<br />
Pew Research	9/8 &#8211; 9/10	&#8211;	54	38	Bush +16<br />
CBS News	9/6 &#8211; 9/8	&#8211;	49	42	Bush +7<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	9/3 &#8211; 9/5	&#8211;	52	45	Bush +7<br />
Newsweek	9/2 &#8211; 9/3	&#8211;	52	41	Bush +11<br />
Time	8/31 &#8211; 9/2	&#8211;	52	41	Bush +11<br />
Zogby	8/30 &#8211; 9/2	&#8211;	46	43	Bush +3<br />
ARG	8/30 &#8211; 9/1	&#8211;	47	47	Tie<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	8/26 &#8211; 8/29	&#8211;	48	48	Tie<br />
Time	8/24 &#8211; 8/26	&#8211;	46	44	Bush +2<br />
FOX News	8/24 &#8211; 8/25	&#8211;	43	44	Kerry +1<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	8/23 &#8211; 8/25	&#8211;	48	46	Bush +2<br />
NBC/WSJ	8/23 &#8211; 8/25	&#8211;	47	45	Bush +2<br />
NPR &#8211; POS/GQR	8/21 &#8211; 8/24	&#8211;	43	47	Kerry +4<br />
LA Times	8/21 &#8211; 8/24	&#8211;	47	44	Bush +3<br />
IBD/TIPP	8/17 &#8211; 8/23	&#8211;	43	43	Tie<br />
Battleground	8/15 &#8211; 8/17	&#8211;	43	44	Kerry +1<br />
CBS News	8/15 &#8211; 8/18	&#8211;	45	46	Kerry +1<br />
Harris	8/10 &#8211; 8/15	&#8211;	47	47	Tie<br />
Zogby	8/12 &#8211; 8/14	&#8211;	43	47	Kerry +4<br />
Gallup	8/9 &#8211; 8/11	&#8211;	48	46	Bush +2<br />
Pew Research	8/5 &#8211; 8/10	&#8211;	45	47	Kerry +2<br />
Time	8/3 &#8211; 8/5	&#8211;	43	48	Kerry +5<br />
AP-Ipsos	8/3 &#8211; 8/5	&#8211;	45	48	Kerry +3<br />
Democracy Corps (D)	8/2 &#8211; 8/5	&#8211;	44	49	Kerry +5<br />
IBD/TIPP	8/2 &#8211; 8/5	&#8211;	42	45	Kerry +3<br />
FOX News	8/3 &#8211; 8/4	&#8211;	43	47	Kerry +4<br />
Marist	7/30 &#8211; 8/2	&#8211;	47	47	Tie<br />
CBS News	7/31 &#8211; 8/1	&#8211;	43	48	Kerry +5<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	7/30 &#8211; 8/1	&#8211;	51	45	Bush +6<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	7/30 &#8211; 8/1	&#8211;	47	49	Kerry +2<br />
ARG	7/30 &#8211; 8/1	&#8211;	45	49	Kerry +4<br />
Newsweek	7/29 &#8211; 7/30	&#8211;	42	49	Kerry +7<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	7/22 &#8211; 7/25	&#8211;	48	46	Bush +2<br />
IBD/TIPP	7/19 &#8211; 7/24	&#8211;	42	44	Kerry +2<br />
Time	7/20 &#8211; 7/22	&#8211;	43	46	Kerry +3<br />
Quinnipiac	7/18 &#8211; 7/22	&#8211;	43	44	Kerry +1<br />
FOX News	7/20 &#8211; 7/21	&#8211;	43	44	Kerry +1<br />
NBC/WSJ	7/19 &#8211; 7/21	&#8211;	47	45	Bush +2<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	7/19 &#8211; 7/21	&#8211;	46	47	Kerry +1<br />
LA Times	7/17 &#8211; 7/21	&#8211;	44	46	Kerry +2<br />
Pew Research	7/8 &#8211; 7/18	&#8211;	44	46	Kerry +2<br />
IBD/TIPP	7/12 &#8211; 7/17	&#8211;	40	42	Kerry +2<br />
Marist	7/12 &#8211; 7/15	&#8211;	44	45	Kerry +1<br />
CBS News/NY Times	7/11 &#8211; 7/15	&#8211;	42	45	Kerry +3<br />
Democracy Corps (D)	7/10 &#8211; 7/13	&#8211;	45	48	Kerry +3<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	7/8 &#8211; 7/11	&#8211;	46	46	Tie<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	7/8 &#8211; 7/11	&#8211;	45	50	Kerry +5<br />
IBD/TIPP	7/6 &#8211; 7/10	&#8211;	43	47	Kerry +4<br />
Newsweek	7/8 &#8211; 7/9	&#8211;	44	47	Kerry +3<br />
Time	7/6 &#8211; 7/8	&#8211;	45	47	Kerry +2<br />
Zogby	7/6 &#8211; 7/7	&#8211;	45	47	Kerry +2<br />
AP-Ipsos	7/5 &#8211; 7/7	&#8211;	49	45	Bush +4<br />
NBC/WSJ	7/6 &#8211; 7/6	&#8211;	41	49	Kerry +8<br />
ARG	7/1 &#8211; 7/3	&#8211;	44	47	Kerry +3<br />
NBC/WSJ	6/25 &#8211; 6/28	&#8211;	45	44	Bush +1<br />
CBS News/NY Times	6/23 &#8211; 6/27	&#8211;	43	42	Bush +1<br />
FOX News	6/22 &#8211; 6/23	&#8211;	47	40	Bush +7<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	6/21 &#8211; 6/23	&#8211;	48	47	Bush +1<br />
Battleground	6/20 &#8211; 6/23	&#8211;	43	41	Bush +2<br />
Gallup	6/9 &#8211; 6/30	&#8211;	45	44	Bush +1<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	6/17 &#8211; 6/20	&#8211;	44	48	Kerry +4<br />
IBD/TIPP	6/14 &#8211; 6/19	&#8211;	44	41	Bush +3<br />
Harris	6/8 &#8211; 6/15	&#8211;	51	41	Bush +10<br />
IBD/TIPP	6/8 &#8211; 6/13	&#8211;	43	40	Bush +3<br />
Pew Research	6/3 &#8211; 6/13	&#8211;	46	42	Bush +4<br />
AP-Ipsos	6/7 &#8211; 6/9	&#8211;	46	45	Bush +1<br />
FOX News	6/8 &#8211; 6/9	&#8211;	42	42	Tie<br />
LA Times	6/5 &#8211; 6/8	&#8211;	42	48	Kerry +6<br />
Gallup	6/3 &#8211; 6/6	&#8211;	44	50	Kerry +6<br />
IBD/TIPP	6/1 &#8211; 6/6	&#8211;	43	41	Bush +2<br />
Zogby	6/2 &#8211; 6/5	&#8211;	42	44	Kerry +2<br />
ARG	6/1 &#8211; 6/3	&#8211;	45	46	Kerry +1<br />
Quinnipiac	5/18 &#8211; 5/24	&#8211;	43	42	Bush +1<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	5/21 &#8211; 5/23	&#8211;	46	47	Kerry +1<br />
InsiderAdvantage	5/21 &#8211; 5/22	&#8211;	43	43	Tie<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	5/20 &#8211; 5/23	&#8211;	46	46	Tie<br />
CBS News	5/20 &#8211; 5/23	&#8211;	41	47	Kerry +6<br />
FOX News	5/18 &#8211; 5/19	&#8211;	40	40	Tie<br />
IBD/TIPP	5/12 &#8211; 5/18	&#8211;	42	41	Bush +1<br />
Newsweek	5/13 &#8211; 5/14	&#8211;	42	43	Kerry +1<br />
Democracy Corps (D)	5/10 &#8211; 5/13	&#8211;	45	46	Kerry +1<br />
Zogby	5/10 &#8211; 5/13	&#8211;	42	47	Kerry +5<br />
CNN	5/12 &#8211; 5/13	&#8211;	44	49	Kerry +5<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	5/7 &#8211; 5/9	&#8211;	47	45	Bush +2<br />
Pew Research	5/3 &#8211; 5/9	&#8211;	43	46	Kerry +3<br />
Ayres McHenry	5/3 &#8211; 5/6	&#8211;	45	41	Bush +4<br />
ARG	5/3 &#8211; 5/3	&#8211;	44	45	Kerry +1<br />
IBD/TIPP	5/2 &#8211; 5/8	&#8211;	46	41	Bush +5<br />
AP-Ipsos	5/3 &#8211; 5/5	&#8211;	46	43	Bush +3<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	5/2 &#8211; 5/4	&#8211;	47	47	Tie<br />
NBC/WSJ	5/1 &#8211; 5/3	&#8211;	46	42	Bush +4<br />
Quinnipiac	4/26 &#8211; 5/3	&#8211;	43	40	Bush +3<br />
Sacred Heart Univ	4/26 &#8211; 5/1	&#8211;	52	46	Bush +6<br />
CBS News/NY Times	4/23 &#8211; 4/27	&#8211;	43	41	Bush +2<br />
Marist	4/20 &#8211; 4/23	&#8211;	47	43	Bush +4<br />
FOX News	4/21 &#8211; 4/22	&#8211;	42	40	Bush +2<br />
Democracy Corps (D)	4/19 &#8211; 4/22	&#8211;	47	44	Bush +3<br />
IBD/TIPP	4/14 &#8211; 4/19	&#8211;	44	40	Bush +4<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	4/16 &#8211; 4/18	&#8211;	50	44	Bush +6<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	4/15 &#8211; 4/18	&#8211;	48	43	Bush +5<br />
Zogby	4/15 &#8211; 4/17	&#8211;	44.7	45.3	Kerry +0.6<br />
Harris	4/8 &#8211; 4/15	&#8211;	46	43	Bush +3<br />
InsiderAdvantage	4/12 &#8211; 4/14	&#8211;	37	43	Kerry +6<br />
Newsweek	4/8 &#8211; 4/9	&#8211;	42	46	Kerry +4<br />
ARG	4/6 &#8211; 4/9	&#8211;	43	48	Kerry +5<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	4/5 &#8211; 4/8	&#8211;	47	43	Bush +4<br />
FOX News	4/6 &#8211; 4/7	&#8211;	43	42	Bush +1<br />
AP-Ipsos	4/5 &#8211; 4/7	&#8211;	45	44	Bush +1<br />
Zogby	4/1 &#8211; 4/4	&#8211;	46	45	Bush +1<br />
CBS News	3/30 &#8211; 4/1	&#8211;	43	48	Kerry +5<br />
IBD/TIPP	3/29 &#8211; 4/3	&#8211;	43	45	Kerry +2<br />
Battleground	3/28 &#8211; 3/31	&#8211;	43	39	Bush +4<br />
LA Times	3/27 &#8211; 3/30	&#8211;	44	47	Kerry +3<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	3/26 &#8211; 3/28	&#8211;	49	45	Bush +4<br />
Pew Research	3/22 &#8211; 3/28	&#8211;	44	43	Bush +1<br />
Newsweek	3/25 &#8211; 3/26	&#8211;	45	43	Bush +2<br />
FOX News	3/23 &#8211; 3/24	&#8211;	43	42	Bush +1<br />
Quinnipiac	3/16 &#8211; 3/22	&#8211;	46	40	Bush +6<br />
AP-Ipsos	3/19 &#8211; 3/21	&#8211;	46	43	Bush +3<br />
Democracy Corps (D)	3/16 &#8211; 3/21	&#8211;	50	47	Bush +3<br />
InsiderAdvantage	3/18 &#8211; 3/19	&#8211;	46	41	Bush +5<br />
Zogby	3/17 &#8211; 3/19	&#8211;	46	46	Tie<br />
Newsweek	3/18 &#8211; 3/19	&#8211;	45	43	Bush +2<br />
CBS News/NY Times	3/10 &#8211; 3/14	&#8211;	46	38	Bush +8<br />
ARG	3/9 &#8211; 3/11	&#8211;	42	48	Kerry +6<br />
IBD/TIPP	3/8 &#8211; 3/11	&#8211;	45	40	Bush +5<br />
NBC/WSJ	3/6 &#8211; 3/8	&#8211;	45	43	Bush +2<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	3/5 &#8211; 3/7	&#8211;	44	50	Kerry +6<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	3/4 &#8211; 3/7	&#8211;	44	48	Kerry +4<br />
IBD/TIPP	3/1 &#8211; 3/7	&#8211;	41	44	Kerry +3<br />
FOX News	3/3 &#8211; 3/4	&#8211;	44	44	Tie<br />
AP-Ipsos	3/1 &#8211; 3/3	&#8211;	46	45	Bush +1<br />
NPR	2/26 &#8211; 9/25	&#8211;	47	45	Bush +2<br />
Pew Research	2/24 &#8211; 2/29	&#8211;	44	48	Kerry +4<br />
CBS News	2/24 &#8211; 2/27	&#8211;	46	47	Kerry +1<br />
Newsweek	2/19 &#8211; 2/20	&#8211;	45	48	Kerry +3<br />
FOX News	2/18 &#8211; 2/19	&#8211;	45	45	Tie<br />
ARG	2/17 &#8211; 2/19	&#8211;	46	48	Kerry +2<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	2/16 &#8211; 2/17	&#8211;	43	55	Kerry +12<br />
Rasmussen	2/15 &#8211; 2/17	&#8211;	48	43	Bush +5<br />
Univ. of Connecticut	2/12 &#8211; 2/16	&#8211;	45	46	Kerry +1<br />
Pew Research	2/11 &#8211; 2/16	&#8211;	47	47	Tie<br />
CBS News	2/12 &#8211; 2/15	&#8211;	43	48	Kerry +5<br />
ABC News/Wash Post	2/10 &#8211; 2/11	&#8211;	43	52	Kerry +9<br />
Rasmussen	2/8 &#8211; 2/10	&#8211;	46	45	Bush +1<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	2/6 &#8211; 2/8	&#8211;	49	48	Bush +1<br />
Time	2/5 &#8211; 2/6	&#8211;	50	48	Bush +2<br />
Newsweek	2/5 &#8211; 2/6	&#8211;	45	50	Kerry +5<br />
FOX News	2/4 &#8211; 2/5	&#8211;	47	43	Bush +4<br />
CNN/USA Today/Gallup	1/29 &#8211; 2/1	&#8211;	46	53	Kerry +7<br />
Rasmussen	1/29 &#8211; 1/31	&#8211;	43	46	Kerry +3<br />
Quinnipiac	1/28 &#8211; 1/31	&#8211;	43	51	Kerry +8<br />
SEARCH BY 2012 RACE</p>
<p>About Us | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy         © RealClearPolitics 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plewis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320542</link>
		<dc:creator>plewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal. Fox News. Find another excuse. Remember there&#039;s always the mainstream media.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wall Street Journal. Fox News. Find another excuse. Remember there&#8217;s always the mainstream media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatcat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320534</link>
		<dc:creator>whatcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;But did we do the same when W was winning the polls in 2004?
Seven Seas on October 2, 2012 at 2:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

FOX News 10/30-10/31 2004 Kerry +2

For most of that summer Kerry was leading in almost every poll. With an 11% lead in one NBC poll, in fact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But did we do the same when W was winning the polls in 2004?<br />
Seven Seas on October 2, 2012 at 2:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>FOX News 10/30-10/31 2004 Kerry +2</p>
<p>For most of that summer Kerry was leading in almost every poll. With an 11% lead in one NBC poll, in fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim_CA</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320529</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim_CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;U N E X P E C T E D L Y&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>U N E X P E C T E D L Y</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320524</link>
		<dc:creator>Axe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Strippers and pollsters are good at spinning on polls

faraway on October 2, 2012 at 2:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Quit insulting strippers. :)

At least strippers know they&#039;re strippers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Strippers and pollsters are good at spinning on polls</p>
<p>faraway on October 2, 2012 at 2:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Quit insulting strippers. :)</p>
<p>At least strippers know they&#8217;re strippers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scalleywag</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320490</link>
		<dc:creator>scalleywag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reminds me of that commercial &quot;we ALL bundle&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of that commercial &#8220;we ALL bundle&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320446</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course we support these stories because Romney is getting beaten in the polls.

But did we do the same when W was winning the polls in 2004?

Seven Seas on October 2, 2012 at 2:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So it cuts both ways?

Theoretically, yes.  Statistically, no.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course we support these stories because Romney is getting beaten in the polls.</p>
<p>But did we do the same when W was winning the polls in 2004?</p>
<p>Seven Seas on October 2, 2012 at 2:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>So it cuts both ways?</p>
<p>Theoretically, yes.  Statistically, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urban elitist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320443</link>
		<dc:creator>urban elitist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be curious to click a link to that alleged Zogby &quot;admission.&quot;. 

And nothing in you post seems to touch at all on the subject of this thread. Do you actually read the original postings.  

Nice of you to suggest that most pollsters are honest most of the time, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be curious to click a link to that alleged Zogby &#8220;admission.&#8221;. </p>
<p>And nothing in you post seems to touch at all on the subject of this thread. Do you actually read the original postings.  </p>
<p>Nice of you to suggest that most pollsters are honest most of the time, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PastorJon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320439</link>
		<dc:creator>PastorJon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course we support these stories because Romney is getting beaten in the polls.
 
But did we do the same when W was winning the polls in 2004?

Seven Seas on October 2, 2012 at 2:48 PM 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Frank Luntz, who you see on Fox and other places with his focus group things, was my professor for one semester in college. At the time he had a polling firm. It&#039;s all playing with the numbers.

You&#039;d get a better result with a simple &quot;How likely are you to vote?&quot; and &quot;Who are you voting for?&quot; than playing with ratios and numbers. If it&#039;s completely random calling, and you got 5,000 people to answer Very Likely and a candidate, you&#039;d have a fairly accurate result. ANY playing with party affiliation and guessing about turnout for each party, etc, is just to massage the numbers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course we support these stories because Romney is getting beaten in the polls.</p>
<p>But did we do the same when W was winning the polls in 2004?</p>
<p>Seven Seas on October 2, 2012 at 2:48 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Frank Luntz, who you see on Fox and other places with his focus group things, was my professor for one semester in college. At the time he had a polling firm. It&#8217;s all playing with the numbers.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d get a better result with a simple &#8220;How likely are you to vote?&#8221; and &#8220;Who are you voting for?&#8221; than playing with ratios and numbers. If it&#8217;s completely random calling, and you got 5,000 people to answer Very Likely and a candidate, you&#8217;d have a fairly accurate result. ANY playing with party affiliation and guessing about turnout for each party, etc, is just to massage the numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milcus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320436</link>
		<dc:creator>milcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course, no where did he say that he day that he or any other pollster rigged the numbers, as Romney’s desperate apologists claim. Merely that he put the best possible spin on numbers that were out there. As every campaign everywhere does. 

Dog bites man.

urban elitist on October 2, 2012 at 3:44 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

He wasn&#039;t asked.

And they dont rig the numbers. They simply oversample Democrats. That is not rigging anything.

No liberal thinks the 2012 turnout will be better for Obama than 2008. Not even Obama&#039;s biggest apologists (we like to call them MSNBC). So, why release polls showing a bigger turnout? That is deceptive, if not intended to rig the polls. 

And lets not mince words, the media is doing this because in every poll Obama loses independents. Remember when the talking point was that whoever wins indepdents would win? Well, now that Obama seems like he has no chance to win independents, the way to show Obama winning has changed to oversampling Democrats, and that is the problem. It defeats the point of a poll to do what the liberal pollsters are doing, even if people like you love the result and refuse to use your logic skills and question whether they are accurate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course, no where did he say that he day that he or any other pollster rigged the numbers, as Romney’s desperate apologists claim. Merely that he put the best possible spin on numbers that were out there. As every campaign everywhere does. </p>
<p>Dog bites man.</p>
<p>urban elitist on October 2, 2012 at 3:44 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>He wasn&#8217;t asked.</p>
<p>And they dont rig the numbers. They simply oversample Democrats. That is not rigging anything.</p>
<p>No liberal thinks the 2012 turnout will be better for Obama than 2008. Not even Obama&#8217;s biggest apologists (we like to call them MSNBC). So, why release polls showing a bigger turnout? That is deceptive, if not intended to rig the polls. </p>
<p>And lets not mince words, the media is doing this because in every poll Obama loses independents. Remember when the talking point was that whoever wins indepdents would win? Well, now that Obama seems like he has no chance to win independents, the way to show Obama winning has changed to oversampling Democrats, and that is the problem. It defeats the point of a poll to do what the liberal pollsters are doing, even if people like you love the result and refuse to use your logic skills and question whether they are accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Dolemonte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320428</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Dolemonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course, no where did he say that he day that he or any other pollster rigged the numbers

urbane effetist on October 2, 2012 at 3:44 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He didn&#039;t have to.

Because &quot;honest&quot; pollsters aren&#039;t afraid to include their polling demographics when the publish their surveys. And most of the time, most &quot;pollsters&quot; do. But sometimes they do not.

Zogby admitted on TV that he would &quot;poll&quot; on the weekends whenever he wanted his results to favor Dems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course, no where did he say that he day that he or any other pollster rigged the numbers</p>
<p>urbane effetist on October 2, 2012 at 3:44 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>He didn&#8217;t have to.</p>
<p>Because &#8220;honest&#8221; pollsters aren&#8217;t afraid to include their polling demographics when the publish their surveys. And most of the time, most &#8220;pollsters&#8221; do. But sometimes they do not.</p>
<p>Zogby admitted on TV that he would &#8220;poll&#8221; on the weekends whenever he wanted his results to favor Dems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggyville</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320425</link>
		<dc:creator>ziggyville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;...some times those in the law bemuse me.

Kaptain Amerika on October 2, 2012 at 2:57 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Those are the ones who end up in Congress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;some times those in the law bemuse me.</p>
<p>Kaptain Amerika on October 2, 2012 at 2:57 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>Those are the ones who end up in Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Dolemonte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320423</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Dolemonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who gives a getalife about &quot;polls&quot;?

I&#039;m still shaking my head at the fact that Edwards got as far in the Democrat Party as he did.

No, actually I&#039;m not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gives a getalife about &#8220;polls&#8221;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still shaking my head at the fact that Edwards got as far in the Democrat Party as he did.</p>
<p>No, actually I&#8217;m not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urban elitist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320416</link>
		<dc:creator>urban elitist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course, no where did he say that he day that he or any other pollster rigged the numbers, as Romney&#039;s desperate apologists claim.  Merely that he put the best possible spin on numbers that were out there.  As every campaign everywhere does. 

Dog bites man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, no where did he say that he day that he or any other pollster rigged the numbers, as Romney&#8217;s desperate apologists claim.  Merely that he put the best possible spin on numbers that were out there.  As every campaign everywhere does. </p>
<p>Dog bites man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320383</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The business I’m in is a business any fool can get into, and a lot can happen.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This quote is a &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;gift&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The business I’m in is a business any fool can get into, and a lot can happen.</p></blockquote>
<p>This quote is a <em><strong>gift</strong></em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OhEssYouCowboys</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320381</link>
		<dc:creator>OhEssYouCowboys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Pollsters lie? 

How about Santa? He’s real, right?

CorporatePiggy on October 2, 2012 at 3:26 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

&lt;em&gt;Ho, Ho, Ho.&lt;/em&gt;

- The Commie
[Slow-jammin&#039; it, with some urban lyrics]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pollsters lie? </p>
<p>How about Santa? He’s real, right?</p>
<p>CorporatePiggy on October 2, 2012 at 3:26 PM</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Ho, Ho, Ho.</em></p>
<p>- The Commie<br />
[Slow-jammin' it, with some urban lyrics]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OhEssYouCowboys</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320379</link>
		<dc:creator>OhEssYouCowboys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Hmmm trying to come up with another rhythm for troll..
 
I’ve got nuthin. :-)

Chip on October 2, 2012 at 3:18 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hell, I came up with somehing, in no time:

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Antidisestablishmentarianism&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.

;O)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hmmm trying to come up with another rhythm for troll..</p>
<p>I’ve got nuthin. :-)</p>
<p>Chip on October 2, 2012 at 3:18 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>Hell, I came up with somehing, in no time:</p>
<p><strong><em>Antidisestablishmentarianism</em></strong>.</p>
<p>;O)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joepub</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320368</link>
		<dc:creator>joepub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the polling reminds me of whats happened to baseball cards...so many different companies making cards out there, the cards value gets watered down so much. Now, pretty much anything after the mid eighties is worthless.

Same with polling companies.  Almost all worthless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the polling reminds me of whats happened to baseball cards&#8230;so many different companies making cards out there, the cards value gets watered down so much. Now, pretty much anything after the mid eighties is worthless.</p>
<p>Same with polling companies.  Almost all worthless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CorporatePiggy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320366</link>
		<dc:creator>CorporatePiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pollsters lie? 

How about Santa? He&#039;s real, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pollsters lie? </p>
<p>How about Santa? He&#8217;s real, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatcat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320364</link>
		<dc:creator>whatcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related, from NewBusters - on those goofy WaPo swing state polls:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/10/01/jennifer-rubin-forces-washington-post-explain-its-own-flawed-poll&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jennifer Rubin Forces Washington Post to Explain Its Own Bogus Poll&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;Out of 929 registered voters in the new poll,&lt;strong&gt; 161&lt;/strong&gt; live in one of these eight states, with a margin of &lt;strong&gt;sampling error of eight points&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot;

They polled &lt;em&gt;20 people&lt;/em&gt; from each of the swing states? Oy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Related, from NewBusters &#8211; on those goofy WaPo swing state polls:<br />
<a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/10/01/jennifer-rubin-forces-washington-post-explain-its-own-flawed-poll" rel="nofollow">Jennifer Rubin Forces Washington Post to Explain Its Own Bogus Poll</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Out of 929 registered voters in the new poll,<strong> 161</strong> live in one of these eight states, with a margin of <strong>sampling error of eight points</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p>They polled <em>20 people</em> from each of the swing states? Oy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cajunpatriot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320358</link>
		<dc:creator>cajunpatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The business I’m in is a business any fool can get into, and a lot can happen.&quot;

Yes, we already knew that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The business I’m in is a business any fool can get into, and a lot can happen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, we already knew that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thatsafactjack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/02/campaign-pollster-under-oath-of-course-we-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-6320355</link>
		<dc:creator>thatsafactjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221311#comment-6320355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Chip on October 2, 2012 at 2:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Soul

Hole

mole

coal

toll

bole

foal

goal

knoll


&#039;ole

vole

there are a few...:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Chip on October 2, 2012 at 2:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Soul</p>
<p>Hole</p>
<p>mole</p>
<p>coal</p>
<p>toll</p>
<p>bole</p>
<p>foal</p>
<p>goal</p>
<p>knoll</p>
<p>&#8216;ole</p>
<p>vole</p>
<p>there are a few&#8230;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>