American Crossroads’ biggest ad buy: Hey, remember how Obama spent $1 trillion on stimulus that didn’t work?
posted at 12:41 pm on October 2, 2012 by Mary Katharine Ham
Super PAC American Crossroads GPS is set to drop $16 million on ads this week in battleground states and targeted races, mostly hitting President Obama on stimulus spending and his jobs record. From CNN:
The conservative super PAC American Crossroads said Tuesday it was buying $11 million in television time this week to air an ad sharply critical of President Barack Obama’s record on jobs.
The group also said its affiliate organization Crossroads GPS would put $1 million toward radio ads and $4 million to air TV ads in competitive U.S. Senate races in North Dakota, Virginia and Montana. American Crossroads will air a Senate ad in Florida.
The TV ad, entitled “Actually Happened,” makes reference to what the Obama White House would like you to forget— what he promised would happen to the jobless rate if we spent $1 trillion on stimulus compared to what actually happened. In the style of Tony Stark, a narrator brings up a CGI chart with the swipe of a hand, showing the literal gap between Obama’s promises on jobs and where we stand today.
“This is what President Obama promised the jobless rate would be if we passed the stimulus: 5.6%. But this is what the jobless rate actually is: 8.1%. The difference? About 3.7 million jobs,” he says. “Obama’s spending drove us 5 trillion deeper in debt, and now we have fewer jobs than when he started.”
The ad concludes, “We can’t afford another four years.” (This link leads to the YouTube of the ad if you’re having trouble watching it below.)
“Obama’s weak leadership has yielded weak results and a weaker America. Staying on Obama’s course means a weaker America every day,” Chairman Steven Law said in a Crossroads statement about the ad buy.
A Tarrance Group survey of likely voters this week suggests Crossroads may be on the right track:
—Three quarters (74%) of voters do not believe federal government spending has helped the economy, and 86% do not believe government spending has helped their own personal financial situation. This pessimism over the impact of government spending is consistent throughout many key demographic groups that are frequently mentioned as “target” voters in the upcoming Presidential election.
—Nearly three quarters of both men (75%) and women (72%) do not believe government spending has helped the economy, along with eight in ten (80%) seniors. A majority (54%) of seniors say spending has “hurt” the economy.
Also, a majority of Independents (55%) and married women (59%) believe government spending has hurt the economy. Three quarters (76%) of middle class families do not believe spending has helped the economy, with 58% believing government spending has actually hurt the economy.—Men (86%) and women (86%) equally do not believe government spending has helped their personal financial situation. Just 9% of Independents and seniors, and 12% of married women and middle class families say government spending has helped their personal finances.
If those numbers sound suspiciously sanguine to you, here are the results of the stimulus question in the WaPo poll this week among registered voters: 70 percent of Americans believe the stimulus either hurt or didn’t help the economy much at all. If you take out those who believe it hurt, the number is 43 percent who believe it didn’t help. Among Independents, the number of voters who believe the stimulus hurt or didn’t help goes up to 76 percent. Obama: Making the ineffective astronomically expensive since 2008.

This week’s Politico/GWU poll, which Ed wrote up here, shows Romney holding slight but important leads on jobs and the economy, but his biggest leads are in this area:
Of the 11 issues on which the candidates were pitted against one another, Romney’s clearest edge came on the federal budget and spending: Fifty-six percent disapprove of Obama’s handling of the issue — 47 percent strongly so. By a 7-point margin, voters believe Romney is best equipped to tackle the debt.
A WaPo/ABC poll (Ed’s write-up) shows a smaller gap for Obama on this issue:
Romney does not have significant leads in any of the areas tested in the poll, but he has a numerical edge on dealing with the federal budget deficit, 48 percent to 45 percent, among all voters.
But the WaPo poll also gives a clue for how to answer the “47 percent” question when it inevitably comes up Wednesday:
More than seven in 10 are dissatisfied or angry with the way the federal government is working, and by 51 percent to 43 percent, voters see government programs as doing more to create dependency among the poor than to help them get back on their feet.
Moreover, Romney and his running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan (Wis.), may be making headway in their argument about the threat of government overreach. Asked whether overregulation or a system that favors the wealthy is the bigger problem, 49 percent of voters say unfairness and 42 percent say overregulation. This is the first time in polls this year that under 50 percent of voters chose unfairness as the larger concern.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Video: Weiner polls second in mayoral race as campaign expands

Open thread, live video: Oversight hearing into IRS non-scandal featuring official taking the Fifth







Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Cliff Clavin and Newman could not be reached for comment.
Del Dolemonte on April 17, 2013 at 9:22 PM
I guess I should lick two tramps…
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:23 PM
Stamps that is.
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:23 PM
Dang it!!
Can I delete?
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:24 PM
AWESOME!
Pork-Chop on April 17, 2013 at 9:27 PM
No worries Electro, we all have our Chinese keyboards bite hard sometimes.
Limerick on April 17, 2013 at 9:27 PM
No, EG, that is forever. Like Herpes.
RovesChins on April 17, 2013 at 9:27 PM
No-can-do amigo. I’d just like to know whether you’re in a fightin’ mood or a lovin’ mood.
antipc on April 17, 2013 at 9:28 PM
*clink*
But I only had three…
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:29 PM
Dang it!!
Can I delete?
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:24 PM
Hahahahahahahaha you got it right the first time hahahahahahaha
Scrumpy on April 17, 2013 at 9:29 PM
Well then. Huh.
Bishop on April 17, 2013 at 9:30 PM
Ouch.
CW on April 17, 2013 at 9:30 PM
Right there is what is the real problem. Places like UPS which mind you, are ALSO UNION, do not have this problem. They are able to take on more people during certain parts of the year when it is needed and then cut the work force when it is not needed.
watertown on April 17, 2013 at 9:30 PM
But the USPS cares.
Curtiss on April 17, 2013 at 9:31 PM
…well then!…it’s time to buy everyone new uniforms!
KOOLAID2 on April 17, 2013 at 9:34 PM
“This is a good thing! Profit is overhead.”
–Obama
hit and run on April 17, 2013 at 9:35 PM
*blushing*
Sorry guys..
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:35 PM
Delivery two days/week would be plenty.
tom daschle concerned on April 17, 2013 at 9:35 PM
Eliminate the post office. Let the private sector and free market work.
nazo311 on April 17, 2013 at 9:35 PM
Show of hands…..
If Congress gives the USPS more flexibility in things like rates and free them from cumbersome union contracts, how many people think that they would use their new-found freedom to find new ways to cut costs and become more competitive?
Now how many people think that they’d manage to muck it up, immediately raise postal rates, and refuse to fire any personnel or otherwise cut costs and become more like one of their competitors?
Happy Nomad on April 17, 2013 at 9:35 PM
…and you’re not even going to link their pictures?
…cum cum!
KOOLAID2 on April 17, 2013 at 9:36 PM
Actually they could use some new uniforms. I think they are using they same ones they did 20 years ago….
/
how is this 25 million funded?
why is it the only monopolies that really survive have some connection to the government?
CW on April 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM
:)
I apologize…
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:38 PM
They must be selling off the stuff I send through the mail on ebay to make up the difference. I’ve lost two of six packages.
southsideironworks on April 17, 2013 at 9:38 PM
GOTD can’t come soon enough..
Well..
It probably will…
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:39 PM
G = Q…
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:40 PM
OK..
I am stepping away from the keyboard..
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:41 PM
Like the DMV, the inside of a post office is a fantastic case study in how to run a business poorly.
That any manager would dare take an employee away from the counter for a “scheduled break” when there is a line of customers waiting is ludicrous (and, of course, not limited solely to government services).
Jeddite on April 17, 2013 at 9:42 PM
You’re on a roll.
Curtiss on April 17, 2013 at 9:42 PM
…I wouldn’t! (:->)
KOOLAID2 on April 17, 2013 at 9:42 PM
…don’t forget your pants!
KOOLAID2 on April 17, 2013 at 9:43 PM
Here’s an idea. Get Congress to repeal that stupid 2006 law that forces the Post Office to pay $5.5 billion a year for health care benefits for people who aren’t even born yet.
SoulGlo on April 17, 2013 at 9:44 PM
I am going to step back and watch..
What a day…
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:45 PM
Draconian sequester cuts. Is there nothing it can’t do?
locomotivebreath1901 on April 17, 2013 at 9:45 PM
G Q
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 9:40 PM
That you are!! ;-D
Scrumpy on April 17, 2013 at 9:46 PM
Bingo. They have no customers.
Limerick on April 17, 2013 at 9:47 PM
LOL I thought this was on purpose, now I’m laughing so hard LOL
NerwenAldarion on April 17, 2013 at 9:50 PM
OT: Fertilizer plant explosion in Waco. Prayers to my fellow west Texans.
H/T Twitchy.
annoyinglittletwerp on April 17, 2013 at 9:58 PM
Appears your keyboard beat you to the punch on that score! Though I gotta admit that licking two tramps was not an image I was expecting on this particular thread.
Happy Nomad on April 17, 2013 at 9:59 PM
What??
Electrongod on April 17, 2013 at 10:00 PM
annoyinglittletwerp on April 17, 2013 at 9:58 PM
OMG! We have bad weather here, is it on national news? Hope people are ok and yes hin, will send up prayers!
Scrumpy on April 17, 2013 at 10:00 PM
hin = hon
Scrumpy on April 17, 2013 at 10:02 PM
Charge More… A LOT more!
If the post office would treat it like a business, they’d charge more, much more. Send the rates through the roof. Sure, that would mean less mail, but there would also be less need for equipment a n d carriers and the whole lot. No loss, but a handsome profit instead. Of course, the post office is happy with the way it is.
anotherJoe on April 17, 2013 at 10:02 PM
Here’s the Twitchy link.
annoyinglittletwerp on April 17, 2013 at 10:05 PM
No need,you said what most guys on here were thinking at this hour of the night.Of course I wasn’t.
docflash on April 17, 2013 at 10:08 PM
Leave Britney Spears ALONE!
Lily on April 17, 2013 at 10:08 PM
Here’s a better link.
annoyinglittletwerp on April 17, 2013 at 10:10 PM
G
scalleywag on April 17, 2013 at 10:12 PM
Gee who could have seen that coming, is what I meant to say. Keyboards are being hijacked tonight!
scalleywag on April 17, 2013 at 10:13 PM
Pretty soon we’re talking about real money.
Jackalope on April 17, 2013 at 10:24 PM
Or other diseases that can be gotten by licking tramps.
Hmmm. I was thinking Charlie Chaplin.
malclave on April 17, 2013 at 10:27 PM
Today my postal worker showed up in jeans, a trendy shirt and a cool messenger bag. Other than the loads of junk mail in his hands I had no idea he worked for the post office.
myrenovations on April 17, 2013 at 10:30 PM
And thanks, EG, I needed the laugh. You did a service :)
Jackalope on April 17, 2013 at 10:31 PM
Whatever/whoever floats your boat. But since he was licking two tramps I suppose one of each would work.
Lily on April 17, 2013 at 10:35 PM
Isn’t this actually an improvement? Last year, they lost $16 billion, $25 million multiplied by 6 days a week and 52 weeks of the year comes to: $7.8 billion.
HakerA on April 17, 2013 at 10:41 PM
It’s OK, they fund their budget with “forever stamps”.
virgo on April 18, 2013 at 12:51 AM
UPS and FedEx are coining money, providing the same service. It’s a great object lesson.
Democrats who support ObamaCare, of whom there are fewer and fewer, need only look here to see what happens when the government runs a business.
MTF on April 18, 2013 at 7:09 AM
I still say every other day delivery will save a lot more than no Saturday delivery. Half get mail Mon,Wed,Fri and half Tue,Thu,Sat. Requires 1/2 the delivery people, and 1/2 the vehicles.
Dasher on April 18, 2013 at 10:38 AM
Nobody’s used the “B” word yet.
Let them declare bankrupcy and let the courts straighten out those union contracts.
osborn4 on April 18, 2013 at 3:20 PM