when he tells him point blank, how saddened he is, that for political gain, Obama has so demeaned the office of the presidency.. To put in in slow.. then twist the blade, reminding the narcissistic little schnit, the presidency belongs to the people of the United States.. not to the temporary occupant of the moment. He should hold the office in trust…. and not disgrace it by lying like a lazy hound dog every time he speaks..

He has failed the people.. and needs to stand by and own his actions like a man..

America can fire a president, and still forgive him, if his heart was to do right by the people..

They won’t forgive a cynical player who was gaming the office for his own benefit.

I want to see Mitt put that arrogant, craven, little snot on notice, we have his measure… and he has to answer for what he’s done.

That’s what I hope to see..

and I hope Mitt uses Obama’s hate for him, to goad him into a meltdown that anyone dare question a living GOD like him.. “HOW DARE WE QUESTION his yoyal friggin self”… I’d pay to see Obama self destruct..

with his ego.. I bet it can be done.. his skins so thin, he can’t process criticism in any form..

The Dims may have won back the Congress but W still could have used the veto pen more frequently.

Sure, he could have, if he’d wanted to shut down the government and get blamed for that.

Or he could have ruled by EO, just like Obama.

“Critics and media pundits might object to Gov. Christie’s confrontational style, but the vast majority of his constituents simply shrug their shoulders.

Ah, no, we’d stand up and cheer.

I hope Mitt calls Obama a liar without actually using the word.”I think the President is confused/muddled/doesn’t understand the math/doesn’t have a grip on the subject at hand” etc.

Mitsouko on October 1, 2012 at 2:41 PM

No, I want him to call Obama a liar on national television, and lay out the evidence why.

Enough of the milquetoast/pu$$y crap.

Midas on October 1, 2012 at 9:57 PM

He can do it without sounding shrill.

All he has to do is say, “Excuse me, but what Mr. Obama just said is absolutely false.”

Midas on October 1, 2012 at 9:57 PM

Agree. If he lies whenever he opens his mouth, he’s a liar! I’ll bet Hot Air archives has video of Obama lying at least once for every day he’s been in office.

I hope Mitt calls Obama a liar without actually using the word.”I think the President is confused/muddled/doesn’t understand the math/doesn’t have a grip on the subject at hand” etc.

Mitsouko on October 1, 2012 at 2:41 PM

No, I want him to call Obama a liar on national television, and lay out the evidence why.

Enough of the milquetoast/pu$$y crap.

Instead we get “oh, it’ll get paid for by removing deductions”. No, “it’ll get paid for” by ramping up the economy, you non-conservative a$$hats. If you think yo have to ‘pay for them’ by removing deductions, then you’re not very well actually reducing taxes, now are you, s@#$heads?

FFS.

The Bush tax cuts have been amply criticized for costing too much and generating too little economic growth, but that’s entirely different from causing the Great Recession.

What kind of happy horsesh*t is this statement? The Bush tax cuts (in which everyone benefitted) generated demonstrable growth, certainly more than the bandages that Obysmal’s economic efforts have done. If they were criticized, the braying was generated by those with a partisan axe to grind. Please compare and contrast the actual figures before perpetrating this false narrative, WaPo.

And it’s $16 trillion now

* U.S. Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000
* Fed budget: $3,820,000,000,000
* New debt: $ 1,650,000,000,000
* National debt: $14,271,000,000,000
* Recent budget cuts: $ 38,500,000,000

Let’s now remove 8 zeros and pretend it’s your household budget:

* Annual family income: $21,700
* Money the family spent: $38,200
* New debt on the credit card: $16,500
* Outstanding balance on the credit card: $142,710
* Total budget cuts so far: $3.85

Who could live like this

When you quote these “fact check” organizations as if they were authoritative, you give them an undeserved air of credibility.

They are not authoritative, or neutral, or, for the most part, even honest. The fact that they will call the left on some of the most outrageous lies does not mean that they are committed to telling the truth.

“Fact checkers” are basically no better than Pravda.

Now, it’s quite true that Obama is lying. But the truth of that has nothing to do with any “fact-check” organizations.

The same “politifact” or “factcheck” or other so called fact-check organization that calls Obama on his most egregious lies will not hesitate to call a conservative a liar based on opinion.

Case in point: Calling “death panels” the “lie of the year,” when the very reason it was effective is that it was true.

To subvert a phrase, “the fact checkers will betray you.”

““Lying?!” an incredulous Stephanopoulos gasped…”

(as he adjusted his knee pads and wiped Obowma’s man goo from his chin…)

It wasn’t until the Democrats took majority control of the House and Senate, in January 2007, that the economy really started to tank. The Democrats have been in majority control (holding 2+ out of 3 of the House, Senate and Presidency) for 5.5 years, and they spent the first half of that driving the economy in the ditch and the second half of that leaving the economy in the ditch.

Hold on a minute, let us not drink our own Kool Aid here. The Dims may have won back the Congress but W still could have used the veto pen more frequently. W was as complicit in running up the spending as the Dims. Compassionate Conservatism = Spend More Money.

I hope Mitt calls Obama a liar without actually using the word.”I think the President is confused/muddled/doesn’t understand the math/doesn’t have a grip on the subject at hand” etc.

No matter what you may think of him, I would pay money to see him in a debate with Obama.

William Eaton on October 1, 2012 at 2:12 PM

Rather see Rush do the task, he has more than bluster to back him up, facts , figures, history, right at his fingertips and he’ll do it without degrading all of us.

Say, where has Mr “National Politics” Christie been hiding these last few years?

I am shocked, SHOCKED!!!!!!

That being said, it is far too late to start branding the liar in chief what he really is (it now sounds like just another election jab)It should have been done everytime he lied. Let the racist charges fly back at those who dare use such filthy degrading weapons as a personal assault to defect truth.

No matter what you may think of him, I would pay money to see him in a debate with Obama.

All “respectful” did was suppress questions and observations like Hannity had and put a gag on this good looking woman in glasses who ran with McCain.

BTW, Steve Schmdt was on MSNBC this AM. He is a regular.