Sacking of Benghazi consulate “a catastrophic intelligence loss”

posted at 12:01 pm on September 24, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Among the more obvious catastrophes of the terrorist attack on our consulate in Benghazi — the loss of a dedicated diplomat in J. Christopher Stevens and three brave Americans who tried to defend the station — is perhaps a more significant loss for our counter-terrorism operations in the region.  The New York Times reported last night that the CIA considers the loss of the Benghazi consulate as “a catastrophic intelligence loss,” which prompts even more questions about security for the site:

The attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans has dealt the Central Intelligence Agency a major setback in its intelligence-gathering efforts at a time of increasing instability in the North African nation.

Among the more than two dozen American personnel evacuated from the city after the assault on the American mission and a nearby annex were about a dozen C.I.A. operatives and contractors, who played a crucial role in conducting surveillance and collecting information on an array of militant armed groups in and around the city.

“It’s a catastrophic intelligence loss,” said one American official who has served in Libya and who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the F.B.I. is still investigating the attack. “We got our eyes poked out.”

Before we go farther, has the FBI actually begun investigating the scene of the “crime”?  According to CBS News this morning, the answer is no:

State won’t answer questions, and the FBI hasn’t gotten to the scene.  However, reporters can apparently comb the rubble and come up with sensitive material and use it for broadcast.  Shouldn’t that raise a few questions about the American response to this attack, too, that State can ignore?

The NYT analysis of this attack shows even further how silly the initial administration spin was.  The station had been compromised, something Stevens apparently knew, as was their fallback safe house, which he discovered far too late.  That strongly suggests that the terrorist network(s) that conducted this attack had significant data on the American mission in the eastern part of Libya, and attacked it not just for reasons of prestige.  These networks have begun operating much more openly since the US-led NATO military mission deposed Moammar Qaddafi, and the CIA needed to keep track of groups like al-Qaeda in the Islamic Magreb and Ansar al-Sharia.

Now that we know that this station was critical to American intelligence efforts in an area rife with the kind of terrorist networks we have been fighting for the last eleven years, one has to ask why it was left so poorly secured.  That question was relevant even without the CIA connection, as the terrorist networks had already made Benghazi an unsafe place for the US to conduct normal diplomatic tasks.  If this was as critical an intelligence post as the NYT report suggests, the weak security arrangements can only be seen as staggeringly incompetent — and worthy of a major Congressional investigation.

The bottom line, though, is that we’ve lost an important post to keep track of the radical Islamists set loose by the NATO intervention Obama championed.  It’s nothing short of a “catastrophe” for American security.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Interesting take, but the question is who benefits from these “gifts”?

Bitter Clinger on September 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM

Let us then begin with the process of elimination and determine who did not benefit.

The United States Intelligence community did not benefit from the loss of information when Obama prematurely announced that Bin Laden had been killed.

The United States Navy did not benefit from the loss of 25 members of Seal Team 6.

And the State Department did not benefit from the losses of Ambassador Stevens or the intelligence information that was lost when he and three other American citizens died in Benghazi.

SWalker on September 24, 2012 at 1:05 PM

Don’t worry folks. CNN will handle the investigation for Obama and Secretary Rice has been been named the designated liar on this one! Obama not worried about intel leaks.. saves him a lot of trouble having to give it away personally and time for some more campaigning! Remember in November!

Marco on September 24, 2012 at 1:08 PM

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on September 24, 2012 at 1:02 PM

Good point.

Could have “secured” the site…since Benghazi is right on the water…with a well-placed piece of ordnance.

No sense in risking live personnel.

Other than provide political cover…gee, we did “everything” we could…inside the Beltway….no rational reason for the FBI to become involved.

Unless, the FBI, together with the US Marshals, are going to be used to round up and arrest every member of the current administration as co-conspirators.

:-)

coldwarrior on September 24, 2012 at 1:08 PM

and time for some more campaigning! Remember in November!

Marco on September 24, 2012 at 1:08 PM

And Golf…don’t forget the Golf…

SWalker on September 24, 2012 at 1:09 PM

Why would the FBI go to Benghazi at all?

The “crime scene” is no longer forensically worthwhile…it has been contaminated, and there are no “witnesses” to interview, and whatever material they might be able to gather or cobble together is essentially worthless from a criminal investigative point of view and as a judicial matter…totally and completely inadmissible.

coldwarrior on September 24, 2012 at 1:00 PM

So the FBI can “find” a copy of the Movie lying in the rubble, and attached to it will be a note written in English: “We need to spontaneously attack the American consulate because of this film. Let’s go right now.”

See? Bark will be proven right in his initial assessment.

Bishop on September 24, 2012 at 1:11 PM

Unless, the FBI, together with the US Marshals, are going to be used to round up and arrest every member of the current administration as co-conspirators.

:-)

coldwarrior on September 24, 2012 at 1:08 PM

Yes, I can just see it now… Asmodeus and Beelzebub arresting Lucifer himself and his staff…

SWalker on September 24, 2012 at 1:13 PM

Bishop on September 24, 2012 at 1:11 PM

Been listening in on Obama-NSC conversations lately???

Plausible. Indeed.

:-)

coldwarrior on September 24, 2012 at 1:14 PM

Does anyone know who this CBS person was that made the statement on the vid…?

d1carter on September 24, 2012 at 1:15 PM

I never believed that the downed “SEAL Team 6″ was a lucky shot. No f’ing way.

VegasRick on September 24, 2012 at 12:35 PM

neither have I….

ted c on September 24, 2012 at 12:38 PM

Yep, it all stinks. We may never know the truth.

slickwillie2001 on September 24, 2012 at 1:16 PM

coldwarrior on September 24, 2012 at 1:14 PM

Count it.

I was a cynic on government before TFGRP came to power, but he and his minions have taken things to an entirely new level; the man will be protected at all costs no matter how many lives are destroyed to do it.

Bishop on September 24, 2012 at 1:18 PM

The intelligence loss is over-stated. Obama can more than make up for this loss by utilizing his friendships within the Muslim Brotherhood.

Basilsbest on September 24, 2012 at 1:22 PM

I was a cynic on government before TFGRP came to power, but he and his minions have taken things to an entirely new level; the man will be protected at all costs no matter how many lives are destroyed to do it.

Bishop on September 24, 2012 at 1:18 PM

Same here. It’s staggering to see how he is protected no matter how incompetent and ill-equipped he is for the job, no matter how much damage he does, no matter how much suffering he causes. It’s all fine because this is what a few people want – no one else matters.

It’s chilling.

Cody1991 on September 24, 2012 at 1:23 PM

White House + State Department + Intelligence Agencies + Pentagon + Federal Law Enforcement + Border Patrol + NHS + all in Chaos though the feckless mismanagement of a psuedo academic sold to us by a lying media pretending to be a free press and enabled by a neutered congress and a corrupted FED Bernake…

Obama’s mission accomplished

workingclass artist on September 24, 2012 at 1:23 PM

Why would the FBI go to Benghazi at all?

The FBI director is waiting for a Marine Brigade with tanks before he sends his people there.

docflash on September 24, 2012 at 1:32 PM

no matter how many lives are destroyed to do it.

Bishop on September 24, 2012 at 1:18 PM

And in this case “Destroyed” is not a figurative term, it literally means, strangled, buggered, shot or blown up. i.e. to be murdered like Ambassador Stevens, Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, Ice Agent Jamie Zapata or the 25 members of Seal Team 6. Now that is some scary shit man…

SWalker on September 24, 2012 at 1:33 PM

Catastrophic intelligence loss or mere bump in the road? You decide (in November)…

Pest on September 24, 2012 at 1:40 PM

Makes you start wondering which side Barry is really on….

albill on September 24, 2012 at 1:42 PM

Well, this made for an interesting read!

R rated exchange between Buzzfeed journalist and Hillary Clinton aide

Looks like tempers are getting a little short over at DoS.

PolAgnostic on September 24, 2012 at 1:44 PM

OK, I’ve tried twice …

There is an interesting “graphic excahnge” between a Buzzfeed reporter and an aide to Hillary Clinton posted over on Drudge.

Filters here are killing the link even when the F bomb is ‘hidden’.

PolAgnostic on September 24, 2012 at 1:46 PM

Doing my best Jay Carney:

Look, if you’re asking if this post was important to us? Sure, it was. But not that important. These things happen. They happened under the last administration. Some have even suggested that the goal of the attackers was to make a point about how poorly the last administration -and administrations going back decades- have managed relations in the middle east and north Africa. Heh. It’s laughable that anyone would think for one minute that this president wasn’t in control of the situation in Tripoli.

Next question.

BKeyser on September 24, 2012 at 2:06 PM

PolAgnostic on September 24, 2012 at 1:46 PM

Here it is: http://bit.ly/RcCHik

And it’s awesome. House of cards.

BKeyser on September 24, 2012 at 2:10 PM

Has Dear Leader spoken to the American public about this tragedy in Libya..?

d1carter on September 24, 2012 at 2:11 PM

Now that we know that this station was critical to American intelligence efforts…

Question is, did the people who planned the attack know that? Is that one of the reasons for the attack?

A spontaneous demonstration just happened to take place on 9/11… which spontaneously turned into a riotous mob that just happened to kill an ambassador and take out a critical intelligence center…

Its all just a coincidence. At least that’s what the Tooth Fairy tells me.

taznar on September 24, 2012 at 2:13 PM

Before we go farther, has the FBI actually begun investigating the scene of the “crime”? According to CBS News this morning, the answer is no

Almost all of the discussion surrounding CNN’s use of the Ambassador’s journal appeared to be coming from a moral / ethical framework. I’m still shocked that this is not a legal matter. How can they use that document at all? Why is it up to them to decide its disposition (i.e. giving it to the family)? Is there no legal authority covering this? Or, are the authorities simply not interested in pursuing it?

dont taze me bro on September 24, 2012 at 2:23 PM

PolAgnostic on September 24, 2012 at 1:44 PM

I’ve had the discussion with my teenagers numerous times about using caution when sending texts & e-mails. You never know who might see them. When this guy put this in writing…did he really not thing people were going to see it? Or did he just not care? Hmmm.

dont taze me bro on September 24, 2012 at 2:28 PM

BDIAYAAR

J.E. Dyer on September 24, 2012 at 2:30 PM

Consider the source but listen carefully.

Schadenfreude on September 24, 2012 at 2:30 PM

tate won’t answer questions, and the FBI hasn’t gotten to the scene.

Well “State” won’t answer questions “because of the on-going FBI investigation” – which hasn’t started, because the FBI has been denied access to the scene by the Libyans.

Nice how that all works out to Barry’s benefit.

GarandFan on September 24, 2012 at 2:32 PM

tate won’t answer questions, and the FBI hasn’t gotten to the scene.

Well “State” won’t answer questions “because of the on-going FBI investigation” – which hasn’t started, because the FBI has been denied access to the scene by the Libyans.

Nice how that all works out to Barry’s benefit.

GarandFan on September 24, 2012 at 2:32 PM

A liberal application of liberal governance with liberal policies informed by liberal pretzel logic

workingclass artist on September 24, 2012 at 2:41 PM

I’ve had the discussion with my teenagers numerous times about using caution when sending texts & e-mails. You never know who might see them. When this guy put this in writing…did he really not thing people were going to see it? Or did he just not care? Hmmm.

dont taze me bro on September 24, 2012 at 2:28 PM


Just my $ 0.02 …

He knows he won’t be in his current job come January 21, 2013.

He doesn’t need to see the internal polls. He’s close enough to Hillary to know what Billy Jefferson is hearing through his contacts which are extensive.

I would also give even money on Hillary “going under the bus” BUT the second the SCOAMF does that Billy Jefferson will start telling all kinds of tales out on the campaign trail about the SCOAMF.

Makes for an interesting Mexican standoff, eh?

PolAgnostic on September 24, 2012 at 2:51 PM

So the FBI can “find” a copy of the Movie lying in the rubble, and attached to it will be a note written in English: “We need to spontaneously attack the American consulate because of this film. Let’s go right now.”

See? Bark will be proven right in his initial assessment.

Bishop on September 24, 2012 at 1:11 PM

The scary thing is that if the White House came out and offered that as conclusive evidence of what had happened, millions of American voters would accept it as gospel, and the bobble-heads in the MSM would report it as fact, no questions asked.

AZCoyote on September 24, 2012 at 3:15 PM

Well, this made for an interesting read!

R rated exchange between Buzzfeed journalist and Hillary Clinton aide

Looks like tempers are getting a little short over at DoS.

PolAgnostic on September 24, 2012 at 1:44 PM

This exchange is very telling. I’m sending this BuzzFeed link to my friends.

Pazman on September 24, 2012 at 3:49 PM

Creep was hospitalized. I wish him a quick but painful death.

Schadenfreude on September 24, 2012 at 3:56 PM

This whole issue stinks to high heaven like the investigations during the Clinton years. Why does the left think we will forget what went on in the past. There’s not enough money in the world to buy silence in DC.

mixplix on September 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM

Nixon lied to the public to cover up a 3rd rate burglary and was forced to resign. Obama lied to cover up the cause of the deaths of the Libyan 4 and crickets from the media and Congress.

chemman on September 24, 2012 at 4:14 PM

The FBI director is waiting for a Marine Brigade with tanks before he sends his people there.

docflash on September 24, 2012 at 1:32 PM

No. Hussein, Hilary, Carney and Gibbs, as well as Rice, should lead the team to show us all that islam is a peaceful religion. After all, those militia offices were burned down by now and militia made to run. Right?

riddick on September 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM

Why does the left think we will forget what went on in the past.

mixplix on September 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM

Because we have done so, in the past and now. Let me know the fallout of Fast and Furious? Solyndra? Corzine? Libya and Egypt? Residential fiats that go against the law? (I can list plenty more).

I can go and on. And yet I can’t recall ANY punishment for anyone involved. GOP Congress ALWAYS backs down and does nothing to uphold the Constitution.

riddick on September 24, 2012 at 4:25 PM

They must be hiring cretins at State.

Back in the “Olden Days” when “grown-ups” were in charge of our government, they would have used anything to deflect the “incident” from getting bigger. The last thing they would do would be to point out a “useful non-sequitur,” like a pathetically bad movie on YouTube, which your adversaries could use to garner more support for their “bad behaviour.”

But, the people didn’t like a “foreign policy snollygoster” back then either.

J_Crater on September 24, 2012 at 4:28 PM

With all that going with this President in this foreign policy mess and the absolute destruction of this country.I would like to ask a question from anyone who would care to try to answer it.I just saw a Rasmussen poll in Michigan Obama 54% Romney 42%.The question is why do people in these states like Michigan,Ohio.Ill.Penn.and others look down on people in my state S.C.and other southern states.They call us hayseeds,stupid,sitting around all day drinking moonshine beating our first cousin wives .Yet we for the most part have enough common sense not to vote for people like Obama,Clinton ,Kerry and Gore.Anyone care to enlighten me and my moonshine drinking first cousin wife beating friends???

logman1 on September 24, 2012 at 4:40 PM

Back in the “Olden Days” when “grown-ups” were in charge of our government,

J_Crater on September 24, 2012 at 4:28 PM

When was that? You mean in Clinton days when he decimated CIA and curtailed their operations and we are paying for it now? Or in Bush/Powell days when Powell’s State Department had employees learn Arabic, but not Hebrew? How did that work out for us?

“Grown up” days ended with Reagan/Bush, a while ago. Not that Carter’s years were good to begin with (and the beginning of our downfall).

riddick on September 24, 2012 at 4:41 PM

Oh, it can’t be as bad as all that, Ed, or the Prez would have mentioned it. It’s just a bump in the road, donchaknow.

Nothing to worry about, I’m sure.

Bob's Kid on September 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM

Just as BJ Clinton weakened the CIA in the ’90′s, Obysmal is doing his part now on behalf of America’s enemies.

onlineanalyst on September 24, 2012 at 12:22 PM

We all know what happened as a result the first time. Nearly 3,000 Americans who are no longer with us.

What makes me think the sequel will be many times worse?

Del Dolemonte on September 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM

logman1 on September 24, 2012 at 4:40 PM

Good questions.

Michigan? Rabid Islamic State as of late with high unemployment.

You just pointed out states that are run by unions mostly. No need to ask any other questions, IMO. We subsidize their living arrangements.

riddick on September 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM

Makes you start wondering which side Barry is really on….

albill on September 24, 2012 at 1:42 PM

Start? I’ve been wondering that since this time in 2007.

Del Dolemonte on September 24, 2012 at 4:47 PM

Our next embassy should be built with armor-plated solid steel electrified walls covered with razors and broken glass and it should be about 30 feet high. Surely we can find an architect in New York to design something stylish, maybe multicolored glass shards and chrome-plated Claymores.

gordo on September 24, 2012 at 5:07 PM

The FBI director is waiting for a Marine Brigade with tanks before he sends his people there.

docflash on September 24, 2012 at 1:32 PM

He’s waiting for all the evidence to disappear. These things take time.

dont taze me bro on September 24, 2012 at 5:15 PM

Don’t worry folks. CNN will handle the investigation for Obama and Secretary Rice has been been named the designated liar on this one! Obama not worried about intel leaks.. saves him a lot of trouble having to give it away personally and time for some more campaigning! Remember in November!
Marco on September 24, 2012 at 1:08 PM

So true! Which side is this admin on!???

Can.I.be.in.the.middle on September 24, 2012 at 5:27 PM

“…played a crucial role in conducting surveillance and collecting information on an array of militant armed groups in and around the city.”

“We got our eyes poked out.”

It doesn’t appears so to the casual observer… rather, it looks like those ‘eyes’ had the wool pulled over them.

socalcon on September 24, 2012 at 5:30 PM

Islamic rioting against America in…Hong Kong?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-23/correct-muslim-protesters-clash-with-police-at-u-s-embassy-tv.html

“Several hundred Muslim protesters clashed with Hong Kong police outside the U.S. Embassy in the city as they were blocked from submitting a letter to diplomatic mission, Hong Kong Cable TV reported today.

About 1,000 protesters gathered in Chater Garden in Central, Hong Kong’s main financial hub, to protest an anti- Islam movie produced in the U.S., according to the report.”

Django on September 24, 2012 at 5:41 PM

From Hong Kong to Morocco, anti-American Muslim riots and bloodshed. Funny how you can’t find out a thing about it from the NY Times, Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, etc.

Clearly, more groveling before the savages is required.

Django on September 24, 2012 at 5:44 PM

What did Christopher Stevens know and why was he silenced…and what did Hiliary know and wen did she know it, and what did/didn’t she tell Obama and why?

RedLizard64 on September 24, 2012 at 5:56 PM

Move along now, nothing here to see!

Another Drew on September 24, 2012 at 6:04 PM

So true! Which side is this admin on!???

Can.I.be.in.the.middle on September 24, 2012 at 5:27 PM

Rhetorical question.

riddick on September 24, 2012 at 6:29 PM

By creating the narrative that a silly video trailer was behind the Muslim uprisings, the Obysmal WH and State Department reminded me of the method of Marc Antony in stirring up the mobs and deflecting anger elsewhere.

This explication from a Shakespeare source demonstrates the point:

In the speech that follows (Brutus’s funeral oration) Antony merely sets the table for dissent. He progressively hits upon the notes of ambition and honourable in a cadence that soon calls both terms into question. Antony’s prime weapons at the beginning are his conspicuous ambiguity…More chilling, however, is Antony’s cynical epilogue to the funeral speech as the mob departs: “Now let it work: mischief, thou art afoot/Take thou what course thou wilt!” As Antony exemplifies, the art of persuasion is not far removed in Julius Caesar from the craft of manipulation.

onlineanalyst on September 24, 2012 at 7:06 PM

The source of that citation was bardweb.net– The Shakespearean Research Center.

What I was looking for was a quotation about rumors, thinking that it was rumors (such as the foolish mob-stirring in the mosques about an equally foolish video trailer) that “art afoot.”

I like this Bible Concordance citation from Ezekiel even better to describe the growing mob violence:

Ezekiel 7:26 Mischief shall come on mischief, and rumor shall be on rumor; and they shall seek a vision of the prophet; but the law shall perish from the priest, and counsel from the elders. (WEB KJV ASV DBY WBS YLT)

The imams, assisted by Obama and the Hillary State House, have raised the flames. They have blood on their hands… and martyrs to their ambition and deceit.

onlineanalyst on September 24, 2012 at 7:19 PM

What the hell, I’ll ask again. Why is Vince Foster dead?
(Stevens did in fact work for Hillary. Right?)

If this election is even close, I’ll take up golf and learn to lie like King Putt.

Missilengr on September 24, 2012 at 7:39 PM

Stevens was muslim? just wow.

clnurnberg on September 24, 2012 at 7:57 PM

The only answer is… to release more Gitmo jihadis.

It will placate the terrorists.

Worked well last time, right?

profitsbeard on September 24, 2012 at 8:27 PM

So… why isn’t the Republican House going in overdrive mode to make this the scandal that it is?

bobcalco on September 24, 2012 at 12:44 PM

Because the House in in Recess?

Who is John Galt on September 24, 2012 at 8:37 PM

Bump in the road.

Hening on September 24, 2012 at 8:47 PM

Obama/Clinton – a clear and present danger.

Midas on September 24, 2012 at 9:12 PM

Seems to be a bit more then a few bumps in the road. Without doubt this is the most incompetent administration in the history of this country. Obama, Clinton and Holder should have cells at Gitmo waiting for them. Romney should be all over TV asking Obama who’s side he’s on, because we all know he is certainly is not on ours.

savage24 on September 24, 2012 at 9:13 PM

So… why isn’t the Republican House going in overdrive mode to make this the scandal that it is?

bobcalco on September 24, 2012 at 12:44 PM

Boehner needs time to work on hi tan. You know, priorities and all that while blaming Hussein for essentially same thing.
.
.
.
.
And we’re about to release a few more from Guantanamo including a couple who were close confidants of Bin Laden.

Benghazi attack was planned by a Guantanamo “reformee”. What could go wrong?

riddick on September 24, 2012 at 11:23 PM

What the hell, I’ll ask again. Why is Vince Foster dead?

Missilengr on September 24, 2012 at 7:39 PM

47% people asked said there do not recognize the name. Another 40% vaguely recollect.

Vince Foster was s typical suicide case, drove a long distance into a rarely visited area, in the middle of the night, just to shoot himself. Oh, yeah, while living in DC area he obviously needed a anti-depressant and only from a doctor in Arkansas, local doctor would not do. You know, any high powered lawyer earning a huge sum would be just depressed about what WSJ said about him.

Now that this question has been asked, sure, what did Stevens know and when did he know it?

riddick on September 24, 2012 at 11:29 PM

Before we go farther, has the FBI actually begun investigating the scene of the “crime”?

I wonder if they need to get a warrant for any possible wiretaps over there. Do they read the “criminals’ their rights first?

Kjeil on September 25, 2012 at 12:16 AM

I asked why the cop in AZ is dead??

Bullhead on September 25, 2012 at 12:38 AM

Lets add to the list of Obama foreign intelligence accomplishments. In 2011 release to the world the specifications of the Bunker buster bombs, Then release the specification of the new improved bunker busters. Then delayed the shipping of the bombs to Israel giving Iran the time to harden it’s nuclear facilities. 2012 gave Iran a drone and all the technology while we could have destroyed the drone on the ground in 20 minutes. The news coverage in this Country of the Embassy attack is nearly 80% different then as covered by Al Jarzeera in the Arab countries.

A few days ago a commenter on Hot Air made the comment near the end of the articles run that “what if these were not mistakes gone bad but successes from going as planed.” That stopped me cold in my tracks as it should every American. Yet the Democrat seem to gain and lead in the polls.

There is little doubt in my mind that this country is heading for a big time revolution this November. Not an armed conflict but major controls and changes to “BUSSINES AS USUAL”. The removal from office of the convoluted thinking of Pelosi, Reid, Bidden and others long time Party members that put their parties and themselves above all else. Controlling the purse strings to our money and using it for the continuation of the greater glory of themselves and their party affiliations.

jpcpt03 on September 25, 2012 at 11:52 AM

Again, the simple question…what ever happened to simple basic trade craft?

coldwarrior on September 24, 2012 at 12:50 PM

.
Simple answer – Leon Panetta

PolAgnostic on September 24, 2012 at 12:55 PM

It went to hell long before Panetta came on the scene. Today’s Agency is a far cry from the professionals of the Cold War Era.
But, by God, they don’t hurt anyone’s feelings!

Solaratov on September 25, 2012 at 12:44 PM

Creep was hospitalized. I wish him a quick but painful death.

Schadenfreude on September 24, 2012 at 3:56 PM

Oh, no. Long, slow and agonizing. May every second of his last hours be filled with terror and indescribable agony.

Solaratov on September 25, 2012 at 12:59 PM

KyMouse on September 24, 2012 at 12:53 PM

I did a quick Google search and couldn’t find anything about the column online. For curiosity’s sake if nothing else, you might want to scan the column and send it into the tip box. I’m sure a lot of people here would like to see it.

IamDA on September 25, 2012 at 10:53 PM

Comment pages: 1 2