Cutter: Women “not really concerned about what’s happened over the last four years”

posted at 5:21 pm on September 24, 2012 by Erika Johnsen

You know something? I’ve changed my mind. There most definitely is a “war on women” going on — but it’s not being orchestrated by the Right, no no. It’s coming from the Left, in an attempt to lump me into some hapless, helpless voting bloc whose members are incapable of thinking critically and probably shouldn’t try.

Obama Deputy Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter: “We’ll continue doing what we have been doing, trying to get the president’s message out on the ground. Whether it’s in the suburban areas of Northern Virginia, or Denver, Ohio, to talk about what the president wants to do in the future. That’s the other thing that you find most often with women. They’re not really concerned about what’s happened over the last four years, they really want to know what’s going to happen in the next four years.”

Face. Palm. It is quite true that I care a lot about what’s going to happen in the next four years — which is why I would be an idiot to disregard what’s gone on in the past four. I most profoundly am concerned with the travesty of an economic recovery we’ve had during President Obama’s tenure, and you bet it’s going to influence my vote. I am not going to just fall in line while you tell me to look “Forward” and that the only things I need concern my sweet little head about are reproductive rights and gender equality because it’s such a “scary” time to be a woman, blah blah blah. In the next four years, I’d like to sure of economic growth, job creation, fiscal solvency, and national security — and President Obama’s record isn’t looking too hot.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Gads that sounds so condescending.

AZfederalist on September 24, 2012 at 6:19 PM

I would swear I felt a pat on the head when I read that.

lynncgb on September 24, 2012 at 6:36 PM

I wonder if they’re interested in the campaign’s Julia.

PA-Cman on September 24, 2012 at 6:36 PM

Heads-Up: Cutter is about to be “grilled” by Wolfman Blitzed on CNN. The way Wolfie teased it, I got the impression he was going to talk to her not about this statement but about the O’bamna-Hillary Debacle in the Middle East.

Gonna make some popcorn.

Del Dolemonte on September 24, 2012 at 6:37 PM

If anyone needs a contrast…
check out the photo of MK & Kelly above the photo of Stephanie, on the right side of the page.

See which ones have the beauty – in addition to all the Hot Air ladies who post here.

22044 on September 24, 2012 at 6:40 PM

Cutter on CNN: “We take Fact Checking Very Seriously”.

Just repeated that exact same phrase twice.

She’s an Unusually Good Liar, just like her former boss Clenis.

Del Dolemonte on September 24, 2012 at 6:42 PM

Cutter on the Romney Campaign comments on the Middle East: “Fictional Attack after Fictional Attack”.

Stale.

She also just called Paul Ryan “Mitt Romney’s Vice President”. Freudian Slip?

Del Dolemonte on September 24, 2012 at 6:45 PM

Yikes, people who vote with their loins are scary.

Makes you long for the days when you had to be a landowner to vote. At least then you’d have modicum of commonsense having been able to negotiate the contracts necessary to purchase property — not to mention having a genuine concern for how and who is running things.

wordsmithy2009 on September 24, 2012 at 6:47 PM

Her left eye is significantly higher than her right eye. Sup with that?

watson007 on September 24, 2012 at 6:53 PM

Listening to Levin. He’s talking about her now.

22044 on September 24, 2012 at 6:57 PM

Democrat women are not really concerned about what’s happened in a Little Rock hotel room in 1978, they really want to know what’s going to happen in the next four years if raped by Bill Clinton. Will he continue to advocate for the free abortion when he’s done with his victim?”

Fixed, for 21st century Democrat women everywhere, who know their place!

MNHawk on September 24, 2012 at 7:10 PM

Reverse women’s suffrage–I can’t take it anymore. I’m so ashamed of my gender voting their feelings over reason.

hoosiermama on September 24, 2012 at 5:26 PM

Exactly.
The dims seem to think that a woman’s ‘brain’ is located below her waist.

annoyinglittletwerp on September 24, 2012 at 7:16 PM

This statement just shows the contempt they have for Women voters. That statement right there infers that women voters are brain dead and not informed. This spokesmouth for Obama does him no favors.

portlandon on September 24, 2012 at 7:22 PM

Don’t worry your pretty little head sweetie…..women weren’t “built” fer ‘memberin’ stuff….

Now run and get me a beer.

Tim_CA on September 24, 2012 at 7:25 PM

It’s great when women can be distilled down to one spokesman.

That’s the other thing that you find most often with women. They’re not really concerned about what’s happened over the last four years, they really want to know what’s going to happen in the next four years.

Especially when that one spokesman is a complete tool.

In four years, the next four years has become the last four years.

Akzed on September 24, 2012 at 7:27 PM

The women I described earlier that won’t vote for “scary” Mitt and Paul but loved how much Obama talked about abortions during the conference, never discuss any politics. However, they know who made what movie, what celebrity is pregnant, or who dressed the best.

ptcamn

Gah. That too.
At least half the women out there prove the men who didn’t want them to have the vote as being right.
Women’s lib is more like women’s regression.

Hard Right on September 24, 2012 at 7:29 PM

This statement just shows the contempt they have for Women voters. That statement right there infers that women voters are brain dead and not informed. This spokesmouth for Obama does him no favors.

portlandon

Per the polls she is about half right.
If women are smarter then men, we are royally screwed as a country.

Hard Right on September 24, 2012 at 7:31 PM

What’s amazing is that they found a woman to utter such nonsense.

If you’re black and conservative, you’re a “race traitor” to these people; if you’re a woman and espouse conservative thoughts, you’re a “gender traitor;” but if you are the equivalent of a porn starlet saying that women don’t mind being treated like sex objects, that’s OK.

These people have ZERO sense of self-irony. Utterly amazing.

Spurius Ligustinus on September 24, 2012 at 7:35 PM

The majority of women are going to vote for Obama. How was she wrong?

xblade on September 24, 2012 at 7:41 PM

Obama, “bump in the road”, “Israel’s one of our closest allies in the Middle East”, and going on The View vs meeting with Netanyahu. Cutter “women don’t care about the past 4 years”. Yep, start of another bad week for Romney.

PatMac on September 24, 2012 at 7:41 PM

The dims seem to think that a woman’s ‘brain’ is located below her waist.

annoyinglittletwerp on September 24, 2012 at 7:16 PM

Sad irony is that is what they always accuse men of.

AZfederalist on September 24, 2012 at 7:42 PM

Blergh

stvdog on September 24, 2012 at 7:42 PM

After a long day of making such statements, Ms. Cutter goes home, and chews up some more newspaper she uses to line up her home… right next to her exercise wheel.

Danny on September 24, 2012 at 7:47 PM

A single woman raising the kids depends on an employed and stable ex-hubbie that can readily find new jobs if needed, to keep the child support coming in.

She’s not concerned finding a new hubbie that’s well employed and stable to provide for her and the kids?

Do they think we’re nincompoops?

Typicalwhitewoman on September 24, 2012 at 7:56 PM

The majority of women are going to vote for Obama. How was she wrong?

xblade on September 24, 2012 at 7:41 PM

Not sure Erika said she was wrong. What she said was:

In the next four years, I’d like to sure of economic growth, job creation, fiscal solvency, and national security — and President Obama’s record isn’t looking too hot.

Not too difficult there braniac.

CW on September 24, 2012 at 7:57 PM

What else can you say when your first term has been such a complete and utter failure?

These aren’t the droids you’re looking for. Sadly, this jedi mind trick works on far too many.

Scrappy on September 24, 2012 at 8:07 PM

With you Erika!
.
.

From the way he polls are looking, most people aren’t concerned about what happened the last four years.

Mark1971 on September 24, 2012 at 5:28 PM

Actually, the polls you are referring to are wrong. Too skewed to Democrats. When unskewed, Romney is WINNING!
(This link has been posted before by WorkingClassArtist)

http://www.unskewedpolls.com/
.
.
Here is an explanation for the skewingfrom one of the links on that page…..which is that pollsters are using the number of Dems in 2008 exit polls as compared to Republicans that year. Of course, the turnout in 2008 was very huge for the incomptent-in-chief, and that excitement is gone today.

Schoen pointed out that the Pew poll was based on Democrats sampled for having an 11 percent voters registration edge over Republicans. He further added, “saying that America has gotten more Democratic than 2008, which is a questionable assumption.”

http://www.examiner.com/article/two-democratic-pollsters-confirm-major-polls-skewed-against-mitt-romney

avagreen on September 24, 2012 at 8:09 PM

The majority of women are going to vote for Obama. How was she wrong?

xblade on September 24, 2012 at 7:41 PM

Something to keep in mind:
WaPo/ABC poll: Obama’s favorable rating now underwater — including with women
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/

avagreen on September 24, 2012 at 8:33 PM

if she wasn’t so scary i would be lmfao@cutter

losarkos on September 24, 2012 at 9:11 PM

To be fair, the liberal women I know aren’t a bit concerned about the last four years. They think all of Obama’s term has been great; any problems are 100% attributable to Republicans (and/or the crazy, extremist Tea Party types–only that’s not the term they use, of course). Their big concern is about the next four years–because they are terrified that Republicans might force women who work for religious organizations to pay for their own abortions and/or birth control (only they don’t get that that’s what they’re upset about–they think they are upset that Republicans, with the mere stroke of a pen, will forever outlaw abortion and birth control).

Those women who hold a different opinion about the last four years and who see beyond the “war on women” hysteria are likely aligned with conservatives or Republicans, which, ipso facto, means they are not women at all–or at least don’t deserve to have their thoughts and opinions acknowledged (well, as anything more than something to ridicule). So, there you go. What you find with most women is that “[t]hey’re not really concerned about what’s happened over the last four years, they really want to know what’s going to happen in the next four years.” Makes perfect sense./*

*Sarc tag applies only to paragraph two. Sadly, paragraph one reflects reality.

butterflies and puppies on September 24, 2012 at 11:25 PM

as long as I’ve got free abortions and free rubbers, Obama has my vote

burserker on September 24, 2012 at 5:52 PM

I’m holding out for some food stamps too, I’m not cheap like you! /sarc

Night Owl on September 24, 2012 at 5:57 PM

Pikers! Anybody can get that stuff. I’m holdin’ out for a Disability Check on top of all that.
(Fat lotta good free rubbers do you if you can’t afford someplace classy…like Motel 6)

Solaratov on September 24, 2012 at 11:34 PM

So who is bedding and feeding this woman?
She doesn’t live in the real world. She lives in liberal la la land!
As a liberal, she is untouched by the real world.
Her mother missed a great opportunity in the first trimester.Too late now……..

Delsa on September 25, 2012 at 1:07 AM

I just tried to watch the video to see if one eye was larger than the other and Cutter video is taken down

Delsa on September 25, 2012 at 1:24 AM

Erica,
You go girl!!!!

She is a demonic beotch. Satan himself has groomed her. She is the Jezebel in Revelation. And most of all she has to go. STAT! Tweet to all you know and those you don’t. Women have to have a mind of their own. (and they do of course.)

We had many like you in the beginnings of our Republic. And I’m proud of you all!

auspatriotman on September 25, 2012 at 1:34 AM

Her left eye is significantly higher than her right eye. Sup with that?

watson007 on September 24, 2012 at 6:53 PM

You calling her cockeyed? War on Wimmin!

FineasFinn on September 25, 2012 at 11:03 AM

Comment pages: 1 2