Quotes of the day
posted at 10:38 pm on September 20, 2012 by Allahpundit
Ann Romney says fellow Republicans who’ve criticized her husband need to “stop it” and realize “how lucky” the party is to have Mitt Romney as its nominee…
“Stop it. This is hard. You want to try it? Get in the ring,” she said. “This is hard and, you know, it’s an important thing that we’re doing right now and it’s an important election and it is time for all Americans to realize how significant this election is and how lucky we are to have someone with Mitt’s qualifications and experience and know-how to be able to have the opportunity to run this country.”…
“It’s nonsense and the chattering class…you hear it and then you just let it go right by,” she told Radio Iowa. “…Honestly, at this point, I’m not surprised by anything.”
With polls showing Mitt Romney locked in tight races with President Obama in Colorado and Nevada, the Republican National Committee — in conjunction with the Romney campaign — is beefing up its operation in the two western battlegrounds.
GOP officials tell ABC News that the RNC is “adding additional staff” in both states — some of whom are being re-assigned from their posts in New Mexico (though the officials noted they “are maintaining offices and staff” there.)…
GOP sources tell ABC they have already “passed the 1 million voter contact mark” in both states. In Nevada, Republicans say they have made “4 times more phone calls and 12 times more door knocks than this time in 2008″ and in Colorado: “4 times more phone calls and 6 times more door knocks than this time” four years ago.
“Right now the undecideds are motivated by their disapproval of the president,” says Republican pollster John McLaughlin. “They want to vote against the president. However, Romney has to give them a reason to vote for him and make the Obama disapproval stick. The Obama campaign’s negative attacks on Romney have been brilliant to stall the normal anti-incumbent vote. If they can’t get them to vote for Obama, they would prefer they just disappear. Convincing them falsely or prematurely that Romney will lose can work just as well.”…
“What tends to happen is the vote decision is driven by two things,” McInturff said. “Your feeling about the direction of the country — where 70 percent say the country is on the wrong track — and their feelings about the president’s performance, which is very negative. I don’t think Romney will get 100 percent of this vote, but I do think a chunk will vote and they will disproportionately break to Romney.”
Romney needs to get specific. But he also must keep it short and sweet – and all of the specific points have to swing back to prosperity, with a particular eye to the coalition he is looking to build. If we follow Polk’s model of four points, then I would suggest the following for Romney:
1. He will reform the tax code. Specifically, he will cut all loopholes that the wealthy have purchased through lobbying efforts and use the money to cut taxes for small businesses and average Americans.
2. He will reduce the deficit by cutting Obama’s wasteful spending and putting our entitlement system on a long-term sustainable path.
3. He will repeal Obamacare and replace it with a system that emphasizes competition and portability – making health insurance more affordable and more secure.
4. He will lower the cost of energy and food. On energy, he will open up new areas for oil drilling and green-light the Keystone pipeline. On food, he will end the madness of the Obama Fed’s money printing, which only helps Wall Street while raising the price of basic necessities for the average American.
Romney’s spending is just starting. This is something that everyone mentions, but then seems to forget: Romney and his allies will probably outspend the president heavily in the next two months.
I don’t think that matters in and of itself. After all, both candidates will have plenty of cash to make their cases, well past the point of diminishing returns.
What does matter, however, is how this disparity was attained. The Obama campaign spent heavily over the summer trying to soften up Romney. It’s unclear how well this worked — the polls were pretty steady and Romney’s favorables actually improved a bit — but a large portion of the basic case against Romney has been made.
In the meantime, the Romney campaign had been very constrained in how it could spend its money; it was limited to primary funds until recently. That means the campaign has largely been outsourced to 527s and campaign committees.
This explains a lot of the Romney campaign to date. During the convention, a parade of people telling tear-jerking stories about how the nominee had helped them out made their way across the stage at the RNC. Stu Rothenberg wondered on Twitter why they hadn’t appeared in ads.
I suspect now that Romney can spend freely, they will appear. Quite frankly, they’ll probably be more effective in the fall, when people are paying attention.
Despite what appears to be a plump bank account and an in-house production studio that cranks out multiple commercials a day, Mr. Romney’s campaign has been tightfisted with its advertising budget, leaving him at a disadvantage in several crucial states as President Obama blankets them with ads.
One major reason appears to be that Mr. Romney’s campaign finances have been significantly less robust than recent headlines would suggest. Much of the more than $300 million the campaign reported raising this summer is earmarked for the Republican National Committee, state Republican organizations and Congressional races, limiting the money Mr. Romney’s own campaign has to spend…
“In a world where we know advertising imbalances lend opportunities for persuasion, it is surprising that any campaign would allow imbalances to continue,” said Erika Franklin Fowler, co-director of the Wesleyan Media Project. “Especially following several weeks of ad dominance by the opponent.”
The financial tide turned against Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and his key allies, who spent more than they brought in during the month of August, according to disclosures filed Thursday.
Romney’s presidential campaign committee raised nearly $67 million last month — a strong figure — but spent about the same amount building its campaign organization and responding to a barrage of attack ads from Obama and his allies. Even so, the campaign spent just $13.7 million on ads, which was less than the $15 million it spent in July…
The spending left the campaign with about $50 million cash on hand at the start of September, not including the remaining debt, according to the disclosures. Obama, whose August disclosures had not been filed as of Thursday evening, had about $88 million in cash at the end of July.
Republican insiders have been encouraging the campaign to get back to talking up Mitt, and who he is, so far with little luck.
The last night of the GOP convention was devoted to showing Romney’s compassion and charity, which he is famously reluctant to show, seeing any talk of such things as immodest. Speakers included a former assistant to Romney in his Mormon church in Boston, who spoke of how when Romney was the lay pastor of the church, he would devote 15 to 20 hours a week to helping people in the congregation; and a couple who told the story of how Romney comforted and befriended their 14-year old son, afflicted with Hodgkin’s disease, and helped the boy write a will in his last days divvying up his skateboard, model rockets and fishing gear among his friends.
None of those people, or any of the others who gave testimonials to Romney’s character that night in Tampa, have been seen during the campaign since then.
HH: And so as you assess the entire playing field seven weeks from the election, Senator Paul, how do you feel about Mitt Romney’s prospects? Or are you worried about having to weather a second term of Obama, which I can’t even really imagine?
RP: You know, I think I’m in the minority here, but I think the election is over. I think that Romney has already won. The people really are tired of the debt, they’re tired of irresponsible leadership. I think they’re tired of having 23 million people out of work. So I think you’ll find, and this is my prediction, and of course, I could be wrong. I am fallible. But you remember when Reagan just pulled away from Carter at the end? I think that’s what we’re going to see, is people coalesce and find that the country’s just not headed in the right direction with all this unemployment and economic stagnation, and that they want somebody who’s been in business, somebody who’s run successful businesses and created jobs. I think that’s the way it’s going to break down, simply on that issue, is which way do we take the country – with someone who likes American business, or someone who can’t wait to sort of punish, regulate and tax American business.
Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan went to Capitol Hill on Thursday to urge his House colleagues to remain optimistic about the GOP’s chances in November, amid eroding poll numbers and growing anxiety among some activists about the party’s prospects…
“This is going to be an up and down race,” Ryan, a congressman from Wisconsin, said during an appearance at the last scheduled weekly meeting of House Republicans before Election Day, according to multiple people in the room…
“Here’s our commitment: We are going to make this about the big things,” he said. “We need to go on offense, and we need to give our constituents the choice of two futures.”
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

Rothenberg: Forecast for Senate seats changing because of White House scandals

MSNBC contributor wonders: Why didn’t Romney make a bigger deal about the IRS scandal last year?

Gosnell attorney: Maybe a 16-week deadline for abortion and more regulation would be better






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Democrats think government power is best used against the “other.”
tom daschle concerned on May 21, 2013 at 6:43 PM
Good Little Appartchiks.
Del Dolemonte on May 21, 2013 at 6:47 PM
Really. Romney was right.
tomas on May 21, 2013 at 6:48 PM
hypocrisy, thy name is dems…
cmsinaz on May 21, 2013 at 6:49 PM
Yep – he was just too nice about it.
gophergirl on May 21, 2013 at 6:49 PM
As I type this, the much maligned (by idiots on this site) Kirsten Powers is on Fox News destroying Obama over the Rosen scandal.
AP, you owe it to your fans and Kirsten to put up the video.
Basilsbest on May 21, 2013 at 6:49 PM
Trollcott ?
I know they are getting ready :O
burrata on May 21, 2013 at 6:50 PM
Dems are nothing but mindless sheep yearning for a strong dictator to tell them what to do. They really wish that Napoleon would have come back for them but they’ll be very happy to settle for a retarded Sukarno knock-off. They get an extra kick out of a third world dictator leading them. Noble savages and all …
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on May 21, 2013 at 6:51 PM
There is a movie called Invasion USA, a Chuck Norris actioner about 600 Communist terrorists landed from Cuba and doing terror AQ would only dream about.
In a conversation, the Soviet leader of the group was saying to his Cuban second-in-command, “Look at these Americans! Fat — and they don’t even know the nature of their own freedom.”
That is today’s liberal.
Liam on May 21, 2013 at 6:51 PM
Romney went after Obama in the manner which was most likely to succeed. He didn’t have enough time after he secured the nomination to prove Obama is the charlatan we all know he is.
Basilsbest on May 21, 2013 at 6:52 PM
It really depends on whose ox is being gored, if I may use the word.
Sometimes, Republicans don’t want press leaks.
slp on May 21, 2013 at 6:53 PM
Yes there is.
It means there are no longer democrats of integrity.
It’s a pity. I used to know some.
cozmo on May 21, 2013 at 6:53 PM
I have to wonder about that. When they say they’re following the story, are they just reading the “AP was threatening national security” items?
malclave on May 21, 2013 at 6:54 PM
Did he have enough time to organize an effective GOTV? Did he have enough time to organize a coherent campaign? I mean, he has only been running for president for two decades.
tom daschle concerned on May 21, 2013 at 6:55 PM
It’s always been odd to me how democrats/liberals support things that, in the long run, aren’t to their benefit:
islamic terrorists
abortion
government intrusion into our lives
higher taxes
It’s really bizarre behavior.
SouthernGent on May 21, 2013 at 6:55 PM
That’s no surprise, though. Dems have lined up behind Barky’s every anti-American, insane, stupid, criminal move since 2008. This is all old hat by now. It was clear by the middle of 2009 that there were no dems with any integrity, at all.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on May 21, 2013 at 6:56 PM
Scratch a genuine diehard liberal, and underneath you’ll find an even more disgusting person than you imagined. Because the normal person can’t imagine the depth of their depravity.
Akzed on May 21, 2013 at 6:56 PM
This could have been quite awkward if all this had come out a couple of weeks ago before the WH Correspondents Dinner thing.
rw on May 21, 2013 at 6:57 PM
Democrats love to oppress and suppress – the details are unimportant.
OldEnglish on May 21, 2013 at 6:58 PM
I am as frustrated with the most transparent administration in history as anyone here.
But on this issue I am more circumspect.
Takeaway quote:
Rich H on May 21, 2013 at 6:59 PM
Who in his right mind would want to touch a liberal without a full-body condom. Or a space suit.
Liam on May 21, 2013 at 6:59 PM
“What difference, at this poi… BOOOOOOSH! … Tbagger!” said the liberal.
BoxHead1 on May 21, 2013 at 7:00 PM
Remember when liberals told us to “question authority” and that “dissent is the highest form of patriotism”?
Good times, good times.
Hayabusa on May 21, 2013 at 7:01 PM
You obviously misunderstood them. And they’ll be the first to tell you that, if they can’t get away from ignoring you.
Liam on May 21, 2013 at 7:03 PM
Dems support this because they get all their “news” from leftist blogs, which, of course, offer the spin that makes all of this badness a-OK in their eyes.
Remember, Lefties can justify anything in their little minds, which is one of the things that makes them lefties. They are never constrained by logic.
goflyers on May 21, 2013 at 7:04 PM
Why do conservatives and true constitutionalists continue in the charade of civility?
Americans who do not support this regime had better put their affairs in order and prepare for the worst. This stinking, rotting nation has lost its’ soul and reason for being.
3Bs
PeaceAtAllCosts on May 21, 2013 at 7:04 PM
It in their DNA. And moderate Republicans think they can change things by working with them.
oldroy on May 21, 2013 at 7:04 PM
They really think there motives are purely altruisic, without understanding the true nature of altruism.
esr1951 on May 21, 2013 at 7:04 PM
Remember The Daily Show’s “Your Race Card is Maxxed-Out”?
The Progs’ High ‘n Mighty Righteous Moral Indignation Card is expired.
Free pass for the next Republican Administration. The Left’s Moral Indignation is nothing but political hackery dressed up like it’s got somewhere to go.
de rigueur on May 21, 2013 at 7:06 PM
There is a right time for everything.
Just an idea, if you please, for your further consideration.
Liam on May 21, 2013 at 7:06 PM
So true. He only had four years to come up with some criticisms of Obama. I mean, besides the devastating one we heard so often in the third debate, “I agree with the president.”
My ears are still ringing from that one.
There Goes the Neighborhood on May 21, 2013 at 7:07 PM
The worst kind of dictator is the ‘altruistic’ one. He sleeps with a clear conscience.
Liam on May 21, 2013 at 7:09 PM
I used to be one, until the Democrat Party left me in the late 1990′s.
And I actually know a few 2013 Democrats who haven’t consumed the Kool Aid. But they are very few, and very far between.
Del Dolemonte on May 21, 2013 at 7:10 PM
Truth be told, this is a tough issue. I think that the specific leak investigations at issue here are clearly government thuggery: Rosen simply scooped a White House press briefing on the same subject by a few hours, and Fast & Furious was a genuine scandal whose revelation did not endanger national security.
But that said, the Bush administration was hit with several leaks that really DID damage national security. And philosophically, I reject the argument that leaking classified information is necessary to expose government misconduct. The fact is, employees have multiple legal ways to blow the whistle on classified matters: they can go to their agency’s Inspector General or Congressional oversight committee. (That’s what happened with the Benghazi investigation, for instance.) The IG and those Congressmen are cleared to handle classified material, and are better positioned to balance the national security implications of going public than a honked-off bureaucrat.
So, as tough as it is to admit, “chilling” the media from damaging national security through gratuitous leaking is not altogether a terrible thing.
Outlander on May 21, 2013 at 7:12 PM
What is especially bizarre is their support not only of Islamic terrorists, but Islam in general-considering how they treat women and gays like trash, etc.
It’s almost like a Pavlovian reflex: Christianity is automatically Bad, so Islam is automatically good, simply because it’s an alternative.
Del Dolemonte on May 21, 2013 at 7:13 PM
I used to very liberal. When I started thinking about it, pulling all things into it from my education and what adults taught me all my life, liberalism stopped fitting anywhere in my life as a right thing to hold, keep, or practice.
Liam on May 21, 2013 at 7:14 PM
He ran a very good campaign which elicited a very enthusiastic response from Republicans as was evident from the size of his campaign rallies. No doubt the GOTV effort would have been better if Palin had not prolonged the Primary with her idiotic encouragement of a brokered convention in the moronic hope that she would be chosen as the nominee.
There isn’t enough data available to discern what the outcome of the election would have been if the nomination had been cinched a couple of months earlier. What is clear is that the same people who bash Romney now, bashed him then and contributed to the GOP not running as good a campaign as was necessary to defeat an incumbent with the unqualified support of 90% of the media.
You Romney haters are as clueless as the Obamaphiles.
Basilsbest on May 21, 2013 at 7:20 PM
Yep. Kinda like Obama himself. Shudders.
esr1951 on May 21, 2013 at 7:20 PM
Sounds like you been pursuing the Proggie blogs a bit.
… on second thought, it doesn’t take that much to come across that increasing lame and desperate defense of the Dear Liar..
Galt2009 on May 21, 2013 at 7:20 PM
rogerb on May 21, 2013 at 7:21 PM
Because Palin?
You are extra special. I made the unfortunate decision to donate time and treasure to Romney, not because I was at all for him, but 100% against bat face.
Keep Beliebing Mittler Youth Captain.
tom daschle concerned on May 21, 2013 at 7:22 PM
This is why I say payback is gonna be a sweet beitch, non negotiable Progs, this poll just shows how truly diseased you are and you all will pay….one way or the other. Anybody have known Progressives working at your companies or know of company owners that hire known Progs? Yeah, me neither and my decision is in perpetuity.
Tangerinesong on May 21, 2013 at 7:24 PM
He’s just another liberal clone, cookie-cutter. With replicative fading.
Liam on May 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM
Ah….I see.
Its the liberals outside of the MSM that think its a good idea to spy on liberals who are the MSM…is that it?
Communism is great…..until it happens to you.
BobMbx on May 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM
Guess the “Press” picked the wrong side for their friends. The press should never be friends with pols, but do their jobs as watchdogs, not lapdogs.
IrishEyes on May 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM
That’s only when they aren’t in power – then it switches over to don’t question our authority.
BTW, not to nit-pick, but I do really wish that people would stop using that ‘L’ word that flatters those authoritarian Statists with the false impression they are in favor of liberty (both ‘l’ words have the same root meaning)
Leftists have shown themselves to be the authoritarian they’ve always been – they just used to have to hide it.
Now that their hold on power is threatened by the concept of Liberty and freedom, they cannot stand those ideas.
Remember: ‘Liberalism’ is the Left’s first and Foremost LIE
Galt2009 on May 21, 2013 at 7:28 PM
Told you, often, and will repeat – leftists are never for liberty, freedom, democracy, equality…just for power.
They are eternal tyrants who claim to be liberal and progressive. Never call them liberal or progressive. They don’t have the gene.
Schadenfreude on May 21, 2013 at 7:30 PM
islamic terrorists = Free Mumia. Most don’t know who he is, but its cool to say it.
abortion = adult behavior without without adult consequences.
government intrusion into our lives = until it hits them personally, then its “the man” trying to get them.
higher taxes = most libs don’t pay them, so why not?
BobMbx on May 21, 2013 at 7:33 PM
They need a motto that tells the truth…
Liberalism — preserving liberty by destroying it.
Liam on May 21, 2013 at 7:35 PM
Not really, it could have given the REB bunches of great material for jokes.
He has joked about IRS tax audits before.
slickwillie2001 on May 21, 2013 at 7:36 PM
AND YET, we’re supposed to trust them with border enforcement and our healthcare???
Brilliant.
PappyD61 on May 21, 2013 at 7:36 PM
Libtards:
2008 old and busted: ZOMG warrantless wiretaps!!1!0ne!
2013 new hotness: I’m totally cool w/ that!
Grimpond on May 21, 2013 at 7:49 PM
Simple answer is he is black. If you then point out that fewer blacks are doing well under his wat h, that he has fewer blacks in his cabinet, that median income haz gone down for black families they will answer he is black. You cannot reason with these willfully ignorant and willfully self-defeating libs. At this point all we can do is hope that enough conservarives, repubs, and indys can get folks elected to combat these fools. The deck is pretty stacked against us. I hope someday we can return this in spades. I cant wait for repubs to use the irs against leftist groups, defunf planned parenthood, load the courts with ultra right wing judges etc…
neyney on May 21, 2013 at 7:51 PM
Of course they think it is fine if the OTHER guy is targeted. The OTHER guy is evil and deserves it.
The problem with aiding and abetting the regimes who are rooting out “evil” is that about the time they run out of “other people’s money” they run out of OTHERS to put up against the wall.
Lily on May 21, 2013 at 7:57 PM
So who really are the socialists, anarchists, commies, “progressives” and the real Jack Booted thugs?
Now we all know…power to the proletariat Dems.
Congratulations for splitting America in half…it’s the beginning of 1861 all over again. Deja vu anyone?
Twana on May 21, 2013 at 8:02 PM
It’s not really hard to understand. If a policy is bad for the country and economy, the left is reflexively for it. Their number one enemy has always been the US. It explains how a party that hates Christian conservatives enthusiastically supports Islamic theocrats and how the party of science can support the global warming hoax.
Doomberg on May 21, 2013 at 8:14 PM
It’s been awhile since we’ve seen a wedge issue on the left with some traction.
This one separates the MSM, who are not happy about this, from the rabid lefties who enthusiastically support anything Dear Leader says and does.
It also separates the rabid lefties from the ACLU faction. And from the Dems who like the MSM the way it is, such as the ones who love to leak info to their favorite left wing hacks.
farsighted on May 21, 2013 at 8:31 PM
Yes, that could be one way they might say that – IF they were to be honest for once.
But if they were honest, they wouldn’t be Leftists..
Galt2009 on May 21, 2013 at 8:40 PM
I wonder if Kirsten Powers voted for Obama. Twice.
ddrintn on May 21, 2013 at 9:47 PM
^ And would vote for him a third time if she had the chance. That’s why she’s maligned.
ddrintn on May 21, 2013 at 9:47 PM