Kirsten Powers: Yes, the media’s reaction to Romney’s Egypt statement yesterday was utterly insane
posted at 6:41 pm on September 13, 2012 by Allahpundit
Via Mediaite, consider this a video complement to Erick Erickson’s piece at Red State this morning about yesterday’s virtuoso exercise in narrative-driven concern-trolling. If you only know KP from her Fox appearances, this clip will come as a surprise, as she’s as unsparing of O’s failures here as any pundit on the other side of the aisle would be. If you follow her Twitter feed, it’ll come as no surprise at all. She’s been lighting into the White House and the embassy for the past 36 hours, and in fact has lit into them frequently in the past on the topic of Egypt. She’s tweeted before too about having friends in the Copt community there, so this is no academic exercise in punditry. The stronger the Brotherhood gets, the more dangerous the situation becomes for the Copts and for the United States. Go figure that she’s more worried about the president’s reaction than Mitt Romney’s.
Speaking of the embassy, I’d sure like some more details on what this exchange is all about:
.@ikhwanweb Thanks. By the way, have you checked out your own Arabic feeds? I hope you know we read those too.
— US Embassy Cairo (@USEmbassyCairo) September 13, 2012
“Ikhwanweb” is the English-language account of the Muslim Brotherhood. The embassy didn’t specify what they saw on the MB’s Arab-language feeds, but this story on Ahram Online will give you an idea:
This reconciliatory tweet, however, was posted while the Brotherhood’s Arabic-language Twitter account and its official website were both praising the protests — staged against a US-made film judged defamatory towards Islam — and calling for a million man march on Friday.
One Arabic language article on the Brotherhood’s site sported the headline ‘Egyptians rise to defend the Prophet’.
The Times of Israel has much, much more about the Brotherhood’s reaction, including their calls to criminalize insults to Islam. It’s a long tradition in the Arab world for leaders to say one thing in English for international audiences and something else entirely for domestic consumption; Arafat in particular was infamous for talking out of both sides of his mouth. If the embassy has reason to believe that the Brotherhood supports what happened yesterday, which of course it does, I sure do wish the Foreign-Policy President would share that information with the American public. Might be relevant to the question of whether Egypt is or isn’t still an “ally,” no?
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Report: Oversight on IRS targeting came from Washington all along

DOJ seized logs for five Fox News phones, possibly James Rosens’ parents’ house






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Better scenario: Imagine the story AP would run…
socalcon on May 21, 2013 at 7:35 PM
Has the IRS reported to DOJ yet on the content of their prayers?
de rigueur on May 21, 2013 at 7:37 PM
{raises hand} ahem, if I might get a copy of those criteria? please? {shrinking away}
socalcon on May 21, 2013 at 7:39 PM
If any money changed hands for weapons, wanna bet said reimbursements were in the form of campaign donations? Now that would truly be the end to end all ends!
can_con on May 21, 2013 at 8:15 PM
Sooo… Obama, Holder and Clinton; who are the other two guys? Oops, my bad, I meant James Rosen, Sharyl Atkisson, Major Garrett – who are the other two?
ghostwalker1 on May 21, 2013 at 8:30 PM
Why should these guys worry? They’ve been laughing in public for almost a year now.
ghostwalker1 on May 21, 2013 at 8:34 PM
Why doesn’t al Jazeera or some other Arabic company interview these guys and find out what really happened?
At this point I think al Jazeera’s word on this is no more or less reliable than that of this fascist administration.
slickwillie2001 on May 21, 2013 at 9:22 PM
If the CIA was trying to recover arms, or the STate Dept. wanted it as an outpost, all I can say is…so what? Somebody should have protected them!
Surely, Hillary didn’t deny protection to teach the CIA a lesson, did she?
PattyJ on May 21, 2013 at 10:39 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2