Romney adviser on whether Egypt statement “could wait”: “That’s a silly question”

posted at 7:16 pm on September 12, 2012 by Erika Johnsen

While the Middle East erupted in protests akin to yesterday’s riots, presenting an opportunity to discuss our presidential candidates’ foreign-policy approaches to the so-called Arab Spring, the mainstream media continued to demonstrate an almost amazingly single-minded focus on the exaggerated faux-shortcomings of Mitt Romney’s communications team. The mind reels (full transcript here — it’s good):

Romney campaign senior foreign policy adviser Richard Williamson: “That’s a silly question, almost anything might wait… I came here to talk about the failed policies in the Middle East, which is what the American people are interested [in]. The failed policies of leading from behind. What you want to do is play a process ‘getcha’ question. I don’t want to play your game… Governor Romney’s statement was fine, it was acceptable, it was right. …We look forward to talking about this substance when you’re available.”

Before this segment of the interview, the CNN anchor went on and on and on about whether the timing of Romney’s statement was inappropriate. No. A thousand times, no. My Townhall buddy Guy Benson already said it perfectly:

Mitt Romney filled the void on behalf of the First Amendment, refused to shy away from American first principles, and excoriated the embassy’s posture (the White House eventually did the same). … Nevertheless, the insta-narrative is that Romney “jumped the gun” by “politicizing” the tragedy in Libya.  He did nothing of the sort. … The media is blaming Romney for capitalizing politically on deaths that he *did not know about* when he released a (generally strong) repudiation of our Cairo embassy’s reactions to a *different event.*  They’d criticize him for any action he took here, unless it involved essentially applauding and agreeing with everything the Obama administration has done, then sitting quietly in a corner.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

That’s a cheap shot, and you know it.

Count to 10 on September 12, 2012 at 7:59 PM

How so ? Hasn’t McCain been supporting the ” rebels” in libya ?
Hasn’t he been a broker for the ” rebels” receiving arms and US taxpayer money from Hussein’s regime ?
Hasn’t he been meeting the leaders of libyan ” rebels” in libya and DC ?
What is wrong in asking McCain —who is an expert on implementing Hussein’s anti-American policies half way around the world — what we should do now ?

burrata on September 12, 2012 at 8:09 PM

If the liberals had their way, the only religions that it would be acceptable to criticize would be Christianity and Judaism.

If the liberals had their way, we’d be apologizing for every action the United States has taken since 1789.

If the liberals had their way, we’d be f***ed.

hillbillyjim on September 12, 2012 at 8:10 PM

jimver on September 12, 2012 at 7:55 PM

One thing I did notice..we got a lot of wishy washy crap from the Egyptian government, but the government in Libya {what government there is} has strongly condemned this in no uncertain terms and have said they will punish the people responsible. I don’t have much faith in anything that comes out of the region, but it might well be that the people who did this were not part of that government. They might have been AlQaida affiliated group who attacked this embassy because they knew it was virtually undefended.

Terrye on September 12, 2012 at 7:59 PM

they probably were (al qaeda), but then don’t forget we armed and trained those ones too, remember when osama was our ‘ally’….you’d hope we learned from that….The point is arm these fanatic neamderthals and sooner or later they will turn against us…egypt being the most potential frigthening scenario and pakistan of course…

jimver on September 12, 2012 at 8:11 PM

I disagree that it is a cheap shot. McCain has had a very naive attitude when it comes to these “revolutions.” The problem in every case is that those we would put in power do not have the institutional legitimacy, organizational ability, or moral authority to get the job done. It is an echo of the bad foreign policy in South America that the US pursued for decades.

Happy Nomad on September 12, 2012 at 8:06 PM

It was absolutely a cheap shot. You are very naive if you think revolutions are ever “clean”, or that McCain doesn’t know how messing things get.

Count to 10 on September 12, 2012 at 8:11 PM

How so ? Hasn’t McCain been supporting the ” rebels” in libya ?
Hasn’t he been a broker for the ” rebels” receiving arms and US taxpayer money from Hussein’s regime ?
Hasn’t he been meeting the leaders of libyan ” rebels” in libya and DC ?
What is wrong in asking McCain —who is an expert on implementing Hussein’s anti-American policies half way around the world — what we should do now ?

burrata on September 12, 2012 at 8:09 PM

And you “know” that it was the “rebels” that did this, how?

Count to 10 on September 12, 2012 at 8:13 PM

Terrye on September 12, 2012 at 8:04 PM

I heard that someone in the security forces might have said something to the bad guys..but I also heard that other security force people were fighting and getting shot at too.

The only statements about locals fighting for our people and getting shot I have heard came from Obama and Hillary Clinton. They also said (clearly a lie) that our Ambassador’s body was being taken to the hospital by loving natives. The pictures about that tell the truth.

But I am not sorry Gaddafi is gone. I am 60 years old and I can remember very well when that plane down over Scotland.Too bad Reagan did not get Gaddafi when the US bombed Tripoli.

It’s an intresting dynamic. We don’t like dictators but don’t necessarily mind the stability they provide. The break-up of Yugoslavia, for example, was a huge mess as the tribal hatreds held in check for decades by Tito were played out. What we are seeing with the Arab Spring is changes of regime but not necessarily changes in governance. Egypt is becoming less Westernized as they Muslim Brotherhood makes it into a totalitarian state (reminds me of the way Iran shifted after their revolution). In Libya we see a central government weak enough that Al Qaeda is able to become the defacto leaders of the “revolution.”

Happy Nomad on September 12, 2012 at 8:16 PM

The media is blaming Romney for capitalizing politically on deaths that he *did not know about* when he released a (generally strong) repudiation of our Cairo embassy’s reactions to a *different event.* 

Romney’s statement referenced the deaths.

verbaluce on September 12, 2012 at 8:16 PM

It was absolutely a cheap shot. You are very naive if you think revolutions are ever “clean”, or that McCain doesn’t know how messing things get.

Count to 10 on September 12, 2012 at 8:11 PM

Have to break a few eggs to make an omelet? The broken eggs are American citizens who are being murdered at the hands of the same folks McCain wanted us to go to bat for. Same story in Egypt, Gaza, and everywhere else that Muslims have been given aid and have shown no hesitation in turning on their benefactors.

sharrukin on September 12, 2012 at 8:16 PM

I dunno, when a foriegn country breaks into our embassy, assassinates our ambassador and drags his body through the streets I think politicians should take notice. Strong notice. But that’s just me.

tommyboy on September 12, 2012 at 8:17 PM

I asked this in the other thread but nobody could seem to wrap their brains around this simple thought: What if they made that statement simply to save their own butts? Is it really that crazy to think that you’d say just about ANYTHING if you could die within minutes or hours?

Please, tell me I’m crazy for thinking that…

ManWithNoName on September 12, 2012 at 8:17 PM

******************* ALERT *****************************

Protests over anti-Islam film resume in Egypt; police use tear gas on protesters outside embassy, in Tahrir Square – @CNN

11 mins ago from http://www..com by editor

http://www.breakingnews.com/topic/anti-islam-film-protests

canopfor on September 12, 2012 at 8:18 PM

canopfor on September 12, 2012 at 8:20 PM

And you “know” that it was the “rebels” that did this, how?

Count to 10 on September 12, 2012 at 8:13 PM

You know that it WASN’T the “rebels ” that did this , how ?
So , let us ask the expert , John McCain. He knows everything about libya and it’s ” rebels”

burrata on September 12, 2012 at 8:21 PM

It was absolutely a cheap shot. You are very naive if you think revolutions are ever “clean”, or that McCain doesn’t know how messing things get.

Count to 10 on September 12, 2012 at 8:11 PM

Whatever. You’re set in your opinion so there is no need to discuss.

But I’ll absolutely disagree that revolutions can’t be clean. The American revolution had its rough spots but was “clean” in the sense that the founding principles made it through the process. The collapse of the Berlin Wall was a clean revolution. I am fully aware that there are dozens of examples that go the other way but I would suggest that to be successful revolution has to be absolute and sweeping. Too often what is billed as revolution is really nothing more than reform.

John McCain doesn’t understand the difference between revolution and reform. Do you?

Happy Nomad on September 12, 2012 at 8:23 PM

Alternate answer: “Mr Lemon, as a journalist, how do you feel about an administration that thinks so LITTLE of the first amendment that is your life’s blood that they would so quickly toss it (and presumably, you) to a crazed mob.”

kurtzz3 on September 12, 2012 at 8:25 PM

Please, tell me I’m crazy for thinking that…

ManWithNoName on September 12, 2012 at 8:17 PM

Can’t tell ya if you are crazy until I understand what the hell you are talking about. Who made what statement to save their butts?

Happy Nomad on September 12, 2012 at 8:26 PM

“Mr Lemon, as a journalist, how do you feel about an administration that thinks so LITTLE of the first amendment that is your life’s blood that they would so quickly toss it (and presumably, you) to a crazed mob.”
kurtzz3 on September 12, 2012 at 8:25 PM

The General is awaiting your response on line three…….

tommyboy on September 12, 2012 at 8:27 PM

So conservatives don’t care that Romney got it completely wrong? That the statement condemning the video came out before the attacks?

Constantine on September 12, 2012 at 8:29 PM

But I’ll absolutely disagree that revolutions can’t be clean. The American revolution had its rough spots but was “clean” in the sense that the founding principles made it through the process. The collapse of the Berlin Wall was a clean revolution. I am fully aware that there are dozens of examples that go the other way but I would suggest that to be successful revolution has to be absolute and sweeping. Too often what is billed as revolution is really nothing more than reform.

John McCain doesn’t understand the difference between revolution and reform. Do you?

Happy Nomad on September 12, 2012 at 8:23 PM

The “American Revolution” was a provincial revolt, and incredibly dirty (including a complete violation of principle in compromising on slavery). The collapse of the Soviet empire was not only dirty, but incomplete. Hell, the occupation of Germany had similar amounts of terrorist attacks to Iraq.

Count to 10 on September 12, 2012 at 8:29 PM

Romney’s statement referenced the deaths.

verbaluce on September 12, 2012 at 8:16 PM

No it didn’t you liar. Not the one the liberal media has latched onto as “jumping the gun.” It was an indictment of the rat-eared bastard’s apologies for somebody offending Muslim sensitivities even before there were any protests.

Happy Nomad on September 12, 2012 at 8:30 PM

Al Jazeera English: Live Stream

http://www.aljazeera.com/watch_now/

canopfor on September 12, 2012 at 8:30 PM

Romney’s statement referenced the deaths.

verbaluce on September 12, 2012 at 8:16 PM

@kirstenpowers10

For those complaining that Romney criticized a statement made before the attacks: the Embassy tweeted they stood by statement AFTER attack.

Flora Duh on September 12, 2012 at 8:31 PM

Count to 10 on September 12, 2012 at 8:29 PM

Oh! I understand now. You’re a socialist. No need to further this discussion at all. Your moronic remarks give you away.

Happy Nomad on September 12, 2012 at 8:32 PM

Happy Nomad at 8:26 PM

I’m on my phone so I can’t quote like I want but my question was referring to what the statement from the guys at the Embassy said before they we’re attacked. What if they thought their statement could buy them some time to get reinforcements?

ManWithNoName on September 12, 2012 at 8:32 PM

Round 2 commencing as we post.

BallisticBob on September 12, 2012 at 8:33 PM

Happy Nomad on September 12, 2012 at 8:30 PM

verbaluce is correct.

I’m outraged by the attacks on American diplomatic missions in Libya and Egypt and by the death of an American consulate worker in Benghazi,” Romney said in the statement. “It’s disgraceful that the Obama Administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks.”

Flora Duh on September 12, 2012 at 8:35 PM

Has McConnell or Boehner said anything, or are they their usual Chicken Littles?

davidk on September 12, 2012 at 8:37 PM

Attention barry soetoro, resign now and save yourself the embarrassment…you can keep the lab made testicles…we wouldn’t want moochelle to be the only one in your house with more testosterone than you….

crosshugger on September 12, 2012 at 8:39 PM

Double down, Mitt. Tell ‘em someone had to speak up for Free Speech and you decided it would be you. And to make it really fun, remind those knee-pad Obot “journalists” that they’ll just loooove Free Speech when you’re president — and criticizing the president becomes patriotic again.

Rational Thought on September 12, 2012 at 8:42 PM

Looks like the Democrat-subservient media is pissed that Gov. Romney looks and sounds more presidential than a tired, worn-out hack on his way to Vegas for some money-ball fun. Romney sounded focused and principled while Ø sounded flat, disinterested and emotionally distant, like he was just going through the motions. That’s no kind of president to have speak for the nation.
.
Ø is much better when he is apologizing for our USofA or blaming the Cambridge police for acting stupidly. President DipShit. Thanks, Asswipe.

ExpressoBold on September 12, 2012 at 8:43 PM

I’m outraged by the attacks on American diplomatic missions in Libya and Egypt and by the death of an American consulate worker in Benghazi. It’s disgraceful that the Obama Administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks.

http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2012/09/11/mitt-romneys-statement-on-us-embassys-apology-to-jihadis-oot/

davidk on September 12, 2012 at 8:44 PM

So conservatives don’t care that Romney got it completely wrong? That the statement condemning the video came out before the attacks?

Constantine on September 12, 2012 at 8:29 PM

Oops you forgot one important part of your talking point – the truth.

The embassy reaffirmed the statement AFTER the attack.

gophergirl on September 12, 2012 at 8:46 PM

There sure is a lot of moderation on this thread.

ExpressoBold on September 12, 2012 at 8:46 PM

Looks like the Democrat-subservient media is pissed that Gov. Romney looks and sounds more presidential than a tired, worn-out hack on his way to Vegas for some money-ball fun. Romney sounded focused and principled while Ø sounded flat, disinterested and emotionally distant, like he was just going through the motions. That’s no kind of president to have speak for the nation.
.
Ø is much better when he is apologizing for our USofA or blaming the Cambridge police for acting stupidly.

ExpressoBold on September 12, 2012 at 8:47 PM

Oops you forgot one important part of your talking point – the truth.
The embassy reaffirmed the statement AFTER the attack.
gophergirl on September 12, 2012 at 8:46 PM

“At 6:30 p.m. ET – The embassy then tweeted about its earlier statement: “This morning’s condemnation (issued before protests began) still stands. As does our condemnation of unjustified breach of the Embassy.”

So you have an equally feeble grasp of language and consider this “sympathizing” with the attackers?

Constantine on September 12, 2012 at 8:52 PM

@kirstenpowers10
For those complaining that Romney criticized a statement made before the attacks: the Embassy tweeted they stood by statement AFTER attack.

Irrelevant, as far as Romney’s and his team’s major fail here.
Some Obama quotes just out that just obliterate him on this. .
Romney dug himself an even bigger hole by doubling down.
The critiques of him for this will continue to build on the right.

verbaluce on September 12, 2012 at 8:55 PM

Oops you forgot one important part of your talking point – the truth.
The embassy reaffirmed the statement AFTER the attack.
gophergirl on September 12, 2012 at 8:46 PM

I can’t imagine that this kind of desperate sounding convoluted logic will play anywhere…
maybe Fox & Friends?

verbaluce on September 12, 2012 at 8:59 PM

Hey! The President of Acting Stupidly is on TV again.

ExpressoBold on September 12, 2012 at 9:04 PM

The exact opposite is, once again, the truth. What a disaster this president is!!!! Romney was exactly right to criticize the “embassy statement” that went out too soon……that was “shooting before aiming”!!! Who, by the way, wrote that statement????The embassy staff? Hillary Clinton? Obama? Who? Why is no one asking that question? And talk about “shooting before aiming”….remember the cop issue in Boston? Obama’s comment about Trayvon Martin???? Geez….. And, now, after a day of supposed “investigation” if this was, in fact, premeditated as is being suggested, where was the “intelligence”? Where, quite frankly, is the intelligence in this administration?

driguana on September 12, 2012 at 9:06 PM

ExpressoBold on September 12, 2012 at 9:04 PM

Maybe someone else can report back on what he says.I can’t stand to hear his barking anymore.

esr1951 on September 12, 2012 at 9:07 PM

Come on. Do you expect the “Evolving One” makes snap decisions? Valerie Jarrett had a hair appointment that day.

djaymick on September 12, 2012 at 9:07 PM

Mitt Romney filled the void on behalf of the First Amendment, refused to shy away from American first principles, and excoriated the embassy’s posture (the White House eventually did the same).

You liberal/progressive morons can whine about the “timing” of Romney’s statement from now to eternity. The facts are simple: Romney was right to criticize the cowardly attempt at Islamofascist appeasement from the Obama embassy personnel in Cairo.

The Obama administration acknowledged the correctness of Romney’s criticism when they later criticized the stupid Cairo apology themselves, calling it inappropriate and not authorized by the White House.

But keep spinning, trolls. Americans know the truth.

AZCoyote on September 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM

Irrelevant, as far as Romney’s and his team’s major fail here.
Some Obama quotes just out that just obliterate him on this. .
Romney dug himself an even bigger hole by doubling down.
The critiques of him for this will continue to build on the right.

verbaluce on September 12, 2012 at 8:55 PM

Irrelevant, VJ’s pool boy refused take any media questions, period. Romney, was put on the spot by an openly hostile media and he responded. Someone looked more presidential here than the other and ain’t the chickenshit n chief.

antipc on September 12, 2012 at 9:24 PM

@kirstenpowers10
For those complaining that Romney criticized a statement made before the attacks: the Embassy tweeted they stood by statement AFTER attack.

Irrelevant, as far as Romney’s and his team’s major fail here.
Some Obama quotes just out that just obliterate him on this. .
Romney dug himself an even bigger hole by doubling down.
The critiques of him for this will continue to build on the right.

verbaluce on September 12, 2012 at 8:55 PM

You are irrelevant, pathetic worm….

jimver on September 12, 2012 at 9:31 PM

Irrelevant, as far as Romney’s and his team’s major fail here.
Some Obama quotes just out that just obliterate him on this. .
Romney dug himself an even bigger hole by doubling down.
The critiques of him for this will continue to build on the right.

verbaluce on September 12, 2012 at 8:55 PM

And, say where’s your boy again?? Leading from jarrett’s behind? Or is it clinton’s? And why was the consulate in Benghazi unprotected on the 9/11 anniversary while there were with clear warnings that the crazies took to the street?? …

jimver on September 12, 2012 at 9:35 PM

Romney dug himself an even bigger hole by doubling down.
The critiques of him for this will continue to build on the right.

verbaluce on September 12, 2012 at 8:55 PM

“Golly gee, I was gonna vote for Romney, but the second he opened his mouth about the riots in Egypt except it was really Libya — or the other way around, whatever — well, I was so turned off that now I’m voting for Obama.”

Srsly?

Mary in LA on September 12, 2012 at 9:41 PM

If the liberals had their way, we’d be f***ed.

hillbillyjim on September 12, 2012 at 8:10 PM

HEH!

Doesn’t help our cause any when you hear our boy Romney say that he will “repeal and replace” Obamacare. RePLACE? Yeah, replace Obama!

Long past time ta lock’n'load buddy.

racquetballer on September 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM

How about a million man march in front of NBC/ABC/CBS headquarters with all of us carrying “5th Column” signs…I lay the downturn of this country at their doorstep…

hillsoftx on September 12, 2012 at 7:45 PM

How ’bout a million man march burning Korans?
OOooo! Does that offend the sensibilities of some Conservatives on this site…many of whom apologize for the film that supposedly caused this latest uproar as ‘crappy’, ‘amateurish’,etc. So what? Stop apologizing! The quality of film is irrelevant! The point is simply that muslim babarians flipped out over a slight (so they say).

RavingLunatic on September 12, 2012 at 10:00 PM

Whoa! Is there a Ram among the Sheep???

Sacramento on September 12, 2012 at 10:32 PM

The MSM are the ones to blame for our country’s decline. They are mostly unprofessional partisan (Democrat) propaganda hacks who have the ability to write or talk as if they know something. They are a disgrace to the country in every sense of the word.

mbabbitt on September 13, 2012 at 1:55 AM

The people who are setting the agenda for political debate and discourse in this nation are dummies. Look at their resumes.

Most can’t do math.

Most can’t think logically.

Most would be working in food service or younger child care except they managed to keep far left idiots in journalism schools happy so they got “A’s”.

They love President Obama since he is a con man and a product of the same bogus, corrupt system.

IlikedAUH2O on September 13, 2012 at 5:17 AM

Anyone who wonders why CNN is losing viewers by the droves only needs to look at this clip to understand why.

Don Lemon is a complete idiot, pure and simple!

pilamaye on September 13, 2012 at 5:44 AM

Media Matters and Politifact are all over themselves on Governor Romney’s statement. There is an acute interest as to when he made it. The timing apparently makes it inappropriate.

Then they got a collection of morons to dissect the whole thing and conclude that it was not an “apology”. So our Nation’s Future Savior and only true leader used the WRONG WORD.

The same buffoons who can smell racism at 2,000 yards can’t see that the word “apology” is shorthand or as Republicans do, code, for a boot licking comment or bottom smooching utterance.

If you have an aggrieved party and you use the words they did, golly, that is an “I feel your pain remark.”

Anyway, I thought they loved us since we elected the Messiah. Now if he could just drop the Barack and rename himself Mohammed….

IlikedAUH2O on September 13, 2012 at 6:03 AM

Guy Benson is either ignorant, uninformed, or a liar. Romney’s statement explicity talks about the deaths Guy Benson claims he did not know about. SOLID JOURNALISM, Guy!!

10:09 p.m., 9/11/12. The Romney campaign releases a statement “embargoed until midnight tonight” from Mitt Romney condemning the administration and the attacks: “I’m outraged by the attacks on American diplomatic missions in Libya and Egypt and by the death of an American consulate worker in Benghazi. It’s disgraceful that the Obama Administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks.”

It would be hard to more wrong than Guy Benson is on this topic. And for some reason Hot Air is refusing to update this post to reflect the truth. Hmm…

sob0728 on September 13, 2012 at 8:58 AM

If there was a 24 hour window where the Obama administration thought they could say anything without having their opposition call them out, it’s interesting that they chose a coordinated attack on the First Amendment while having their propagandist wing readied to attack the leader of their opposition if he broke the 24 hour armistice.

If Romney waits until the armistice ends, then the criticism of what the Democrats did can’t be too serious because if it was that serious of a matter, why did he wait until 9/12?

The line of attack they have chosen to use against Romney shows that all of this was taken into consideration with their response on the 11th, even if there wasn’t any coordination with the jihadis to initiate the premise for their free speech attack. The armistice was taken into account.

Buddahpundit on September 13, 2012 at 10:43 AM

If Mitt hadn’t made a statement, the msm would have asked where’s Mitt on this. He can’t win with these people. He’s taking this directly to the American people like he should be. The empty chair went to Vegas and complained about having a tough day.

Kissmygrits on September 13, 2012 at 10:48 AM

So conservatives don’t care that Romney got it completely wrong? That the statement condemning the video came out before the attacks?

Constantine on September 12, 2012 at 8:29 PM

Odd that you don’t seem to care that the embassy got it completely wrong.

There was no reason to believe, at the time of the statement they made, that the attacks had anything at all to do with that stupid film. It was 9-11, the attacks were in response to bin laden’s death and the attackers were very clear to point all this out.

It looks more and more like the admin had the intel about the attacks beforehand, knew how it would look, and got in front of it with this statement that, as you accurately point out, was made BEFORE THE ATTACKS!

And now, everyone is blaming that stupid little film that clearly had nothing to do with any of it. Your guy is responsible for the attacks but you couldn’t admit that if your life depended on it.

runawayyyy on September 13, 2012 at 11:59 AM

Most of us knew last night Ambassador Stevens had been murdered, why did the boy king not know until this morning?

Because he went to bed Tuesday night while details were breaking.

OBAMA WENT TO SLEEP NOT KNOWING WHAT WAS HAPPENING THERE.

And now he’s off in Vegas while the Pentagon is moving 2 warships toward the Libyan coast.

Unfreakinbelievable!

Flora Duh on September 12, 2012 at 7:23 PM

This.

And we finally have the answer to Hillary’s 3:00 in the morning phone call question. The Prez doesn’t take calls at that hour.

Portia46 on September 13, 2012 at 1:57 PM

We look forward to talking about this substance when you’re available you get your head out of Obama a**.”
-
Fixed to increase accuracy…

RalphyBoy on September 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM

Comment pages: 1 2