Quotes of the day

posted at 9:01 pm on September 9, 2012 by Allahpundit

President Obama’s post-convention bounce has grown to four points according to two new polls released Saturday.

Gallup’s daily tracking poll has Obama at 49 percent support among registered voters to GOP candidate Mitt Romney’s 45 percent…

A Reuters/Ipsos daily-tracking poll released Saturday also gave Obama a 4-point lead. Obama leads Romney 47 percent to 43 percent among likely voters. On Friday, Obama overtook Romney in the same poll and held a 46 to 44 percent edge.

“The bump is actually happening,” said Ipsos pollster Julia Clark. “How big it’ll be and how long it will last remains to be seen,” she added.

***

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows President Obama attracting support from 49% of voters nationwide, while Mitt Romney earns 45% of the vote. Three percent (3%) prefer some other candidate, and three percent (3%) are undecided…

This is the president’s biggest lead over Romney among Likely Voters since March 17. See daily tracking history. Obama’s convention bounce is evident both in the head-to-head numbers with Romney and in his Job Approval ratings…

A president’s job approval rating is one of the best indicators for assessing his chances of reelection. Typically, the president’s job approval rating on Election Day will be close to the share of the vote he receives. Currently, 52% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president’s job performance. That’s his highest approval rating in more than a year-and-a-half, since January 2011.

***

President Barack Obama heads out of the national political conventions with a much clearer path to winning, top advisers to Mitt Romney privately concede.

The Romney campaign, while pleasantly surprised by Obama’s lackluster prime-time performance, said the post-convention bounce they hoped for fell well short of expectations and privately lament that state-by-state polling numbers — most glaringly in Ohio — are working in the president’s favor.

“Their map has many more routes to victory,” said a top Republican official. Two officials intimately involved in the GOP campaign said Ohio leans clearly in Obama’s favor now, with a high single-digit edge, based on their internal tracking numbers of conservative groups. Romney can still win the presidency if he loses Ohio, but it’s extremely difficult…

Obama officials have maintained for several weeks that there are too few undecided voters for Romney to get the bounce he needs from the debates. “Romney is not going to win undecided voters four-to-one,” a senior administration official told reporters on Air Force One on Friday. “If you are losing in Ohio by four or five points and trailing in Colorado by two points, if you are trailing in Nevada by two or three points, you are not going to win in those states.

***

Once upon a time, the Romney campaign dreamed of putting New Jersey, New Mexico, and Oregon in play. Now, just a few months later, they are on the precipice of giving up on Michigan and Pennsylvania, and they are still behind in Ohio.

So using money to try to make Paul Ryan’s Wisconsin competitve is sensible, maybe essential. Right now, Romney-Ryan has fewer electoral college paths than Kerry-Edwards did at this point in 2004.

***

“We’re very comfortable with the reality of what this race is about, and we’re not in the momentum business,” said Stuart Stevens, Romney’s chief strategist. “We’re in the talking-to-voters-about-their-lives business.”…

The 1980 analogy holds for Romney the potential for a breakthrough during or after the debates. In that campaign, Ronald Reagan trailed President Jimmy Carter into the month of October. He moved ahead after the candidates’ only head-to-head debate. Romney advisers have said for months that the longer they stay roughly even with the president, the better their chances of winning in November.

Obama advisers, however, see that as a flawed analogy. The electorate was less polarized then than now, with more opportunity for each candidate to attract a larger number of undecided voters than exists today. They also note that Reagan’s image was more positive than Romney’s has been. “There are so many ways that’s not plausible,” Axelrod said of the 1980 analogy, “starting with Obama’s not Carter and Romney’s not Reagan.”

***

Thursday night in Charlotte, Barack Obama doubled down on his liberalism, articulating the case for big government, greater regulation, and more spending (which he calls “investing”). He defined a choice that is starkly ideological, courageously embracing the left. We have not seen such positioning since the days of Mike Dukakis and Walter Mondale. And with good reason: the American people are conservative…

While eloquent as he accepted his party’s nomination, Obama failed to go after Mitt Romney in his speech and throughout the whole Democratic convention. “The folks in Tampa,” “the Republican establishment” and “the conservative Congress” all came in for a thrashing. Mitt Romney was not on the list in both Clinton and Obama’s speeches. In fact, his name was hardly mentioned — an odd occurrence in view of the over $100 million Obama has spent on ads attacking Romney…

The result of these two conventions is a decided advantage for Romney.

***

Wisconsin is a big target. It has been the whole damn time. All the groaning and eeyoring by folks over it’s absence in the first release was weak-kneed silliness, as much as the fretting over “120% turnout in Madison” was for the recall. Team Romney is going to attack a vastly larger map than what McCain was desperately trying to win avoid embarrassment and hold in 08. Enjoy that bounce from the convention while you can, President Obama. The ads and GOTV rollout begins now, and no amount of scale-thumbing by Purely Partisan Polling will be able to deflect a 9-figure onslaught.

***

Why the Media Predict-o-Herd is wrong 1.They ignore the coming ad blitz and cash advantage Romney holds…

4. After 200 million against Romney and a thousand hits by press stenographers running Chicago’s hits, Romney is alive…and inoculated.

5. Registration numbers in key states ain’t pretty for Obama: in 2008 Dems had a 670k reg adv in Fl and he barrrely won. Now? Only 440k…

8. The same “Democrat victory is inevitable” stories from every cycle except 84 are an echo of the era of Gang of 500 agenda power.

***

On paper, given Obama’s record, this election should be a cakewalk for the Republicans. Why isn’t it? I am afraid the answer may be that the country is closer to the point of no return than most of us believed. With over 100 million Americans receiving federal welfare benefits, millions more going on Social Security disability, and many millions on top of that living on entitlement programs–not to mention enormous numbers of public employees–we may have gotten to the point where the government economy is more important, in the short term, than the real economy. My father, the least cynical of men, used to quote a political philosopher to the effect that democracy will work until people figure out they can vote themselves money. I fear that time may have come…

Maybe this anxiety is misplaced. President Obama has never been able to rise above 47% support in the polls, and perhaps when November comes undecided voters will break against the incumbent, as the conventional wisdom has it. Maybe the election won’t be so close after all. We’d all better hope so. Because, given the rate at which Democrats are frantically adding to the dependency state, another four years of Obama may be enough to tip the balance between the private sector and government dependence once and for all.

***

[O]nce you accept a wealth-redistribution system in which government becomes the arbiter of “social justice,” the ball game is over. If government is given license to even the scales between the have-nots and the haves, the political incentive to even them will be constant and overpowering: Enough will never be enough. If the rationale for giving government this power is that the asset in question is corporate property, not private, what is to be the limiting principle? Why health care but not housing or income? And when it comes to providing for the truly needy among 310 million people, central-government planners will simply never be as good at it as decent societies and their local governments. And so the allocation of burdens and benefits in federal entitlement programs is guaranteed to be warped, wasteful, and ultimately unsustainable.

Yet, no political party is making that case. Both candidates want you to know they are sentries of the safety net. And no major conservative journal or think tank, it seems, would have it any other way. Concededly, the GOP’s approach, “Let’s work within this implausible system and do the best we can to patch it up . . . someday,” is a more attractive position than Obama’s “Let’s break the bank now.” But inspiring? . . . Not exactly…

Obama’s base, that lost third of the country, may not be as enthralled as they were in 2008. But they are committed, utterly convinced about who the villains are, and prepared to be as chameleon as it takes to reel in, from the culture they dominate, the additional 15 percent or so needed to push their guy across the finish line. That’s how what should be a landslide for his opponent becomes a squeaker.

***

Only the Romney campaign can cut through the cultural, educational, and media filters and force a debate over the Obama Democrats’ bogus redefinition of the American dream. The media can ignore what conservatives say, but they still have to cover the candidate. With the exception of his welfare ads, however, the Romney campaign has avoided an assault on Obama’s ideology. Romney’s entirely plausible strategy is to downplay the ideological battle (Ryan nomination notwithstanding)…

I can’t say for certain that Romney’s strategy is wrong. But I do think it’s far riskier than we realize. Treating Obama as a nice guy in over his head, rather than a smart leftist who knows exactly what he’s doing, leaves the Democrats’ bogus narrative about government unanswered. America is changing, and Republicans are naive to rely on the public to simply recognize the problems in the Democrats’ claims without significant help from our nominee…

I don’t have access to the Romney campaign’s focus-group and survey data. Maybe they’re right to try to pry away those erstwhile Obama supporters in only the gentlest of ways. Yet I worry that the Romneyites are fooling themselves. Technocrats and fixers from a state where liberals dominate, they are neither inclined or prepared to show how the Obama Democrats are slowly redefining American exceptionalism into the European social democratic dream. Romney may squeak by on bad unemployment numbers and gentle coaxing of undecideds, but patriotic veneer the Democrats have managed to slap on their leftism is worrisome. If Obama wins, it will be because we allowed him to get away with it.

***

***

Via the Corner.

***

Via Mediaite.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 6 7 8

People think I hate Palin, but I don’t.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:20 AM

Won’t be Sarah Palin. The woman is a polarizing, incompetent buffoon with loser written all over her, and the whole country knows it. Besides her band of clueless worshipers who post on sites like this, the only people who want Palin to speak are Dems who know she’s toxic and would hurt more than she helps.

Sarah Palin, please stick to your reality tv shows. You screwed up already in 2008, and we don’t need you to do it again this year.

bluegill on August 28, 2012 at 3:57 PM

So this is how you talk about someone you don’t hate?

Got it.

#WAR

P.S. That is a rhetorical question which requires no answer. I just asked it to once again point out your blatant hypocrisy.

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 8:28 AM

The moby brigade is still up? Don’t these losers sleep?

wargamer6 on September 10, 2012 at 8:25 AM

No need for them to. They draw their strength from each other.

And the cases of 5 Hour Energy that OFA provides them.

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 8:30 AM

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:20 AM

this obsession you have with Sarah is unhealthy. mitt the nominee. he’s running his campaign the way he sees fit.

he made the decision that it was better to lose a Palinista than irritate an “independent”.

what he has sown, he will reap. i fully expect you to start the Sarah Palin blame game come november 5th.

renalin on September 10, 2012 at 8:31 AM

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:01 AM

co chi loco.

HerneTheHunter on September 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM

No need for them to. They draw their strength from each other.

And the cases of 5 Hour Energy that OFA provides them.

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 8:30 AM

Morning Flora. I’ve enjoyed your many informative links, lately. (I’ve dubbed you the “canopfor of the south”.)

PS–I don’t know wargamer6, or if he’s calling me a “moby”, but I think you know that’s not true. (Feel free to read what I wrote on the last page. And, do tell me if it’s moby-esque.)

RedCrow on September 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM

So this is how you talk about someone you don’t hate?

Got it.

#WAR

P.S. That is a rhetorical question which requires no answer. I just asked it to once again point out your blatant hypocrisy.

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 8:28 AM

Even polarizing, incompetent buffoons with loser written all over them have their good points. We just don’t want polarizing, incompetent buffoons (especially ones who try to foster inter-party conflict) like Sarah Palin to be seen as the face of the Republican Party or conservatism. That’s all.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM

BTW has anyone noticed that AN EMPTY CHAIR is beating Obama by 5 points this morning!!!

And Romney is already 6-9 points behind in Ohio.

Face it……..This is McCain 2.0 and if Romney loses and we have the same RINO leadership in Congress the republican party is finished.

Look at the electoral map people. The Dems already get an automatic 150-200 electoral votes.

PappyD61 on September 10, 2012 at 7:33 AM

You forgot to clap and jump up and down.

The poll from Pi$$ Poor Poll in OH had its own thread. PPP was trumpeting the news since Saturday that its upcoming poll from OH showed a BIG lead for Barry , and when it was released, it was a 5 point edge with a +4 Dem overweight. The turnout in 2010 was like 35 D 37R. And look closer, Romney has the edge with Independents in that poll.

And you may want to further celebrate by rejoicing over PPP poll in NC showing Barry at 49 and Romney at 48 with a +13 D overweight.

bayview on September 10, 2012 at 8:35 AM

this obsession you have with Sarah is unhealthy.

renalin on September 10, 2012 at 8:31 AM

Is your self parody intended or accidental?

bayview on September 10, 2012 at 8:37 AM

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM

Woman, you’re too dumb to save. Your ship sailed a long time ago.

HerneTheHunter on September 10, 2012 at 8:38 AM

this obsession you have with Sarah is unhealthy. mitt the nominee. he’s running his campaign the way he sees fit.

renalin on September 10, 2012 at 8:31 AM

Pardon me, but aren’t you the Sarah Palin fanatic who comes on this site regularly to promote any news seen as favorable to Obama and damaging to Mitt? Oh, yes, I think it is you. And aren’t you the person who spends his/her time happily relaying whatever anti-Mitt comments are made by hosts of an MSNBC morning show, as if anyone cared. Why, yes, that would be you again.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:41 AM

RedCrow on September 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM

No, I don’t think he was referring to you. It is more likely he meant people like Illinidiva, libfreeordie and Pappy, who spent several hours yesterday going from thread to thread spreading his doom and gloom.

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 8:41 AM

Even polarizing, incompetent buffoons with loser written all over them have their good points.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM

Yeah, you’re right. Sometimes you do say something that makes sense.

#WAR

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 8:44 AM

typical comment from the HotAir commenter and Palin fanatic Renalin: “hey guys, Mika just said that Mitt doesn’t have a chance. Then joe nodded in agreement. would have to agree. Mitt is toast. Palin would be beating Obama right now”

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:46 AM

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 8:41 AM

Oh. Well, because he was joking about “mobies” never going to sleep, I thought he meant bluegill and me.

Thanks for the response. :)

RedCrow on September 10, 2012 at 8:50 AM

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:46 AM

Bluegill, evidently you have not figured it out yet…but, I want Obama out of there…NOW!

All I’m asking is that Mitt fight equally as hard and mean against Obama, as he did his fellow Republican candidates in the primaries.

Because, God knows, Obama is not going to observe the Marquis of Kingsbury rules and Robert’s Rule of Order.

Quit insulting and start encouraging.

kingsjester on September 10, 2012 at 8:51 AM

typical comment from the HotAir commenter and Palin fanatic Renalin: “hey guys, Mika just said that Mitt doesn’t have a chance. Then joe nodded in agreement. would have to agree. Mitt is toast. Palin would be beating Obama right now”

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:46 AM

.
Yeah, she would.

Of course, she would have to do it without your vote.

listens2glenn on September 10, 2012 at 8:52 AM

You forgot to clap and jump up and down.

The poll from Pi$$ Poor Poll in OH had its own thread. PPP was trumpeting the news since Saturday that its upcoming poll from OH showed a BIG lead for Barry , and when it was released, it was a 5 point edge with a +4 Dem overweight. The turnout in 2010 was like 35 D 37R. And look closer, Romney has the edge with Independents in that poll.

And you may want to further celebrate by rejoicing over PPP poll in NC showing Barry at 49 and Romney at 48 with a +13 D overweight.

bayview on September 10, 2012 at 8:35 AM

Note that on Saturday they were talking about Obama being 9 points ahead of Romney in Ohio in the PPP poll but when some people start laughing at them they thought to adjust their secret sauce and their offical release came up with only 5 points Obama ahead… Right there you can tell that they are full of sh*t and they are just making up numbers…

Reagrding the North Carolina Poll all what I can say is LOL…

mnjg on September 10, 2012 at 8:54 AM

All I’m asking is that Mitt fight equally as hard and mean against Obama

kingsjester on September 10, 2012 at 8:51 AM

Ok, please give me an example of fighting mean. How exactly should Mitt fight “mean” against Obama?

If you mean get personal and call names, then I disagree with you.

Obama will be beaten with substantive arguments.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:55 AM

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 7:53 AM

…HA!…knew you couldn’t be busy for a thread like this!…A cheery FLUKE YOU to you this fine day!

KOOLAID2 on September 10, 2012 at 8:55 AM

The only people who would have been excited to hear her speak are already a lock to vote against Obama.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:01 AM

There you go again. Why don’t you do something novel for a change, actually read some of the previous comments on a thread before spouting off at the gills.

If you had, you would have seen where several self-professed Palin supporters have stated they are also supporting and voting for Romney.

But we already know why you don’t, don’t we gilled one? It would spoil your lame and oft-repeated mantra about Palin and her “groupies” doing what they can to cause disruption within the ranks.

#WAR

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 9:03 AM

Yeah, she would.

Of course, she would have to do it without your vote.

listens2glenn on September 10, 2012 at 8:52 AM

Sorry, but the woman wouldn’t be able to last even one week in the campaign. Heck, she struggled to answer questions about what she read, for crying outloud. We all witnessed her spectacular meltdown in 2008. And I voted for McCain/Palin. To this day she is unable to take interview questions from anyone but friendly interviewers. Let her stick to her Facebook posts and her campaigning for conservative candidates around the country, but don’t insult our intelligence by suggesting that she is even close, in terms of competence, qualifications, etc., to being on the same level as Mitt or Paul Ryan, who face the tough questions day in and day out.

Face it, guys. She isn’t as great as you make her out to be.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 9:03 AM

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:55 AM

Simply tell the truth. Obama is not a “nice guy who is in over his head”.

kingsjester on September 10, 2012 at 9:06 AM

Obama will be beaten with substantive arguments.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:55 AM

then why isn’t mitt giving them? you spend every minute of your waking day obsessing about Sarah. don’t you wonder why mitt’s losing ohio. he’s even behind in fundraising.

doesn’t matter. mitt could have a gazillion dollars. he has no message.

que sera, sera.

renalin on September 10, 2012 at 9:07 AM

f you had, you would have seen where several self-professed Palin supporters have stated they are also supporting and voting for Romney.

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 9:03 AM

I make a distinction between reasonable people who like Palin and the Palin fanatics who make it a habit to bash Mitt and see her as the only hope for the country. Get it? Not sure where you’ve been on here, but maybe you’ve noticed that a lot of Palin fanatics on this site seem more interested in Palin’s political future than they are in Obama being defeated. Surprised you never picked up on that. Flora, I voted for her in 2008. I am just sick and tired of this clinging to the idea that Palin is our only saviour.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 9:09 AM

que sera, sera.

renalin on September 10, 2012 at 9:07 AM

Did you mean to say: Queen Sarah, Sarah?

bayview on September 10, 2012 at 9:13 AM

Simply tell the truth. Obama is not a “nice guy who is in over his head”.

kingsjester on September 10, 2012 at 9:06 AM

That’s your idea of fighting “mean” against Obama? As usual, you just parrot Mark Levin, but don’t know what you’re talking about and can’t back up your Levin regurgitations with any substance. Please prove me wrong. Tell me exactly what fighting “mean” against Obama would be. You said you want Mitt to start fighting “mean” — so let’s hear you provide an example. Can you do it?

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 9:14 AM

Face it, guys. She isn’t as great as you make her out to be.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 9:03 AM

Face it gilled one, you feed off of your jealousy of Palin. It nourishes you, it sustains you.

Otherwise you would do a little research and find the dozens of interviews she’s done with not so friendly media organizations.

Ah forget it. You just continue to exist in your own little oxygen deprived underwater universe, if it makes you feel complete.

#WAR

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 9:15 AM

Anyway, have a nice day, everyone. Time to take off. And don’t take it too personally if I insulted you or disagreed. Except for people like renalin… he can take it personally.. I think that guy’s just a useless boob and a disgrace to the decent Sarah Palin supporters.

Never fear, Mitt will win this!

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 9:17 AM

fanatics

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 9:09 AM

spokesfish talking about fanatics?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!

KOOLAID2 on September 10, 2012 at 9:19 AM

I make a distinction between reasonable people who like Palin and the Palin fanatics who make it a habit to bash Mitt and see her as the only hope for the country.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 9:09 AM

Oh really?

The only people who would have been excited to hear her speak are already a lock to vote against Obama.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 8:01 AM

Where’s the distinction there?

Something else you would have learned if you had taken the time to read the thread, is that many of the Palin supporters think that some who claim to be, are nothing but Mobys who are only here to cause disruption.

But being considerate enough to separate the two, before painting them all with the same brush, is not something that would occur to you is it?

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 9:23 AM

…spokesfish talking about fanatics?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!

KOOLAID2 on September 10, 2012 at 9:19 AM

Well, she should know.

Thank goodness Romney is stunningly handsome (in a mature way) and is probably the most telegenic presidential candidate ever. I don’t care what anyone says, this WILL help him with people just discovering who he is. Romney is very easy on the eyes, the camera loves him, he looks like a winner, and, as sad as it is to say, people are superficial. He just doesn’t look menacing at all. The man looks pleasant.

bluegill on May 30, 2012 at 9:25 AM

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 9:26 AM

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 9:26 AM

QED!

HerneTheHunter on September 10, 2012 at 9:42 AM

Dire Straits was here..:)

PS..And late..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 9:42 AM

That’s your idea of fighting “mean” against Obama? As usual, you just parrot Mark Levin, but don’t know what you’re talking about and can’t back up your Levin regurgitations with any substance. Please prove me wrong. Tell me exactly what fighting “mean” against Obama would be. You said you want Mitt to start fighting “mean” — so let’s hear you provide an example. Can you do it?

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 9:14 AM

You never listen to Mark Levin. Your wet little brain would have exploded long since.

Naturally Curly on September 10, 2012 at 9:45 AM

Dire Straits was here..:)

PS..And late..:)

Dire Straits
on September 10, 2012 at 9:42 AM

.
Indeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed ! ! !

listens2glenn on September 10, 2012 at 9:47 AM

Except for people like renalin… he can take it personally.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 9:17 AM

yep, the missiles i bought up in Wasilla are hitting the target:)

renalin on September 10, 2012 at 9:49 AM

Dire Straits was here..:)

PS..And late..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 9:42 AM

Morning Dire. Missed ya! ; )

Bmore on September 10, 2012 at 9:53 AM

listens2glenn on September 10, 2012 at 9:47 AM

LoLz..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 9:59 AM

Bmore on September 10, 2012 at 9:53 AM

Good morning!..Had visiting family in the house!..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM

listens2glenn on September 10, 2012 at 8:52 AM

.
Sorry, but the woman wouldn’t be able to last even one week in the campaign. Heck, she struggled to answer questions about what she read, for crying outloud. We all witnessed her spectacular meltdown in 2008.

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 9:03 AM

.
.
WHAT meltdown. ? !

Her biggest problem was her naivete (at the time) of the National scene, and Terry Nelson.

She’s no longer naive, and she won’t have any more “Terry Nelson’s” to foul her up.

listens2glenn on September 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM

Good morning!..Had visiting family in the house!..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM

Hope you had a lovely time with them. You didn’t miss much here. Mostly some weak kneed types, “The End is Near”, types. ; )

Bmore on September 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM

Hope you had a lovely time with them. You didn’t miss much here. Mostly some weak kneed types, “The End is Near”, types. ; )

Bmore on September 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM

So I see..Do not get discouraged by them..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 10:09 AM

So I see..Do not get discouraged by them..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 10:09 AM

Shoot, you should know better. Me? I seldom if ever get discouraged. Especially by those lame asses. ; ) They just need some leadership. They will always be followers. Just need to whip them into shape, boot camp style. ; ) Mostly boot.

Bmore on September 10, 2012 at 10:11 AM

Good morning!..Had visiting family in the house!..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM

.
Hope you had a lovely time with them. You didn’t miss much here. Mostly some weak kneed types, “The End is Near”, types. ; )

Bmore on September 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM

.
I’m a little sensitive about those knees, and I’ll thank you not to bring ‘em up. . : )

listens2glenn on September 10, 2012 at 10:13 AM

Bmore on September 10, 2012 at 10:11 AM

Good deal..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 10:18 AM

Bmore on September 10, 2012 at 10:11 AM

LoLz..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 10:19 AM

listens2glenn on September 10, 2012 at 10:13 AM

El Rushbo should be interesting..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 10:29 AM

listens2glenn on September 10, 2012 at 10:13 AM

.
El Rushbo should be interesting..:)

Dire Straits on September 10, 2012 at 10:29 AM

.
Indeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee . . . well, yes.

Yes, today’s EIB broadcast should be even better than normal. . : )

listens2glenn on September 10, 2012 at 10:55 AM

bluegill on September 10, 2012 at 9:03 AM

Face it gilled one, you feed off of your jealousy of Palin. It nourishes you, it sustains you.

Otherwise you would do a little research and find the dozens of interviews she’s done with not so friendly media organizations.

Ah forget it. You just continue to exist in your own little oxygen deprived underwater universe, if it makes you feel complete.

#WAR

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 9:15 AM

Flora “brings it” again.

SparkPlug on September 10, 2012 at 2:12 PM

Ah forget it. You just continue to exist in your own little oxygen deprived underwater universe, if it makes you feel complete.

#WAR

Flora Duh on September 10, 2012 at 9:15 AM

At least you right-wing nuts are finally admitting Republicans are smothering the planet in carbon dioxide.

Axe on September 10, 2012 at 3:42 PM

Comment pages: 1 6 7 8