Obama’s DNC 2012: Kneecapped by nostalgia

posted at 4:41 pm on September 7, 2012 by Mary Katharine Ham

CHARLOTTE, N.C.— A couple hours before President Obama took the stage Thursday night, The Foo Fighters’ lead singer seemed to presage his speech with a rendition of “My Hero.” “There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes,” Dave Grohl wailed. “There goes my hero. He’s ordinary.”

The moody pop anthem could have been the soundtrack to the night’s punditry, as person after person declared Obama’s speech “pedestrian,” “not the best speech of the convention, “ C work from an A student. It was nearly universally acknowledged that President Bill Clinton was better, and even suggested—gasp!—that Obama was outperformed by the normally bumbling Vice President Joe Biden. Politico headlined its recap, “Downsizing the dream.” Ouch.

If the speech felt like falling to earth from a dream, Obama himself is partly to blame, and not just for one lackluster speech. He crafted the dreamscape himself. He made big promises, he set high expectations, he embraced those promises and expectations, and ultimately he failed to fulfill them. This week was just a microcosm of Obama’s difficulties pitching a presidency built on big promises in the harsh economic realities of 2012.

In a pleasant three-day romp designed to assiduously avoid dealing with the problems of 2012, Democratic delegates were steered dreamily through the accomplishments of any year but the past three (with the notable exception of the auto bailout). The stimulus didn’t make an appearance. The Affordable Care Act, not in Obama’s speech. Instead, even unpleasant party memories made the cut for reminiscing— Jimmy Carter spoke via video outside of primetime. A highlight of Geraldine Ferraro addressing the convention in historically disastrous 1984 revealed just how purposefully the party was cribbing talking points from itself.

“The promise of our country is that the rules are fair. If you work hard and play by the rules, you can earn your share of America’s blessings,” Ferraro’s voice boomed in the arena, echoing the words of dozens of speakers, who had been echoing her all week.

The most prominent nod to nostalgia was the presentation of President Clinton, who luxuriated in the lime light, giving an entertaining 48-minute speech that landed punches on Mitt Romney and did the requisite Obama boosting. But what it did most effectively was transport the room to the 90s, Clinton’s genial g-dropping evoking the warm-and-fuzzies of the boom before the tech bubble burst, peace dividends pre-9/11, Kelly, Brenda, Brandon, and Dylan. Even Grohl’s hair played its part, lying in an angsty Nirvana-esque fringe across his face.

The question was always whether the warm-and-fuzzies would transfer without outshining. Camp Romney faced the same question when adding Paul Ryan to the ticket, when Ann Romney spoke, and when Sen. Marco Rubio gave a rousing lead-in to Mitt’s convention speech. But unlike Mitt Romney, Barack Obama is not accustomed to the possibility of being deemed the second-most capable speaker in a room (or the “5th or 6th most interesting” person).

Obama’s ability to capture imaginations and rouse spirits with his words is central to his brand in a way it’s not to Mitt Romney’s, who’s rightly criticized for not rousing, or even Clinton’s. Clinton wears his charm as a powerful accessory to a presidency in a healthy economy and a list of bipartisan bills made possible by a mid-term tack to the center.

Clinton wasn’t just a gifted speaker but preternatural pivoter. His appearance showcased a man who has always been adept (sometimes maddeningly so) at suiting himself to the political moment, this one included. Then, he was joined on stage by a man who has proven incapable of doing the same.

Accordingly, the convention attempted to change the moment to suit Obama. Michelle Obama’s speech could easily have been given, nearly word for word, in 2008. A moving tribute to the woman who originated “Fired up! Ready to go!” was vintage Hope and Change. Obama, too, was trying to play ’08 Obama, crescendoing to soaring rhetoric at the prescribed moment. But the reality of 2012 is tough to make take flight, and it had to be addressed— “I never said this journey would be easy, and I won’t promise that now…Yes, our path is harder but it leads to a better place.” The crowd inside the hall played an ’08 crowd convincingly, with weeping and worship hands. They were part of the dream and they want to keep it alive and experience it again, just as they did then.

Treating Obama’s presidency as if the intervening four years never happened is preferable to grappling with another disappointing jobs report and stubborn 8-percent unemployment, not to mention the broken promises they evoke. But outside the convention, those realities intruded, unimpeded by any speech, and waking up from a dream is never pleasant.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Been to many TEA party rallies, have you? Or are you merely engaging in rectal speak?

As usual…

JohnGalt23 on May 24, 2013 at 1:46 PM

As I just posted HotairLib has their whole head up their six o clock.

hamradio on May 24, 2013 at 2:43 PM

Who wrote the speech? Or are you just praising the messenger?

mixplix on May 24, 2013 at 2:57 PM

MSNBC consensus: Obama’s speech was historic, amazing, “one of the best of his presidency”

Connect the dots: journolist meeting by invitation only at the White House on, what Tuesday?, “big”speech by Obama on Thursday, lame stream media fawning over speech on Friday. Who would have seen that coming, huh?

parke on May 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM

They need the “war on terror” in order to further erode our Constitutional freedoms and to deflect criticism from the administration’s and Federal government’s ongoing corruption.

They are just trying to massage it so that they don’t offend the Muslims, international Libtards and their own sensibilities anymore than necessary.

A few Muslim terrorists here and there are quite expendable to this Administration despite their sympathies for them. These drone attacks also do much deflect any potential criticism that the Administration is weak in dealing with such matters.

Dr. ZhivBlago on May 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM

MSNBC is nothing but a left wing propaganda machine serving their master, Obama.

rplat on May 24, 2013 at 3:07 PM

Nobel Peace Prize that he totally earned a mere nine months into his presidency? Yeah, that one.

I believe that he was officially nominated 10 days after he was sworn in. Wow! The WON really worked long hours that week and a half to earn that POS medal. During those ten days he ordered NO DRONE STRIKES to keep his peaceful record clean.

fred5678 on May 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM

Obama: Don’t worry about that Ben Ghazi guy. I killed Bin Laden, and Bush didn’t!

And Obummer still wants to close Gitmo? Good luck with that–not even Upchuck Schumer was willing to hold trials in New York!

Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:24 PM

They need the “war on terror” in order to further erode our Constitutional freedoms and to deflect criticism from the administration’s and Federal government’s ongoing corruption.

They just changed the definition of terrorist. They used to be jihadis from the Middle East–now they’re Minutemen in Arizona and Tea Partiers in Ohio.

Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM

…bromides about what we’re told are President Foreign Policy’s miraculous yet still oddly unmaterialized abilities to move us drastically closer to world peace.

Erika, sometimes your writing shows signs of rivaling even the Master of Snark himself, Allahpundit. Good work!

KS Rex on May 24, 2013 at 3:45 PM

I love how crazy Al invoked the Nobel Peace Prize in praise of a speech that spoke about dropping bombs on people’s head. Maybe it was the “fewer” bombs than before that raised this to historic levels.

Do they even know or care that they are morons.

marnes on May 24, 2013 at 3:46 PM

His speech made less sense than Bluto’s Animal House Speech and was far less entertaining. Nothing less than base rallying time. Never thought I would say this, but Code Pink was the best part.

DDay on May 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM

Sperling posted this at the Examiner on May 23 about this “historic speech of Obysmal’s:

During his foreign policy speech Thursday afternoon, President Obama warned that domestic terrorism would increase in the modern age of the Internet.

“[T]his threat is not new,” Obama said. “But technology and the Internet increase its frequency and lethality.”

Obama warned Americans that materials on the Internet could influence people to commit terrorist acts.

“Today, a person can consume hateful propaganda, commit themselves to a violent agenda and learn how to kill without leaving their home,” he said.

To combat domestic terrorism, Obama reminded Americans that it was important to reach out to Muslim communities.

“The best way to prevent violent extremism is to work with the Muslim American community — which has consistently rejected terrorism — to identify signs of radicalization and partner with law enforcement when an individual is drifting towards violence,” he said. “And these partnerships can only work when we recognize that Muslims are a fundamental part of the American family.”

You see, we are just not working hard enough to “work with the Muslim American community” who are a “fundamental part of the American family.” Watch out, too, because Obysmal is again trying to limit the impact of the Internet.

onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:22 PM

That Chris Hayes is a bit of a twink, isn’t he?

onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM

Obama apparently gave two speeches yesterday and I watched the other one.

myiq2xu on May 24, 2013 at 5:03 PM

Comment pages: 1 2