<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WaPo/ABC poll: Obama&#8217;s favorable rating now underwater &#8212; including with women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poll: Obama Losing Ground with Women &#171; RubinoWorld</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6233332</link>
		<dc:creator>Poll: Obama Losing Ground with Women &#171; RubinoWorld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6233332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] HotAir: WaPo/ABC Poll: Obama’s Favorable Rating Now Underwater &#8211; Including With Women [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HotAir: WaPo/ABC Poll: Obama’s Favorable Rating Now Underwater &#8211; Including With Women [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s Unfavorable Rating With Women Now Underwater &#171; womensdcproject</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6229405</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama&#8217;s Unfavorable Rating With Women Now Underwater &#171; womensdcproject</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6229405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the recent WaPo/ABC poll among registered voters shows Obama&#8217;s decline among women registered [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the recent WaPo/ABC poll among registered voters shows Obama&#8217;s decline among women registered [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6221472</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6221472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Seriously, guys, I want to believe. I do. But … I don’t.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Dittoes, and from what I&#039;ve been able to learn it appears as if this election will be won by the alphabet party that turns off the least amount of their base. 

No one has yet discovered any good reason to vote for Romney, and Paul Ryan isn&#039;t running for POTUS, so let&#039;s just hope Mitt keeps his liberal ideology to himself for a few more months. 

BTW, every poll that excludes Governor Gary Johnson is a slanted poll. Tea leaves would be as usefull in predicting the race.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Seriously, guys, I want to believe. I do. But … I don’t.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dittoes, and from what I&#8217;ve been able to learn it appears as if this election will be won by the alphabet party that turns off the least amount of their base. </p>
<p>No one has yet discovered any good reason to vote for Romney, and Paul Ryan isn&#8217;t running for POTUS, so let&#8217;s just hope Mitt keeps his liberal ideology to himself for a few more months. </p>
<p>BTW, every poll that excludes Governor Gary Johnson is a slanted poll. Tea leaves would be as usefull in predicting the race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnold Yabenson</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6219407</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnold Yabenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6219407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe women aren&#039;t the monolithic abortion-loving bloc he thought thy were?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe women aren&#8217;t the monolithic abortion-loving bloc he thought thy were?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Traianus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6219137</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Traianus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6219137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What should really trouble people is this; when Obama ran for office the first time, he successfully let people project all their hopes and dreams upon his bare edifice. Now for the second term, he is trying to get them to perform that same projection with a non-existent second term agenda. Incomplete? What exactly is incomplete?

The message is now- he need more time? More time for what? What is his plan and more importantly, what about the first four years? What did he promise and what did he deliver? When he say he needs more time- for what exactly?

The truth is there are no accomplishments upon which Mr. Obama has delivered. At least not any we wanted or which helped us cure our greatest challenges as a nation. None. He had four years but that wasn’t…enough time? What he has actually done made things worse and yet he is still not changing course.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What should really trouble people is this; when Obama ran for office the first time, he successfully let people project all their hopes and dreams upon his bare edifice. Now for the second term, he is trying to get them to perform that same projection with a non-existent second term agenda. Incomplete? What exactly is incomplete?</p>
<p>The message is now- he need more time? More time for what? What is his plan and more importantly, what about the first four years? What did he promise and what did he deliver? When he say he needs more time- for what exactly?</p>
<p>The truth is there are no accomplishments upon which Mr. Obama has delivered. At least not any we wanted or which helped us cure our greatest challenges as a nation. None. He had four years but that wasn’t…enough time? What he has actually done made things worse and yet he is still not changing course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6219116</link>
		<dc:creator>rockmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6219116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women really, really do not like negative campaigns.  That&#039;s what they&#039;ve been seeing from Obama.  Rising gas prices this summer also are felt keenly by women, and Obama has not said a word about gas prices.  So he&#039;s running a campaign they dislike and appears out of touch on the issues that are affecting them right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women really, really do not like negative campaigns.  That&#8217;s what they&#8217;ve been seeing from Obama.  Rising gas prices this summer also are felt keenly by women, and Obama has not said a word about gas prices.  So he&#8217;s running a campaign they dislike and appears out of touch on the issues that are affecting them right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloggless</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6219096</link>
		<dc:creator>bloggless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6219096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe these result.  Democrats have become the party of Giant Vaginas and free birth control pills. In my limited scope on female matters, women are not pleased. The Giant Vagina thing is downright insulting, and most women are just too tired trying to get by, to be even thinking about sex. The Democrat party has become an absurdity. I think most gals would prefer a Mitt over a Barack.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe these result.  Democrats have become the party of Giant Vaginas and free birth control pills. In my limited scope on female matters, women are not pleased. The Giant Vagina thing is downright insulting, and most women are just too tired trying to get by, to be even thinking about sex. The Democrat party has become an absurdity. I think most gals would prefer a Mitt over a Barack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVAHockey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6219077</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVAHockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6219077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is basically saying:  Ignore the fact that your husband is underemployed and your unemployed son moved back in to the house, which is upside down on the mortgage.  Free BC regardless of need and abortion rights.  

That has to ring hollow, regardless of your position on abortion the BC coverage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is basically saying:  Ignore the fact that your husband is underemployed and your unemployed son moved back in to the house, which is upside down on the mortgage.  Free BC regardless of need and abortion rights.  </p>
<p>That has to ring hollow, regardless of your position on abortion the BC coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC.Charlie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6219016</link>
		<dc:creator>SC.Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 13:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6219016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first I have heard of a $35 million house for Obama in Hawaii.  I about fell out of my chair.  Talk about being part of the .001%.  I guess he doesn&#039;t want to live among the ordinary folks and be a community organizer anymore after he is thrown out of office in November.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first I have heard of a $35 million house for Obama in Hawaii.  I about fell out of my chair.  Talk about being part of the .001%.  I guess he doesn&#8217;t want to live among the ordinary folks and be a community organizer anymore after he is thrown out of office in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKYFOX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218988</link>
		<dc:creator>SKYFOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 13:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That women are more driven by their emotions does not make them stupid.  Most of them don&#039;t take kindly to being slapped around.  You only hear about the ones who do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That women are more driven by their emotions does not make them stupid.  Most of them don&#8217;t take kindly to being slapped around.  You only hear about the ones who do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrustyB</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218871</link>
		<dc:creator>CrustyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 13:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe women saw that video of Romney pledging to protect legalized abortion?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe women saw that video of Romney pledging to protect legalized abortion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bayview</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218800</link>
		<dc:creator>bayview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not familiar with Gravis, but it released 2 polls for OH and FL. RV poll. and Doug Kaplan, the pollster, is a republican ( this is what the DU crowd was focused on when they are discussing the results there). 

OH
Barry 44, Romney 47	Romney +3
Brown 44, Mandel 44	Tie

D 42
R 37
I 21

FL
Barry 47, Romney 48	Romney +1
Nelson 43, Mack 42	Nelson +1

D 43
R 42
I 14]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not familiar with Gravis, but it released 2 polls for OH and FL. RV poll. and Doug Kaplan, the pollster, is a republican ( this is what the DU crowd was focused on when they are discussing the results there). </p>
<p>OH<br />
Barry 44, Romney 47	Romney +3<br />
Brown 44, Mandel 44	Tie</p>
<p>D 42<br />
R 37<br />
I 21</p>
<p>FL<br />
Barry 47, Romney 48	Romney +1<br />
Nelson 43, Mack 42	Nelson +1</p>
<p>D 43<br />
R 42<br />
I 14</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PappyD61</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218790</link>
		<dc:creator>PappyD61</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Squirrel !!!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;




Look at Michelle&#039;s toned arms.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Squirrel !!!</em></strong></p>
<p>Look at Michelle&#8217;s toned arms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: racquetballer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218785</link>
		<dc:creator>racquetballer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The people on the left that are well off, that feel so strongly about their positions, should pony up their own money, voluntarily, to support their causes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people on the left that are well off, that feel so strongly about their positions, should pony up their own money, voluntarily, to support their causes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don L</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218781</link>
		<dc:creator>Don L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;A lot of polls are reducing Ind. to under 4%. What’s up with that? I think they can’t skew the D/R split any more toward Dems, so they’ve begun removing the Ind. so as to bump up Obama’s percentage.

For example: Say we have 33/33/34 DRI split with Romney winning independents by 10%, we get 51.7% of the vote for Romney.

Can’t have that. Breaking 50% is the holy grail of politics. So we skew by D+10. We now have 38/28/34 DRI split. This gives Romney 46.7% and Obama 53.3%. Does this look familiar? Why yes. Yes it does.

Ok, but Romney’s winning even more now. He’s at 15% with Ind. He’s gonna cross 50% even with this D+10% skew. What to do? What to do? We remove the Ind. Bring it down to 5%. I’ve seen 1 to 4% myself. So let’s go with 47/45/4. Note it doesn’t go to 100% anymore. But now, we have 47.2% of the vote for Romney and 47% for Obama. It’s neck in neck. Does this look even more familiar? And yes, I have seen 47% Dems to Obama in a PPP poll and 40% to Obama in a Survey USA poll today.

The reality is that a 32/35/33 DRI with Romney winning Ind. by 15% gives Romney 54% of the vote. Granted he won’t get all R’s, but neither will Obama get all D’s. And give the same amount to D/R and whoever wins the Ind. wins the election. That’s Romney right now.

MrX on September 4, 2012 at 11:49 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Another way to see this is that if we all die from 3 diseases and they cure one, the deaths from the other two go up markedly.
Liberals lie using these techniques all the time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A lot of polls are reducing Ind. to under 4%. What’s up with that? I think they can’t skew the D/R split any more toward Dems, so they’ve begun removing the Ind. so as to bump up Obama’s percentage.</p>
<p>For example: Say we have 33/33/34 DRI split with Romney winning independents by 10%, we get 51.7% of the vote for Romney.</p>
<p>Can’t have that. Breaking 50% is the holy grail of politics. So we skew by D+10. We now have 38/28/34 DRI split. This gives Romney 46.7% and Obama 53.3%. Does this look familiar? Why yes. Yes it does.</p>
<p>Ok, but Romney’s winning even more now. He’s at 15% with Ind. He’s gonna cross 50% even with this D+10% skew. What to do? What to do? We remove the Ind. Bring it down to 5%. I’ve seen 1 to 4% myself. So let’s go with 47/45/4. Note it doesn’t go to 100% anymore. But now, we have 47.2% of the vote for Romney and 47% for Obama. It’s neck in neck. Does this look even more familiar? And yes, I have seen 47% Dems to Obama in a PPP poll and 40% to Obama in a Survey USA poll today.</p>
<p>The reality is that a 32/35/33 DRI with Romney winning Ind. by 15% gives Romney 54% of the vote. Granted he won’t get all R’s, but neither will Obama get all D’s. And give the same amount to D/R and whoever wins the Ind. wins the election. That’s Romney right now.</p>
<p>MrX on September 4, 2012 at 11:49 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Another way to see this is that if we all die from 3 diseases and they cure one, the deaths from the other two go up markedly.<br />
Liberals lie using these techniques all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218777</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dems war on women: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAp9sFVdERQ&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dems war on women: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAp9sFVdERQ" rel="nofollow">Here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don L</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218767</link>
		<dc:creator>Don L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Underwater? Finally. What took us so long to ridicule this empty chair?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Underwater? Finally. What took us so long to ridicule this empty chair?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218764</link>
		<dc:creator>moo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are we all going to talk about when Obama loses?

Nevermind... I&#039;ll be busy working hard building MY business again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are we all going to talk about when Obama loses?</p>
<p>Nevermind&#8230; I&#8217;ll be busy working hard building MY business again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change We Can Believe In &#171; YouViewed/editorial</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218708</link>
		<dc:creator>Change We Can Believe In &#171; YouViewed/editorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 11:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;WaPo/ABC poll: Obama’s favorable rating now underwater — including with women&#8220; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;WaPo/ABC poll: Obama’s favorable rating now underwater — including with women&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Notorious G.O.P</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218619</link>
		<dc:creator>The Notorious G.O.P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course Mr. Clown Shoes himself doesn&#039;t believe it. Allah why don&#039;t you go work at Kos where you would be more comfortable. I have more respect for Charles Johnson than I do Allah.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Mr. Clown Shoes himself doesn&#8217;t believe it. Allah why don&#8217;t you go work at Kos where you would be more comfortable. I have more respect for Charles Johnson than I do Allah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeinTX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218206</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeinTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 03:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t get this &#039;Crat meme that abortion is the definition of being a woman.  Really?  The epitome of being a woman is having abortions?  As if all American women have had multiple abortions and see having an abortion on demand as a marque of womanhood?  Who are these women who need to have abortion on demand and at the taxpayer dime?  

The economy?  

The availability of jobs?

The value of the dollar?

The value of your home and property?

Your tax bill?

Inflation?



And free and easy guiltless abortion is the American woman&#039;s number one, above all, identity?  Blending an infant into a puree in your own body trumps all economic and security concerns? REALLY?  


I don&#039;t get it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get this &#8216;Crat meme that abortion is the definition of being a woman.  Really?  The epitome of being a woman is having abortions?  As if all American women have had multiple abortions and see having an abortion on demand as a marque of womanhood?  Who are these women who need to have abortion on demand and at the taxpayer dime?  </p>
<p>The economy?  </p>
<p>The availability of jobs?</p>
<p>The value of the dollar?</p>
<p>The value of your home and property?</p>
<p>Your tax bill?</p>
<p>Inflation?</p>
<p>And free and easy guiltless abortion is the American woman&#8217;s number one, above all, identity?  Blending an infant into a puree in your own body trumps all economic and security concerns? REALLY?  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6218165</link>
		<dc:creator>MrX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 03:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6218165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of polls are reducing Ind. to under 4%. What&#039;s up with that? I think they can&#039;t skew the D/R split any more toward Dems, so they&#039;ve begun removing the Ind. so as to bump up Obama&#039;s percentage.

For example: Say we have 33/33/34 DRI split with Romney winning independents by 10%, we get 51.7% of the vote for Romney. 

Can&#039;t have that. Breaking 50% is the holy grail of politics. So we skew by D+10. We now have 38/28/34 DRI split. This gives Romney 46.7% and Obama 53.3%. Does this look familiar? Why yes. Yes it does.

Ok, but Romney&#039;s winning even more now. He&#039;s at 15% with Ind. He&#039;s gonna cross 50% even with this D+10% skew. What to do? What to do? We remove the Ind. Bring it down to 5%. I&#039;ve seen 1 to 4% myself.  So let&#039;s go with 47/45/4. Note it doesn&#039;t go to 100% anymore. But now, we have 47.2% of the vote for Romney and 47% for Obama. It&#039;s neck in neck. Does this look even more familiar? And yes, I have seen 47% Dems to Obama in a PPP poll and 40% to Obama in a Survey USA poll today.

The reality is that a 32/35/33 DRI with Romney winning Ind. by 15% gives Romney 54% of the vote. Granted he won&#039;t get all R&#039;s, but neither will Obama get all D&#039;s. And give the same amount to D/R and whoever wins the Ind. wins the election. That&#039;s Romney right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of polls are reducing Ind. to under 4%. What&#8217;s up with that? I think they can&#8217;t skew the D/R split any more toward Dems, so they&#8217;ve begun removing the Ind. so as to bump up Obama&#8217;s percentage.</p>
<p>For example: Say we have 33/33/34 DRI split with Romney winning independents by 10%, we get 51.7% of the vote for Romney. </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t have that. Breaking 50% is the holy grail of politics. So we skew by D+10. We now have 38/28/34 DRI split. This gives Romney 46.7% and Obama 53.3%. Does this look familiar? Why yes. Yes it does.</p>
<p>Ok, but Romney&#8217;s winning even more now. He&#8217;s at 15% with Ind. He&#8217;s gonna cross 50% even with this D+10% skew. What to do? What to do? We remove the Ind. Bring it down to 5%. I&#8217;ve seen 1 to 4% myself.  So let&#8217;s go with 47/45/4. Note it doesn&#8217;t go to 100% anymore. But now, we have 47.2% of the vote for Romney and 47% for Obama. It&#8217;s neck in neck. Does this look even more familiar? And yes, I have seen 47% Dems to Obama in a PPP poll and 40% to Obama in a Survey USA poll today.</p>
<p>The reality is that a 32/35/33 DRI with Romney winning Ind. by 15% gives Romney 54% of the vote. Granted he won&#8217;t get all R&#8217;s, but neither will Obama get all D&#8217;s. And give the same amount to D/R and whoever wins the Ind. wins the election. That&#8217;s Romney right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xrayiiis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6217692</link>
		<dc:creator>xrayiiis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6217692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe they are giving him bad numbers before the convention so they can say he got a big bounce.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they are giving him bad numbers before the convention so they can say he got a big bounce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COgirl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6217589</link>
		<dc:creator>COgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6217589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I live in the swing state of Colorado. Not that I watch much network tv where the ads would be going full steam ahead, but the only ad I have seen is one that is really pushing hard on the &quot;Romney is bad for women&quot; theme. I tend to think that maybe the Obama internal polling is consistent with the results in this poll and that&#039;s why they are doubling down on this theme. Personally I think all the polls are overstating the Obama strength and that the one could be in for a shellacking in November.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in the swing state of Colorado. Not that I watch much network tv where the ads would be going full steam ahead, but the only ad I have seen is one that is really pushing hard on the &#8220;Romney is bad for women&#8221; theme. I tend to think that maybe the Obama internal polling is consistent with the results in this poll and that&#8217;s why they are doubling down on this theme. Personally I think all the polls are overstating the Obama strength and that the one could be in for a shellacking in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cartooner</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/comment-page-2/#comment-6217499</link>
		<dc:creator>cartooner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530#comment-6217499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Child, please! Obama is going to lose. This time in 1980, Jimmy Carter was farther ahead of Reagan than Obama is now. Don&#039;t get complacent, but we will win!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Child, please! Obama is going to lose. This time in 1980, Jimmy Carter was farther ahead of Reagan than Obama is now. Don&#8217;t get complacent, but we will win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>