Where are Milwaukee’s “missing” black voters?

posted at 1:01 pm on September 1, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Are 60% of Milwaukee’s black voters from 2008 missing?  That’s what a study from the New Organizing Institute claims, which estimates that as many as 160,000 black voters in the city from the last presidential election can no longer be found.  Slate reports on this claim without any real skepticism or scrutiny, after noting NPR’s speculation that the housing crisis would cause Democrats more trouble in finding their voters:

This spring, the League of Young Voters, which was created to mobilize young minority communities, collaborated with the liberal Wisconsin Voices coalition to dispatch teams of young canvassers. Starting in April, they spent eight weeks knocking on 120,882 doors across 208 of Milwaukee’s 317 wards to raise awareness of the gubernatorial recall election scheduled for June.  The doors had one thing in common: the voter file said they were all home to a registered voter whom a commercial data vendor had flagged as likely to be African-American.

But the voter file represented a fiction, or at least a reality that had rapidly become out of date.  During those eight weeks, canvassers were able to successfully find and interact with only 31 percent of their targets. Twice that number were confirmed to no longer live at the address on file  — either because a structure was abandoned or condemned, or if a current resident reported that the targeted voter no longer lived there.

Based on those results, the New Organizing Institute, a Washington-based best-practices lab for lefty field operations, extrapolated that nearly 160,000 African-American voters in Milwaukee were no longer reachable at their last documented address — representing 41 percent of the city’s 2008 electorate.  It is a staggering figure in a battleground state where Democratic prospects rely on turning out Milwaukee’s urban population, an ever more urgent cause since Paul Ryan’s presence on the ticket could help mobilize core Republican constituencies in the city’s suburbs.  Over half of those identified as displaced were under the age of 35, and thus also less likely to be reachable through traditional landline phones.

Simply put, this is an absurd conclusion to reach.  It starts with an assumption that the “voter file” used in this search was accurate, both in identifying African-American voters and in identifying legitimate registrations.  It ends with the assumption that a voter who no longer lives in the same place in 2012 that he or she did in 2008 is somehow “missing.”  And the result of this absurdity is the claim that 160,000 voters in a city population of only 594,833 — including non-voters — went “missing,” and no one noticed.

If this is actually true, then we have a perfect way to corroborate this claim.  The 2008 election, where Barack Obama became the first African-American President, was generally agreed to boost participation among black voters around the nation.  In Wisconsin, that demo accounted for 5% of the overall vote, according to exit polling. In the 2010 gubernatorial election, it was 4%.  Unlike most other states, Wisconsin held a statewide election as well as a primary — the recall election of Scott Walker, Rebecca Kleefisch, and several state senators.  In exit polling from the June election, black voters once again comprised 5% of the vote, up from 2010′s gubernatorial election.

Obama won Wisconsin handily in 2008 by 13 points in an election where 2,939,604 votes were cast; five percent of that would be 146,980 votes cast by African-American voters in the entire state.  In the 2010 election, 2,133,244 votes were cast, 4% of which would have been 85,330.  The recall election won by Walker had 2,516,065 votes cast — almost perfectly between the two — and five percent of that comes to 125,803.    None of these remotely indicate that Milwaukee had 160,000 extra black voters to go missing in the first place.  That’s more than the number of black voters who turned out statewide in 2008 in Obama’s first presidential election.

By the way, the number of people who voted in Milwaukee County — not the city — in the 2008 election was 475,192.  In 2012, it was 396,183, a difference of only 79,000 in a special election effort.  It also produced almost exactly the same result as in the 2010 gubernatorial election, too.

Finally, let’s go to the best data of all — the Census Bureau.  The state of Wisconsin’s population in the 2011 estimate was 5,711,767 people, of whom 6.5% identify as black.  That’s a statewide total of 371,265 black adults and children, up from 2000′s 304,460 and 5.7%, and slightly higher than 2010′s 359,148 and 6.3% rather than declining.  The city of Milwaukee’s population of 597,867 is 40% African-American, which comes to 239,147 adults and children.  Assuming one child for every two adults, there would only be 157,837 African-American adults of voting age in the city altogether.  In Milwaukee County, the population is 952,532, with 27% being African-American.  That comes to 257,183 African-American adults and children (most of them live in the city itself, obviously), and using the same 2:1 ratio for adults to children, we get 169,741 voting-age-eligible adults.

In order to believe this survey, one would have to believe that every African-American adult had abandoned the city of Milwaukee, and nearly all from the county of Milwaukee, too, which demonstrates the absurdity of its conclusion.   Furthermore, even if the claim were true, those voters would show up elsewhere — either elsewhere in Wisconsin, or elsewhere in the US.  The percentage of black voters in Wisconsin exit polling from 2008 to 2012 should have cratered with that kind of exodus had it occurred, but instead it remained remarkably stable all the way through June of this year.  The only conclusion is that the claim is absolutely and transparently nutty.

There are a few possible reasons for the New Organizing Institute to make this claim, and they’re not mutually exclusive.  One, they may be just that bad at math.  Two, they may just be that bad at door knocking. Three, they may just be that bad at research.  Four, the voter file from 2008 contained massive amounts of fraudulent registrations, and the state’s new voter-ID law has respondents thinking twice about trying it again in 2012 — although 160,000 is as absurd a figure for that as it is for claiming people missing.  Five, the New Organizing Institute wanted to stake a claim that a loss in Wisconsin wasn’t due to their bad GOTV efforts but a result of both the housing crisis and voter suppression, and concocted the data to support the conclusion.

I suspect a bit of all these are at work in this claim, and arguably in the reporting of it too.  It’s very curious that Slate’s Sasha Issenberg didn’t bother to do the math herself to test NOI’s ridiculous figures before writing the lead, “Sixty percent of Milwaukee’s black voters have disappeared.”  This looks like agenda flogging rather than journalism.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Ed, I’m impressed. You have the knack of taking statistics from different sources and reporting on the linkages in such a way as to make it obvious to anyone with average skill that they are looking at a master.

Imagine — a group of blackfolk 10 times the number of the full staff at the GM plant in Janesville at its prime — just gone.

It has to be the racists. The alternative is that every election won by a Democrat in the environs of Milwaukee is a fraud.

unclesmrgol on September 2, 2012 at 2:07 AM

There Goes The Neighborhood

I can hear Archie Bunker saying your name.

Typicalwhitewoman on September 2, 2012 at 1:30 AM

Thank you.

I think?

There Goes The Neighborhood on September 2, 2012 at 2:15 AM

Maybe they were taken by aliens. I’m not going to worry about it, though…

I’m sure they’ll all be back in time for the election.

trigon on September 2, 2012 at 2:42 AM

The city of Milwaukee’s population of 597,867 is 40% African-American, which comes to 239,147 adults and children. Assuming one child for every two adults, there would only be 157,837 African-American adults of voting age in the city altogether. In Milwaukee County, the population is 952,532, with 27% being African-American. That comes to 257,183 African-American adults and children (most of them live in the city itself, obviously), and using the same 2:1 ratio for adults to children, we get 169,741 voting-age-eligible adults.

It seems strange to just assume a 2:1 ratio of adults to children. Is there some reasoning behind this? According to the US census, 23.7% of the population is under the age of 18 as opposed to the 33.3% assumed here.

jhffmn on September 2, 2012 at 4:51 AM

What is that picture from?

Baerwulf on September 2, 2012 at 7:06 AM

Perhaps the “missing” people went back to Chicago where they actually live. They will be bussed up to their the temp locations to vote in early Nov. But don’t worry, there is no such thing as vote fraud, and absolutely no need for photo ID showing you are a resident of the state.

ray on September 2, 2012 at 8:21 AM

Awwww c’mon … we all know what happened:
The Dems stopped paying the homeless with cash and cigarettes, didn’t drag people to the polls, and this time, didn’t slash the tires of GOP transport vans.

And THIS Gem:

“Based on those results, the New Organizing Institute, a Washington-based best-practices lab for lefty field operations, extrapolated that nearly 160,000 African-American voters in Milwaukee were no longer reachable at their last documented address — representing 41 percent of the city’s 2008 electorate.”

Whenever I see “best practices”, I know that idiots need to be led by the nose.
Good research on the stats, btw. It puts everything into perspective. Like:
How much cash (or cigarettes) does the DNC have on hand to bribe voters?
~(Ä)~

Karl Magnus on September 2, 2012 at 8:46 AM

Jeez, is it just me or did the rest of you get a headache following the “math”? Maybe I’m just more visual and needed a chart. In any event, my vote is for #4: fraudulent registrations. And hey, why is it that in this terrible economy I have not seen a single homeless exposé on one of the alphabet networks?

SpiderMike on September 2, 2012 at 9:26 AM

No wonder Obama-Holder fight so hard to keep fraudulent voters on the rolls.

Christian Conservative on September 2, 2012 at 9:27 AM

Maybe they never existed, except on the voter rolls. Hell the Democrats register the dead, their pets, and God knows what else. They never want to talk about voter fraud that seems to run rampant in their party. Truly honest elections are a rare commodity these days.

savage24 on September 2, 2012 at 9:57 AM

that’s the thing about dead people and made up characters. They’re never there until the votes are counted.

DanaSmiles on September 2, 2012 at 11:08 AM

“A Raleigh-based group devoted to reducing the potential for voter fraud presented the N.C. Board of Elections on Friday with a list of nearly 30,000 names of dead people statewide who are still registered to vote.

The Voter Integrity Project compiled the list after obtaining death records from the state Department of Public Health from 2002 to March 31 and comparing them to the voter rolls….”

http://www.jammiewf.com/2012/just-in-time-for-the-dnc-30000-dead-north-carolinians-registered-to-vote/

workingclass artist on September 2, 2012 at 11:08 AM

Hmmmmmm……If abandoned and condemned buildings is a criteria, I wonder how many voters are “missing” in Dee-troit?

BlueStateExpat on September 2, 2012 at 11:12 AM

In Minnesota, a registered voter can “vouch” for up to 15 new persons seeking to both register and vote on election day, even if the people they are vouching for may have absolutely no identification whatsoever, nor any proof at all of the “fact” that they live in the jurisdiction where they want to vote — such as a utility bill having been mailed to them at their address.

Vouching, especially in a city environment, allows political hackse to game the system on a massive scale, and could result in one person showing up in multiple precincts in a city, and voting numerous times, with little or no chance of being caught.

Trochilus on September 1, 2012 at 6:58 PM

God help us! Unbelievable!!!!
The price of liberty really is eternal vigilance.

redridinghood on September 2, 2012 at 12:21 PM

What is that picture from?

Baerwulf on September 2, 2012 at 7:06 AM

It looks like coach “K” – Duke basketball (also coach of team USA)

VegasRick on September 2, 2012 at 12:23 PM

Hmmmmmm……If abandoned and condemned buildings is a criteria, I wonder how many voters are “missing” in Dee-troit?

BlueStateExpat on September 2, 2012 at 11:12 AM

Way the hell too many.

I still say there should be a national jobs program centered on tearing down old dangerous buildings that haven’t been used in decades. They’re a public health hazard because cockroaches like to hide in them, and I don’t mean the ones with six legs.

MelonCollie on September 2, 2012 at 12:27 PM

Pretty much puts an end to the lefty talking point that voter-fraud doesn’t exist.

They could check out Philadelphia, Miami, Los Angeles, Chicago, and the list goes on and find this exact situation in nearly all of these cities.

These lefties require photo-ID to enter their gated communities, but think it’s racist to require it to vote….

You want to defend yourself in federal court? Better have photo-ID to get in or you can forget it. And a fair trial is a right granted by the constitution as well…..

Yes, the lefties know the only reason for no voter ID laws is so they can continue to perpetrate the fraud they have for years. Now they know that WE KNOW how rampant it is.

goflyers on September 2, 2012 at 12:54 PM

What is that picture from?

Baerwulf on September 2, 2012 at 7:06 AM

It’s from the Jan/2011 basketball game- Duke vs NC State.

redridinghood on September 2, 2012 at 1:47 PM

Great joke going around that pretty much says it all (unfortunately):

“My parents were staunch Republicans and voted every election for 50 years. Imagine our surprise when we learned they became Democrats after they died!”

shootingstar on September 2, 2012 at 3:07 PM

Great joke going around that pretty much says it all (unfortunately):

“My parents were staunch Republicans and voted every election for 50 years. Imagine our surprise when we learned they became Democrats after they died!”

shootingstar on September 2, 2012 at 3:07 PM

LOL-I’m going to have to pass that around.

redridinghood on September 2, 2012 at 4:59 PM

Non-existent people are ussually hard to reach. What’s the world coming to when Democrat election theft is questioned?

arand on September 2, 2012 at 5:26 PM

Nah, we don’t need any voter ID laws, everything is just fine.

SC.Charlie on September 1, 2012 at 1:14 PM

.
.
Thread winner.

listens2glenn on September 2, 2012 at 5:49 PM

Is Milwaukee still there?

curved space on September 2, 2012 at 10:22 PM

“Four, the voter file from 2008 contained massive amounts of fraudulent registrations… …although 160,000 is as absurd a figure for that as it is for claiming people missing.”

Given everything we have heard and seen about ACORN led voter registration and the events leading up to the Walker recall exactly what is your justification for saying that fraudulent voter registration of that magnitude is absurd?

Nomas on September 3, 2012 at 7:52 AM

And hey, why is it that in this terrible economy I have not seen a single homeless exposé on one of the alphabet networks?

Dude, where you been for 30 years? Homeless people (and uemployment lines) don’t exist when Democrats hold the White House. Don’t worry though; you’ll see plenty of homelessness/joblessness stories if Mitt gets elected. You’ll also see the rediscovery of the concept of presidential responsibility. You can bank on that.

Don Michael Bitsconi on September 3, 2012 at 9:03 AM

Of course this has not been picked up by the MSM or the Justice Department. Voter fraud does not exist.

SC.Charlie on September 3, 2012 at 12:57 PM

Comment pages: 1 2