Thanks a lot, USADA: Lance Armstrong faces the loss of his seven Tour de France titles
posted at 1:11 pm on August 24, 2012 by Erika Johnsen
And now for something completely different! Well, maybe not completely different — like the many within our festering federal government, this is yet another instance of an unbridled power-tripping bureaucracy run amok — but as a huge cycling fan, this is one of the few sports-related contributions I can make, and the Erika Johnsen Rage Machine is running on all cylinders.
I am all for trying to keep athletics of all sorts clean and drug-free, if the arbiters of the sport so desire (whether or not there’s actually a lot of wisdom in banning supposed performance enhancers is a whole other rich debate, but I won’t go there). It’s a tough job, being the doping police, and trying to keep an even playing field in a world full of ever more innovative doping techniques is a constant battle. Cycling in particular has a long and infamous history of anti-doping crusades — probably because cycling, more than being about hand-eye coordination or other such skills, often comes down to who can simply suffer the longest and the hardest.
There are various international governing bodies that regularly test the riders and enforce doping policies — and again, I’m okay with it. But a years-long, repeatedly meandering witch hunt against a man that never once tested positive on a drug test while active in the sport, borne of stale allegations from vengeful or scapegoating former fellow riders, after a federal grand jury criminal investigation failed to nail him? That is something by which I absolutely cannot abide.
Lance Armstrong has already been retired from professional cycling for a couple years now, but that hasn’t stopped the fishing expedition against him. There are plenty of Europeans who resent him simply for being a stellar American champion (Heh. ‘Murika.), bitter members of the cycling community with axes to grind, and an anti-doping coalition on a mission to prove some stupid trumped-up point. The guy just hasn’t been able to enjoy his retirement. At some point, I’m sure the relentless inquisition starts to take its toll — and last night, Armstrong announced that he would no longer fight the ongoing case against him.
There comes a point in every man’s life when he has to say, “Enough is enough.” For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a two-year federal criminal investigation followed by Travis Tygart’s unconstitutional witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense.
I had hoped that a federal court would stop USADA’s charade. Although the court was sympathetic to my concerns and recognized the many improprieties and deficiencies in USADA’s motives, its conduct, and its process, the court ultimately decided that it could not intervene.
If I thought for one moment that by participating in USADA’s process, I could confront these allegations in a fair setting and – once and for all – put these charges to rest, I would jump at the chance. But I refuse to participate in a process that is so one-sided and unfair. Regardless of what Travis Tygart says, there is zero physical evidence to support his outlandish and heinous claims. The only physical evidence here is the hundreds of controls I have passed with flying colors. I made myself available around the clock and around the world. In-competition. Out of competition. Blood. Urine. Whatever they asked for I provided. What is the point of all this testing if, in the end, USADA will not stand by it?
As Armstrong goes on to say, the USADA (largely funded by your tax dollars, by the way! Yippee!) has been nothing but a bully throughout this entire ludicrous affair. They’ve violated their own 8-year limitation with their 17-year-old charges; the Union Cycliste Internationale and USA Cycling have ordered them to quit their investigation; they’ve done a lot of shady deals with vindictive characters; broken their own rules and willfully operated outside of their jurisdiction; and have obviously made Lance Armstrong into an especial target. Nobody in the cycling world receives more scrutiny than a multi-win Tour de France champion, but once the USADA decided to punish him, they just couldn’t let it go.
U.S. Anti-Doping Agency Chief Executive Travis Tygart said late Thursday he was still waiting to hear directly from Armstrong but added that the cyclist’s decision not to proceed in an arbitration process will leave Armstrong stripped of all of his Tour titles and 2000 Olympic bronze medal and result in a lifetime competition ban. …
Armstrong’s attorneys asked a USADA attorney to turn the matter over to UCI, the international cycling union, but USADA maintains it retains jurisdiction to strip the titles.
Armstrong never tested positive for performance-enhancing use during his decade-plus of Tour races.
I’m not at all sure that the USADA actually has the authority to unilaterally declare that Armstrong is stripped of his titles and banned from pro cycling, but the UCI says they’re going to wait for the detailed case from the USADA before weighing in.
Unforgivable, USADA. Again, I’m all about doping controls, but maybe you guys should think about a cost v. benefit analysis before you absorb everybody’s time and resources with an inquest that’s thin on evidence and ripe with malice. The world of cycling is always looking for ways to bring in a larger American audience to help grow the sport and keep the industry vibrant, and Lance Armstrong has accomplished more for that goal than anyone else — ever.
Armstrong isn’t even one of my personal favorite cyclists, and I don’t actually buy it that he’s quite the squeaky-clean, innocent victim he’s proclaiming himself to be, but I clearly remember watching him on television, struggling up steep summits and whizzing down tricky descents, through the mountains and over the fields, in wind and rain and scorching sun, for three weeks, over seven separate months of July, with nothing but pain and hard-man focus on his face. As far as I’m concerned, he won those Tours. Stripping him of his titles is only going to disenchant potential fans even more and contribute to the stigmas against cycling.
So congratulations, USADA. I hope you’re feeling really great about yourselves and everything you’ve accomplished right now. Really awesome job.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Report: Oversight on IRS targeting came from Washington all along

DOJ seized logs for five Fox News phones, possibly James Rosens’ parents’ house






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Monsieur Hollande, you have no earthly clue what real austerity is, merci beaucoup.
gryphon202 on May 4, 2013 at 11:36 AM
Government wine? (Facepalm.)
RoadRunner on May 4, 2013 at 11:40 AM
Is that really any more ridiculous than the government food commodities our own government purchases?
gryphon202 on May 4, 2013 at 11:43 AM
Do the French really want to tick the Germans off. Again. If so, one can only hope O’Dumbo stays the hell out of it.
GarandFan on May 4, 2013 at 11:45 AM
You want some government cheese to go with that government wine?
Flange on May 4, 2013 at 11:52 AM
Let them drink wine
BobMbx on May 4, 2013 at 11:53 AM
Like, oh, m’god!
HB3 on May 4, 2013 at 11:56 AM
Being English, I’m loving this!
OldEnglish on May 4, 2013 at 11:56 AM
Government Whine!
xdwall on May 4, 2013 at 11:57 AM
Coolest wine I ever consumed was a Chateau de la Chaize 1976 Beaujolais Tricentennial Edition Magnum. The sales rep of the winery I was working for at the time gave me and the winemaker the bottle. He estimated its worth at about 3500-5000.
It wasn’t the best wine I’ve ever tasted, but it was the best wine in context.
Beaujolais are generally composed of a majority of Gamay Noir grape. Gamay Noirs don’t hold up well over time, and when we opened it, we expected it to taste flat and boring. Not so. For a 35 year old Gamay Noir, the wine was incredible, maintained a ton of fruit, and still had amazing structure considering the scenario. A truly incredible winemaker did some great work in 1976.
blatantblue on May 4, 2013 at 12:00 PM
I’m sure blatantblue will disagree, but anymore French wines are at the bottom of my families list. For the money, domestic or even Aussie wines are better for the buck than their high-priced wines and are just as good IMHO. Buy your local regional wines also. (Unless you’re upstate NY)
hawkdriver on May 4, 2013 at 12:03 PM
HAH! BB.
hawkdriver on May 4, 2013 at 12:04 PM
Night Train, last Tuesday, #3.99
BobMbx on May 4, 2013 at 12:06 PM
I’ll see your Night Train and raise you a Mad Dog 20/20. Don’t make me go all in with Thunderbird.
CaptainNed on May 4, 2013 at 12:09 PM
Maybe Ed can pick up a nice Merlot for his patio time.
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on May 4, 2013 at 12:10 PM
I can understand. It is France after all. Don’t drink the water.
hawkeye54 on May 4, 2013 at 12:14 PM
I trump your wine selections with two words: Silver Satin. I rest my case.
Mason on May 4, 2013 at 12:17 PM
So in other words he’s lying to everyone.
JEM on May 4, 2013 at 12:32 PM
That was a good year for anti-freeze.
steebo77 on May 4, 2013 at 12:33 PM
What’s the word? Thunderbird! Worst headache I’ve ever had, by far, was from drinking that stuff. My head hurts just thinking about it.
Flange on May 4, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Maybe they could get a deal on some Boone’s Farm Strawberry Hill.
trigon on May 4, 2013 at 12:49 PM
Well, I don’t particularly want to make fun of the French.
But they do ask to be ridiculed, so it would be rude of me not to comply.
And I hope you voted UKIP…
JohnGalt23 on May 4, 2013 at 12:51 PM
Had I not escaped to OZ, I would have for sure!
OldEnglish on May 4, 2013 at 1:00 PM
I think the French still ship a lot of good mid-priced wines. I like the Aussies, too, but too much American wine is characterless and/or overpriced.
Why would they even bother cellaring a $20 bottle of wine? And what Palace guest has so little status that they’d be served it?
urban elitist on May 4, 2013 at 1:05 PM
Looks like a lot of folks did this time around – I would trade 100 Republicans for one Nigel Farage. Those of you who haven’t yet should behold some of the man’s youtube clips.
stout77 on May 4, 2013 at 1:16 PM
May the rest of the bottles turn to vinegar!
Spit, double spit.
can_con on May 4, 2013 at 2:10 PM
I wouldn’t completely agree. I’d say a lot of wines we’ve gotten from Virginia are what i would consider regional and in possession of a lot of character.
My family also buys a lot of the wines from the Biltmore Estate label that have a nice distinct taste. I concede it’s not a completely valid argument for them though because so much of the grape juice they start with is actually imported from other regions. What actually comes from their vineyards is very distinct.
I’d be interested to know what French label for mid-price you think is worth buying.
hawkdriver on May 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM
Perhaps we should send barge loads of Boonesfarm, Ripple, Wild Irish Rose… or Muscatel …as humanitarian aid. The wines of brown-bag-wrapped-bottle connoisseurs everywhere.
To be fair, though, Boonesfarm is more widely enjoyed by the wine spritzer crowd, as it has a very low alcohol content with a sort of kool-aid flavor point.
thatsafactjack on May 4, 2013 at 2:36 PM
I don’t know if I’m comfortable sending away crates of Strawberry Hill.
. . . trying to set your “Kool-Aid” snootery aside.
Axe on May 4, 2013 at 4:10 PM
…they’re French!…JugEars will buy it!
KOOLAID2 on May 4, 2013 at 4:20 PM
Sorry. Not ‘snootery’, though.
Check you Sketchbook mail. :)
thatsafactjack on May 4, 2013 at 5:11 PM
Sarc tags are for gurls. :)
k. But give me till the top of the hour; I’m about to update the site.
Axe on May 4, 2013 at 5:15 PM
Gotta have SOMETHING on hand if Obama pays a visit.
JamesS on May 4, 2013 at 7:34 PM
Nothing about huge Ukip surge in UK election? Shame on you, Hot Air
callingallcomets on May 5, 2013 at 5:17 AM
Nothing but the finest box of wine for Barack.
And put an extra straw in it for Big Mooch.
justltl on May 5, 2013 at 6:25 AM
No, and the French were warned about that over 150 years ago:
“Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.”
― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law
ebrown2 on May 5, 2013 at 9:25 AM