Will the Dem convention be Abortion-palooza?
posted at 12:41 pm on August 23, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
With the recent face-plant of Todd Akin in Missouri, Democrats think they have hit on a winning theme for their convention in Charlotte. Agenda changes show that Democrats will make Akin the poster boy of the GOP and focus the three-day affair on abortion and contraception policy, Paul Bedard reports:
Just as the Akin crisis was reaching a crescendo, the Democrats on Wednesday announced that three starlets of the pro-choice movement will be featured at the convention, an event that will now drive the liberal charge that the Republicans are anti-women.
Democrats said that they will feature Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parent Action Fund, Nancy Keenan, president of the NARAL Pro-Choice America and Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown University student whose plea for federal birth control funding drew the ire–and a subsequent apology–from Rush Limbaugh.
What’s more, the Democrats are expanding their list of women ready to assail the GOP on women’s issue, adding Maryland Sen. Barbara Mikulski and actress Eva Longoria to the list that already includes Sen. John Kerry and Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren.
What a great idea! After all, the issue of abortion and contraception doesn’t even appear on the radar screen for voters in this cycle, as polls from Gallup and the CBS/NYT/Quinnipiac partnership attest. Jennifer Rubin has a few suggestions for Democrats as to how to stage their Abortion-palooza:
The Democrats, reports suggest, are going to focus their convention in Charlotte, N.C. ( a right-to-work state that voted to ban gay marriage), on Todd Akin, to a surprisingly large extent. This will be quite amusing when he eventually drops out. But at least we know they are attuned to abortion, an issue that registers at less than 1 percent in Gallup’s poll asking about voters’ most important issues.
It’s not clear if they will have a single abortion night or multiple nights on the subject. Maybe they could call their three convention nights “trimesters,” and on the last of these extol their devotion to late-term and partial-birth abortions. President Obama has spoken eloquently on the topic.
It is, I think, appropriate to devote this much focus to abortion since there is no issue closer to the soul of the Democratic Party than the right to abort a baby for any reason at any time. No candidate for high office in the Democratic Party can say otherwise and expect to have a national presence. I mean when the media talk about an issue for days and days, it’s got to be important.
Be sure to include abortion in that third “trimester,” just as Barack Obama supports it in real life.
With this in mind, let’s turn to what Republicans need to do next week in order to win the convention battle. In my column today at The Fiscal Times, I outline four keys for the GOP — and the biggest key is message discipline:
If there was any benefit to the Todd Akin fiasco in Missouri this week, it comes as a reminder to insist on message discipline in Tampa, Florida. The issues that voters care most about in poll after poll this cycle are the economy, job creation, and federal budget deficits that will once again exceed a trillion dollars for the fourth year in a row. Providentially, the Republican ticket has an enormous level of credibility on these issues, with Mitt Romney’s long track record of private-sector success and Paul Ryan’s record of offering specific budgetary reform.
Republicans have an opportunity to speak directly to voters on these issues, which will also highlight how the Obama campaign has avoided addressing them at all. That means that Romney and Ryan will need to be specific enough to emphasize that they have a plan to fix the economy, without getting into a 59-point presentation. Concepts and principles should dominate their presentations.
At the same time, organizers should insist that speakers support the focus on economics and budgetary issues. If the convention speakers begin drifting away from these core issues, especially on social issues after the controversy over Akin’s remarks, it plays directly into the distraction strategy of Democrats — and will have the media talking about nothing else.
This could set up a clear contrast between Romney and Obama, and Republicans and Democrats. Romney and the Republicans will talk about issues that concern voters most, offer clear alternatives to the failed policies of the Obama administration, and thereby convince undecided voters that Romney is a serious candidate. If the GOP convention can do that, it will make the Democratic Abortion-palooza not only look much more petty, but also make it clear that Obama and the Democrats are intellectually bankrupt on the key issues of this electoral cycle.
Update: Changed the front-page pic after a couple of reader complaints. I wanted to emphasize that I also discuss Romney and the GOP convention in the post, but I think the complaints are justified.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 4 5 6
INC on May 13, 2013 at 5:31 PM
Yes..long time ago.
Was a big story here..locally.
Yeah.. understatement. :(
bazil9 on May 13, 2013 at 5:33 PM
Trolls shown up yet?
annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:34 PM
You’re welcome.
I have another quote for you. I think I got this one from the Priests For Life site.
Now with Gosnell, they have no answer. Jill Stanek has been writing this year about the increasing demoralization of abortionists. That’s how much they care about making abortion “rare”—they get down about it.
INC on May 13, 2013 at 5:35 PM
Just you…
cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:38 PM
Just you…
cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:38 PM
I opened THAT door up, didn’t I.
annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:40 PM
And
walkedran right into it.cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:41 PM
I bet they hate the ability to change your profile picture to your ultrasound picture on Facebook.
cptacek on May 13, 2013 at 5:52 PM
William Saletan of Slate wrote an article in 2007 on the impact of technology on abortion: “The fetus is squirming, and so are we.”
Yeah, they hate it.
INC on May 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM
9 of 12 Jurors in #Gosnell Trial Are ‘Pro-Choice’ http://ow.ly/kZwUn
Resist We Much on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM
Somebody ask for Humpbot?
http://tinyurl.com/humpgos
jmad on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM
I didn’t know that. Was that when they were being asked questions prior to being seated for the trial?
So only one is pro-life? That’s remarkable.
I wonder what they all think now.
INC on May 13, 2013 at 6:07 PM
bazil9 on May 13, 2013 at 4:50 PM
I agree with you … and a year or 2 ago I would agree with you.
and I feel the Bible supports this because as was pointed out…
an image bearer of GOD was murdered.
but then the cold eyed accountant shows up …
paying X amount for appeals x number of years …
*sigh* …. but I agree it meets the criteria IMHO
to be a DP award ….
conservative tarheel on May 13, 2013 at 6:09 PM
Seriously?!?!?!
ladyingray on May 13, 2013 at 6:09 PM
Even if given the death penalty, he won’t die from it. Take life without parole in general population.
He’s WANTING the death penalty at this point….
ladyingray on May 13, 2013 at 6:15 PM
I’m wondering how many other denizens of abortion clinics are closely watching this unfold. I also wonder what their pucker factor is right about now.
Oldnuke on May 13, 2013 at 6:24 PM
The one image that comes to mind is the scene in the movie “Ghost”. The bad guy dies at the end, and the black shadows come to get him, and drag him away.
I hope when they come for Gosnell, he goes kicking and screaming, and has to run the gauntlet of the faces of every baby he ever butchered…all the way to Hell!
grumpy_old_soldier on May 13, 2013 at 6:26 PM
His lawyer is a piece of work.
What media was that?
Cindy Munford on May 13, 2013 at 6:39 PM
yup .. and then at the great white throne … he is brought before the King of Kings and is tried … every baby he butchered is there and testifies against him …
he is judged by his works as everything is written down … then the lambs book is opened and his name is not written down … and at this point the King of Kings pronounces sentence “depart from me into everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his angels!”
at this point he is picked up and cast into the lake of fire.
conservative tarheel on May 13, 2013 at 6:40 PM
Which tells you how truly ugly this was that even believers couldn’t turn away.
kim roy on May 13, 2013 at 6:40 PM
oh come now … the throngs of reporters and tv and radio types down there
standing room only in the press area .. /s
conservative tarheel on May 13, 2013 at 6:41 PM
PP is just as guilty as Gosnell. More guilty in fact, they have far more innocent baby blood on their hands.
Kjeil on May 13, 2013 at 6:43 PM
Silly ‘social conservatives’ ruining the party with their defense of the unborn. How many more babies do you want to save at the expense of the party!?eleventyone1one1!
LaughterJones on May 13, 2013 at 6:52 PM
It’s a hollow statement by the leading, government authorized death camp in the USA.
You get to have freedoms in the USA! Just have to make it out of the womb first!
LaughterJones on May 13, 2013 at 6:55 PM
.
Why do I always miss the good stuff, in real time ?
listens2glenn on May 13, 2013 at 6:57 PM
Ok, now that the trial is over, will the Exalted One comment on it?
And will anyone in the media have the temerity to actually ask him to go on record?
Forgive me. I’ve been watching political movies, where these things actually happen…
Chris of Rights on May 13, 2013 at 7:35 PM
May they now Rest in Peace
txmomof6 on May 13, 2013 at 8:00 PM
Another 3,288 today, and every day in the USA.
slickwillie2001 on May 13, 2013 at 8:14 PM
Wow, can’t even bring themselves to mention the babies.
Dongemaharu on May 13, 2013 at 9:15 PM
If the bill Obama sponsored in the Illinois legislature had passed in Pennsylvania, would Gosnell have been convicted?
As I recall, Obama wanted to decriminalize killing a baby after a botched abortion.
jya lai on May 14, 2013 at 10:54 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 4 5 6