Rasmussen: Romney edging Obama in Wisconsin 48/47
posted at 2:56 pm on August 16, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
Three weeks ago, Barack Obama had a narrow three-point lead in Wisconsin over Mitt Romney, 49/46. In a poll taken yesterday of likely voters, Rasmussen notes that the race has shifted subtly. Now Romney has the edge in a virtual tie over Obama, 48/47:
The presidential race in Wisconsin is a little tighter this month following Mitt Romney’s selection of hometown Congressman Paul Ryan as his running mate.
The latest Rasmussen Reports statewide telephone survey of Likely Voters shows Romney with 48% support to President Obama’s 47%. Three percent (3%) prefer some other candidate, and two percent (2%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
In late July, it was Obama 49%, Romney 46%. This is the Republican’s largest level of support yet in the Badger State. Prior to this survey, the president has earned 45% to 52% of the vote, while Romney has picked up 41% to 46% of the vote.
Don’t get too excited over the results, at least not yet. The shift here is within the poll’s margin of error. It’s still better than the non-shift in yesterday’s Rasmussen poll of Florida, which still shows Romney edging Obama within the MoE and both candidates dropping.
Still, this result in Wisconsin seems to show that native son Paul Ryan will have a positive impact on Romney’s chances to be the first Republican to win Wisconsin since Ronald Reagan in 1984′s 49-state landslide. That threatens to put pressure on Obama in Iowa and even Minnesota, although my state’s ability to go red has been a perpetual pipe dream since 1972. It might force Obama to spend resources here that would have normally gone into Iowa and Missouri, though, two states that Ryan can definitely help Romney win.
The internals look pretty good for Romney in Wisconsin. His three-point edge comes entirely from independents (46/43), while party loyalty is all but complete (only 1% of Republicans and 2% of Democrats switching). Romney wins double-digit leads and majorities in the two older age demographics, but loses the under-40 demo by 19 points. That’s hardly unexpected, and it might be better than Republicans would expect.
On favorability, Romney has even better news. He’s +10 overall at 54/44, and he’s even a net positive among women (51/48) and even among the under-40 demo at 49/49. Ryan’s favorability is even higher at 57/36, 52/40 among women and 46/42 among younger voters. Among independents, Ryan gets a 61/31 +30 in favorability — a big boost, as Romney is only a +7 at 53/46. Obama’s ObamaCare scares more voters than Ryan’s proposed changes to Medicare (48/42), with a +14 among independents in favor of Ryan (46/32), but a -7 among women (43/50).
The key question is whether Ryan on the ticket makes Wisconsin voters more likely to vote for Romney; overall, it’s a +15 at 46/31. Among Republicans and Democrats, this probably measures enthusiasm more than an actual game-changer, since party loyalty is all but complete already. On that basis, Romney gets an edge, since it helps with 85% of Republicans, while hurting with only 65% of Democrats. Among independents, though, the gap is a +21, 49/28. This could be a very big deal, especially with the advantages of Republican organization over the past year in GOTV efforts for the recall elections.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Bobby Jindal: Paternalistic, big-government liberalism is the biggest loser here

Super Nannies: EU bans olive oils, Germany ponders Autobahn speed limit






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
As I just posted HotairLib has their whole head up their six o clock.
hamradio on May 24, 2013 at 2:43 PM
Who wrote the speech? Or are you just praising the messenger?
mixplix on May 24, 2013 at 2:57 PM
Connect the dots: journolist meeting by invitation only at the White House on, what Tuesday?, “big”speech by Obama on Thursday, lame stream media fawning over speech on Friday. Who would have seen that coming, huh?
parke on May 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM
They need the “war on terror” in order to further erode our Constitutional freedoms and to deflect criticism from the administration’s and Federal government’s ongoing corruption.
They are just trying to massage it so that they don’t offend the Muslims, international Libtards and their own sensibilities anymore than necessary.
A few Muslim terrorists here and there are quite expendable to this Administration despite their sympathies for them. These drone attacks also do much deflect any potential criticism that the Administration is weak in dealing with such matters.
Dr. ZhivBlago on May 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM
MSNBC is nothing but a left wing propaganda machine serving their master, Obama.
rplat on May 24, 2013 at 3:07 PM
I believe that he was officially nominated 10 days after he was sworn in. Wow! The WON really worked long hours that week and a half to earn that POS medal. During those ten days he ordered NO DRONE STRIKES to keep his peaceful record clean.
fred5678 on May 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM
Obama: Don’t worry about that Ben Ghazi guy. I killed Bin Laden, and Bush didn’t!
And Obummer still wants to close Gitmo? Good luck with that–not even Upchuck Schumer was willing to hold trials in New York!
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:24 PM
They just changed the definition of terrorist. They used to be jihadis from the Middle East–now they’re Minutemen in Arizona and Tea Partiers in Ohio.
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM
Erika, sometimes your writing shows signs of rivaling even the Master of Snark himself, Allahpundit. Good work!
KS Rex on May 24, 2013 at 3:45 PM
I love how crazy Al invoked the Nobel Peace Prize in praise of a speech that spoke about dropping bombs on people’s head. Maybe it was the “fewer” bombs than before that raised this to historic levels.
Do they even know or care that they are morons.
marnes on May 24, 2013 at 3:46 PM
His speech made less sense than Bluto’s Animal House Speech and was far less entertaining. Nothing less than base rallying time. Never thought I would say this, but Code Pink was the best part.
DDay on May 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM
Sperling posted this at the Examiner on May 23 about this “historic speech of Obysmal’s:
You see, we are just not working hard enough to “work with the Muslim American community” who are a “fundamental part of the American family.” Watch out, too, because Obysmal is again trying to limit the impact of the Internet.
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:22 PM
That Chris Hayes is a bit of a twink, isn’t he?
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM
Obama apparently gave two speeches yesterday and I watched the other one.
myiq2xu on May 24, 2013 at 5:03 PM
Nah. I’d detest the little pissant s.o.b. if he was white…or Asian…or any one of the myriad of made-up racial divisions.
Solaratov on May 24, 2013 at 11:00 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2