Palin not speaking at Republican convention?
posted at 12:41 pm on August 13, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
I put the question mark on the headline for a reason. Everyone began reporting this last night, based on a statement from Sarah Palin herself. Greta van Susteren got the scoop on the statement:
Everything I said at the 2008 convention about then-candidate Obama still stands today, and in fact the predictions made about the very unqualified and inexperienced Community Organizer’s plans to “fundamentally transform” our country are unfortunately coming true. This year is a good opportunity for other voices to speak at the convention and I’m excited to hear them. As I’ve repeatedly said, I support Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan in their efforts to replace President Obama at the ballot box, and I intend to focus on grassroots efforts to rally Independents and the GOP base to elect Senate and House members so a wise Congress is ready to work with our new President to get our country back on the right path. This is imperative. As President Clinton said in 2008 while candidate Obama and lapdogs in the media were thrashing his wife’s record and reputation, this is “…the biggest fairy tale.” For the sake of America’s solvency and sovereignty we must close this nonsensical book in November
Reuters and the Associated Press followed by reporting definitively that Palin won’t speak at the convention. Neither had any additional information to further support that conclusion. The Washington Post’s Aaron Blake offers some analysis, but no further confirmation. However, as I read that statement, I don’t see any solid demurral from Palin, only that she looks forward to “other voices” at the GOP convention, and that her focus will be on House and Senate races … which is where Palin has focused since the midterms.
Perhaps this is Palin’s way of making it easier for convention organizers to keep her off the agenda; maybe she agreed to issue a soft denial for the sake of unity. She explicitly supported Romney and Ryan in the statement and attacked Obama on their behalf. Still, I think it’s a mistake to keep her off the dais. Palin electrified the convention in 2008, and it’s just good manners to have the #2 from the last ticket speak at the next convention. Few people in the party can fire up the grassroots like Palin does, and few people will draw the attention she gets. If there is still room to offer her a speaking slot, the convention should do so, and do so quickly.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Sigh: Indiana man faces possible jail time for nursing bald eagle back to health

GOP: Yeah, about that “relatively minor” and completely underhanded carbon-rule change…








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 6 7 8
Suhail Mohammed approves.
/facepalm
gryphon202 on August 14, 2012 at 8:47 AM
At the beginning of this thread, I had two theories.
It appears that it was a combo of both. from RCP:
Furthermore:
Looks like Romney didn’t want her their and the only to save face with conservatives was to offer some mickey mouse slot and let Palin either accept or decline.
She declined.
WisRich on August 14, 2012 at 10:30 AM
We’ll never know for sure. I don’t trust the Dutch rudder dextrosphere to tell me what really happened.
gryphon202 on August 14, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Unless we limit Representatives to one four year term, and Senators to one six year term, we will never have an honorable Congress. There is simply no other way.
Haldol on August 14, 2012 at 11:05 AM
kingsjester on August 13, 2012 at 7:45 PM
Hmmmnnn … Dude? … it’s come to this … as a palate cleanser … Palin … awesome … I wanna kinda er, sorta lick the heels of her shoes, kinda. LOL. Plus, LULLZ, dude, hmmnnnn, it’s come to this on the palate-cleansing front … hmmmnnnn, Dude! And er, LOL. The obligatory palate-cleanser and the boredom. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obesity_in_the_United_States
It’s come to this.
220 is much too much for five-ten, at least in my squad. Hmmnnnn … dude?
JackieB on August 14, 2012 at 3:11 PM
kingsjester on August 13, 2012 at 7:45 PM
Exit question, hmmnnn dude? You’re running almost a thousand blogs? Really? It’s come to this? Name one, just one. Hmmnnnn, dude?
JackieB on August 14, 2012 at 3:20 PM
You’ll need a lot of relish to make those lefties palatable. Make sure you cook ‘em well to kill off all the parasites. And the scrawny splintery bones — ugh! Better stock up on dental floss.
Mary in LA on August 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM
Wow! I didn’t know that. Just makes me admire Ronald Reagan even more!
Mary in LA on August 14, 2012 at 3:59 PM
.
.
( s i g h )
You’re a college boy or girl, aren’t you Jackie’ ?
If we put you on a farm with all the tools and seed necessary, I seriously doubt you could survive.
But those fat, stupid, sub-literate “cracker” folk have been feeding themselves . . . AND THE REST OF THE COUNTRY, INCLUDING YOU … for a very long time now.
Those country folk don’t need you to survive.
But you sure as (expletive) need them.
And what you’re calling “education” is indoctrination into atheism, and Socialized Government.
We as parents (and grandparents) believe we have a right to reject and defy such a curriculum in our public schools.
listens2glenn on August 14, 2012 at 6:59 PM
I have to add this. I just have to.
What an odd little person you are.
Emphasis on “little.”
theotherone on August 15, 2012 at 12:13 AM
listens2glenn on August 14, 2012 at 6:59 PM
What does that even mean? Let’s guess …
Yes, listens2glenn (you’ve got to love that name; it says so much), a university conferred a higher degree on me. Problem?
JackieB on August 16, 2012 at 7:11 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 6 7 8