Guess who’s on a winning streak in endorsements?

posted at 3:21 pm on August 3, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

I’m not surprised by this, but I am a little surprised that the Washington Post noticed it.  Despite media claims that the Tea Party has gone dormant and that Sarah Palin’s influence has waned, the candidates she backs for office have an uncanny knack for winning their elections — even when they start far off the pace:

Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin — though derided on the left and recently dismissed by former vice president Dick Cheney as a poor pick in 2008 — is nevertheless proving her enduring power within the Republican Party in the most concrete of ways: She keeps picking winners.

Each of five candidates she has endorsed this year who have faced primaries or other campaigns have won, including former Texas solicitor general Ted Cruz, who Tuesday beatthe state’s well-connected lieutenant governor for the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate. …

She has endorsed just nine Republicans this year — five of them women, according to the Web site of SarahPAC, her political committee. In an interview on Fox News on Wednesday, Palin said that she is making down-ticket races, not the presidential campaign, a focus of her efforts this year. She called Senate and House races “so instrumental in reforming government, shrinking it, allowing the private sector to grow and thrive.”

This might be easy to dismiss if Palin made a habit of endorsing front-runners, but that’s not been the case.  Ted Cruz started off at a large disadvantage to Lt. Governor David Dewhurst in practically every metric imaginable.  Dewhurst had Rick Perry’s endorsement, a high profile office, tons of his own money to use in the primary fight, and at one time a huge lead in the polls.  In the first round of the primary in May, Cruz only narrowly forced a runoff, at 30% and Dewhurst just a shade under 48%.  The Tea Party engagement that Palin helped facilitate took Cruz from 18 points down in May to a 13-point victory this week — a remarkable 31-point turnaround in just two months.

Similarly, Palin backed Tea Party upstart Richard Mourdock against longtime incumbent Dick Lugar in Indiana’s GOP primary.  Palin endorsed Mourdock late in the cycle, just a couple of weeks before the primary.  Lugar had been up as much as 25 points in the polls in early 2012, but two weeks prior to her endorsement, Mourdock’s internal poll had him even with Lugar.  One week after Palin endorsed Mourdock, he was 10 points up on Lugar in what the local newspaper called “a dramatic slide” for the incumbent.  By the time the election rolled around one week later, Mourdock ended up with a 22-point victory over the entrenched incumbent.

There are very few figures in national politics who could have contributed to those results in a significant fashion.  Barack Obama won’t have any kind of coattails this year, just to choose one example, and Democrats in down-ticket races may have to distance themselves from the party leader this year to remain competitive.  I doubt that any Democratic candidate for Congress is pining for the Joe Biden endorsement, either.  Of the four principals in the 2008 election, Palin is the only one whose clout has increased, and probably is the only one whose clout hasn’t decreased significantly.  That’s why the Palin-Cheney kerfuffle last week really missed the point.  Regardless of whether one thinks Palin was a good pick for the 2008 ticket, she has transformed into a highly influential activist with the grassroots.  Attempting to minimize that or marginalize Palin as a powerhouse in the GOP will likely leave Palin with the last laugh.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

This azzhole on the Issa hearing is just yacking about “bla, bla, bla, oversight…SC Citizens United”.

What azzholes rule the land.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:24 PM

Special Prosecutor.

Nothing else.

Jail time.

tetriskid on May 22, 2013 at 1:25 PM

Stolen election

Thicklugdonkey on May 22, 2013 at 1:25 PM

I don’t care..
What is President Claus going to give me this year?

Electrongod on May 22, 2013 at 1:25 PM

Obviously the WH delayed its release. Nothing else explains this.

NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 1:25 PM

Any place to place a wager on there being a President Biden before Jan 20th 2017?

meci on May 22, 2013 at 1:26 PM

ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT.

Good Lt on May 22, 2013 at 1:26 PM

Leftie azzhole is deflecting.

Obama just changed the timeline…IG report was supposed to be released last Sept…but post-poned due to election.

Nixon was a kindergarten crook compared to these goons.

“This admin. is as transparent as a burqua” — Greg Gutfeld

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:26 PM

Doesn’t have to be the “White House” that suppressed it. It could have been promulgated through political channels. These people are partisans, they don’t need direction from the President to protect him.

But one thing to watch, and remember this name: Cindy Thomas

http://www.fox19.com/story/22380127/reality-check-exclusive-cincinnati-agent-giving-orders-in-irs-scandal

That story is potentially HUGE.

crosspatch on May 22, 2013 at 1:26 PM

POTUS put a flag in a flowerpot to let IG know when to release report?

oldroy on May 22, 2013 at 1:26 PM

Well, gee whiz, this might have had an impact on the election….

MTF on May 22, 2013 at 1:27 PM

Obama won illegitimately.

The consequences of this are incredible.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:27 PM

What exactly did Nixon do? Someone please tell me

Thicklugdonkey on May 22, 2013 at 1:27 PM

“HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Obama won!” – HAL the maniacal fascist

NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 1:27 PM

I don’t care..
What is President Claus going to give me this year?

Electrongod on May 22, 2013 at 1:25 PM

You aren’t going to get a damn thing. And you are going on report for even suggesting you should.

However, those shadowy, down-trodden under-documented immigrants, they’ll be getting healthcare, food, schooling… Probably even the latest large screen TV and premium cable in their Govt. provided housing.

oldroy on May 22, 2013 at 1:28 PM

Why is anyone surprised by what these thugs did to get Dear Leader re elected? We are seeing the tip of the iceberg.

d1carter on May 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM

ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT.

Good Lt on May 22, 2013 at 1:26 PM


THIS.

tetriskid on May 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM

Smoke. Gun.

nobar on May 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM

Flat tax is all we should settle for now. Defund and declaw this monstrosity

Thicklugdonkey on May 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM

Gowdy!

CTSherman on May 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM

What exactly did Nixon do? Someone please tell me

Thicklugdonkey on May 22, 2013 at 1:27 PM

Unlike Obama, Nixon made audio tapes of himself swearing.

Fenris on May 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM

I don’t care..
What is President Claus going to give me this year?
Electrongod on May 22, 2013 at 1:25 PM

A bill to pay those Obamaphones you detest so much. You may whine as usual but ultimately you will pay it.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:34 PM

The picture of the Clown in Chief is perfect.

The USA is a 3rd world country, run by potentates.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:35 PM

Yogi Berra “It’s deja vu all over again”.

It’s funny how this is almost of “remake” of the Nixon administration in so many respects. Nixon was not the first or the last to employ the tactics he used (witness current events).

teejk on May 22, 2013 at 1:35 PM

Issa himself said a few days ago that he knew last year “approximately” what would be in the report, but it’s one thing to think you know based on a leak and another for the IG to confirm it with an update. Here’s the real question: Why was George, the IG didn’t Issa go public?

kunegetikos on May 22, 2013 at 1:35 PM

It’s getting harder and harder for Democrats on this IRS Committee to lecture the GOP about this not being a PARTISAN issue since all the evidence coming out about all 3 scandals going on have 1 thing in common: Delaying/covering up/protecting Obama until AFTER the Presidential election!

easyt65 on May 22, 2013 at 1:36 PM

It’s pretty clear now that every single White House, Treasury and IRS official involved in this, including the IRS IG, is a liar and can’t be trusted.

Curtiss on May 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM

Special prosecutor stat

cmsinaz on May 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM

I have NO CONFIDENCE in the House leadership to do what is in the best interests of Limited government Conservatives (or the long term survivability of the U.S.).

And they will probably cave on this as well.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/22/usa-energy-obama-idUSL2N0E22DP20130522?feedType=RSS&feedName=utilitiesSector&rpc=43

May 21 (Reuters) – The White House has threatened to veto legislation pending in the U.S House of Representatives that could strip from President Barack Obama the authority to approve the controversial Keystone XL pipeline.

The Republican-controlled House is expected on Wednesday to vote on, and almost certainly approve, H.R. 3, the Northern Route Approval Act.

The bill would declare a Presidential cross-border permit is not required to approve the TransCanada Corp.’s proposed pipeline, which would carry oil sands from Canada’s Alberta province to refiners in Texas.

Obama’s advisers “would recommend that he veto this bill,” the White House’s Office of Management and Budget said in a statement of administrative policy.

Prospects for action on Keystone in the Senate, which is held by Democrats, are uncertain.

A majority of the Senate wrote to Obama in January urging approval of the project. But those 53 backers, including nine Democrats, would be far short of the two-thirds votes needed to overcome a presidential veto – 67 if all 100 members of the Senate voted.

In its statement the OMB said the House bill “conflicts with longstanding Executive branch procedures regarding the authority of the President, the Secretaries of State, the Interior, and the Army, and the Environmental Protection Agency administrator.”

It added that the State Department “is working diligently to complete the permit decision process” for Keystone, making the bill “unnecessary.”

A decision on the pipeline has been pending for over four years. The project is strongly supported by much of the energy industry as a boost to North American oil security, and by some unions as a driver of job creation.

Environmental groups say the 830,000-barrel-per-day pipeline would raise greenhouse gas emissions (FREE THE ENGINE OF GROWTH, that might, just might impact his ability to have the Saudis completely fund the construction of the Obama Library and Shrine to Greatness in Chicago in 2017) and lock the United States into oil dependence for decades into the future.

PappyD61 on May 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM

But the election’s over, so it’s safe now.

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

I have to defend the IG here, as whenever this happens there is a struggle between the IG guidelines, which tell them to give the agency they are investigating some time to review the report for accuracy, and their statutory duty to report to Congress. IGs always come down on the side of the bureaucracy, so there is nothing unique about this IG giving the IRS time to review the report before releasing it to Congress.

Congress always complains about this; in fact, if you go back, for example, and look at the IG reports for the SEC and how they allowed various pyramid schemes like Madoff to occur, you will find Senators like Dodd making the same complaints against that IG.

blue13326 on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

Obama rigged the election.

albill on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

A bill to pay those Obamaphones you detest so much. You may whine as usual but ultimately you will pay it.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:34 PM

I still cannot fathom why you think this is an insult. You may as well post nothing but the word “poop”, because it amounts to the same thing. Obviously you don’t pay taxes and you’re proud of this fact. Why would you ever think that people who are proud to be self-reliant would ever consider being self-reliant an insult? I understand you’re a fascist, but that doesn’t make calling others not fascist an insult.

NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 1:39 PM

But the election’s over, so it’s safe now.

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

So you admit to being opposed to the rule of law and support a “might makes right” philosophy.

Fenris on May 22, 2013 at 1:39 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

So did Nixon.

Good Lt on May 22, 2013 at 1:40 PM

“HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Obama won!” – HAL the maniacal fascist

NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 1:27 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

“Rule of law? Liberty?? Honesty??? Integrity???? HAHAHAHAHA, suckers!” – HAL the fascist

NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 1:40 PM

Hitler won more openly.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:40 PM

But the election’s over, so it’s safe now.

Yup. And he WON by stealing the election, which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

Edited for accuracy.

Del Dolemonte on May 22, 2013 at 1:41 PM

Maybe we really do need a Gen. James Mattoon Scott…and have a Col. ‘Jiggs’ Casey willing to back him up, this time.

Face it, the current Obama regime has no use for the Constitution, and has tossed aside the rule of law.

If amnesty is passed into law, we will have a liberal/progressive regime permanently in place until the end of the century…if we survive at all past the next couple decades.

coldwarrior on May 22, 2013 at 1:41 PM

The Castro Brothers won.

Chavez won.

The Burma thugs won.

Nixon was resurrected by Obama, go figure.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:41 PM

It isn’t conspiratorial to say the 2012 election results are illegitimate. It’s a fact. We can argue til the end of time whether or not Benghazi would’ve cost Obama reelection(I think it wouldn’t have, although it could’ve made it tighter). But that’s different in that everyone knew Obama was trying to run out the clock and that’s exactly what he did.

This is intentionally burying an IG report that had every reason to be released to Congress and the public. I don’t know if that’s technically criminal, but it should be grounds for impeachment. Don’t tell me for one second this scandal wouldn’t have swung the Presidential election(and possibly a few Senate races), cuz it absolutely would have.

Imagine that instead of nearly the entire summer being dominated by nonsense like Sandra Fluke, Todd Achin, and Romney’s dog, we were subjected hearings and news reports on the IRS intentionally targeting social and fiscal conservatives while giving progressives and libs a pass? Think that wouldn’t have driven down Obama’s numbers with the public regarding which candidate was more trustworthy? Think that wouldn’t have galvanized conservative voters and gotten them to the polls regardless of their reservations toward Romney? Yeah, me neither.

Doughboy on May 22, 2013 at 1:41 PM

“Rule of law? Liberty?? Honesty??? Integrity???? HAHAHAHAHA, suckers!” – HAL the fascist

NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 1:40 PM

HAL would have been a good little Nazi.

Probably would have drove the trains.

tetriskid on May 22, 2013 at 1:42 PM

Thuggish charlatanic crooks inhabit the WH an the aministration.

America lost the last shred of decency and moral standing in the world.

Obama set the land back at least 30 years for race relations and ruined her, never to recover to her once glorious ideal.

This all for his hue. Congratualtions stupid media. He destroyed most of you. May you suffocate in his azz. He threw your 1st rights under the bus. You are the stupidest people in the world.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:43 PM

But the election’s over, so it’s safe now.
Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.
HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

Yep, he won. And like Rush has been saying day after day for a week, the first black prezident ain’t going no where because no one’s going to ‘peach him.
Period. Obama has it nice. Hillary not so much.

Marcus on May 22, 2013 at 1:43 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

Except now it’s now clear he could be illegitimate.

Perp walk time.

Chuck Schick on May 22, 2013 at 1:43 PM

2014 can’t come soon enough.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:43 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

He didn’t win the election. He stole it by suppressing a damaging report which would’ve severely tarnished his administration and his party. This is the kind of crap you expect in a banana republic, not the United States of America.

Doughboy on May 22, 2013 at 1:44 PM

HAL would have been a good little Nazi Kapo.

tetriskid on May 22, 2013 at 1:42 PM

FIFY.

coldwarrior on May 22, 2013 at 1:44 PM

But how could the election have been stolen? Didn’t Jimmy Carter and the UN monitor it?

Chris of Rights on May 22, 2013 at 1:44 PM

Nixon was resurrected by Obama, go figure.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:41 PM

Or rather, Obama is the reincarnation of Nixon. Smarter, faster, stronger this time. Nixon was no conservative, but his wage and price controls were an overreach for the proto-fascists of the time.

Fenris on May 22, 2013 at 1:45 PM

OT: WaPo now claiming that Petraeus doctored the Benghazi talking points that were then doctored by the administration.

oldroy on May 22, 2013 at 1:45 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

His day of judgement will come you boot licking fascist.

jawkneemusic on May 22, 2013 at 1:45 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

Carry that as your banner into next year and 2016.

I’m sure “I support government suppression of my political opponents because Obama!” is going to be a winning Democrat campaign.

Good Lt on May 22, 2013 at 1:46 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.
 
HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

 
+1. History books wouldn’t write about it nearly the same if he were no longer in office.

rogerb on May 22, 2013 at 1:46 PM

There will now be scandal fatigue.
So much crap clogging up the pipes that dwelling on it will be thrown back in our faces.
If feels good to say the word Impeach but we know it will never happen.
Just look at what has transpired over the last 4 years. This is the new normal!
Enjoy.

LeftCoastRight on May 22, 2013 at 1:47 PM

This is the kind of crap you expect in a banana republic, not the United States of America. from the Democrat party.

Doughboy on May 22, 2013 at 1:44 PM

Fixed.

Good Lt on May 22, 2013 at 1:47 PM

There will now be scandal fatigue.

That’s not our problem.

That’s Obama’s problem. His entire administration is and will be tainted by this going forward, and that’s a good thing.

Makes the case for limiting government power better than we ever could.

Good Lt on May 22, 2013 at 1:48 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

Quoting myself from another thread…

Let’s be honest here. If the details on Benghazi, DoJ and reporters, and IRS had broken, say, last September, we’d now be discussing how President Romney could get his jobs plan past the obstructionist Democrats in the Senate.

He stole an election. It’s that simple.

Chris of Rights on May 22, 2013 at 8:35 AM

Chris of Rights on May 22, 2013 at 1:48 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

Yes, we understand you have no principles, no ethics, no honesty, no morals and no humanity.

We understand that you are perfectly fine with criminality and thuggery and that you don’t care about the rule of law.

We get it. You don’t have to keep stating it. You are amoral, dishonest, unethical, anti-American, filled with hatred and want to live in a dictatorship.

We understand. No need to keep on about it.

Monkeytoe on May 22, 2013 at 1:48 PM

After the “video was at fault in Benghazi” why would anyone believe one single word from this admin.?

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM

We have known for a long time that Obama does not attend regular Intel Meetings. Obama claims HE has no idea what HIS hand-picked Cabinet is doing. He evidently does not meet with his Cabinet Members or his Czars, having given them their ‘marching orders’ to do what they were hired to do. Except the problem is these hand-picked Cabinet Members are NOT in charge of their own departments/agencies and have no idea what their people are doing either. Obama’s WH Staff is being briefed on events and scandals, but they don’t bother him with details. The White House ITSELF has made the case that THIS ADMINISTRATION is THE MOST incompetent, inept, poorly and criminally run administration in U.S. HISTORY!

At some point the United States Congress has to listen to this argument coming out of the Wite House and decide it has no other option but to act on it in the best interest of the nation. That action should be to IMPEACH this President.

easyt65 on May 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM

Issa is beginning to look like he may be in over his head! Not a lot of confidence after today….especially after learning about what he knew last Sept., and the fiasco this morning.

tomshup on May 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM

But the election’s over, so it’s safe now.

I agree it’s really nasty that this stuff was held back from becoming public until now, however, in reality, I don’t see this IRS mess being enough to have gotten those Republicans who stayed home in November from getting off their butts and pulling the lever for Romney.

Bitter Clinger on May 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

O.J. won too. For a while.

fogw on May 22, 2013 at 1:51 PM

The IG guy just said that the IRS destroyed information.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:51 PM

With an audit, the examiners look at everything through fresh eyes. They conduct their audit regardless of what others have reported. So, for this guy to use the suppression of information as “part of an ongoing audit” is untruthful. And since the IRS conducted their own internal information, didn’t they already have the opportunity to weigh in on their own results?

djaymick on May 22, 2013 at 1:51 PM

I agree it’s really nasty that this stuff was held back from becoming public until now, however, in reality, I don’t see this IRS mess being enough to have gotten those Republicans who stayed home in November from getting off their butts and pulling the lever for Romney.

Bitter Clinger on May 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM

The IRS intimidation made tea party groups shut down.

There was not the level of 2010 activism in 2012. People stayed home.

tetriskid on May 22, 2013 at 1:52 PM

The IG guy just said that the IRS destroyed information.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:51 PM

Of course they did.

They are criminals.

tetriskid on May 22, 2013 at 1:52 PM

No wonder the dems are so keen to enact gun control.

questionmark on May 22, 2013 at 1:52 PM

Stolen election.

However, seems to me that there is really only one question here.
How does Congress handle these scandals? Or do they even address them?

This president and his administration are illegitimate and criminal. Do the Congress critters deal with it or let it slide ala Lerner today?
Seriously, if they are going to let this shiite slide then for god’s sake quit wasting our time.

ORconservative on May 22, 2013 at 1:54 PM

The White House ITSELF has made the case that THIS ADMINISTRATION is THE MOST incompetent, inept, poorly and criminally run administration in U.S. HISTORY!

At some point the United States Congress has to listen to this argument coming out of the Wite House and decide it has no other option but to act on it in the best interest of the nation. That action should be to IMPEACH this President.

easyt65 on May 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM

Problem is the Constitution makes the standard for impeachment to be the commission of “high crimes and misdemeanors”. I don’e see incompetence meeting that standard. Obama has purposely insulated himself from negative news so he can always claim ignorance to all that is going on around him.

Bitter Clinger on May 22, 2013 at 1:54 PM

HAL would have been a good little Nazi

tetriskid on May 22, 2013 at 1:42 PM

No. HAL IS a good little Nazi. And, at this point, it would be foolish for anyone to think otherwise…

joejm65 on May 22, 2013 at 1:54 PM

You may whine as usual but ultimately you will pay it.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:34 PM

I still cannot fathom why you think this is an insult. You may as well post nothing but the word “poop”, because it amounts to the same thing. Obviously you don’t pay taxes and you’re proud of this fact. Why would you ever think that people who are proud to be self-reliant would ever consider being self-reliant an insult? I understand you’re a fascist, but that doesn’t make calling others not fascist an insult.

NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 1:39 PM

She sounded like she was making a thinly veiled threat. I wonder what her and her fellow national socialists plan to do to back that up.

CurtZHP on May 22, 2013 at 1:54 PM

The IRS intimidation made tea party groups shut down.

There was not the level of 2010 activism in 2012. People stayed home.

tetriskid on May 22, 2013 at 1:52 PM

And many of those “tea party people” weren’t excited for Romney in the first place. I still say it wouldn’t have made a difference in the end. We had a poor candidate.

Still doesn’t make what’s happened right, of course.

Bitter Clinger on May 22, 2013 at 1:56 PM

easyt65 on May 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM

Kinda harsh there, doncha think?

I mean, we have a genuine official affirmative action Prezdit sitting in the White House…he had to come up the hard way and all that, didn’t have a level playing field, not like all those old famous rich white Presidents…so we have to cut him some slack…maybe let him have a third term, so he can get it right…he’s new at this executive stuff, never had the opportunity to hold a real job…was never allowed to meet a payroll…or maintain a budget…so let’s not be so harsh on the guy. All those Tea Party types are racists and the fascist GOP-controlled Congress won’t let Obama get anything done.

He’s historic, you know. And Black.

/s/

[A compilation of comments I've heard over the past several months about Obama from liberals...locally.]

coldwarrior on May 22, 2013 at 1:57 PM

The dam is beginning to crack.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 1:58 PM

O.J. won too. For a while.

fogw on May 22, 2013 at 1:51 PM

OJ may have been found not guilty, but he got a life sentence anyway.

I think the same for Obama. He’s tainted now, and the investigations have barely begun winding up. And, with Senate help, he’s going to screw up again, in Syria. There will be more lies, more coverups, more scandals. He doesn’t have the charisma of Bill Clinton and, because of that, Obama won’t be a major player after he leaves office.

The Universe tends to balance things out. It just takes time.

Liam on May 22, 2013 at 1:59 PM

Issa is beginning to look like he may be in over his head! Not a lot of confidence after today….especially after learning about what he knew last Sept., and the fiasco this morning.

tomshup on May 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM

Erm, we just learned today’s testimony that it’s becoming more likely that administration officials and IRS agents were delaying and suppressing this report so that it wouldn’t come out before the election.

What the hell are you watching? Captain Planet reruns?

Good Lt on May 22, 2013 at 2:01 PM

Knew it was true but it’s still sickening to be proven right.

wyntre9 on May 22, 2013 at 2:02 PM

The media are considered “allies”.

Anyway, if the president is innocent, he will end up needing and wanting a special prosecutor sooner rather than later. If he and his White House already have too much to hide, then they must clam up, cry partisanship and hope their allies on the Hill and in the media have the stamina for the long, hard slog ahead.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 2:02 PM

he had to come up the hard way and all that, didn’t have a level playing field, not like all those old famous rich white Presidents…

coldwarrior on May 22, 2013 at 1:57 PM

Yeah, our first affirmative action president granted access at every level just because he’s black (except Columbia where being black wasn’t good enough so he was also Kenyan). So hard! No wonder HAL is so proud of him. Obama demonstrates any loser can attain the loftiest precipice.

NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 2:02 PM

I sat in a White House chief of staff’s office every day for more than two years. The only reason the legal counsel would tell the chief of staff about an impending report or disclosure would be so the chief of staff could tell the president. The legal counsel would assume the chief of staff would know how and when to bring up the matter. The chief of staff would be expected to know if there were additional factors surrounding the issue that needed to be considered before the president was told, or whether or not others needed to be included in the conversation when the information was shared with the president. There are many valid reasons why the chief of staff would tell the president, but I can’t think of a reason why he and the legal counsel would both agree that this news nugget would go no further. It’s very odd.

The legal counsel would never assume that information shared with the chief of staff would not go to the president. In my experience, a legal counsel never would believe that there was information that was appropriate for the chief of staff to know but that was inappropriate for the president to know. Out of all the news that has emerged regarding the Obama IRS scandal, this is the most curious whopper I’ve heard so far. I can’t wait to hear the real story.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 2:05 PM

Anyway, if the president is innocent, he will end up needing and wanting a special prosecutor sooner rather than later.

Obama is leading the charge on this, and has come out strongly in favor of one. He wants nothing more than to find out the truth here. He has said repeatedly that he supports the appointment of a special prosecutor to…oh, wait. No he hasn’t.

Good Lt on May 22, 2013 at 2:05 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

I think you mean WON*.

PersonFromPorlock on May 22, 2013 at 2:06 PM

List of issues hidden to re(s)elect the POS

1 – IRS report (targeting began in 2009)
2 – Bengahazi accounting
3 – Reid getting Romney’s tax info
4 – Proof the POS got on Indiana ballots illegally – jury came to that conclusion a couple of months ago.
5 – Rosen and FOX wiretaps (began in 2009)

wyntre9 on May 22, 2013 at 2:06 PM

It isn’t conspiratorial to say the 2012 election results are illegitimate. It’s a fact.

Agree, doughboy.

wyntre9 on May 22, 2013 at 2:07 PM

Does anyone have Lysol and a mop? The toilets are backed up, and HAL is slushing all over the floor again.

creekspecter on May 22, 2013 at 2:10 PM

Here’s the real question: why didn’t Issa go public?

kunegetikos on May 22, 2013 at 1:35 PM

Unsupported assertions that the IG would have denied until after the election would have rebounded on the Rs as pursuing ghosts. If Issa had passed along rumors, the Administration would be sure there would not be corroboration in time for the elections.

Sekhmet on May 22, 2013 at 2:12 PM

Ms. Lummis is wonderful.

Gov’t going after the people who employ the IRS and the entire gov’t.

The federal gov’t has turned against the people.

Goliath has turned against the people who hired them.

This will be a one good video.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 2:13 PM

Ms. Lummis is wonderful.

Gov’t going after the people who employ the IRS and the entire gov’t.

The federal gov’t has turned against the people.

Goliath has turned against the people who hired them.

This will be a one good video.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM

Sorry for the double.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM

What exactly did Nixon do? Someone please tell me

Thicklugdonkey on May 22, 2013 at 1:27 PM

Unlike Obama, Nixon made audio tapes of himself swearing.

Fenris on May 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM

Ultimately, this is what made it possible for the Watergate investigation to gain enough traction to engage attention outside of the media and politicians. Once Nixon’s public persona of piety was convincingly pulverized, the people who had voted for him also turned against him. (based on my personal recollections from the time)

Some of the blow-back from the AP scandal is having the same effect on the Leftist media, who are starting (heh) to question Obama’s credibility.

Now, if there are any videos (tapes are too old-fashioned)…

AesopFan on May 22, 2013 at 2:16 PM

Here’s the real question: why didn’t Issa go public?

kunegetikos on May 22, 2013 at 1:35 PM

Unsupported assertions that the IG would have denied until after the election would have rebounded on the Rs as pursuing ghosts. If Issa had passed along rumors, the Administration would be sure there would not be corroboration in time for the elections.

Sekhmet on May 22, 2013 at 2:12 PM

Cf. Romney vs Crowley.

AesopFan on May 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM

I agree it’s really nasty that this stuff was held back from becoming public until now, however, in reality, I don’t see this IRS mess being enough to have gotten those Republicans who stayed home in November from getting off their butts and pulling the lever for Romney.

Bitter Clinger on May 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM

Maybe, maybe not. Maybe it would have been Democrats or Independents. Maybe Romney would have won with 100% of the vote, we can never know what might have been.

That’s the problem. They effected the election and the election was a fraud because of it.

If the people don’t have the information they need to vote… because government intentionally holds back it is NOT a free election.

petunia on May 22, 2013 at 2:28 PM

Not to mention the intimidation that occurred… something slowed down the momentum of the TEA Party after 2010… they just couldn’t get it together.

Now we know why. That also makes the idea that November 2012 was a free and fair election a fraud.

I know we can’t go back… but Obama is illegitimate, his second term should not be. He threw the election.

petunia on May 22, 2013 at 2:32 PM

Why didn’t Issa raise this in Sept.?

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 2:32 PM

Recall Obama/Biden 2013!

kirkill on May 22, 2013 at 2:34 PM

Oh my gosh, what a weasel.

petunia on May 22, 2013 at 2:34 PM

Comment pages: 1 2