<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HHS mandate loses first test in federal court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge rejects Mennonite firm&#8217;s healthcare law challenge &#171; How A Conservative Thinks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6640151</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge rejects Mennonite firm&#8217;s healthcare law challenge &#171; How A Conservative Thinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6640151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I believe the judge is wrong on this one&#8230;.the 1st amendment does apply here as well. Doesn&#8217;t matter if they run a &#8220;for profit&#8221; business, Obamacare violates their religious views, therefore it violates their 1st amendment rights. It appears it just depends on what judge you get that determines the ruling you get. Others have been ruled in favor of their 1st amendment rights. The Catholic family that owns a Colorado-based company won a court victory in their battle to stop t... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I believe the judge is wrong on this one&#8230;.the 1st amendment does apply here as well. Doesn&#8217;t matter if they run a &#8220;for profit&#8221; business, Obamacare violates their religious views, therefore it violates their 1st amendment rights. It appears it just depends on what judge you get that determines the ruling you get. Others have been ruled in favor of their 1st amendment rights. The Catholic family that owns a Colorado-based company won a court victory in their battle to stop t&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HHS Mandate Round-up &#124; @ActonInstitute PowerBlog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6090916</link>
		<dc:creator>HHS Mandate Round-up &#124; @ActonInstitute PowerBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6090916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the rule,” Fr. Pavone said early this year. “You don’t adapt to injustice; you oppose it.”HHS Mandate Loses First Test in Federal Court Ed Morrisssey, Hot AirThe injunction only applies to Hercules Industries, not the mandate as a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rule,” Fr. Pavone said early this year. “You don’t adapt to injustice; you oppose it.”HHS Mandate Loses First Test in Federal Court Ed Morrisssey, Hot AirThe injunction only applies to Hercules Industries, not the mandate as a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtdavs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6074834</link>
		<dc:creator>mtdavs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6074834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t the new Health Care Law exempt Islamic people from being a part of this because of &quot;violating&quot; some of their beliefs?  Yet, the same is not afforded to Catholics or other Religious beliefs?  I would call that a double standard.  But, then again, I still can&#039;t rationalize the &quot;liberal&quot; thinking person.  But, then again, do liberals really &quot;think&quot;???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t the new Health Care Law exempt Islamic people from being a part of this because of &#8220;violating&#8221; some of their beliefs?  Yet, the same is not afforded to Catholics or other Religious beliefs?  I would call that a double standard.  But, then again, I still can&#8217;t rationalize the &#8220;liberal&#8221; thinking person.  But, then again, do liberals really &#8220;think&#8221;???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawkins1701</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073837</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawkins1701</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 21:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;That seems, though, like a slam-dunk...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;It&#039;s a tax,&quot; John Roberts explained.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That seems, though, like a slam-dunk&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a tax,&#8221; John Roberts explained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GWB</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073832</link>
		<dc:creator>GWB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 21:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Repeal and &lt;em&gt;[&lt;strong&gt;Do Not&lt;/strong&gt;]&lt;/em&gt; Replace ™

Tim_CA on July 28, 2012 at 11:51 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
FIFY]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Repeal and <em>[<strong>Do Not</strong>]</em> Replace ™</p>
<p>Tim_CA on July 28, 2012 at 11:51 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>FIFY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xblade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073763</link>
		<dc:creator>xblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Why are you blaming this on Roberts? 

Count to 10 &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because he IS to blame. It&#039;s not complicated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why are you blaming this on Roberts? </p>
<p>Count to 10 </p></blockquote>
<p>Because he IS to blame. It&#8217;s not complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workingclass artist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073747</link>
		<dc:creator>workingclass artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The logic behind Roberts rumored position is religious organizations can always opt out by shutting down the organizations which are found non compliant and just practice their faith behinds the four walls of a church in private where no one can see or be bothered by them.
Skwor on July 28, 2012 at 2:29 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Roberts is wrong and he knows it. He&#039;s decided to act against constitutional principle and legislate relativism.

It is not up to him to decide Catholic Dogma,Tradition or Doctrine. 

For Catholics charity (including hospitals) and schooling are &lt;strong&gt;inseparable&lt;/strong&gt; to the faith and this has been the case since Apostolic times and grew with the first monasteries established by Saint Athanasius in Europe (344 AD)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The logic behind Roberts rumored position is religious organizations can always opt out by shutting down the organizations which are found non compliant and just practice their faith behinds the four walls of a church in private where no one can see or be bothered by them.<br />
Skwor on July 28, 2012 at 2:29 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Roberts is wrong and he knows it. He&#8217;s decided to act against constitutional principle and legislate relativism.</p>
<p>It is not up to him to decide Catholic Dogma,Tradition or Doctrine. </p>
<p>For Catholics charity (including hospitals) and schooling are <strong>inseparable</strong> to the faith and this has been the case since Apostolic times and grew with the first monasteries established by Saint Athanasius in Europe (344 AD)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workingclass artist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073733</link>
		<dc:creator>workingclass artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is good news since another judge threw out another case...Catholics re-group and keep fighting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news since another judge threw out another case&#8230;Catholics re-group and keep fighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skwor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073630</link>
		<dc:creator>Skwor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumor has it Roberts considers the HHS mandate not a mandate but an optional support program. He will find it legal under the reasoning it does not violate any constitutional grounds.

The logic behind Roberts rumored position is religious organizations can always opt out by shutting down the organizations which are found non compliant and just practice their faith behinds the four walls of a church in private where no one can see or be bothered by them.

In the end it was purported that Roberts believes if the public wants any true justice on this issue they need to vote and get congress to manage it because it is not the courts responsibility to resolve conflicts between the public and issues of constitutionality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumor has it Roberts considers the HHS mandate not a mandate but an optional support program. He will find it legal under the reasoning it does not violate any constitutional grounds.</p>
<p>The logic behind Roberts rumored position is religious organizations can always opt out by shutting down the organizations which are found non compliant and just practice their faith behinds the four walls of a church in private where no one can see or be bothered by them.</p>
<p>In the end it was purported that Roberts believes if the public wants any true justice on this issue they need to vote and get congress to manage it because it is not the courts responsibility to resolve conflicts between the public and issues of constitutionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeaPartyNation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073597</link>
		<dc:creator>TeaPartyNation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Hercules Rises!… First Plaintiff Beats Obama HHS-Abortion Mandate in Court&quot;

And the bad news - this will likely be appealed all the way to SCOTUS, where traitor, fool, OBOZO tool and socialist media puppet Roberts will have another chance to shaft the Constitution and all Americans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hercules Rises!… First Plaintiff Beats Obama HHS-Abortion Mandate in Court&#8221;</p>
<p>And the bad news &#8211; this will likely be appealed all the way to SCOTUS, where traitor, fool, OBOZO tool and socialist media puppet Roberts will have another chance to shaft the Constitution and all Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickwillie2001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073548</link>
		<dc:creator>slickwillie2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Few Things Considered on July 28, 2012 at 12:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

HA is abominable on a smartphone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Few Things Considered on July 28, 2012 at 12:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>HA is abominable on a smartphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count to 10</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073530</link>
		<dc:creator>Count to 10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Yep, every time something regarding ObamaTax / ObamaCare / Socialized Medicine comes up, it just rekindles my anger toward Benedict Roberts. This should have been dead and buried a month ago, instead the distinguished jurist managed to betray the Constitution and the citizens of this country.

When history is written, one of the key contributors to the breakup of the United States of America into several entities, one of which will remain a Constitutional Republic, will be John Roberts’s abrogation of his duty to uphold and defend the Constitution by granting the federal government unlimited power through its taxing authority.

AZfederalist on July 28, 2012 at 1:24 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Why are you blaming this on Roberts?  There were four other judges that voted for worse.  Frankly, he stayed within the power that he was supposed to exert.  Striking down the law on the basis of whether or not it was a tax would not have been upholding the Constitution.
This law needs to be repealed, not struck down.  Don&#039;t whine that you didn&#039;t get a deus ex machina, vote people into office that will change it properly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yep, every time something regarding ObamaTax / ObamaCare / Socialized Medicine comes up, it just rekindles my anger toward Benedict Roberts. This should have been dead and buried a month ago, instead the distinguished jurist managed to betray the Constitution and the citizens of this country.</p>
<p>When history is written, one of the key contributors to the breakup of the United States of America into several entities, one of which will remain a Constitutional Republic, will be John Roberts’s abrogation of his duty to uphold and defend the Constitution by granting the federal government unlimited power through its taxing authority.</p>
<p>AZfederalist on July 28, 2012 at 1:24 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Why are you blaming this on Roberts?  There were four other judges that voted for worse.  Frankly, he stayed within the power that he was supposed to exert.  Striking down the law on the basis of whether or not it was a tax would not have been upholding the Constitution.<br />
This law needs to be repealed, not struck down.  Don&#8217;t whine that you didn&#8217;t get a deus ex machina, vote people into office that will change it properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count to 10</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073512</link>
		<dc:creator>Count to 10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I find disturbing is that we have to hang this on religious freedom.  Government shouldn&#039;t be mandating what has to go into insurance -- and birth control certainly isn&#039;t the kind of thing that anyone would want to take out a policy against &quot;needing&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find disturbing is that we have to hang this on religious freedom.  Government shouldn&#8217;t be mandating what has to go into insurance &#8212; and birth control certainly isn&#8217;t the kind of thing that anyone would want to take out a policy against &#8220;needing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZfederalist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073506</link>
		<dc:creator>AZfederalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, every time something regarding ObamaTax / ObamaCare / Socialized Medicine comes up, it just rekindles my anger toward Benedict Roberts. This should have been dead and buried a month ago, instead the &lt;em&gt;distinguished&lt;/em&gt; jurist managed to betray the Constitution and the citizens of this country.

  When history is written, one of the key contributors to the breakup of the United States of America into several entities, one of which will remain a Constitutional Republic, will be John Roberts&#039;s abrogation of his duty to uphold and defend the Constitution by granting the federal government unlimited power through its taxing authority.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, every time something regarding ObamaTax / ObamaCare / Socialized Medicine comes up, it just rekindles my anger toward Benedict Roberts. This should have been dead and buried a month ago, instead the <em>distinguished</em> jurist managed to betray the Constitution and the citizens of this country.</p>
<p>  When history is written, one of the key contributors to the breakup of the United States of America into several entities, one of which will remain a Constitutional Republic, will be John Roberts&#8217;s abrogation of his duty to uphold and defend the Constitution by granting the federal government unlimited power through its taxing authority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073503</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think we have to worry about Roberts this time.  There&#039;s no confusing talk about whether something is a tax or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we have to worry about Roberts this time.  There&#8217;s no confusing talk about whether something is a tax or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ultracon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073457</link>
		<dc:creator>ultracon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[obamao is the anti-Christ and sebelius is merely one of his minions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obamao is the anti-Christ and sebelius is merely one of his minions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Few Things Considered</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073453</link>
		<dc:creator>Few Things Considered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Annoying popup book offer makes this story unreadable on the iPhone, because it can&#039;t be closed, and it won&#039;t go away after a time. Allah must be to blame...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annoying popup book offer makes this story unreadable on the iPhone, because it can&#8217;t be closed, and it won&#8217;t go away after a time. Allah must be to blame&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care BS - VIDEO: MEET U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN KANE</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073445</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care BS - VIDEO: MEET U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN KANE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Ed Morrissey points out, this ruling is no reason to get cocky. But it&#8217;s not bad news when a Carter-appointed judge [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey points out, this ruling is no reason to get cocky. But it&#8217;s not bad news when a Carter-appointed judge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuckeyeSam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073441</link>
		<dc:creator>BuckeyeSam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is a big deal. This is a case involving religiously motivated private citizens. On paper, they&#039;re one step farther away from DHS&#039;s definition of a religious organization than the religious hospitals and schools that are suing the feds. 

These cases are all religious liberty cases, and the Obama administration will lose these big time. Too bad the ultimate resolution is one, two, or three years from now.

Even if the religious organizations are not in a position to seek an injunction in their cases, unlike the Obamacare cases, I can&#039;t see them losing at any level (federal district courts, federal courts of appeal, and SCOTUS).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a big deal. This is a case involving religiously motivated private citizens. On paper, they&#8217;re one step farther away from DHS&#8217;s definition of a religious organization than the religious hospitals and schools that are suing the feds. </p>
<p>These cases are all religious liberty cases, and the Obama administration will lose these big time. Too bad the ultimate resolution is one, two, or three years from now.</p>
<p>Even if the religious organizations are not in a position to seek an injunction in their cases, unlike the Obamacare cases, I can&#8217;t see them losing at any level (federal district courts, federal courts of appeal, and SCOTUS).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hillbillyjim</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073433</link>
		<dc:creator>hillbillyjim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Roberts hadn&#039;t decided to play Gumby with the Constitution with his strenuous linguistic and legal contortions, this whole conversation would be moot.

Thanks for nothing, Justice Roberts. You may have convinced yourself that you rose above politics for some noble reason, but all you did is further the diminishing of our foremost founding document.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Roberts hadn&#8217;t decided to play Gumby with the Constitution with his strenuous linguistic and legal contortions, this whole conversation would be moot.</p>
<p>Thanks for nothing, Justice Roberts. You may have convinced yourself that you rose above politics for some noble reason, but all you did is further the diminishing of our foremost founding document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Holobyte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073421</link>
		<dc:creator>Sterling Holobyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Didn’t you watch the Olympic opening ceremonies? Socialized medicine is glorious, and if you disagree, you hate children.

Romney 2012.

Philly on July 28, 2012 at 11:43 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I stopped watching after I saw that bit about the NHS. It was disgusting! Danny Boyle should be ashamed of himself for politicizing the Olympics like that.  As well as Matt Loser and Merideath Viera for putting their two cents worth(that&#039;s all that they are worth) in about it.  They won&#039;t be, of course, but they are libs after all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Didn’t you watch the Olympic opening ceremonies? Socialized medicine is glorious, and if you disagree, you hate children.</p>
<p>Romney 2012.</p>
<p>Philly on July 28, 2012 at 11:43 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I stopped watching after I saw that bit about the NHS. It was disgusting! Danny Boyle should be ashamed of himself for politicizing the Olympics like that.  As well as Matt Loser and Merideath Viera for putting their two cents worth(that&#8217;s all that they are worth) in about it.  They won&#8217;t be, of course, but they are libs after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mord</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073410</link>
		<dc:creator>Mord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since the Obamacare ruling I have little faith that the courts will decide in favor of freedom over bureaucratic fiat. Ed, you predicted that this mandate would be withdrawn the day it was proposed, and almost every time it has made news since then. 

Any practical Politician would have already done so, but this guy is an entirely new species. He is a dictator coming out of his cocoon of benevolence. It&#039;s getting scary to watch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since the Obamacare ruling I have little faith that the courts will decide in favor of freedom over bureaucratic fiat. Ed, you predicted that this mandate would be withdrawn the day it was proposed, and almost every time it has made news since then. </p>
<p>Any practical Politician would have already done so, but this guy is an entirely new species. He is a dictator coming out of his cocoon of benevolence. It&#8217;s getting scary to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: letget</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073408</link>
		<dc:creator>letget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Flora Duh on July 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Ramirez has a cartoon on the issue you brought up. Great as usual!

http://news.investors.com/editorialcartoons/cartoon.aspx?id=62018
L]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Flora Duh on July 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>Ramirez has a cartoon on the issue you brought up. Great as usual!</p>
<p><a href="http://news.investors.com/editorialcartoons/cartoon.aspx?id=62018" rel="nofollow">http://news.investors.com/editorialcartoons/cartoon.aspx?id=62018</a><br />
L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skywise</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073407</link>
		<dc:creator>Skywise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No no... See, it&#039;s a tax... And the taxing authority of the federal government is absolute.  So not only must they pay the tax, the government can also tax the church for their incoming tithes plus tax all distributions.

That doesn&#039;t hinder their exercise of religion at all... That&#039;s just the price of living in a civilized society and if those taxes are punitive well that&#039;s just too bad isn&#039;t it?

/s just in case my dripping sardonic sarcasm isn&#039;t that dripping but that IS our current legal state.

FUBO and FUR]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No no&#8230; See, it&#8217;s a tax&#8230; And the taxing authority of the federal government is absolute.  So not only must they pay the tax, the government can also tax the church for their incoming tithes plus tax all distributions.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t hinder their exercise of religion at all&#8230; That&#8217;s just the price of living in a civilized society and if those taxes are punitive well that&#8217;s just too bad isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>/s just in case my dripping sardonic sarcasm isn&#8217;t that dripping but that IS our current legal state.</p>
<p>FUBO and FUR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: letget</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/28/hhs-mandate-loses-first-test-in-federal-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6073400</link>
		<dc:creator>letget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209188#comment-6073400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the bhocare issue. Here is an interesting article about how the &lt;strong&gt;states&lt;/strong&gt; can crater bhocare? If this is true, and I have no idea why it wouldn&#039;t be, this IS the way to go to put a stake in the heart of bhocare? 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/27/How-States-Can-Reject-and-Replace-Obamacare?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter
L]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the bhocare issue. Here is an interesting article about how the <strong>states</strong> can crater bhocare? If this is true, and I have no idea why it wouldn&#8217;t be, this IS the way to go to put a stake in the heart of bhocare? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/27/How-States-Can-Reject-and-Replace-Obamacare?utm_source=dlvr.it&#038;utm_medium=twitter" rel="nofollow">http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/27/How-States-Can-Reject-and-Replace-Obamacare?utm_source=dlvr.it&#038;utm_medium=twitter</a><br />
L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>