CIA: Did you mean these documents? Update: Judicial Watch fights another delay

posted at 10:01 am on July 25, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Lost amid the hilarity of watching Senator Dianne Feinstein do a Cory Booker impersonation by denying she meant what she said about White House leaks was another, and perhaps more significant, retraction.  The Department of Justice had to file a motion admitting that the CIA had found numerous documents that should have been released in a Freedom of Information Act request from Judicial Watch about White House interaction with filmmakers producing a movie about the killing of Osama bin Laden:

The Central Intelligence Agency recently discovered a “4 to 5 inch stack” of documents that relate to the spy agency’s cooperation with the makers of a forthcoming Hollywood film on the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, according to a new court filing.

The documents about CIA dealings with the film now titled “Zero Dark Thirty” were “inadvertently overlooked” in response to a Freedom of Information Act request and lawsuit filed by the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, Justice Department attorneys said in a motion filed in federal court in Washington Tuesday afternoon (posted here).

“The CIA discovered a 4 to 5 inch stack of records potentially responsive to plaintiff’s FOIA request that had been inadvertently overlooked during the CIA’s search,” Civil Division attorney Marcia Berman wrote. “The CIA is continuing to look into the circumstances of the discovery of the new documents to ensure the adequacy of its search.”

Well … oopsie!  This relates directly to the issue around which Feinstein danced yesterday, which is the intentional leaking of national-security information to burnish the reputation of Barack Obama.  Judicial Watch sued for documentation that related to official contacts between the administration and the filmmakers, as speculation grew that not only did the White House give unprecedented access in order to make itself look good in the cinema, but that the access would allow the film to get released before the election.  (The filmmakers pushed the release date back after the controversy erupted.)

We’ll have to see whether Judicial Watch gets any answers from these documents, assuming they do get released.  It’s pretty certain that JW won’t do a Cory Booker impression, though.

Update: Apparently, the CIA wanted another month to review the stack of newly-found documents, even though they were supposed to comply with the FOIA request by the end of May.  Judicial Watch just filed a motion opposing the request for another month’s delay:

2. Plaintiff’s counsel learned of Defendant Central Intelligence Agency’s (“CIA”) failure to produce all responsive documents by the Court’s May 18, 2012 deadline on July 19, 2012. Defendant’s counsel also informed Plaintiff’s counsel that the CIA would not be able to complete its review and production of the documents until August 24, 2012, and requested an extension of the briefing schedule.

3. On the morning of July 20, 2012, Plaintiff’s counsel informed Defendants’ counsel that a motion for extension of time based on failure to comply with deadlines was improper, and suggested instead that Defendants promptly produce the newly discovered documents on an expedited basis so that Plaintiff could review them and respond prior to the Defendants’ July 27, 2012 deadline to file their Motion for Summary Judgment in this case.

JW is asking for a reasonable timetable that would produce the documentation by August 10th.  We’ll see what the court says.

Update II, 7/26/12: I completely forgot to link my source for the original story — Politico and Josh Gerstein.  My profuse apologies to both.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

…Bishop says B S !

KOOLAID2 on July 25, 2012 at 10:04 AM

Every inch counts.

Electrongod on July 25, 2012 at 10:04 AM

Making the President look good, when he can’t.

hillsoftx on July 25, 2012 at 10:04 AM

Youse didn’t see nuthin’.

listens2glenn on July 25, 2012 at 10:06 AM

The Central Intelligence Agency recently discovered a “4 to 5 inch stack” of documents that relate to the spy agency’s cooperation with the makers of a forthcoming Hollywood film on the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, according to a new court filing.

…..this is the President who came out and stated he didn’t want to “spike the football”……
….What a narcissistic a$$.

Baxter Greene on July 25, 2012 at 10:06 AM

Lost amid the hilarity of watching Senator Dianne Feinstein do a Cory Booker impersonation by denying she meant what she said

…why do all the Democrats…especially JugEars have a problem with the “messaging”????????

KOOLAID2 on July 25, 2012 at 10:06 AM

Every inch counts.

Electrongod on July 25, 2012 at 10:04 AM

That’s what she said. ;)

search4truth on July 25, 2012 at 10:06 AM

Every inch counts.

Electrongod on July 25, 2012 at 10:04 AM

Said the actress to ….

OldEnglish on July 25, 2012 at 10:08 AM

They posted a preview of one of the new docs on Judicial Watch’s website:

The *** ** ******* ** ***** ****** ** it ******** *** * *********. Also, ******* *** **** ********** while **** * ******* **.

strictnein on July 25, 2012 at 10:09 AM

OldEnglish on July 25, 2012 at 10:08 AM

Yer too slow – silly old bugger!

OldEnglish on July 25, 2012 at 10:09 AM

“inadvertently overlooked”

…hey!…is that a name of a new virus?… prevalent only in the White House?

KOOLAID2 on July 25, 2012 at 10:11 AM

They were “found” because the suit filed specifically identified them, and they knew they were caught sitting on evidence…
If the suit was just a general investigation, without specifics, they would have never been found, but they called out some memo’s specifically.

It would be advised that Issa do the same…he has copies of memo’s, I would bet on it. I would like him to specifically ask for those memo’s that Eric Holder has been sitting on.

right2bright on July 25, 2012 at 10:11 AM

The Central Intelligence Agency recently discovered a “4 to 5 inch stack” of documents that relate to the spy agency’s cooperation with the makers of a forthcoming Hollywood film on the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, according to a new court filing.

Orange. Jumpsuits.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on July 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM

Senator Dianne Feinstein is malleable? What a shock.

nimrod on July 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM

Dang you KOOLAID2, your in stoppable………….

angrymike on July 25, 2012 at 10:13 AM

The leaks all came from Obama, or his immediate staff.

The insider look and documents and access granted the movie producers (for a film glorifying Obama, no less), the tours of the SCIF downstairs with Obama as tour guide (celebrities and donors, only) and the general lack of OPSEC attitude within the current White House…it is all on Obama.

If GW Bush can be pilloried and held-accountable for what some idiots in the 800th MP Brigade did on their spare time out in Iraq, thousands of miles and layers of command structure away, then, dammit, Obama needs to be pilloried and held totally accountable for what happens within his own office.

coldwarrior on July 25, 2012 at 10:13 AM

Zero Dark Thirty”

They couldn’t call it Thirty Minutes After Midnight? Hollywood just had to give a hat tip to President Ø. lol

Fallon on July 25, 2012 at 10:14 AM

In=un

angrymike on July 25, 2012 at 10:15 AM

Judicial Watch sued for documentation that related to official contacts between the administration and the filmmakers, as speculation grew that not only did the White House give unprecedented access in order to make itself look good in the cinema, but that the access would allow the film to get released before the election. (The filmmakers pushed the release date back after the controversy erupted.)

If the film is not released before the election, maybe President Romney can block it altogether, for national security reasons!

Steve Z on July 25, 2012 at 10:16 AM

None dare call it Treason.

Naturally Curly on July 25, 2012 at 10:17 AM

Ms Feinstein must have “been paid a visit”. It’s the Chicago way.

vcferlita on July 25, 2012 at 10:17 AM

Wanna make team Obama squirm, ask them why Bradley Manning is on trial while non one in the white house is?

rob verdi on July 25, 2012 at 10:18 AM

So they’re either incompetent boobs who can’t track records, or they’re lying sacks of sh1t. Which is it?

RadClown on July 25, 2012 at 10:19 AM

The Department of Justice had to file a motion admitting that the CIA had found numerous documents that should have been released in a Freedom of Information Act request

These “lapses” in FOIA compliance should be taken very seriously. Five inches of documents is not merely an administrative error. At best it shows they did not take compliance seriously but I somehow think that it was a much more nefarious ommission.

The irony being that this political propaganda that would have made Leni Riefenstahl proud will only come out after the dictator is out of power. As if a film showing Obama “getting” OBL would have ever been a game changer in the election results.

Happy Nomad on July 25, 2012 at 10:19 AM

More Obama administration hostage videos to come!

Jaibones on July 25, 2012 at 10:20 AM

Steve Z on July 25, 2012 at 10:16 AM

Probably can’t do that. Prior Restraint. New York Times v. The United States re: The Pentagon Papers.

If the Executive Office of the President releases something, it cannot be called back or restrained by the Executive….the horse already bolted the barn at that point.

coldwarrior on July 25, 2012 at 10:20 AM

So they’re either incompetent boobs who can’t track records, or they’re lying sacks of sh1t. Which is it?

RadClown on July 25, 2012 at 10:19 AM

And why not both?

right2bright on July 25, 2012 at 10:20 AM

It’s pretty certain that JW won’t do a Cory Booker impression, though.

Of course not. That act is only required of Dim politicians who slip up and accidentally speak some embarrassing truth about Dear Leader.

AZCoyote on July 25, 2012 at 10:21 AM

The Department of Justice had to file a motion admitting that the CIA had found numerous documents that should have been released in a Freedom of Information Act request from Judicial Watch about White House interaction with filmmakers producing a movie about the killing of Osama bin Laden:

FACEPALM!

this should be prosecuted…

ted c on July 25, 2012 at 10:22 AM

coldwarrior on July 25, 2012 at 10:13 AM

Blame the MSM too. If it had done it’s job, Obama would never have made it to the White House.

News2Use on July 25, 2012 at 10:22 AM

a “4 to 5 inch stack” of documents that relate to the spy agency’s cooperation with the makers of a forthcoming Hollywood film on the raid that killed Osama bin Laden,

W

T

F?

ted c on July 25, 2012 at 10:23 AM

The insider look and documents and access granted the movie producers (for a film glorifying Obama, no less), the tours of the SCIF downstairs with Obama as tour guide (celebrities and donors, only) and the general lack of OPSEC attitude within the current White House…it is all on Obama.

Obama to moviegoers: This is how I got Bin Laden. Ain’t I great?

Obama to terrorists: This is how I got Bin Laden. Avoid these guys and you can stay alive and kill us.

Steve Z on July 25, 2012 at 10:23 AM

“There’s no business like show business”, as the song goes. Apart from wrecking the economy and cheap public relations what else are these barbarians good for?

arand on July 25, 2012 at 10:23 AM

So they’re either incompetent boobs who can’t track records, or they’re lying sacks of sh1t. Which is it?

RadClown on July 25, 2012 at 10:19 AM

The two are not mutually exclusive, are they.

Kenosha Kid on July 25, 2012 at 10:24 AM

angrymike on July 25, 2012 at 10:13 AM

(:->)

KOOLAID2 on July 25, 2012 at 10:25 AM

Zero Dark Thirty: is that one of the waking moments that Obama is up and thinking about jobs???

ted c on July 25, 2012 at 10:26 AM

“Zero Dark Thirty”!

Starring Kofi Kingston as President Bark.

Also starring Jake Gyllenhaal as Leon Panetta, Halle Berry as Mrs. Bark, and introducing Bobo the Wonder Chimp as Vice President Biden.

Starts November 3rd, advance tickets available online.

Bishop on July 25, 2012 at 10:26 AM

Hey ya’ll see what government does for you? we plugged them holes in bin laden’s head!

/you should be thanking me.

PS; enjoy them roads n’ bridges.

ted c on July 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM

So they’re either incompetent boobs who can’t track records, or they’re lying sacks of sh1t. Which is it?

RadClown on July 25, 2012 at 10:19 AM

Malevolent retards, just like the Dog-Eater.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on July 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM

Joe Biden will fall on the sword (that goes through his loin) for this one so he can escape the debates and running this Fall. He is serious afflicted mentally to the point where he’s just confabulating. Free Joey.

gracie on July 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM

KOOLAID2
we gotta get you a job, how bout I call Rmoney™ and get you a ambassador job, say to Canada?
I think you’ll be like bunking with Canopfor ………….

angrymike on July 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM

If GW Bush can be pilloried and held-accountable for what some idiots in the 800th MP Brigade did on their spare time out in Iraq, thousands of miles and layers of command structure away, then, dammit, Obama needs to be pilloried and held totally accountable for what happens within his own office.

coldwarrior on July 25, 2012 at 10:13 AM

^^^^^ This, times a million ^^^^^

Washington Nearsider on July 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM

Obama put on a show;

US operatives received the death blow.

PopsRacer on July 25, 2012 at 10:30 AM

serious
seriously (thorry)

gracie on July 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM

Were they with the Rose Law firm papers?

ctmom on July 25, 2012 at 10:32 AM

“The CIA is continuing to look into the circumstances of the discovery of the new documents to ensure the adequacy of its search.”

TRANSLATION: We’re going to find the SOB who “found” these documents that WERE NOT supposed to be found.

GarandFan on July 25, 2012 at 10:32 AM

Bishop on July 25, 2012 at 10:26 AM

LOL. I know you were watching Monday night.

Goebbels would be so proud of this Administration.

kingsjester on July 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM

I don’t suppose the DOJ could suddenly “find” all the F&F documents requested by Issa, could they? Where’s the brave dude on the inside who says “Enough of this shiit” and gathers them up to expose the corruption in the debacle?

Bishop on July 25, 2012 at 10:34 AM

Oh…that gate key!

bigdubs on July 25, 2012 at 10:34 AM

As for the movie I’ll wait for the DVD,Oh, my player is broken.

docflash on July 25, 2012 at 10:35 AM

TRANSLATION: We’re going to find the SOB who “found” these documents that WERE NOT supposed to be found.

GarandFan on July 25, 2012 at 10:32 AM

No, they had to find them, they were identified, specifically, in the suit.

right2bright on July 25, 2012 at 10:36 AM

Zero Dark Thirty: is that one of the waking moments that Obama is up and thinking about jobs???

ted c on July 25, 2012 at 10:26 AM

They are using military jargon because “par five with a serious dog leg” minimizes Obama’s involvement in this operation even though it is a more accurate description.

Happy Nomad on July 25, 2012 at 10:39 AM

Bishop
Issa has the documents, he just wants them to come from the proper channels, to protect his mole……..

angrymike on July 25, 2012 at 10:39 AM

The CIA discovered a 4 to 5 inch stack of records potentially to plaintiff’s FOIA request

Great moments in US intelligence……Here’s to you Mister SuperSpyMan….for finding that 20lb stack of paper under your desk labeled “DO NOT GIVE TO JUDICIAL WATCH UNLESS YOU ABSOLUTELY HAVE TO” and “WHATEVER YOU DO, TRY NOT, I SAY AGAIN NOT TO FIND THIS 4-5 INCH STACK OF PAPERS”……Now, get back to reading those satellite images..and don’t miss anything, mmmkay!?

ted c on July 25, 2012 at 10:41 AM

They are using military jargon because “par five with a serious dog leg” minimizes Obama’s involvement in this operation even though it is a more accurate description.

Happy Nomad on July 25, 2012 at 10:39 AM

they coulda split the difference and just titled it “SAND TRAP” …./

ted c on July 25, 2012 at 10:43 AM

Were they found in Mrs. Clinton’s anteroom?

50sGuy on July 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM

Issa has the documents, he just wants them to come from the proper channels, to protect his mole……..

angrymike on July 25, 2012 at 10:39 AM

Let’s hope so, and that they get publicized mid September.

Bishop on July 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM

The documents must have fallen out of someone’s socks.

kenny on July 25, 2012 at 10:45 AM

Obama’s gonna press his “executive privilege” button and lock the suspect files in his desk.

Cavalry on July 25, 2012 at 10:45 AM

Where were they? On Hillary’s nightstand?

davidk on July 25, 2012 at 10:46 AM

Were they found in Mrs. Clinton’s anteroom?

50sGuy on July 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM

No. That’s where all the mistranslations are kept, not the serious stuff.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on July 25, 2012 at 10:46 AM

Ms Feinstein must have “been paid a visit”. It’s the Chicago way.

vcferlita on July 25, 2012 at 10:17 AM

I was thinking she woke up next to a horse’s head.

BuckeyeSam on July 25, 2012 at 10:47 AM

Were they found in Mrs. Clinton’s anteroom?

50sGuy on July 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM

Beat me.

davidk on July 25, 2012 at 10:47 AM

A five inch stack of documents, neatly packaged and ISOLATED from other pertinent docs. That is a lot of communications. Someone HAD to know they were missing. No way they were “overlooked” The FOIA request was looking for just those docs.
Be interesting if any of these new found docs have redactions.

Jabberwock on July 25, 2012 at 10:47 AM

angrymike on July 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM

…I’d like bunking with canopfor…I’d learn how to use the computer!…I can’t get away though…I’m at the job 12-14 hours a day…I’m a serf for King JugEars!

KOOLAID2 on July 25, 2012 at 10:49 AM

Were they found in Mrs. Clinton’s anteroom?

50sGuy on July 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM

Stole my post… Well played, Mauer…

Khun Joe on July 25, 2012 at 10:49 AM

The CIA discovered a 4 to 5 inch stack of records potentially responsive to plaintiff’s FOIA request

these weren’t the coloring books used to keep the VP busy during the mission were they????

ted c on July 25, 2012 at 10:50 AM

The leaks all came from Obama, or his immediate staff.

The insider look and documents and access granted the movie producers (for a film glorifying Obama, no less), the tours of the SCIF downstairs with Obama as tour guide (celebrities and donors, only) and the general lack of OPSEC attitude within the current White House…it is all on Obama.

If GW Bush can be pilloried and held-accountable for what some idiots in the 800th MP Brigade did on their spare time out in Iraq, thousands of miles and layers of command structure away, then, dammit, Obama needs to be pilloried and held totally accountable for what happens within his own office.

coldwarrior on July 25, 2012 at 10:13 AM

^^^Yes, hell Yes, and worth repeating!^^^

And, these instances are all we know about. I will guarantee that when this nightmare is over, there will be revelation after revelation of one treasonous act after another. Just don’t know whether Romney will pursue prosecution or not, but he should.

TXUS on July 25, 2012 at 10:54 AM

None dare call it Treason.

How many people other than myself recall that was the title of a book authored by Missorian John Stormer in the early ’60′s?

oldleprechaun on July 25, 2012 at 10:54 AM

I’m sorry. Why do I keep waiting for some journo – MSM, right-leaning, talkie – to put 2+2 together.

The leaks came from people associated with this film. Most likely Weinstein, the producer, who’s hosting the latest fundraiser for Barry and was an ardent “Halluburton” meme-pimper.

His plan to push “Barry killed UBL” for the election was undone, so what does he have to lose?

The guy is a grad-A, certified AHole. He’s more than capable of this and knows no one will look his direction. But he knows the right people with the intel to get access.

Year ago, my gut said Plame was leaked by Powell. Same deal here.

budfox on July 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM

these came out of the same dark room those F&F docs occupy

where the heck is that room?

Slade73 on July 25, 2012 at 10:57 AM

Well … oopsie!

Kinda describes the 2008 election, doesn’t it?

Too bad we had to put ourselves on the precipice of bankruptcy and “fundamentally transform” America to prove it.

ICanSeeNovFromMyHouse on July 25, 2012 at 10:57 AM

The Central Intelligence Agency recently discovered a “4 to 5 inch stack” of documents

I call horsesh!t on this. Every federal document these days is first electronic, gets logged, and is entered into a library tracking database or one type or another.

You don’t just “find” a stack of papers, this isn’t 1912, it’s 2012 for heaven’s sake.

From the motion:

From its initial review of the documents, the CIA has determined that the newly discovered documents are responsive to plaintiff’s request but contain some duplicates of produced records. The CIA estimates that there are approximately 30 new documents (primarily emails), with many documents containing multiple pages.

E-mails start as electronic documents, this just supports my contention of utter horse hockey.

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on July 25, 2012 at 11:10 AM

By the way, plaintiff’s second motion under part 6. contains an error wherein August 24, 2011 is referenced, rather than August 24, 2012. I hope they catch this.

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on July 25, 2012 at 11:15 AM

That jug-earred dog eater and his thugs are the worst of the worst.

jqc1970 on July 25, 2012 at 11:20 AM

“Zero Dark Thirty”

At the end of the movie everyone in the Situation Room hugs and high-fives over Bud Light and Roasted Rottweiller Hoagies.

CorporatePiggy on July 25, 2012 at 11:21 AM

Gee, you’d think Hollywood was running the White House. Makes me think Dear Leader tried to shut down any finger pointing at Hollywood for Aurora, CO mass murder, too. More vile inspirational movies please just to keep those cards and letters and checks coming.

gracie on July 25, 2012 at 11:24 AM

From its initial review of the documents, the CIA has determined that the newly discovered documents are responsive to plaintiff’s request but contain some duplicates of produced records. The CIA estimates that there are approximately 30 new documents (primarily emails), with many documents containing multiple pages.

Excuse me, but when producing documents responsive to a request, one does NOT exclude duplicates. ALL documents must be produced so the requester can see any notes made or other differences that MIGHT be on duplicates. It also lets one see if some docs are not being produced since if you see a distribution list of a doc to X Y and Z but only X and Z produce a copy, you know Y is holding something back.

Not only must we now worry about redactions, but that 11th hour executive privilege can always show up.

katablog.com on July 25, 2012 at 11:29 AM

E-mails start as electronic documents, this just supports my contention of utter horse hockey.

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on July 25, 2012 at 11:10 AM

katablog.com on July 25, 2012 at 11:29 AM

This and this…there was no “error”, it can’t happen.

right2bright on July 25, 2012 at 11:34 AM

The transparentest administration evah!

EconomicNeocon on July 25, 2012 at 11:44 AM

Just how many agencies is Inspector Clouseau running?

Say, I wonder if the CIA has any documents on Operation Fast & Furious? Wouldn’t that be fun?

ajacksonian on July 25, 2012 at 11:54 AM

Oh…that gate key!

bigdubs on July 25, 2012 at 10:34 AM

Have fun storming the Castle!

Bulletchaser on July 25, 2012 at 11:55 AM

Let me guess, the movie release is … October?

Yeah, something has got to be done about money in politics. Just not the budget of Hollywood and Indie films (that would be censorship!!!!)

Axeman on July 25, 2012 at 12:08 PM

You don’t just “find” a stack of papers, this isn’t 1912, it’s 2012 for heaven’s sake.

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on July 25, 2012 at 11:10 AM

Why not? This is the party that repeatedly finds boxes of unprocessed ballots in the trunk of cars!

Axeman on July 25, 2012 at 12:10 PM

Meanwhile, in the second most tightly-leashed dictatorial regime in the universe, Kim Jong Un got married.

LetsBfrank on July 25, 2012 at 12:11 PM

Let me guess (part #2) Barack Obama will be played by Duane Johnson, ripped t-shirt and all.

Squad Leader: No one ever needs to know that you lead the assault, Mr. President… For all I know, you’re sitting back in Washington. (winks)

Axeman on July 25, 2012 at 12:14 PM

I think you are all overreacting and have never had a messy desk. You know how it is, you have a little free time and you go to clean off your desk and start filing things …hey lookee there… I was wondering where that 5-6 inch stack of documents was. It was right under the telephone message pad.

HawaiiLwyr on July 25, 2012 at 12:15 PM

I just really have ZERO faith in anyone regarding hijinks like this.
If no one was alarmed back in the 30s & 40s + regarding the copious amounts of evidence regarding the fact that communists had infiltrated all parts of the Federal Govt,including the State Dept (which eventually ended up influencing the outcome of wars & important foreign relations, China’s cultural rev. etc), then WTF would they care about this stuff?

Point is here, people just don’t care enough to be anything more than outraged.

Badger40 on July 25, 2012 at 12:22 PM

HawaiiLwyr on July 25, 2012 at 12:15 PM

Back in the day, we had to clear our desks whenever we left the office. We had clear plastic waste bins on the desks, and burn bags for all paper no longer needed. All file drawers had combinations, which had sign sheets to mark who opened it and when and who closed it and when. Good OPSEC. If you went to lunch or to a meeting on the other side of the building, your desk had to be cleared and everything locked up. One or two times messing up could potentially put one’s clearance and access in jeopardy.

Overseas it was even tighter.

They might be running the Agency a bit different these days…but they heralded the so-called “paperless office” right about the time I left…so a stack of documents 4-5 inches would be all on electronic media by now, you’d think.

coldwarrior on July 25, 2012 at 12:24 PM

That jug-earred dog eater and his thugs are the worst of the worst.

jqc1970 on July 25, 2012 at 11:20 AM

No worse than FDR & his thugs.
And yet, so many Conservatives hold him up as such a great POTUS, including Newt who as a historian, should f$%^ing know better.

Badger40 on July 25, 2012 at 12:25 PM

LOL. Was it found on the cafeteria table? Who found it, a janitor named Socks Berger?

Here, watch the DOJ make a 6 inch stack a 4 to 5 inch stack right before you see it … Presto!

Dusty on July 25, 2012 at 12:27 PM

I was thinking she woke up next to a horse’s head.

BuckeyeSam on July 25, 2012 at 10:47 AM

And her husband woke up next to a horse’s ass.

soundingboard on July 25, 2012 at 12:27 PM

What a great Administration, not involved in any scandal as of yet, says the MSM.

DDay on July 25, 2012 at 12:28 PM

Are my eyes going bad, or did they ‘photoshop’ Audrey Tomason out of this picture? Previous versions had her peering over a shoulder.

(She’s the Director for Counter-terrorism and wrote the “TOP SECRET” Apocalypse Equation calling for 95% global population reduction at the hands of the world governments by any means available.)

xmanvietnam on July 25, 2012 at 12:28 PM

xmanvietnam on July 25, 2012 at 12:28 PM

Seems they just cropped her out of this photo.

Full White House photo here.

coldwarrior on July 25, 2012 at 12:34 PM

xmanvietnam on July 25, 2012 at 12:28 PM

And who can forget this little gem…

The classified documents on the lower left….out in the open…and a few others placed on the White House flicker feed.

This administration has ignored OPSEC since day one.

If you are a current top-of-the-charts hip-hop artist you’ve probably been shown a lot more classified information around the White House than you’d have access to as the classified document control officer from the White House Communications Agency.

coldwarrior on July 25, 2012 at 12:42 PM

Seems like we should be getting better liars for our taxpayer dollars.

trigon on July 25, 2012 at 12:50 PM

coldwarrior on July 25, 2012 at 12:24 PM

Actually I was joking. But in all seriousness, thank you for your service.

HawaiiLwyr on July 25, 2012 at 12:53 PM

Were they on a credenza in the family’s quarters, next to the Rose Law Firm documents?

Cindy Munford on July 25, 2012 at 1:05 PM

So disappointed with Senator Feinstein….she has the senority, the committee power and the end-of-career respect and I thought she would have the guts to stand up to WH pressure. Remember how FBI Director J.Edger Hoover had files on everyone for blackmail…makes you wonder, doesn’t it? First Booker and now Feinstein….too close to not raise eyebrows.
My respect for Ms. Feinstein just went down the toilet…not that she gives a hoot, of course.

shootingstar on July 25, 2012 at 1:07 PM

Comment pages: 1 2