Quotes of the day
posted at 8:01 pm on July 22, 2012 by Erika Johnsen
Israel has bolstered its security presence for the London Olympics amid fears that an Iranian terror squad in Europe may be planning an attack on its athletes, according to a press report Sunday.
Scotland Yard and Britain’s domestic intelligence service MI5 are believed to have raised their assessment of the threat against the Israeli delegation following last week’s suicide attack on an Israeli tourist bus in Bulgaria, the Sunday Times reported.
The Israeli government has reportedly dispatched agents from its internal security service Shin Bet to protect its team of athletes.
***
Agents from Israel’s elite intelligence organisation, Mossad, are hunting Iranian-backed terrorists in Europe, who are allegedly planning an “anniversary” attack 40 years after the Munich massacre, Britain’s The Sunday Times reports.
The fears come as tensions rise over the International Olympic Committee refusal to commemorate the killing of 11 Israeli athletes and coaches by Palestinian terrorists on September 5, 1972.
In preparation for an Olympic terror assault, panic rooms for VIPs and spectators have been set up beneath London’s Olympic Stadium to protect them from being taken hostage or killed, according to The Sunday Times.
***
Taking into account the possibility of an Israeli attack on Iran during the 2012 Summer Games, the Olympic committee in charge of the London event has formed a special team to prepare for the contingency. …
England is thought to be within the range of Iranian missiles and UK officials believe that a military confrontation between Jerusalem and Tehran could involve the country against its will.
The special team listed a number of steps that would need to be taken in the event of such a conflict, among them: opening a special command center, providing secret safe houses for foreign leaders wishing to meet for diplomatic purposes, and preparing for emergency evacuations of dignitaries.
***
International Olympic Committee president Jacques Rogge won’t budge: There will be no minute’s silence for the Israeli victims of the 1972 Munich massacre at the opening ceremony of the London Olympics.
Rogge rejected the latest calls Saturday for a special observance to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the murder of 11 Israeli athletes and coaches by Palestinian gunmen at the Munich Games.
“We feel that the opening ceremony is an atmosphere that is not fit to remember such a tragic incident,” Rogge said.
***
Organisers of the Olympics hit back on Sunday at cynics after weeks of negative headlines, saying criticism over planning mistakes and costs were being outweighed by a surge in public excitement as the gala opening ceremony nears.
Britain’s famously caustic media, which have highlighted security and transport problems before the July 27-Aug. 12 Games, also seemed to adopt a more positive stance as thousands turned out to cheer the Olympic torch relay through London.
“I think possibly what we’re going through as a nation, as a city is that necessary, pre-curtain-up moment of psychological self-depression before the excitement begins on Friday when the curtain goes up,” London Mayor Boris Johnson told the BBC.
“The mood is perceptibly changing. People are starting to get really excited here in London about the arrival of the torch …. The last remaining clouds of dampness and Olympo-scepticism are going to be banished,” he later told Sky News.
***
The athletes and the Olympic torch have arrived in London – and so has the party.
For those keener on celebrity-spotting or dancing the night away than medal counting, the British host city has plenty of action to offer during games time.
Away from the track and field, Hollywood royalty such as Brangelina and Nicole Kidman will be rubbing shoulders with diplomats and businessmen at the city’s glitziest clubs and grandest historic buildings.
Meanwhile, Dizzy Rascal, Snow Patrol and other musicians will keep crowds entertained at outdoor concerts across the capital…
***
Olympic athletes are giving up their personal physical data in exchange for the latest gadgets that record sleep, diet and exercise patterns as they try to boost their performance in this year’s games.
Several health technology companies plan to use the athletes’ data to help re-engineer the tracking devices and later reposition the products for the amateur sports performance market or the $61bn weight loss market.
“These are early-phase trials to see how it works,” said Kevin Sayer, president of DexCom, which has donated its continuous glucose monitors to several US athletes. “We’re open to learn.”
Many of the technologies have been developed since the last Olympics and executives at a number of health-tracking companies are looking to the London games to increase their exposure.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air
Bobby Jindal: Paternalistic, big-government liberalism is the biggest loser here
Super Nannies: EU bans olive oils, Germany ponders Autobahn speed limit
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
RWM 8D Good memory.
tom daschle concerned on May 22, 2013 at 5:18 PM
And, they don’t have those freedoms because… sharia. It’s a bit of a perpetual motion machine.
After a certain point, I think you can hold them responsible, if not guilty. They can stand up for themselves like men. Instead, they remain slaves to their fear. Oh yes, it’s a legitimate fear. But, that doesn’t mean they aren’t responsible for their own inaction.
GWB on May 22, 2013 at 5:18 PM
Yes. And of course the kuffar pay to house them in jail, which isn’t just convenience — getting the unbelievers to pay for your community, either by taxing them or raiding their caravans, is downright Muhammad-like. Summed up in the immortal words of Anjem Choudhary “you work, give us the money! Allahu akbar, we take the money.”
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 5:19 PM
If that keeps happening the Brit government won’t have to worry about dealing with it. The British people will rise up and things will get ugly.
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 5:21 PM
So of course the political class will do nothing.
Like here.
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 5:22 PM
“Islamists” is mainly used by very wimpy “conservatives”. “Liberals” usually won’t even use words that are even a euphemism for Muslim.
VorDaj on May 22, 2013 at 5:22 PM
There are many nice islamofacists. Most of them wouldn’t kill infidels when someone was looking. And they wouldn’t butcher the infidels in cold blood either. There would just douse them with gasoline and burn them alive.
SparkPlug on May 22, 2013 at 5:22 PM
You absolutely CAN and should hold them responsible AND guilty. We’ve implored muslims to condemn this sort of thing since 9/11 and what do they do? THEY LIE.
Look at all the muslims in Boston and Cambridge that knew the two bombers. Did any of them come forward and warn authorities?
NO!
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 5:24 PM
Ok, I’ll tell you that. And, will add, for emphasis, that they certainly aren’t interested in beheading them, either.
Midas on May 22, 2013 at 5:24 PM
I’ll second that.
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 5:25 PM
That’s pretty wild, here and now. :) Sort of throws the testosterone obliviousness of the Harvard Law post-grad (who still uses “alot” to be ironic) into stark relief.
Maybe wielding cutting hand weapons makes some guys feel powerful after all.
Axe on May 22, 2013 at 5:25 PM
I have sympathy for humane people trapped in muslim-dominated countries. Some of them are probably even muslim — but, obviously, they are the true Tiny Minority of Extremists in islam because speaking out is a quick death sentence for them.
The ones that most anger me are the muslims in the West who claim they are “afraid” to speak out. (And yes, I’ve read those claims in European papers, of muslims in places like Belgium who claimed they feared reprisal if they spoke out.) Sorry, not buying it. If you won’t speak out when the entire muslim population is 5% (and supposedly, only a Tiny Minority of that 5% are extremists), then when will you speak out?
CJ on May 22, 2013 at 5:25 PM
Well, or hang them. Or is that specifically reserved as their tolerant treatment for gays? Oh, damn, forgot stoning; but that’s a tolerant handling of Sandra Fluke-types, I think. Well, and genital mutilation. But in a nice way, or something.
Midas on May 22, 2013 at 5:27 PM
They are FOS, CJ.
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 5:28 PM
20 minutes before someone with a gun showed up??? Sheesh
E9RET on May 22, 2013 at 5:29 PM
Not by penalty of death.
cptacek on May 22, 2013 at 5:17 PM
Dan_Yul on May 22, 2013 at 5:29 PM
Do you need a hug Dan? How far off topic are you willing to drag your selfish concern?
tom daschle concerned on May 22, 2013 at 5:31 PM
From October 2009:
The Outrageous Truth Slips Out: Labour Cynically Plotted to Transform the Entire Make-up of Britain Without Telling Us
From February 2010:
Labour’s ‘Secret Plan’ to Lure Migrants; The Government Has Been Accused of Pursuing a Secret Policy of Encouraging Mass Immigration For Its Own Political Ends
slickwillie2001 on May 22, 2013 at 5:33 PM
I’m sorry that Jessica Ahlquist received hate mail and death threats, but I’m even more sorry that she lost her faith.
Ward Cleaver on May 22, 2013 at 5:33 PM
What happens in New Jersey stays in New Jersey?
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local/new_jersey&id=8989357
Fallon on May 22, 2013 at 5:34 PM
Off topic? This is what people who speak out against the dominant religion can encounter in our society. It’s much worse for people in the muslim world. That’s why we don’t hear more from those who don’t support jihad.
Dan_Yul on May 22, 2013 at 5:36 PM
I think it’s absolutely right to hold responsible the people who commit terrorist acts or other violence in the name of Islam. I also think it’s right to hold responsible people who aid others in doing so, like someone mentioned the Boston bombers. Fine.
To the degree that people are allowed to speak freely about stuff like this, without fear of reprisal, I think it’s OK to expect them to do so. My only point is that in a lot of places that doesn’t exist, and when that is the case, you can’t claim that silence is an indication that they agree with the ideology. That these freedoms are absent because of sharia should not be used to indict someone who disagrees with sharia.
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 5:38 PM
I agree. Muslims everywhere, but especially those living in Europe and America, need to speak out (and act) against these kinds of things more strongly.
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 5:39 PM
I sense you need some attention so I’ll give you a response. Never ever in my life have I ever heard anyone threaten or try to silence an atheist. I don’t know why you people are so aggrieved, after all we are just dancing to our DNA.
tom daschle concerned on May 22, 2013 at 5:40 PM
Add to your list…
May, 2013
The Truth At Last! Peter Mandelson Admits Labour ‘Sent Out Search Parties’ To Bring Migrants Here After Losing The Votes Of The Working Class
Resist We Much on May 22, 2013 at 5:41 PM
If I wanted to, I could go down to the local baptist church and hold up a sign saying “Your god is not real”, and expect to come back alive.
I would be insane to go to Saudi Arabia and do this at a mosque.
You can call this a difference in degree, or make historical arguments. Whatever.
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM
It Took British Cops 20 Minutes To Respond To Islamist Terror Attack Because They Had To Wait For Officers With Guns To Show Up…
Cops in the UK don’t carry guns.
wyntre9 on May 22, 2013 at 5:45 PM
In medieval times, people created fairy tales and magical creatures to make sense of their world. One of the most endearing is the unicorn, a horse with a single horn that symbolized purity and wholesomeness. In our modern times, people in Europe and the United States consider themselves more sophisticated and rational than people from the Middle Ages, but we still create myths, albeit more subtle ones.
Daily we hear reports of violent acts committed by Islamic terrorists on every inhabited continent. We try to wish it away with the myth of the ‘Moderate Muslim’, telling ourselves the Islamic agenda has been’ hijacked’ by a tiny minority of ‘islamists’ and that soon the huge, silent, ‘moderate majority’ of Muslims will take charge and change things. However, post 9/11 very few Muslims have condemned terrorist actions. We are still waiting for ‘moderates’ to stand and deliver, identifying and removing ‘extremist thugs’ from their mosques and their communities. Waiting for this self-correction is our modern version of searching for unicorns.
“Moderate” Muslims will not be able to wrest control of the agenda for several reasons. First of all, Mohammed, the Messenger of Allah’s eternal word, was not moderate. No “moderate” can legitimately tell another Muslim to stop doing the things Mohammed himself did. Also, the Qur’an condones violence and coercion to further the Islamic agenda. People whom we call ‘moderates’ are labeled hypocrites by Allah Himself in the Qur’an. ‘Moderates’ will always lose the argument because, as ex-Muslim author Ibn Warraq says, “There may be ‘moderates’ in Islam but Islam itself is not moderate.”
Islamic expert Daniel Pipes and others estimate ten percent of the Islamic world to be militant. In 1933 when the Nazi party took control of Germany it had 2 million members, comprising only three percent of Germany’s sixty-six million citizens. A tiny minority of extremists can control a vast number of “moderates”, making them irrelevant.
RasThavas on May 22, 2013 at 5:46 PM
Hmm, seems like Ms. Ahlquist was trying to silence Christians. So when Christians object to being silenced (threats aside, that’s unacceptable, presuming they were legit), does that constitute wanting to silence atheists?
It’s a bit like the discussion yesterday about rape; if a victim hits her rapist with a brick, and the rapist chokes her to death – was it self-defense, or… probably not?
You try to silence me, I object, and… I’m trying to silence you? Is that how it works?
Midas on May 22, 2013 at 5:46 PM
Two words: bacon cannon
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 5:46 PM
I’m not arguing with your point. But depending on where you live in America you might expect to be at least shunned around town and your kids shunned at school. So it’s behooves you to keep your mouth shut, just as it does infidels in the muslim world.
Dan_Yul on May 22, 2013 at 5:47 PM
We don’t hear ANYTHING from those who are here and relatively safe. If they disagreed with the jihadis many of them would find a way to express that. Do they? No!
You can’t equate what happened to Jessica Ahlquist to what the muslims are doing. You cannot deny their cult of death is evil.
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 5:48 PM
For the most part, no, they don’t. But you said “They want the infidels silenced just like what happens here with atheists, agnostics, etc.” And that just isn’t true. The muslims don’t “silence” athiests by using their own 1st Amendment freedoms – freedom of speech, freedom of assembly – to counter the athiest, but by throwing acid in their face, or by burying them in the ground except for their head and stoning them, or by trying them for apostasy and throwing them off a cliff, or by a mob beating them to death. AND YOU DA*N WELL KNOW IT.
Your attempt at moral equivalence in this means that every other argument you might want to make has lost credibility. You might want to re-look at your principles in light of that.
GWB on May 22, 2013 at 5:52 PM
Can we get a 0.6 decibel level of outrage from the nice Muslims?¿
How about a 0.3 decibel?¿
Is this freaking meter plugged in. I’m getting a flatline here.
SparkPlug on May 22, 2013 at 5:52 PM
There is a rather famous case of a so called “moderate muslim” guy from upstate NY who started a group for “moderate muslims” but that all cam to a halt after he murdered his wife for offending his honor.
After that I started to wonder WTF a moderate muslim is, exactly.
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 5:54 PM
I’m an atheist and no Christians here have tried to silence me.
Resist We Much on May 22, 2013 at 5:54 PM
I’m curious as to what might have motivated the attack.
Basilsbest on May 22, 2013 at 5:54 PM
Well said. The only thing I’d change would be the ‘post 9/11′ part – it’s been this way since well before I became ‘aware’ politically and started wondering aloud why Islam seemed hell-bent on destroying everyone around them, back in the early 80′s. Before that was Iran of course, but before my time a bit – but really, going *way* back… we’ve been waiting for the ‘moderates’ for a long, long time…
Midas on May 22, 2013 at 5:55 PM
Please don’t misunderstand me. I am not promoting the “moderate Muslim” or “tiny minority of extremists hijacked the religion” claptrap. I am well aware that these are fictions.
In order to be a “moderate Muslim”, one would have to reject many of the core teachings of Islam.
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 5:56 PM
This murder was brought to you by the “religion of peace.” The more devoted one is to Islam the more violent he/she will become.
newtopia on May 22, 2013 at 5:57 PM
One that has only murdered one other person? I guess it could be one that hasn’t murdered their first person yet.
Midas on May 22, 2013 at 5:57 PM
Sarcasms or are you that tone deaf?
CTSherman on May 22, 2013 at 5:57 PM
#UK police hiding behind tree#
Hey you with that butcher knife. Come out with your hands up or else we will get someone here with a gun in about 20 minutes. I really mean it. He could get here in 18 minutes if there isn’t too much traffic so you better surrender so I can come out from behind this tree and arrest you.
SparkPlug on May 22, 2013 at 5:58 PM
From the BBC:
(Emphasis added)
Really it’s a mystery. I doubt they will ever be able to uncover why such a thing occurred.
Blaise on May 22, 2013 at 5:58 PM
Shhhh
…Oh…wait…
Axeman on May 22, 2013 at 5:59 PM
“Get a life, bin that knife!” was the campaign slogan I saw about two years ago around London. It appears that knife control is working as well as gun control there.
oryguncon on May 22, 2013 at 6:00 PM
I’m a devout atheist who religiously skips church every Sunday. No Christians have tried to block me from skipping church.
SparkPlug on May 22, 2013 at 6:00 PM
Religion of psychos.
bitsy on May 22, 2013 at 6:01 PM
prolly made by Jews
Axe on May 22, 2013 at 6:02 PM
Every so often I’m too busy to skip church.
SparkPlug on May 22, 2013 at 6:03 PM
Violent crime in the UK shot up a lot after the gun ban, I actually looked at their crime stats during the gun control debate. It was eye opening.
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 6:03 PM
More selective reading here. I bolded the part most of you dismiss. They want the infidels silenced, just like many of you do.
The means are different but the ends are the same. Silencing the opposition.
Dan_Yul on May 22, 2013 at 6:03 PM
This is horrific =( something you’d expect to see in Afghanistan, Yemen or Nigeria..This is also what happens when you let so many Muslim Immigrants come unimpeded into your control..ah then again, don’t know if those savages were from another country but still..In shock over this..The religion of peace strikes again
sadsushi on May 22, 2013 at 6:03 PM
This reminds me of that story on Drudge about riots in Sweden. Follow the link to the page and all they say is it’s in the “immigrant quarter”.
Yeah, we know who’s immigrating to Sweden, the same people who are invading every other well-meaning country in Europe. But we go out of our way to simply talk about “riots in the immigrant quarter”….
Axeman on May 22, 2013 at 6:04 PM
Any relation?¿
SparkPlug on May 22, 2013 at 6:05 PM
Who is trying to silence you Dan? Name names.
tom daschle concerned on May 22, 2013 at 6:05 PM
Actually no. The Qu’ran doesn’t say “silence the unbelievers”, and jihadis would not be satisfied with a state of affairs where unbelievers are merely “silenced”, so, again, no.
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 6:08 PM
Peaceful Muslims are afraid to speak out for fear of retaliation even though their faces are covered with rags and can’t even be identified.
Cowards.
SparkPlug on May 22, 2013 at 6:13 PM
No. :)
But his dialectics and ethics are frequently stellar.
*represent*
Axe on May 22, 2013 at 6:13 PM
That was in Buffalo. He cut her head off because she was going to divorce him. The beheading suggested a religious motive in addition to selfish rage. The fellow had a TV gig promoting positive relationships with moslems.
KW64 on May 22, 2013 at 6:15 PM
Axe on May 22, 2013 at 6:13 PM
Awesome. Maybe someday the Axe clan and the Spark clan will stop feuding over hotties.
SparkPlug on May 22, 2013 at 6:16 PM
To the UK members here, hows that GUN BAN going for you guys over there? Good thing guns are banned. It prevents people from getting murdered dont you know.
TX-96 on May 22, 2013 at 6:18 PM
He’s doing his level best by the elephant in the room is that we protect and defend those who have opinions that differ from ours. Our military, our soldiers put themselves in harms way to defend the constitution. He doesn’t get that.
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 6:18 PM
Looks like the bogey man that has been trying to silence Dan finally succeeded.
:(
tom daschle concerned on May 22, 2013 at 6:18 PM
Yes, that was the guy.
He should come back and keep going with it.
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 6:20 PM
If people in London want to riot – this would be
a good reason. If they don’t then they are lost.
redguy on May 22, 2013 at 6:21 PM
I imagine he’s just digging through online sources looking for some nugget to prove me wrong. Or some other ‘similarity’ to seize upon.
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 6:22 PM
I spent ten months in England in the early 80s – the country and it’s people were wonderful – the food, not so much. But London and the other cities I visited were spectacular.
I just returned from a business trip to London where I took a few days to visit family friends who moved back to England 18 months ago after living in the US for 7 years.
London is a scary pit, majority recent immigrants and their descendents. Some large cities have essentially been occupied by first, second and now third generation Muslim immigrants.
The feel of the nation and it’s people is utterly and completely different than it was in the 80s.
Worst, by far, are the 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants. They are technically British, but most are radical or radicalizing rapidly. There are many places where I could not travel because I was told I would be in grave danger simply because I’m white and especially because I’m American.
It made me think that the 80s were not that long ago. The fundamental transformation of England (perhaps the entire UK) is essentially complete… Time will tell if it stays that way.
According to my friends, many native British people are ready to fight back – but many are still apathetic, with generations living on the dole (welfare). So who knows.
DrDeano on May 22, 2013 at 6:23 PM
You are with this question.
But as usual the point I was originally making has been overlooked. That point was that there are people in the muslim world who do not support jihad but it is not safe for them to speak up. I some muslims in Egypt who did not want the islamists to take control of Egypt and this was back in the early 1990s.
Dan_Yul on May 22, 2013 at 6:23 PM
I don’t get why the attackers waited for 20 minutes after the beheading for the police to arrive.
And by the aerial and street level footage of the crime scene it’s clear the attack took place in a populous area.
Something VERY stinky about this story.
wyntre9 on May 22, 2013 at 6:24 PM
Maybe you could convey your ideas with greater clarity.
Are you afraid of your own shadow?
tom daschle concerned on May 22, 2013 at 6:26 PM
I am one of those who served in the military so don’t tell me I don’t get it.
Dan_Yul on May 22, 2013 at 6:27 PM
General Pershing had a similar pilot project that worked in the Phillipines. Time to expand it. Arm all US military and law enforcement with bacon filled hollow point rounds. Mandate that all food products made in the US or imported into the US must contain pork. Fight pigs with pigs.
TX-eye on May 22, 2013 at 6:27 PM
A group of 100 EDL members demonstrated near the crime scene.
Leader Tommy Robinson addressed the crowd, saying: ‘We have got weak leadership. They have allowed this to happen. People are scared to say the word Muslim. They are scared to offend them
You know what? We are offended. People in this country are angry. They have had enough.’
UKDM
wyntre9 on May 22, 2013 at 6:29 PM
OK, well this much I agree with. I wouldn’t use the term “islamist” in making the point, but yeah.
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 6:29 PM
Oh look! Another machete attack, this time in Sweden where they are rioting:
I see no mention of the word “Muslim” or “Islam” in the story but I’m quite sure it wasn’t a Christian wielding that machete. Or rioting:
Buy Danish on May 22, 2013 at 6:29 PM
Maybe you could work on your reading comprehension.
Dan_Yul on May 22, 2013 at 6:30 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/10074881/Mum-talked-down-Woolwich-terrorists-who-told-her-We-want-to-start-a-war-in-London-tonight.html
So the muslims here get a pass? We never hear a peep from them. Except for CAIR of course.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2329236/Woolwich-attack–Moment-heroic-woman-tries-remonstrate-knife-wielding-soldier-killer-police-arrived-scene.html
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 6:31 PM
Proof you are trying to silence me.
I am aggrieved!
Ok, putting the toy down, it was terribly boring anyways.
tom daschle concerned on May 22, 2013 at 6:32 PM
I will tell you that, every time you attempt to equate muslims with Christians. We have not seen any muslims in THIS country speaking out in any numbers against the jihadis. What we get is CRICKETS.
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 6:35 PM
Here’s an example of selective reading. I never said the muslims get a pass. I said I met some who did not want the islamists taking over Egypt. So I heard more than a peep from them live and in person.
These are former muslims but here are some with something to say:
http://apostatesofislam.com/
Dan_Yul on May 22, 2013 at 6:37 PM
Another good example is Ibn Warraq
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 6:41 PM
How long before this sort of thing happens here?
dverplank on May 22, 2013 at 6:41 PM
No, this is someone asking a question.
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 6:44 PM
I agree we don’t hear enough from them in this country. We’re foolish to welcome them here.
Dan_Yul on May 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM
Outright beheading or attacks? We’ve had brazen attacks on soldier here already. One crazed muslim attacked and killed one soldier and wounded a second in Little Rock, july 09, screaming Allahu Akbar. He shot them. He was apprehended quickly as I recall.
Then there was The Fort Hood massacre…
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 6:47 PM
Over thirty minutes for the British
cops to show up,
its a shame the soldier wasn’t armed!!
canopfor on May 22, 2013 at 6:48 PM
We need to do better background checks or some background checks.
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 6:49 PM
Don’t know the ‘when’, but the ‘where’ I’m willing to bet will be in Dearborn, MI
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/jamie-glazov/american-muslims-stone-christians-in-dearborn-michigan-1/
This event obviously isn’t anything close to public beheading, but neither is it something that should be happening in the USA either.
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 6:49 PM
Then there was The Fort Hood massacre…
dogsoldier on May 22, 2013 at 6:47 PM
dogsoldier:Speaking of that JihadyGoon piece of sh*t.-:O
Fort Hood shooting
Fort Hood murder suspect, accused of killing 13 in 2009, asks to fire lawyers, represent himself – @AP
Submitted 22 mins ago from http://www.fox23.com by editor
http://www.breakingnews.com/
canopfor on May 22, 2013 at 6:53 PM
Nothing’s changed, except Churchill would be arrested under the UK hate criems law for saying this today.
Wethal on May 22, 2013 at 6:54 PM
I hope that’s what happens. Let him get up there and tell everyone how it was Allah’s will.
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 6:56 PM
Serious incident in Woolwich, UK
Report:
Britain investigating possible Nigerian link in London attack, sources say – @Reuters
Submitted 25 mins ago from http://www.trust.org by editor
==================================================
http://www.trust.org/item/20130522222527-5f70o
canopfor on May 22, 2013 at 6:59 PM
Um, New Jersey.
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local/new_jersey&id=8989357
Fallon on May 22, 2013 at 7:00 PM
Boko Haram is bad news
rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 7:02 PM
The Documentary Losing our Sons trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atkyJ5ryKDw
Fallon on May 22, 2013 at 7:06 PM
Are they sure it wasn’t The Lord’s Prayer? The two are soooo similar.
Exterminate the koranimals. They are miserable in this life. Give them the death they dream of. Sooner or (probably) later, Western Civilization will awaken to the fact there is no living in peace with this part of the human mosaic.
Western_Civ on May 22, 2013 at 7:14 PM
NO- other way around dip shite.
an hug a moderate muzzie. FU.
bazil9 on May 22, 2013 at 7:16 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »