Fighting her own party: An interview with Missouri First Congressional District candidate Robyn Hamlin [Update]

posted at 4:41 pm on July 19, 2012 by Dustin Siggins

In 2010, Robyn Hamlin ran for Congress as a Tea Party candidate in a district long held by Democrats. With little money and even less name recognition, she garnered less than 30% of the vote in the general election. The owner and operator of two small businesses who raises chickens on the side, she is frustrated with what she sees as a corrupt system in Washington that Congress is unwilling to change. Now she’s running again, this time against not only Democrats but the local and state GOP, which for reasons of a basic lack of courage made an under-the-table deal with the incumbent Democrat to guarantee the seat remains his.

As part of her re-election campaign, Hamlin hired Liberty Torch Political Consulting, LLC, a libertarian political consulting firm co-founded by my friend Josiah Schmidt. Earlier this week Josiah asked me if I’d interview Hamlin in order to help her get the word out about the GOP’s deal as well as garner support among conservatives nationwide in order to help her raise the money necessary to win the seat. Below is that interview, conducted by phone last evening.

Hamlin’s website can be seen here, and a press release from the campaign outlining the basics of the GOP’s underhanded deal with the district’s Democrats can be seen here.

Dustin Siggins: In 2010 you garnered 26% of the vote in the general election. Why will this year be different?

Robyn Hamlin: My name recognition is higher and I constantly educate voters. People don’t know what their political parties are supposed to do locally, how things happen, how to elect people, or what congressional district people are in. In 2010 people did not know what district they were in, and had signs for candidates they couldn’t even vote for.

Regarding the vote count, we did very well considering we had no money. We raised $21,000 and got that high of a percentage. We made door hangers and all else that we could in-house and walked everywhere to get to everyone.

 

DS: How important is redistricting to your campaign this year?

RH: It helps a little because losing a district in Missouri makes people pay attention. Additionally, the two incumbents (Lacy Clay and Russ Carnahan) are fighting each other for the Democratic nomination. One district left, which was Carnahan’s, and now we have two incumbents tearing each other apart. This makes them weaker and the eventual Republican general election, hopefully me, stronger.

 

DS: One of the reasons Josiah wanted me to interview you was because of an alleged deal between the local GOP and local Democrats. What is that about?

RH: This area was once considered a protected district, meaning it had to go to a black Representative due to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the area’s demographics. That went out the window after the 2000 Census. Every ten years we count all citizens and get their race, gender, etc. and this has not been a protected district since 2000.

I sent Josiah e-mails I exchanged with the local GOP, including one in March really blasting them. I sent it to 700 people with my complaint about how the GOP wasn’t competing for the district. One of the responses told me that the area is a majority-minority district, and thus the local GOP didn’t want to cause waves. So rather than do their due diligence, they just kowtowed.

My answer to the woman responding to my e-mail was to inform her that the area is no longer protected. I pointed out that this should have been obvious for many reasons, including the simple fact that Russ Carnahan is white and Lacy Clay is black.

As a side note, I’m half-white and have-Cherokee, but I don’t fall under “protected” status. You’d think I’d get special treatment – I mean, I’m a single mother who runs two businesses and is half-Cherokee. I fall under every minority category possible, but I don’t think I deserve assistance. Unless someone can’t do something, such as being in a wheelchair and needs help going up a ramp, he or she should stand on their own two feet.

Back on track – I did research on the racial diversity of the area and the Civil Rights Act, and found that the St. Louis-area racial demographics no longer fall under the Act’s purview. Yet the GOP continued to ignore me and just try to hand the district to the Democrats because they just want to ignore the 1st District.

The state GOP even does this. If you are in the 1st District and call to ask about volunteer opportunities, they will take your information and send you to another district. They are so used to having the 1st District be protected that they haven’t kept up with the way the district has changed. They did this in 2010. It’s also about leaving the Clays alone (Clay’s father held the seat before he did) and Carnahan ( Carnahan’s sister is Secretary of State, and Carnahan’s father was elected governor). Also, Carnahan’s brother has a green wind farm that due to ballot language in his district got federal and state money to subsidize his wind farm.

 

DS: Speaking of wind farms and federal monies, let’s shift to policy. Your website indicates you are pretty fiscally conservative. What are the three most important things you want Congress to do about the fiscal mess we’re in?

RH: We need a balanced budget in Congress, with the exception of a Declaration of War from Congress. Other than that, we need a Balanced Budget Amendment. We also need sound money backed by something. Lastly, there are 159 countries in the world. We give money to 152 and borrow from 25. That is insanity. A fifth-grader could figure out what’s wrong with that. We should quit giving money to people we’re borrowing from.

 

DS: We spend less than one percent of our budget on direct foreign aid, which means we’re spending less than $37 billion annually on foreign aid. Is that really such a big deal compared to our huge deficits?

RH: It’s not the number. It’s the mentality. It bleeds over into everything else.

 

DS: Ideally, how long would you take to balance the budget?

RH: It should be balanced every year. That’s Congress’ job. That’s the job of every business owner and homeowner in the country. Every one of us on Main Street has to have a budget. Some people get paid weekly, and they budget within that check. Whether that check is $300 or $2,000, they have to live within their means. If they get laid off or work fewer hours, they have to re-evaluate. They don’t have a money tree in the backyard or a printing press in the basement.

This does not mean adding in the cost of living or allowing government agencies to allow budget processes for unnecessary spending at the end of the fiscal year. I used to work for the government. At the end of the fiscal year you’d see expensive chairs, desks, movies, audiovisual equipment, etc. popping up out of nowhere just to spend the money to say they need more in the next year.

This applies to hospitals as well. I don’t know what it’s like where you’re from, but a lot of hospital wings happen to pop up in my area when money is available. They really like that federal health care money.

 

DS: What are some internal changes in Congress you’d like to see?

RH: I think term limits should be simple: 30 years total in any elected office. That includes as a selectman, mayor, state representative, Member of Congress, and/or President. This idea of political science majors leaving college to just work their way up the political ladder without ever having a real job is ridiculous.

We never voted for Congress to have automatic pay increases. They voted that for themselves. We have veterans begging on the side of the road, and policymakers vote themselves a raise. There’s a problem here. We need significant change.

 

DS: What kind of Member will you be when it comes to working with your colleagues, should you be elected? You have Members like Allen West who are firebrands, but you also have many Members who just kind of go along to get along.

RH: I’m a squeaky wheel. I yell every time I see an injustice. I will talk about an injustice forever until it’s fixed. Ignoring it isn’t the solution, since ignoring means people aren’t going to know it’s a problem. If they send me to Washington, constituents will hear from me routinely. I will probably use a lot of money on franking privileges. They will hear from me on simple, folded, stapled paper telling them about how bad things are on the Hill. They’ll hear the gossip from me as it’s happening.
Update: A couple of comments pointed out errors in the interview. Hamlin is not running for re-election, and it was indeed the Voting Rights Act she referenced, not the Civil Rights Act. My apologies for these silly errors.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Singling out games that actually bring sales tax revenues to the state. I guess people will just buy their games out of state. Brilliant.

njrob on January 15, 2013 at 5:56 PM

nonpartisan.

Bmore on January 15, 2013 at 5:57 PM

No matter, people will just download them from the Internet so Missouri authorities will never know.

FloatingRock on January 15, 2013 at 5:57 PM

When I was in high school, I played a game called “Counter-Strike,” a first-person shooter game that allowed you and your friends to play each other online.

Hey you damn kids, get off my lawn. When I was in high school, I was using punch tape, and graduated to a TRS-80 color computer. We only had missile command. And we liked it.

rbj on January 15, 2013 at 5:58 PM

Glad I got it out of my system but I remember when my beer joint got the new Stargate. Nobody played Defender after that. Talk about making use of a rainy day when you’re a carpenter. Nearly wore my right thumb off.

DanMan on January 15, 2013 at 5:58 PM

test

SWalker on January 15, 2013 at 6:00 PM

Might have been relevant to the blog post to include the intent of the tax revenue:

2. The revenue generated by the additional tax imposed under this section, less any reduction allowed under section 149.021, shall be deposited in the state general revenue fund and appropriated solely for the treatment of mental health conditions associated with exposure to violent video games.

http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills131/biltxt/intro/HB0157I.htm

can_con on January 15, 2013 at 6:01 PM

Seems like someone here is a Borderlands fan, I recognize that picture! :-)

Doomberg on January 15, 2013 at 6:01 PM

More waste of life and distraction. No, not the video games, those are awesome. It’s Government who won’t StayTF out of our lives.

HopeHeFails on January 15, 2013 at 6:03 PM

can_con on January 15, 2013 at 6:01 PM

I remember back in the day when Ann Richards told us the lottery would fund schools in Texas. I guess we didn’t consider the long odds on that ever happening either.

DanMan on January 15, 2013 at 6:03 PM

DanMan on January 15, 2013 at 6:03 PM

Not endorsing the tax, just seemed to be an incomplete post without that info.

can_con on January 15, 2013 at 6:05 PM

Indeed. Singling out speech in video games for special taxation is likely unconstitutional, and especially here in Missouri, our policymakers should know better.

Well, according to Benedict Roberts, taxing citizens for merely being alive is perfectly Constitutional, so I don’t see why levying a tax on what someone says would be a problem. To get draconian legislation to pass muster, per Benedict Roberts, all the legislature has to do is declare it to be a tax.

AZfederalist on January 15, 2013 at 6:06 PM

Meh, how ’bout some regular adult guidance in moral, ethical, and responsible behavior to those playing such games. Might be much more effective than another scheme to extract revenue for government to spend unwisely.

hawkeye54 on January 15, 2013 at 6:06 PM

The sad thing is, is that the legislator who proposed this tax is a Republican(Rep. Diane Franklin, of Camdenton, MO). Whenever I hear a Republican raise the specter of a new tax as a solution, I just shake my head in amazement.

RAN58 on January 15, 2013 at 6:06 PM

See, yall let em start with the sin tax, some of us tossed up the red flags, of course… nahh that cant happen ( open the door )…

Enjoy.

watertown on January 15, 2013 at 6:09 PM

This is as stupid as most of the proposed gun control regulations.

Parents: If you do not want your children exposed to violent video games, DON’T BUY THEM FOR YOUR KIDS and monitor what they do online. Do your duty as parents.

Resist We Much on January 15, 2013 at 6:12 PM

Great idea!
Reg that trash!
Violent video games need to be curbed, reg that nasty rap crap while your at it!

purgatory on January 15, 2013 at 6:13 PM

I was relieved to see that the jerk who introduced this is a Democrat.

Nessuno on January 15, 2013 at 6:14 PM

I think we should ban the toys in Happy Meals, too!

Tra la la, oh so busy fixing the world! — Liberal Twit

John the Libertarian on January 15, 2013 at 6:15 PM

I thought we were somewhat safe here in Missouri, but it looks like the Rhinos are coming home to roost here too.

Does Texas still have room for more people?

Mo_mac on January 15, 2013 at 6:15 PM

One time I played Angry Birds…. next thing I knew the family parakeet was strapped to a wrist rocket and I was launching it at the police.

lm10001 on January 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM

How about taxing violent movies? We could double the ticket price on any movie in which more than 10 rounds are expended or any injury to a character is inflicted thorough violence. Not sure how you’d handle video rentals and sales, but I’m sure some bright Democrat with an ivy-league law degree who has friends in high places can figure out something that will work.

“We are disappointed that even in the wake of an overwhelming decision in the United States Supreme Court finding proposals such as this to be patently unconstitutional

Oh, come on, the 1st Amendment was about protecting political speech, leaflets, town criers and the like. The founding fathers could not have dreamed of violent video games like Halo or Assassin’s Creed. Next thing you constitutional cultists will be telling me is the 2nd Amendment protects the right of everyone to own a nuke.

Socratease on January 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM

They should tax mental illness, too. That’ll curb it.

John the Libertarian on January 15, 2013 at 6:18 PM

Socratease on January 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM

Why did you leave porn out?

John the Libertarian on January 15, 2013 at 6:19 PM

Played Counterstrike, eh? Ever play Action Half-Life?

oddjob1138 on January 15, 2013 at 6:20 PM

One time I played Angry Birds…. next thing I knew the family parakeet was strapped to a wrist rocket and I was launching it at the police.

lm10001 on January 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM

Angry Birds, a gateway game to more violent video games that will eventually soil over into real world violence. Need to nip it in the bud Andy, nip it in the bud!

/s

AZfederalist on January 15, 2013 at 6:22 PM

One time I played Angry Birds…. next thing I knew the family parakeet was strapped to a wrist rocket and I was launching it at the police.

lm10001 on January 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM

.
L O L ! … Threadwinner!

listens2glenn on January 15, 2013 at 6:22 PM

Do it. Hit leftys where it hurts.

Blake on January 15, 2013 at 6:23 PM

That should be “spill over”

AZfederalist on January 15, 2013 at 6:23 PM

The sad thing is, is that the legislator who proposed this tax is a Republican(Rep. Diane Franklin, of Camdenton, MO). Whenever I hear a Republican raise the specter of a new tax as a solution, I just shake my head in amazement.

RAN58 on January 15, 2013 at 6:06 PM

Amazement? More like denial. The Republican Party gave up the fight against tyranny years ago.

gryphon202 on January 15, 2013 at 6:24 PM

One time I played Angry Birds…. next thing I knew the family parakeet was strapped to a wrist rocket and I was launching it at the police.

lm10001 on January 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM

Haha!

This is dumb. I hate taxes. ALL taxes.

Othniel on January 15, 2013 at 6:24 PM

Great… looking forward violent rap tax, the TV crime show tax, Nazi documentary tax, the right wing radio tax, and the late night talk show tax. Oh yeah tax porn all you like… I am fully stocked and can make my own if I need more.

lexhamfox on January 15, 2013 at 6:24 PM

If they are going to put a sin tax on violent video games purchased in the state then how about a sin tax on the violence Hollywood beams into the homes in Missouri. Neither are a solution to the problem but fair is fair.

chemman on January 15, 2013 at 6:25 PM

Go after video games my Missouri but don’t dare touch ‘right to work’. Disappointed…

darlus on January 15, 2013 at 6:27 PM

So, more tax(es) is going to ‘reduce gun violence’?

Sir Napsalot on January 15, 2013 at 6:27 PM

Singling out speech in video games for special taxation is likely unconstitutional, and especially here in Missouri, our policymakers should know better.

Ahem: “INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE FRANKLIN.”

It’s “policymaker”, no ess, and you ought to make note of that. It would also be nice if you explained something about Representative Franklin. Is he, perchance, a Democrat?

Dusty on January 15, 2013 at 6:31 PM

One time I played Angry Birds…. next thing I knew the family parakeet was strapped to a wrist rocket and I was launching it at the police.

lm10001 on January 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM

*snort* Literally, I snort laughed!

texgal on January 15, 2013 at 6:32 PM

If violent videogames are the cause of realworld violence, then why hasn’t realworld violence increased with the advent of violent videogames? Since the introduction of the “first-person shooter” videogame, the violent videogame to those of you playing the home game, violence rates in America have gone almost continually down year after year. When are these people going to get it? Just because I watch a “violent” cartoon like G.I.Joe or play a “violent” videogame like Halo: Reach doesn’t mean I’m going to shoot somebody for cutting me off in traffic. Statistics, science, and even commonsense tells us that shooting aliens, zombies or even prostitutes on their TV does not prompt people to shoot up a shopping mall. What next? You gonna ban my Risk boardgame?

Browncoatone on January 15, 2013 at 6:34 PM

Whoa! There goes PAC MAN…..

Don L on January 15, 2013 at 6:34 PM

Boy oh boy, is this dumb.

thebrokenrattle on January 15, 2013 at 6:35 PM

My sons and their friends, all now young adults, spend hours playing so-calling “violent” video games and none of them have ever assaulted anyone in any way and have no plans to do so. These games, like Call of Duty, are especially popular among the military. A harmless way to de-stress.

Since the rating system is a voluntary industry measure, perhaps the industry will no longer rate their games, thus solving the problem. On the other hand, following the 1st Amendment to begin with is probably a better idea.

Common Sense on January 15, 2013 at 6:36 PM

why stop there? you might as well tax violent movies, books, songs…

One time I played Angry Birds…. next thing I knew the family parakeet was strapped to a wrist rocket and I was launching it at the police.

lm10001 on January 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM

lol… =)

Sachiko on January 15, 2013 at 6:41 PM

Yeah. I think we all remember the rash of tunneling caused by playing too many hours of Dig Dug. And air pump assaults shot through the roof.

It’s good to finally be able to talk about it now.

TexasDan on January 15, 2013 at 6:44 PM

That’s funny.

It’s one thing to have an honest discussion on whether these games are good for kids.

It’s a whole ‘nother animal to just opportunistically tax it.

Funny.

“If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving….”

cane_loader on January 15, 2013 at 6:45 PM

Clearly, the law is poorly crafted.

Just add it to the rest of the liberal laws that have been enacted.

GarandFan on January 15, 2013 at 6:47 PM

Indeed. Singling out speech in video games for special taxation is likely unconstitutional, and especially here in Missouri, our policymakers should know better.

This video game tax is obviously stupid.

However I would support any tax increase on movies made in Hollywood. Should I know better? Yes…but I don’t care. Hollywood has done everything they can to hurt freedoms in America and they have been a propagandist for socializing this country. This is a political war and it is time they suffered some of their own medicine.

William Eaton on January 15, 2013 at 6:51 PM

When I was a kid we played a game that didn’t involve a video game system, it was called “War” and we ran around with plastic guns blowing each other away and then bayoneting the wounded.

Oddly enough every one of the dudes from my gang ended up joining the military and creating stable lives. Huh.

Bishop on January 15, 2013 at 6:54 PM

[..]Indeed. Singling out speech in video games for special taxation is likely unconstitutional, and especially here in Missouri [..]

Unconstitutional you say. I doubt it. Singling out products for special taxes happens all the time not only here in MO but all states. See tobacco taxes.

kahall on January 15, 2013 at 6:55 PM

Obviously, young children cannot purchase Mature rated content.

Obviously, it is the child’s guardians who are supplying them with “violent” video games.

Therefore, it should be obvious that any legislation should deal with substantial fines for parents; not game-producers

Anyway, obviously.

Opinionnation on January 15, 2013 at 7:50 PM

We’re taxing free expression now? Nice.

triple on January 15, 2013 at 8:01 PM

Lets tax violent celebrities.
Then.. lets tax government. It’s time. We tax them and split the money up among ourselves.

JellyToast on January 15, 2013 at 8:04 PM

What the crap Missouri..I live here and this would be a joke and surely unconstitutional

sadsushi on January 15, 2013 at 8:04 PM

You have 3 kinds in government.

You’ve got the people who are out to destroy you and amass as much power for themselves as they possibly can. That’s all it’s about. Nothing else. Whatever they talk about, whatever ever issue they say they are for or against.. it’s just a tool to further their real agenda …. all power for themselves.

Then you have the other types who are aware of the first types and want to stop them. Very few of those people but there are a few.

Then the rest of them are just plain dumb useless idiots. Whatever sounds good at the moment.. whatever way the freaking wind seems to be blowing it just doesn’t matter. The whole world could be running to jump off a cliff and they would try to get out in front of the dive if they thought it would make suicidal mob like them more.

JellyToast on January 15, 2013 at 8:12 PM

One time I played Angry Birds…. next thing I knew the family parakeet was strapped to a wrist rocket and I was launching it at the police.

lm10001 on January 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM

*snort* Literally, I snort laughed!

texgal on January 15, 2013 at 6:32 PM

(:->)

KOOLAID2 on January 15, 2013 at 8:35 PM

Update: “Liberal anti-gun trolls like nonpartisan hardest hit”

Liam on January 15, 2013 at 8:44 PM

No more taxes please.

Taxes levied on things the government doesnt approve of, are just an excuse to take more money.

Stupid “sin” taxes punish middle and low class families and it prevents nothing.

Another dollar out of our pockets is another dollar for government to use for their power or be wasted

Im done accepting taxes on anything else.

alecj on January 15, 2013 at 10:34 PM

Glad I got it out of my system but I remember when my beer joint got the new Stargate. Nobody played Defender after that.

DanMan on January 15, 2013 at 5:58 PM

Going from Defender to Stargate. Memories…quarters…and yes, sore thumbs.

MNHawk on January 16, 2013 at 10:20 AM

The founding fathers could not have dreamed of violent video games like Halo

Remember that time you shot that human in Halo?

Yeah, me neither.

mintycrys on January 16, 2013 at 12:01 PM