<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The No. 33, and the surprisingly bipartisan art of repeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smoovious</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6018645</link>
		<dc:creator>Smoovious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 04:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6018645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HOW can they possibly call this a bi-partisan vote with a straight face!?

You had 5... FIVE... out of 191 Democrats in the house, vote with the Republicans to repeal... &lt;a href=&quot;http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2012/roll460.xml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;

How in the hell does 2.6% of the Democrats, make this a bi-partisan vote?

It isn&#039;t bi-partisan in the slightest. This is still a partisan vote.

You need a lot more of the Democrats voting with the Republicans (or vice-versa) before it even approaches bi-partisan...

I&#039;m getting so fed up with the spin.

Call it like it is, writers! We don&#039;t need the spin...

-- Smoov&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOW can they possibly call this a bi-partisan vote with a straight face!?</p>
<p>You had 5&#8230; FIVE&#8230; out of 191 Democrats in the house, vote with the Republicans to repeal&#8230; <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2012/roll460.xml" rel="nofollow"></p>
<p>How in the hell does 2.6% of the Democrats, make this a bi-partisan vote?</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t bi-partisan in the slightest. This is still a partisan vote.</p>
<p>You need a lot more of the Democrats voting with the Republicans (or vice-versa) before it even approaches bi-partisan&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting so fed up with the spin.</p>
<p>Call it like it is, writers! We don&#8217;t need the spin&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8211; Smoov</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runawayyyy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6015700</link>
		<dc:creator>runawayyyy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6015700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Today marks the 33rd vote the Republican-led &lt;strong&gt;Congress&lt;/strong&gt; has taken to repeal all or part of ObamaCare.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

MKH, love ya, mean it....but the republicans don&#039;t control congress.  They control the house.  Your use of the language must be more precise lest the leftists use your own words to try to fool the easily fooled (i.e. democrats) into thinking republicans control the senate as well.

obama plans to run against republicans by painting them as do-nothing extremists, when in fact his own party controls the senate which refuses to even pass a budget.  The leftist press has no intention of pointing this out.  Please don&#039;t help them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Today marks the 33rd vote the Republican-led <strong>Congress</strong> has taken to repeal all or part of ObamaCare.</p></blockquote>
<p>MKH, love ya, mean it&#8230;.but the republicans don&#8217;t control congress.  They control the house.  Your use of the language must be more precise lest the leftists use your own words to try to fool the easily fooled (i.e. democrats) into thinking republicans control the senate as well.</p>
<p>obama plans to run against republicans by painting them as do-nothing extremists, when in fact his own party controls the senate which refuses to even pass a budget.  The leftist press has no intention of pointing this out.  Please don&#8217;t help them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haiku Guy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6015098</link>
		<dc:creator>Haiku Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6015098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Zombies, the Double Tap is the rule.  Don&#039;t get stingy with the ammunition. 

But Zombie entitlements are an altogether tougher problem, and a Thirty-Quadruple Tap is not out of the question...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Zombies, the Double Tap is the rule.  Don&#8217;t get stingy with the ammunition. </p>
<p>But Zombie entitlements are an altogether tougher problem, and a Thirty-Quadruple Tap is not out of the question&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITguy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6014470</link>
		<dc:creator>ITguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6014470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, how do we get the Republicans in the Senate to filibuster everything else until Harry Reid allows this bill to come to the floor for a vote?

We must put every Senator on the record with a vote either up or down for this bill.  There are enough Democrat Senators up for re-election in close races that we should be able to get at least 51 votes for repeal in the Senate.  And if the Democrats try to prevent a vote on this bill, then SHUT THE SENATE DOWN UNTIL THEY ALLOW A VOTE ON THIS BILL!

Force a vote, and force the Democrat Senators to go on the record.  Either they support repeal, or they go against the electorate&#039;s wishes, less than 4 months before the November Elections. No matter how they vote, it&#039;s a win for conservatives.  If they vote for repeal, it goes to Obama and his veto makes him OWN IT... becuase his veto alone kept this monstrosity alive.  And if the Democrat Senators vote against repeal, it will be that much easier to defeat them in their next election, whether that be 2012, 2014, or 2016.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, how do we get the Republicans in the Senate to filibuster everything else until Harry Reid allows this bill to come to the floor for a vote?</p>
<p>We must put every Senator on the record with a vote either up or down for this bill.  There are enough Democrat Senators up for re-election in close races that we should be able to get at least 51 votes for repeal in the Senate.  And if the Democrats try to prevent a vote on this bill, then SHUT THE SENATE DOWN UNTIL THEY ALLOW A VOTE ON THIS BILL!</p>
<p>Force a vote, and force the Democrat Senators to go on the record.  Either they support repeal, or they go against the electorate&#8217;s wishes, less than 4 months before the November Elections. No matter how they vote, it&#8217;s a win for conservatives.  If they vote for repeal, it goes to Obama and his veto makes him OWN IT&#8230; becuase his veto alone kept this monstrosity alive.  And if the Democrat Senators vote against repeal, it will be that much easier to defeat them in their next election, whether that be 2012, 2014, or 2016.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITguy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6014445</link>
		<dc:creator>ITguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6014445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EXCELLENT post, MKH!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCELLENT post, MKH!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ariel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6014225</link>
		<dc:creator>ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6014225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;JUST DEFUND IT FFS

Swerve22 on July 11, 2012 at 5:36 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Here&#039;s the problem with defunding; cutting off the funding only puts the program in hibernation, only to be revived once the Democrats regain control of the House, which will eventually happen, like Dr. Frankenstein&#039;s heir reanimating the corpse of his ancester&#039;s  monster, or to be more in keeping with Mary Katharine&#039;s analogy, as when the lifeless zombies came back in George Romero&#039;s &quot;Return of the Living Dead&quot; after being re-exposed to air in the very beginning of the movie, a classic scene.

Now, do you really want to pin your hopes on the wisdom of the Democrats not to try to reanimate its signature program, be it zombie or otherwise?

I say kill the beast.  Drive a stake through its heart, cut off its head, use silver bullets, do whatever it takes to remove this abomination from our midst before it wreaks havoc upon us all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>JUST DEFUND IT FFS</p>
<p>Swerve22 on July 11, 2012 at 5:36 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s the problem with defunding; cutting off the funding only puts the program in hibernation, only to be revived once the Democrats regain control of the House, which will eventually happen, like Dr. Frankenstein&#8217;s heir reanimating the corpse of his ancester&#8217;s  monster, or to be more in keeping with Mary Katharine&#8217;s analogy, as when the lifeless zombies came back in George Romero&#8217;s &#8220;Return of the Living Dead&#8221; after being re-exposed to air in the very beginning of the movie, a classic scene.</p>
<p>Now, do you really want to pin your hopes on the wisdom of the Democrats not to try to reanimate its signature program, be it zombie or otherwise?</p>
<p>I say kill the beast.  Drive a stake through its heart, cut off its head, use silver bullets, do whatever it takes to remove this abomination from our midst before it wreaks havoc upon us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massrighty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6014071</link>
		<dc:creator>massrighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 23:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6014071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;the next journolist thing will be the issue is ‘settled’…everyone’s tired of the conflict (barry/left Won) and now it is time to MoveOn.
 
I’ve heard that twice already today (once on FNC from a wsj ‘repeater’)

r keller on July 11, 2012 at 6:06 PM 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes; I also have heard &quot;relitigating past battles.&quot; 
Memes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the next journolist thing will be the issue is ‘settled’…everyone’s tired of the conflict (barry/left Won) and now it is time to MoveOn.</p>
<p>I’ve heard that twice already today (once on FNC from a wsj ‘repeater’)</p>
<p>r keller on July 11, 2012 at 6:06 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes; I also have heard &#8220;relitigating past battles.&#8221;<br />
Memes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JusDreamin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013886</link>
		<dc:creator>JusDreamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done, and welcome, um, back Mary Katharine!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, and welcome, um, back Mary Katharine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FogDog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013844</link>
		<dc:creator>FogDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;My mama always told me someday I&#039;d be good at something. Who&#039;d a guessed that something&#039;d be zombie-killing?&quot; - Tallahassee, &lt;em&gt;Zombieland&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

With apologies to Spartacus, &lt;strong&gt;I AM TALLAHASSEE!&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;My mama always told me someday I&#8217;d be good at something. Who&#8217;d a guessed that something&#8217;d be zombie-killing?&#8221; &#8211; Tallahassee, <em>Zombieland</em></p></blockquote>
<p>With apologies to Spartacus, <strong>I AM TALLAHASSEE!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riddick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013823</link>
		<dc:creator>riddick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boehner is getting tough! Tough, I tell you!

A much better vote would be the DE-FUNDING of this monstrosity, but we all know Boehner would never vote for something that actually WORKS.

De-fund this crap, no money for wasteful programs, right? 

Ryan is suddenly missing on the biggest waste of money in the economy, which, even while not yet fully implemented not only affects 1/6th of the economy, but costs who knows how many future jobs in the process as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boehner is getting tough! Tough, I tell you!</p>
<p>A much better vote would be the DE-FUNDING of this monstrosity, but we all know Boehner would never vote for something that actually WORKS.</p>
<p>De-fund this crap, no money for wasteful programs, right? </p>
<p>Ryan is suddenly missing on the biggest waste of money in the economy, which, even while not yet fully implemented not only affects 1/6th of the economy, but costs who knows how many future jobs in the process as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rovin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013811</link>
		<dc:creator>Rovin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;“Small business owners are the engine of our economy and because Democrats and Republicans worked together, we can ensure they spend their time and resources creating jobs and growing their business, not filling out more paperwork,” &lt;strong&gt;said the noted extremist&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m shocked that you would call our president an extremist.  What&#039;s so extreme about signing into law the highest tax increase in the history of the nation?  Oh, wait.....&lt;em&gt;noted&lt;/em&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Small business owners are the engine of our economy and because Democrats and Republicans worked together, we can ensure they spend their time and resources creating jobs and growing their business, not filling out more paperwork,” <strong>said the noted extremist</strong>. </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m shocked that you would call our president an extremist.  What&#8217;s so extreme about signing into law the highest tax increase in the history of the nation?  Oh, wait&#8230;..<em>noted</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PersonFromPorlock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013810</link>
		<dc:creator>PersonFromPorlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the GOP wants to do something that&#039;s not &lt;em&gt;purely&lt;/em&gt; symbolic, how about passing a House resolution &#039;deeming&#039; that the House resolution &#039;deeming&#039; that Obamacare had passed the House did not in fact pass? Seems perfectly reasonable to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the GOP wants to do something that&#8217;s not <em>purely</em> symbolic, how about passing a House resolution &#8216;deeming&#8217; that the House resolution &#8216;deeming&#8217; that Obamacare had passed the House did not in fact pass? Seems perfectly reasonable to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: totherightofthem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013803</link>
		<dc:creator>totherightofthem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;JUST DEFUND IT FFS

Swerve22 on July 11, 2012 at 5:36 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;  This.  Just, this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>JUST DEFUND IT FFS</p>
<p>Swerve22 on July 11, 2012 at 5:36 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>  This.  Just, this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spivey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013795</link>
		<dc:creator>spivey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lamestream media is so incompetent.  All we hear today is this &#039;33 futile fails&#039; meme absent any context - the &lt;em&gt;important&lt;/em&gt; part.  sometimes I wish I could have lunch with somebody like Andrea Mitchell just to experience the vapidity first hand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lamestream media is so incompetent.  All we hear today is this &#8217;33 futile fails&#8217; meme absent any context &#8211; the <em>important</em> part.  sometimes I wish I could have lunch with somebody like Andrea Mitchell just to experience the vapidity first hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ornery_independent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013787</link>
		<dc:creator>ornery_independent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow MKH...on my radio AND my laptop! It&#039;s a &lt;strong&gt;Double Hammy!&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow MKH&#8230;on my radio AND my laptop! It&#8217;s a <strong>Double Hammy!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013781</link>
		<dc:creator>davidk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Zombies… 

SWalker on July 11, 2012 at 6:00 PM 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh.  Never gets old.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Zombies… </p>
<p>SWalker on July 11, 2012 at 6:00 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh.  Never gets old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r keller</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013779</link>
		<dc:creator>r keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the next journolist thing will be the issue is &#039;settled&#039;...everyone&#039;s tired of the conflict (barry/left Won) and now it is time to MoveOn.

I&#039;ve heard that twice already today (once on FNC from a wsj &#039;repeater&#039;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the next journolist thing will be the issue is &#8216;settled&#8217;&#8230;everyone&#8217;s tired of the conflict (barry/left Won) and now it is time to MoveOn.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that twice already today (once on FNC from a wsj &#8216;repeater&#8217;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickwillie2001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013775</link>
		<dc:creator>slickwillie2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahh, bipartisan. John McCain voice: &quot;I just love this bipartisan stuff.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, bipartisan. John McCain voice: &#8220;I just love this bipartisan stuff.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013774</link>
		<dc:creator>davidk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I like Dr. Tom Price’s take on the repeal:
 http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/309130/price-repeal-robert-costa

onlineanalyst on July 11, 2012 at 5:51 PM 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Good stuff.  Thanks for the link.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I like Dr. Tom Price’s take on the repeal:<br />
 <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/309130/price-repeal-robert-costa" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/309130/price-repeal-robert-costa</a></p>
<p>onlineanalyst on July 11, 2012 at 5:51 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Good stuff.  Thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gryphon202</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013772</link>
		<dc:creator>gryphon202</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Repeal is for legitimate laws.

NULLIFY THE BASTARD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repeal is for legitimate laws.</p>
<p>NULLIFY THE BASTARD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The War Planner</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013767</link>
		<dc:creator>The War Planner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;..the passing of the bill was partisan and extreme. Many of those house members (*anthony weiner …cough..) walked the plank for this thing in 2010. They need to keep after it. Just passing legislation making new laws is hardly enough. We are at the phase in our nation’s history when some of them have to be removed from the books.

ted c on July 11, 2012 at 5:39 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

..[assuming my HondaV69 persona] Waddya expect them to do? Surround the White House and start lobbing grenades over the fence or mug Harry Reid in the cloak room? This falls squarely on the shoulders of Willard McDole and the Mittbots, none of whom look as sexy in high-heeled boots as Sarah Palin does. [assuming my Dole Delmonte persona]..

F-

:-D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>..the passing of the bill was partisan and extreme. Many of those house members (*anthony weiner …cough..) walked the plank for this thing in 2010. They need to keep after it. Just passing legislation making new laws is hardly enough. We are at the phase in our nation’s history when some of them have to be removed from the books.</p>
<p>ted c on July 11, 2012 at 5:39 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>..[assuming my HondaV69 persona] Waddya expect them to do? Surround the White House and start lobbing grenades over the fence or mug Harry Reid in the cloak room? This falls squarely on the shoulders of Willard McDole and the Mittbots, none of whom look as sexy in high-heeled boots as Sarah Palin does. [assuming my Dole Delmonte persona]..</p>
<p>F-</p>
<p>:-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWalker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013764</link>
		<dc:creator>SWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;

    Zombies are them troublesome dead walkers that just get in the way of a good night out, 

ted c on July 11, 2012 at 5:46 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a6YdNmK77k&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zombies... &lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>    Zombies are them troublesome dead walkers that just get in the way of a good night out, </p>
<p>ted c on July 11, 2012 at 5:46 PM</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a6YdNmK77k" rel="nofollow">Zombies&#8230; </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013758</link>
		<dc:creator>davidk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CLASS act. http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/8069.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CLASS act. <a href="http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/8069.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/8069.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Holobyte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013751</link>
		<dc:creator>Sterling Holobyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still don&#039;t understand why Roberts didn&#039;t, as a condition of saying this monstrosity was constitutional(as a tax), put a disclaimer in there that it also has to be sent back to be redone, since it was passed illegitimately the first time.  Since the democrats couldn&#039;t just shove the legislation through this time and would be forced to work on a better solution with republicans, wouldn&#039;t that be the &quot;fairer&quot; thing to do?  And aren&#039;t democrats all about &quot;fairness&quot;?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t understand why Roberts didn&#8217;t, as a condition of saying this monstrosity was constitutional(as a tax), put a disclaimer in there that it also has to be sent back to be redone, since it was passed illegitimately the first time.  Since the democrats couldn&#8217;t just shove the legislation through this time and would be forced to work on a better solution with republicans, wouldn&#8217;t that be the &#8220;fairer&#8221; thing to do?  And aren&#8217;t democrats all about &#8220;fairness&#8221;?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dentarthurdent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-no-33-and-the-surprisingly-bipartisan-art-of-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-6013750</link>
		<dc:creator>dentarthurdent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=206073#comment-6013750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;It always does with zombies.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;ted c on July 11, 2012 at 5:46 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Rule 17 - Always double-tap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It always does with zombies.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>ted c on July 11, 2012 at 5:46 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>Rule 17 &#8211; Always double-tap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>