This just in: Bain attack still not working

posted at 11:21 am on July 10, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Two analyses from the flawed WaPo/ABC poll, as well as spending in swing states, deliver grim news to Team Obama this morning.  Their main line of attack in which they hope to paint Mitt Romney as an uber-rich vampire capitalist clearly isn’t moving the needle among voters — and that’s true despite an overwhelming spending advantage Barack Obama has enjoyed in the early going.  Unless they can come up with a better argument, Romney’s fundraising will shortly put them in a very big hole.

First, the WaPo’s Chris Cillizza notes that the spending strength of Team O has a serious downside, considering the results:

What’s clear from a broad analysis of ad spending in the swing states is that conservative super PACs are supplementing Romney in a way that is keeping him very much in the game. (A new Gallup/USA Today poll of 12 swing states shows Obama at 47 percent to Romney’s 45 percent.)

And now, with word of Romney’s massive June fundraising — $106 million collected — it seems likely that Romney will not only be able to equal Obama on air but, with an assist from the Republican super PACs, over take him between now and November 6.

And that’s a very scary proposition if you are on the Democratic side of the aisle.

That probably won’t take place until after Labor Day, but that’s precisely when it matters.  Romney has held back on massive ad campaigns — not entirely, but not to the extent that Obama has — while he gathers his fiscal strength.  This far out, it’s questionable whether an advertising blitz will even reach voters effectively, as they tend to tune out the television while going on vacations and engaging in other summer activities.

In this case, we can see how effective a massive summer campaign is, too, since Obama has conducted one.  National Journal’s Josh Kraushaar looks at the WaPo/ABC poll and declares it nothing more than a wash, a way to mark time:

Two things have become clear in the presidential race over the past month. One, it’s evident that President Obama’s campaign team believes, with good justification, that attacking Romney’s record at Bain Capital to portray him as a wealthy, out-of-touch millionaire is their most effective line of attack. Second, it’s becoming clear that the attacks are doing more to buy the Obama campaign time than seriously change the trajectory of the race.

For all the attention paid to the effectiveness of President Obama’s Bain-themed attacks, it’s remarkable how Obama has been stuck right around 47 percent for a very long time.  As the Washington Post‘s Chris Cillizza documented, the president’s team has handily outspent Romney and his allied super PACs, pouring in $91 million into eight swing states in an early spending barrage intended to make Romney seem an unacceptable challenger.  But for all that effort, the numbers haven’t moved much at all: The latest ABC News/Washington Post poll out today shows the race deadlocked at 47 percent. Yesterday’s USA Today/Gallup swing state poll showed Obama statistically tied with Romney, the exact same result the survey showed one month ago.

In other words, Team Obama spent a lot of money — an overwhelming amount — and it changed nothing about his standing in the race.  Meanwhile, Romney saved his money and will have a big funding advantage in the post-Labor Day environment, while Obama struggles to raise funds.  While Kraushaar thinks that Bain attacks are the most promising of Obama’s strategies, clearly they haven’t done anything even when Obama has had the stage to himself, after two full months of deploying this strategy.  Even the WaPo/ABC poll shows that half of voters don’t care, and only 24% in a sample with 33% being Democrats think it constitutes a reason to vote against Romney.

If that’s the best option for Obama, he’s in deep trouble.  Kraushaar thinks so, too:

They’ve gotten their first impressions from the early Obama television ads, but Romney will have his chance to tout his positives with the August convention and upcoming debates.  There’s a reason why the Obama campaign is trying to disqualify Romney early on. Because if they don’t score an early knockout, it becomes harder to win over the late deciders as the election approaches.

If class warfare is all they have, they’re going to fail, and fail badly.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Kind of like communism was good for the youth, religions, and the artists.

acyl72 on May 22, 2013 at 8:45 PM

Surprised there wasn’t a “donate button” at the bottom of her webpage.

can_con on May 22, 2013 at 8:48 PM

Congratulations class of 2013, you managed to graduate without learning critical thinking skills. You have been programmed to be compliant to the state from which all your needs and desires will come. Don’t bother looking for meaningful employment, as we have ruined any chance of you being independent and self determined. Everything you say and do can and will be used against you if you show any signs of resistance to the state. You will not enjoy any privacy. Welcome to Amerika.

tom daschle concerned on May 22, 2013 at 8:51 PM

I will gladly pay rob you Tuesday for the hamburger Death Panels you buy for me today.

—————— Joe Mengele Sebelius, Death Panels Kommandant.

viking01 on May 22, 2013 at 8:51 PM

Um..I just have to comment…pre-existing condition of acne?? WTF

BeachBum on May 22, 2013 at 8:51 PM

Great job kids, you’ll be excited to know being dependent on us is now easier than ever!

rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 8:52 PM

Sebelius touts ObamaCare as a boon to graduates instead of the war on the young it actually is

I’m tired of this BS meme about “robbing our childrens’ futures”. This is simple thievery, and we’re being stolen from NOW through inflation, and means nothing to most voters…they’re used to living in debt and the numbers are so staggering it simply doesn’t compute for them. Oh, and…they believe that the Wizards of Wall Street and the Gov’t surely know what they’re doing and will fix everything.

So, it doesn’t mean anything to enough people to make a difference at the polls. Besides, even if it did, how much more would the GOP get is into debt? They’ve done it before.

Dr. ZhivBlago on May 22, 2013 at 8:52 PM

There’s an old joke that goes, “I want to live long enough to be a burden to my kids.”

Obamacare is going to guarantee I am, along with a lot of other people my age and older.

Liam on May 22, 2013 at 8:54 PM

-Making it possible to stay on your parent’s health plan until you turn 26, giving you the flexibility to make choices about your future without worrying about where you’re going to get health insurance.

Not if your parents lose their employer provided insurance and get thrown on the exchanges.

Curtiss on May 22, 2013 at 8:56 PM

Nurse Diesel was born 60 years too late. She would have made a marvelous Nazi and Associate of Dr. Mengele. Pity…

/SPARC

glcinpdx on May 22, 2013 at 8:57 PM

Nurse Diesel was born 60 years too late. She would have made a marvelous Nazi and Associate of Dr. Mengele. Pity…

/SARC

glcinpdx on May 22, 2013 at 8:58 PM

I was at a party this past weekend, a rather daper young man of 80 years told a “funny but true” joke.

He asked at Social Security how he was going to get back all that he had paid in. The lady looked up his numbers, and told him with interest, it would take 32 more years to pay him back.

He looked me straight in the eye and said

“Those bastards aren’t getting a dime, I’m going to live to be 112.”

If you knew Don, you could believe that.

JusDreamin on May 22, 2013 at 9:05 PM

-Making it possible to stay on your parent’s health plan until you turn 26, giving you the flexibility to make choices about your future without worrying about where you’re going to get health insurance.

Of course you can get Plan B at age 15.

You can drive a car at 16.

You can vote at age 18.

You can legally drink at 21.

You can serve in the military.

But when it comes to healthcare, you can mooch off your parents until you’re old enough that you probably have a family of your own. Here’s to being a responsible adult or something.

Happy Nomad on May 22, 2013 at 9:14 PM

Good if you are going to be a government worker.

Guess there might be some openings in the IRS soon…

ProfShadow on May 22, 2013 at 9:15 PM

I doubt any but the most serious and earnest of young Democrats are actually going to find their way to the HHS blog. I mean, how many here even knew there was one? I didn’t.

Even if they are aware of her statement, all Sebelius’ words won’t mean a thing when members of the class of 2013 can’t find work or can only find part-time work thanks to Obamacare or when they see differences in their paycheck because of Obamacare.

INC on May 22, 2013 at 9:17 PM

-Making it possible to stay on your parent’s health plan until you turn 26, giving you the flexibility to make choices about your future without worrying about where you’re going to get health insurance.

How many parents will subsidize their “kids” until they’re 26? I won’t.

Charlemagne on May 22, 2013 at 9:17 PM

Somehow, though, I can’t feel sorry for these college kids who, their first time voting, voted for Obama. And for those who voted for him twice. And let their liberal parents who voted Obama suffer just like the rest of us.

While I deplore this law and wish it be repealed, I’m going to enjoy seeing liberals suffer for the laws they wanted but didn’t always have to heed. Now, for the first time, liberals have to pay, too.

“Welcome to the party, pal!”

Liam on May 22, 2013 at 9:20 PM

This is one messed-up vicious cycle that the Obama administration is perpetuating here, and make no mistake: They are counting on the allure of seemingly “free” government benevolence to keep the charade going. Don’t go for it, graduates.

I have little faith in the young. They get their news from Colbert and Stewart and couldn’t tell you where Canada is on a map let alone intelligently explain international affairs. Many of them will happily sign up for that “free” healthcare.

Happy Nomad on May 22, 2013 at 9:21 PM

Maybe she can explain why she broke the law & why she was extorting money from organization she was ‘lover’s….it will give her some practice before she has to do it before CONGRESS!

easyt65 on May 22, 2013 at 9:23 PM

How many parents will subsidize their “kids” until they’re 26? I won’t.

Charlemagne on May 22, 2013 at 9:17 PM

Well good for you! I knew that the financial support was cut off the minute I graduated from college. Of course, I had a job and wasn’t back in my childhood race car bed because of the lousy economy.

Happy Nomad on May 22, 2013 at 9:24 PM

Somehow, though, I can’t feel sorry for these college kids who, their first time voting, voted for Obama.

Liam on May 22, 2013 at 9:20 PM

Well, remember that campaign ad. They wanted their first time to be special.

Happy Nomad on May 22, 2013 at 9:26 PM

Well, remember that campaign ad. They wanted their first time to be special.

Happy Nomad on May 22, 2013 at 9:26 PM

Well, they gave it up to a psycho, and he’ll forever be like a stalker.

Liam on May 22, 2013 at 9:30 PM

“You vill drink zee Obamakare, und you vill enchoy it! Ja?”

slickwillie2001 on May 22, 2013 at 9:32 PM

What year did Sebelius run in the Kentucky Derby?

bw222 on May 22, 2013 at 9:34 PM

Well, they gave it up to a psycho, and he’ll forever be like a stalker.

Liam on May 22, 2013 at 9:30 PM

Yeah, it’s like a Lifetime Movie Network script.

Innocent happy young people graduate from college. Before you know it they’re enrolled in Obamacare, have to trade their cool phones in for Obamaphones because they don’t have any income. They turn on the television to see Mooch lecturing them to eat their vegetables. It is as if they’ve lost their real families and been adopted by the Obamas. Or more accurately they’ve been recruited into the radical left-wing party of which Obama is the cult leader.

Happy Nomad on May 22, 2013 at 9:41 PM

What year did Sebelius run in the Kentucky Derby?

bw222 on May 22, 2013 at 9:34 PM

Hah! Trick question. Sebelius isn’t a mudder and got scratched before the race for fear that the track conditions would result in a broken leg. Thus eliminating any chance of stud fees.

Happy Nomad on May 22, 2013 at 10:00 PM

Chickens coming home to roost.

.Left wing professorial nuts in colleges teach kids socialism.
.left wing indoctrinated college freaks elect Obama president.
.Obama appoints whackos like Sebelius and the IRS to propose and administer Obamacare and other lunatic government programs (government “problems” would be more apt.)–all over-funded, job-killing and cancerous.
.Left wing indoctrinated college freaks not only can’t afford Obamacare but they can’t get any jobs because of it.
.In a no-job market the only openings available for poorly trained, unqualified left wing indoctrinated college freaks is to become left wing professorial nuts themselves. Problem is-only one opening per 75,000 applicants.

MaiDee on May 22, 2013 at 10:55 PM

Of course, I had a job and wasn’t back in my childhood race car bed because of the lousy economy.

Happy Nomad on May 22, 2013 at 9:24 PM

This. Only recently has it even been physically possible for me to go apartment shopping. And the state of the job market basically robs you of all career choice.

Seriously, you wanna be depressed to the core of your being? Try writing out a budget and realizing 9 hour shifts of putting up with flappy-mouthed rudesters for co’work’ers and being abused by dumb angry proles who want everything for free will BARELY provide enough money to exist on.

Would be a lot more money for me if it wasn’t being taken to feed the Democrat ‘minority’ voting blocs…

MelonCollie on May 22, 2013 at 10:55 PM

.In a no-job market the only openings available for poorly trained, unqualified left wing indoctrinated college freaks is to become left wing professorial nuts themselves. Problem is-only one opening per 75,000 applicants.

MaiDee on May 22, 2013 at 10:55 PM

Exactly. Even with all manner of Federal subsidies, there are only so many ‘jobs’ for overpaid wind-up puppets. The rest of us actually have to find real employment, which is currently about like panning for gold at your local public pool.

MelonCollie on May 22, 2013 at 10:58 PM

In a no-job market the only openings available for poorly trained, unqualified left wing indoctrinated college freaks is to become left wing professorial nuts themselves. Problem is-only one opening per 75,000 applicants.

MaiDee on May 22, 2013 at 10:55 PM

Nah, there are plenty of jobs for them. Obama wants his domestic national police force, equipped as well as the military. 3 hots and a cot along with all the “personal defense weapons” and “weapons of war” you can want with that new authoritah.

oryguncon on May 22, 2013 at 11:24 PM

-Requiring most insurance plans to cover proven preventive services—like birth control and certain cancer screenings—without you paying a penny.

Well, except for that really, really high insurance premium – you know, that one that you’re required to purchase. Oh sure, you probably wouldn’t have purchased insurance at such a young age – but if we’re going to offset the costs associated with insuring people with preexisting conditions – we need to you to pay your fair share. See? Doesn’t that feel good?

Sure hope you find a good-paying job… you’re going to need it!

Hill60 on May 23, 2013 at 12:04 AM

I still think that in this picture she looks like Dana Carvey as The Church Lady.

bugsy on May 23, 2013 at 5:42 AM

I don’t understand why there is never any pushback from the GOP or commentators on the stupid claim that insurance companies discriminate with higher premiums based on being a woman. What they are referring to is that insurance is typically higher for a woman of child bearing age than a similarly aged man. Well, duh that’s because women can get pregnant and men can’t and so they are at a higher risk of causing higher payouts. I know my six pregnancies cost our insurance company a lot more money than my husband did at the same age. To force a single male to pay the same rates as a single female during childbearing years is redistribution for the sake of politics/feminist agenda pure and simple.

txmomof6 on May 23, 2013 at 5:52 AM

I despise this Sebelius woman.

locomotivebreath1901 on May 23, 2013 at 6:12 AM

to the class of 2013:

good luck finding a job; and don’t forget to pay your obamacare ‘taxes’ or the IRS will be coming for you.

you voted for these socialists; welcome to the real world chumps!

burserker on May 23, 2013 at 10:10 AM

In charge of your medical records.

Schadenfreude on May 23, 2013 at 3:16 PM