Noted monitor of tax returns releases no tax returns
posted at 9:21 am on July 10, 2012 by Jazz Shaw
Democrats believe they’ve found a tasty bone to gnaw on in terms of Mitt Romney not yet releasing all of his tax returns. Given the nation’s appetite for openness about the history of presidential candidates, this may well be a debate we can have, but there might be just one tiny problem with the agent they sent out to carry the torch on this one. DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Shultz showed up for an interview on WCVB-BOS (ABC) in Boston, MA on Monday to read the riot act on Mitt. After complaining about various perceived sins of the rich and Romney’s insufficient number of released tax returns, the reporter, Janet Wu, brought up an uncomfortable point. (Transcript cleaned up for typos, original available at the link.)
WU: Are you the best attack dog on this particular issue considering you have never released your tax.
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: Absolutely, I’m not running for president.
WU: You are a public official.
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: I file full financial disclosure required under the law. Mitt Romney is actually the first candidate in modern history to only release one year of a tax return.
We can, as I said, have a perfectly valid public discussion about precisely how many years of tax returns or other such personal documents candidates should release when asking the voting public for their support. But in this case, we have one member of the United States Congress calling out a former governor who seeks to be President of the United States. And if I’m doing the math correctly here, the person who releases one year of tax returns has released, proportionally, more than the person who has released zero years by a factor of…
My calculator just exploded. I’ll get back to you.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Report: Oversight on IRS targeting came from Washington all along

DOJ seized logs for five Fox News phones, possibly James Rosens’ parents’ house






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
On the plus side, we now have on record that Pelosi understands that the economy sucks! Let’s just save this story and pull it out next year when they try to say the economy is booming.
jeffn21 on May 17, 2013 at 10:36 AM
The video has been removed from Huff, here is another:
Obama’s ‘Pivot’ To Jobs The Deja Vu Reel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jwn4dJcl08
Jason58 on May 17, 2013 at 10:54 AM
“We have to pass a Jobs Bill now so we’ll know what’s in it.”
NoPain on May 17, 2013 at 6:31 PM
Those chicks didn’t just get hit with the ugly stick, they caught the whole lumber yard.
Mini skirt on the far left? Seriously? Yikes!
NoPain on May 17, 2013 at 6:39 PM
Yes, Pelosi’s emphasis is on jobs. Mainly, her own.
UnrepentantCurmudgeon on May 19, 2013 at 2:17 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2