Razgriez on July 6, 2012 at 7:23 PM

I inquired of you who this small Gov’t candidate is that is so deserving of your coveted vote but you choose not to disclose. Interesting strategy you have there keeping your ideal candidate a secret. Not sure it’s real effective but neither are you. If you’ve got someone in mind why wouldn’t you want to try to rally support for them by telling us why we should vote for them? My guess is you’re either a liberal or you’re a Gary Johnson supporter. Understandable why you’d want to keep that to yourself.

Buttercup on July 6, 2012 at 6:31 PM

Why is it that I’m selfish for being sick and tired of watching the GOP do actions that bleed those of small government beliefs to the independent parties? How is it selfish, that I want Romney to prove to me he’s actually not still of liberal belief?

I want a Republican to actually run on an actual platforms, and not just simply “Well, I’m not the other guy”.

And yet, apparently, I’m “selfish” for wanting real promises, and not lip service. I’m apparently “ignorant” for questioning a candidate who’s current view points are questionable. But apparently, it’s not ignorant nor selfish to just vote for someone simply because they have an R by their name.

Sounds an awful lot like the Democrat party: “Vote for us, at least we’re not the other guys, and we might throw you a doggy treat if we feel like it/need your vote.

Razgriez on July 6, 2012 at 5:27 PM

Math might not be your strong suit but this is a two person race. One is Obama and the other one isn’t. If you want to cast some symbolic ineffective vote that doesn’t mean anything to anyone but yourself go ahead but if you cannot see how that helps Obama then you are beyond ignorant
Just curious who is this small Gov’t ideal candidate anyway? Anyone we’ve heard of?

Anyone who isn’t supporting Romney at this point is simply supporting Barack Obama’s reelection campaign.

Not voting for Romney = A Vote for an Obama 2nd Term

bluegill on July 6, 2012 at 2:53 PM

Question, bluegill, how much do you think that helps Romney? This stupid “You’re either place blind loyalty to the party, or you’re against us” view point? If I wanted that kind of party, I’d have registered with the Democrats years ago. I do not serve the Republican party big wigs. I do not swear fealty to them. It serves me, an average citizen of the U.S.A.

But once again, people like you help prove the “Big Tent” narrative is just a load of crap. It seems when those of us with small Government ideals try to walk in, amazingly those some people and their fans shut us out unless we swear blind allegiance to them.

Not voting for Romney = A Vote for an Obama 2nd Term

Does anyone seriously care about this? I know we’ve written a bunch of posts about it — it’s the political story du jour so we’re almost obliged — but I can’t believe there’s a single voter outside the chattering class that’s following it.

Unfortunately it’s not even his 10th flip flop…

TheAlamos on July 6, 2012

You might find this hard to believe but this election and what is at stake is bigger than you. I know in your superior mind of puritanical bliss you’ve convinced yourself it’s all about yourself and how you feeeeeeell. Well good for you Oprah.

Buttercup on July 6, 2012 at 12:48 PM

A plant, BC. Overdoing it a bit. Shows too many signs, like the liberalish blindness to how things actually work, and yes, the lefty overweening self-regard. Who was blaming him/her?

Yeah! More blame pls! Blame people like me who will not vote for Obamalite in November! MORE! MORE! MORE!

Goodluck to you, Romney’s conservative in November!

LOLOL!

TheAlamos on July 6, 2012 at 11:29 AM

Jerks like you are either libturds or total useless idiots.

TheAlamos on July 6, 2012

You might find this hard to believe but this election and what is at stake is bigger than you. I know in your superior mind of puritanical bliss you’ve convinced yourself it’s all about yourself and how you feeeeeeell. Well good for you Oprah.

I’m not sure how anyone who is even considering voting for Romney can, with a straight face, call themselves a conservative.

CoffeeMan on July 6, 2012 at 9:02 AM

I am a conservative and I am voting for Romney. I have no other viable option. In 1996 I voted for Harry Browne, but no similar candidate exists these days.

Hard not to feel a little sorry for Romney.
It’s lonely at the flop.

verbaluce on July 6, 2012 at 10:53 AM

Why sorry? GOP nominated Romney because he’s a sure win, right? 3 points lead from Obama, WOWOW! Compared to Reagan’s almost 10-point lag from JimmyC, Romney’s a sure winnah!

ROMNEY! ROMNEY! ROMNEY! ROMNEY!
_CARE!___CARE!___CARE!___CARE!_

ROFLMAO!

Anyone who’s still either on the fence or sitting out because of Romney needs to get their heads on straight. Speaking as a long-time anti-Mitt, with him at least there’s a chance of surviving. Otherwise, not so much. This is not a drill.

curved space on July 6, 2012 at 10:48 AM

Yeah! More blame pls! Blame people like me who will not vote for Obamalite in November! MORE! MORE! MORE!

Goodluck to you, Romney’s conservative in November!

LOLOL!

The difference between Romneycare and Obamacare is that the people of MA wanted Romneycare. That’s all the distinction Romney needs to make.

grahsco on July 6, 2012 at 11:23 AM

God job! Romneybot! Bravo!

Have fun voting for a Massachusetts liberal, retards.

CoffeeMan on July 6, 2012 at 9:15 AM

duh duh duh otay dank you duh duh duh my waffle

The staff that provided the opposition with the etch-a-sketch image? Sure, give ‘em a raise. It’s a shame that AllahChihuahua apparently can’t help himself when it comes to picking scabs that only help Obama win reelection. And then plays “Eeyore” later.

cicerone on July 6, 2012 at 9:46 AM

So, you do consider them scabs?

why blame Romney’s staff instead of the candidate himself?

The staff that provided the opposition with the etch-a-sketch image? Sure, give ‘em a raise. It’s a shame that AllahChihuahua apparently can’t help himself when it comes to picking scabs that only help Obama win reelection. And then plays “Eeyore” later.

it’s the political story du jour so we’re almost obliged

No, not really.

That wasn’t a kneejerk assumption. I must have had you confused with someone else. But just try and keep me out of the voting booth and see how that works out.

gryphon202 on July 6, 2012 at 9:32 AM

Ayeah, the words “instant Darwin Award” comes to mind…

I suggest loading a shotgun with rock salt and aiming just below the belt buckle. But you’ll need to be at point-blank range to hit a target that small.