Romney, RNC raise $4.6 million after SCOTUS decision
posted at 11:21 am on June 29, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
Yesterday may have been tough on Republicans in general and conservatives opposed to big expansions of federal power, but the news wasn’t all bad. Thanks to outrage over the Supreme Court decision to keep ObamaCare in place, Mitt Romney and the RNC enjoyed an unplanned money bomb for the campaign. Over 47,000 donors sent $4.6 million into campaign coffers in less than a day:
Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign has raised $4.3 million since the Supreme Court ruled President Obama’s healthcare law is constitutional.
Romney started raising funds immediately after the decision, and in a message to supporters Friday morning his campaign spokeswoman said he had raised $4.3 million from 43,000 donations.
“As of this morning, we have raised $4.3 million with 43,000 donations online. ” spokeswoman Andrea Saul said. …
Romney’s campaign had raised $2.5 million by 1:33 p.m. Thursday.
The RNC said yesterday that the fundraising numbers represented joint efforts by Team Romney and the RNC, not just the Romney campaign alone. The campaign confirmed that with me earlier, also updating the numbers at The Hill from $4.3 million to $4.6 million from 47,000 donors. Either way, it’s an impressive response, one that shows the danger for Obama of having this as a major issue over a big political summer — just as it was in 2010.
On that same note, Roll Call reports that the Tea Party is back — and not just back, but prepared. Despite frequent media reports of the Tea Party’s demise, the movement has spent the last two years becoming more professional and influential, not just on the ground but in Washington DC. Now that the Supreme Court has allowed ObamaCare to pass into law, they’re ready — and newly energized:
In upholding most of President Barack Obama’s health care law, the Supreme Court handed the tea party a new lease on life.
While activists spouted made-for-TV rancor through megaphones outside the court Thursday, the behind-the-scenes strategists who helped Republicans take the House in 2010 prepared for a flood of donations they said will fuel even greater gains this November. …
The movement, born in 2009 from the opposition to the health care overhaul, has developed a professionalism that few expected, attracting seasoned operatives and winning allies in Congress. Vitriolic protests have taken a back seat to well-executed fundraising campaigns. Groups such as the Tea Party Express have raised tens of millions of dollars on the promise of derailing the health care law.
And, in many ways, Thursday’s ruling is exactly what they had been training for.
We will have to see whether the Tea Party can overcome its Romney-skepticism to put their strength to use on his behalf. Right now, though, the only option for getting rid of ObamaCare is, as Bob McDonnell said earlier today, Mitt Romney. Their last non-Romney option died at the Supreme Court yesterday. Even if the Tea Party still harbors skepticism over Romney’s commitment to repeal, they simply have no other path to repeal, and no time to waste. After another four years with Obama in the White House consolidating his signature health-care reform into massive amounts of regulation, it will be impossible to repeal it cleanly, or probably at all.
That goes both ways in this election, I believe. Even if they don’t align together perfectly, both Romney and the Tea Party need each other too much now to go their own ways any longer.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

Video: Ft. Hood shooter still drawing salary – $278,000 and counting

Chinese breach of Google in 2010 exposed counter-espionage data







Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
barky isn’t a shooter, he’s more of a ball handler.
VegasRick on May 20, 2013 at 5:35 PM
Ouch. :)
Bob's Kid on May 21, 2013 at 1:11 AM
Oh, if only dear leader Stalin knew of these atrocities he’d certainly stop them…
Pull the other one.
I agree with you, whether Barky knew or not is “Irrelevant”.
Except in my mind even if it’s the crew who scuttled her, the captain goes down with the ship. In your mind, he gets a promotion.
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on May 21, 2013 at 1:41 AM
Obama, head of the Neo-Know Nothing Party.
Sgt. Schultz, chief of staff.
I KNOW NOTHING, NOTHING!
profitsbeard on May 21, 2013 at 3:36 AM
Oh, I so needed this. Thank you.
athenadelphi on May 21, 2013 at 4:15 AM
This is simply not believable. It seems Obama and his minions are all too young to have learned the lessons of Watergate.
claudius on May 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM
That is precisely why they are able to use law as legal passes, such as “I don’t recall,” I did not know,” I drank too much tea” “No one informed me. I first saw this travesty on Fox none-news.”
Under oath, that would shift rapidly to: “Under advisement of my attorney, I plead the fifth amendment.”
Don L on May 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM
From the Sopranos:
It’s not good to go into the unknown, not knowin’.
claudius on May 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM
L*I*A*R
easyt65 on May 21, 2013 at 9:34 AM
Obama runs the white House like a terrorist cell! He probably uses couriers to communicate with his cohorts in other cells of the government! Find the couriers, water board them, and you’ve caught him in his crimes! Ha!
Marco on May 21, 2013 at 9:50 AM
But what if the President not only knew about it, but started it…?
President met with anti-Tea Party IRS union chief the day before agency targeted Tea Party.
dominigan on May 21, 2013 at 10:24 AM
Good question. Had this been any republican, bayam would call it proof, as undeniable as the sun rising in the east.
But bayam will simply pretend that it proves nothing, there is no smoke and therefore no fire. Hypocrite practices hypocrisy, who’s surprised?
On the other hand, bayam’s statement could be interpreted as stating that obama is responsible and should be held accountable. Is that what you’re saying bayam?
runawayyyy on May 21, 2013 at 10:40 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3