New RNC ad: ObamaCare is a tax

posted at 9:21 am on June 29, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

It didn’t take long for the RNC to take advantage of the obvious political opening from yesterday’s Supreme Court decision.  They released a new one-minute spot intended for television that shows all of the denials from Barack Obama and other Democrats that ObamaCare was a tax, and reminds everyone that the Court now confirms that Obama broke his promise to the middle class — and lied about it:

This is probably the best attack that Republicans and Mitt Romney can muster from yesterday’s defeat — and it’s likely to be effective.  Whatever boost Obama gets politically from prevailing at the Court will dissipate when people start associating his two-year-long project with a massive tax increase (which it is, to the tune of $1.7 trillion over ten years, according to the CBO).  The RNC doesn’t mention another point in this ad, although I’ll bet they do in later spots: when Americans left the workforce by the millions in despair over a lack of job creation in 2009 and 2010, Barack Obama spent his time focused not on job creation but on raising taxes on the middle class.

I’d expect a lot more of this over the next few weeks, and not just from the RNC and Team Romney.  Here’s a new graphic from Reason, via Power Line:


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

I’d much rather hear a new RNC ad saying “Obamacare is dead, now let’s fix the economy”.

Thanks Justice Roberts. Not only did you join the liberal justices in your dissent, you put a stranglehold on the economy for another four months.

My retirement fund thanks you, putz.

fogw on June 29, 2012 at 9:43 AM

“Justice” Roberts didn’t join the liberals he is a liberal. No to states rights, no to individual liberty = Big Government Liberal.

Kjeil on June 29, 2012 at 10:14 AM

The ad could have been better. Now that CJ Roberts told us this is a “tax”, why not say that Obama passed the largest tax increase in history on the middle class disguised as a tax on lack of health insurance?

Steve Z on June 29, 2012 at 10:15 AM

It is weak. Instead of pursuing Constitutional, limited government arguments, let’s just point a finger and say, “he broke a promise!” It’s so juvenile and irrelevant.

Dante on June 29, 2012 at 9:32 AM

That worked pretty well for Clinton, remember “Read my Lips???”

Mini-14 on June 29, 2012 at 10:15 AM

txmomof6 on June 29, 2012 at 10:11 AM

Actually, I am aware of that. Until recently I had 2 close relatives running hospitals in CO and WA, with my mother and uncle working in a diff hospital in CO. I decided to go at healthcare a slightly different way. I am getting a D.C. (chiropractor) because I am sick of what I grew up seeing from the gov./pharma influence and could not bring myself to subject myself to that kind of torture.

On the whole unionizing thing…good luck to the moochers when they go on strike…

airmonkey on June 29, 2012 at 10:17 AM

We beat the crap out of BO/Democrats in Nov 2010.

It’s time for the knockout punch in Nov 2012.

Finish what we started.

bailey24 on June 29, 2012 at 10:19 AM

Please folks, call it O-Tax. Because there is nothing “caring” about this legislation.

It’s centerpiece is a tax/penalty. It aims to remove all choice about your care. It injects a mindless Government into every aspect of your life, including access to your bank accounts. And it forces the young into a PONZI scheme under threat of punishment, requiring them to pay for their elders’ health treatments that the death panel may later decide that same young person does not get to receive because they don’t meet the required criteria.

So again, let’s drop this oxymorononic moniker that is “Obama Care.”

LetsBfrank on June 29, 2012 at 10:19 AM

Typical GOP small-mindedness. All they’re interested in is playing the game.

Dante on June 29, 2012 at 9:30 AM

Game?

Isn’t it ironic that liberals like Dante thinks this is a game, yet are celebrating the fact that ObamaCare has survived the tenants of the Supreme Court, while not yet admitting that this new healthcare LAW is the LARGEST TAX INCREASE ON THE MIDDLE CLASS in the history of this nation?

Congratulations libs, you’ve got your flawed and “free” healthcare, but at what expense? More importantly, can this nation fiscally afford this new entitlement as it is written? And, as premiums rise, (and they are rising daily), how many businesses will be forced to opt out of the program and as a result millions of employees will have no choice but to enter the government exchange. Forget the politics of this decision for a moment and ask yourselves where the money will come from—when the money runs out.

I’ve got news for folks like Dante—the “game” you liberals are playing will be over on November 6th.

Rovin on June 29, 2012 at 10:20 AM

Refresh my memory . . . . was the tax tied to upwards of 3000 ‘medical devices’ (of which things like dentures and tampons were included) still part of the bill, or was that axed during it’s umpteen incarnations before final passage?

tdpwells on June 29, 2012 at 9:53 AM

I think you are talking about the 2.3% Med Device tax that comes off the top-line revenues and, yes, it is still a part of this. There have been some separate bipartisan initiatives to repeal that tax, especially from Senators in states with strong medical device manufacturing, e.g. MA, MN. Following the SCOTUS decision, several med device companies announced plans to close facilities and layoff workers, e.g. Stryker. This is a major issue for med device companies and will absolutely result in fewer jobs and less medical innovation.

TheTownsman on June 29, 2012 at 10:21 AM

Are they allowed to show George S in their ads if this runs on TV? Didn’t the RNC get in trouble for showing an ad that had Tom Brokaw in it?

Regardless, its a simple message that needs to be hammered home: The ObamaCareTax.

On a side not, Obama sure likes things with three letters:
Dog
Tax
Lie

GadsdenRattlers on June 29, 2012 at 10:23 AM

It is weak. Instead of pursuing Constitutional, limited government arguments, let’s just point a finger and say, “he broke a promise!” It’s so juvenile and irrelevant.

Dante on June 29, 2012 at 9:32 AM

Most voters care more about a bunch of overgrown multi-millionaires in funny clothes trying to put a toy ball through a hoop than the Constitution.

itsnotaboutme on June 29, 2012 at 10:23 AM

inthemiddle on June 29, 2012 at 9:28 AM

When you are inthemiddle of a pile of feces you have a couple of choices:
1. you can use it as fertilizer and experience growth
or
2. you can decompose and become part of it.

So far you have chosen the decomposition route. That makes you a big pile of …..

chemman on June 29, 2012 at 10:27 AM

The ad wasn’t strong enough. Yeah, it’s a tax–but so what? The ad needed to underscore the damage done to the economy as a result, the sheer enormity of the size of the tax, the cuts in Medicare that accompanied it. Not sharp enough. It’ll do for the time being–but not a really effective ad.

writeblock on June 29, 2012 at 10:35 AM

Makes me think of “To Serve Man“.

aunursa on June 29, 2012 at 9:52 AM

That is my all time favorite Twilight Zone Episode. And yes, its a “cook book.”

magicbeans on June 29, 2012 at 10:37 AM

The ad wasn’t strong enough. Yeah, it’s a tax–but so what? The ad needed to underscore the damage done to the economy as a result, the sheer enormity of the size of the tax, the cuts in Medicare that accompanied it. Not sharp enough. It’ll do for the time being–but not a really effective ad.

writeblock on June 29, 2012 at 10:35 AM

I’m sure it is just the first in a series.

stvnscott on June 29, 2012 at 10:37 AM

Rovin on June 29, 2012 at 10:20 AM

Wow, that was a whole lot of erroneous assumption on your part. You are trapped in bonds of your own making.

Dante on June 29, 2012 at 10:37 AM

I also think the ad needed to hit on the deception used to pass the law, not leave it to the viewer to connect the dots. Obama pulled a bait-and-switch and the public needs to be reminded of this.

writeblock on June 29, 2012 at 10:37 AM

Why can’t these pieces of $hit in the RNC castigate Roberts?

libertarianlunatic on June 29, 2012 at 10:38 AM

Love it that the boy wonder was used. It is not just a tax increase; it is the intrusion into our lives at a time in life that is so crucial – when we are oldest and sick that this pig will harm us. People who go to school for 10 years and assume big loans with it, should bot have to work for the Govt. And those who worked all their lives and paid their share should not be told to take an aspirin.

democratsarefools on June 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM

chasdal on June 29, 2012 at 9:59 AM

Essentially correct. However, we now have a SCOTUS precedent like Wickard that can be used in the future for similar mandates, oops, taxes. The only way to defang the precedent is via the constitutional amendment route also.

chemman on June 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM

Sorry this is so long, but well worth the read:

10 Poorest Cities in America and how did it happen

City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level
1. Detroit , MI 32.5%

2. Buffalo , NY 29.9%

3. Cincinnati , OH 27.8%

4. Cleveland , OH 27.0%

5. Miami , FL 26.9%

5. St. Louis , MO 26.8%

7. El Paso , TX 26.4%

8. Milwaukee , WI 26.2%

9. Philadelphia , PA 25.1%

10. Newark , NJ 24.2%

What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common?

Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list)

hasn’t elected a Republican mayor since 1961

Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn’t elected one since 1954

Cincinnati, OH – (3rd) since 1984

Cleveland, OH – (4th) since 1989

Miami, FL – (5th) has never had a Republican mayor

St. Louis, MO – (6th) since 1949

El Paso, TX – (7th) has never had a Republican mayor

Milwaukee , WI – (8th) since 1908

Philadelphia, PA – (9th) since 1952

Newark, NJ – (10th) since 1907

Einstein once said,

‘The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.’

It is the poor who habitually electDemocrats ..

yet they are still POOR.

You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.

You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.

You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.

You cannot lift the wage earner up

by pulling the wage payer down.

You cannot further the brotherhood of man

by inciting class hatred.

You cannot build character and courage

by taking away people’s initiative and independence.

You cannot help people permanently by doing for them,

what they could and should do for themselves.”

Abraham Lincoln

Bambi on June 29, 2012 at 10:45 AM

The WH will just come back and say it wasn’t them who raised your taxes it was that “righty CJ Roberts!”

geramy2012 on June 29, 2012 at 10:49 AM

Dante on June 29, 2012 at 10:37 AM

Other than the last line, (which should come to pass), please explain how any of my other suppositions are incorrect.

Rovin on June 29, 2012 at 10:49 AM

geramy2012 on June 29, 2012 at 10:49 AM

no doubt

cmsinaz on June 29, 2012 at 10:53 AM

I also think the ad needed to hit on the deception used to pass the law, not leave it to the viewer to connect the dots. Obama pulled a bait-and-switch and the public needs to be reminded of this.

writeblock on June 29, 2012 at 10:37 AM

That would be better.

I’m afraid the guy who wrote this ad was one of those who believes all you have to do is say the word “tax” and everyone will automatically start screaming support to Republicans. He’s probably one of those who thinks saying the word “Communist” will have a similar effect.

Burke on June 29, 2012 at 10:57 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqK97av7I3s

The Beatles sang of da TAXMAN

seven on June 29, 2012 at 10:58 AM

Refresh my memory . . . . was the tax tied to upwards of 3000 ‘medical devices’ (of which things like dentures and tampons were included) still part of the bill, or was that axed during it’s umpteen incarnations before final passage?

tdpwells on June 29, 2012 at 9:53

AM

I think you are talking about the 2.3% Med Device tax that comes off the top-line revenues and, yes, it is still a part of this. There have been some separate bipartisan initiatives to repeal that tax, especially from Senators in states with strong medical device manufacturing, e.g. MA, MN. Following the SCOTUS decision, several med device companies announced plans to close facilities and layoff workers, e.g. Stryker. This is a major issue for med device companies and will absolutely result in fewer jobs and less medical innovation.

TheTownsman on June 29, 2012 at 10:21 AM

Let’s see you tax what you want less of. By taxing medical devices, you will get less medical device innovation, fewer jobs in the medical device field. — Yep that’s a winner!!

Dasher on June 29, 2012 at 11:01 AM

Since it is in the interests of the country to have more taxpayers, why can’t Congress now tax everyone who is capable of having children but who is failing to have children?

Since they are not doing something beneficial to the country?

They are avoiding creating fresh taxpayers, which could be construed as primordial tax avoidance.

That needs a “penalty”. Tax them for inaction!

profitsbeard on June 29, 2012 at 11:14 AM

WSJ points out today that that Congressional Budget Office projects that 76% of those who pay the Obamacare tax will make less the 500% of the federal poverty level, estimated to be $24,000 for a family of four in 2016. Which means that 76% of those paying the Obamacare tax will earn less than $200,000 a year.

So much for Obama’s promise not to raise taxes on anyone earning under $200,000. In fact it’s the largest and most regressive tax ever imposed on the middle class in U.S. history. And it will only go up as it’s the only means of keeping the whole rotten edifice “solvent.” The feds can’t shove the expense off onto the states via Medicare expansion (thank SCOTUS for that), and individuals are going to pile onto the system when their private insurance rates become too high. Whatever you think of Roberts’ decision, future Obamacare “fixes” will be known as “tax increases.”

Effective ad, but they need to start showing these numbers, too.

de rigueur on June 29, 2012 at 11:17 AM

The the Obama/Romneycare mandate is a tax then that means Romney raised taxes in Massachusetts a lot higher than people thought.

FloatingRock on June 29, 2012 at 11:17 AM

Here’s another pic and a video clip to go with the Admiral Ackbar meme:

Pic

Vid

Mervis Winter on June 29, 2012 at 11:22 AM

The the Obama/Romneycare mandate is a tax then that means Romney raised taxes in Massachusetts a lot higher than people thought.

FloatingRock on June 29, 2012 at 11:17 AM

You forgot to tell everyone to vote for Gary Johnson, too. /

changer1701 on June 29, 2012 at 11:26 AM

OK ad – but not great. I’d like to see them hit this harder about it being the biggest tax increase in all of history.

dentarthurdent on June 29, 2012 at 11:39 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqK97av7I3s

The Beatles sang of da TAXMAN

seven on June 29, 2012 at 10:58 AM

It’s not a tax?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a50_nJj699s

Not-a-Marxist on June 29, 2012 at 11:41 AM

It’s time to fight fire with fire….

No more continuing resolutions without either a full Obamacare repeal or being ousted by the voters for trying

Just buy the earplugs, shut it down in total, and refuse to negotiate.

The people will either do the right thing or deserve what they get if their knees buckle

Not-a-Marxist on June 29, 2012 at 11:44 AM

I’m not entirely thrilled with Romney (but I’m an ABO), but doing a little research reveals more of what really happened in Massachusetts – which is severely Dem controlled. According to wikipedia (I know – not the best, but quick and easy):

On April 12, 2006, Governor Mitt Romney signed the health legislation.[18] Romney vetoed eight sections of the health care legislation, including the controversial employer assessment.[19] Romney also vetoed provisions providing dental benefits to poor residents on the Medicaid program, and providing health coverage to senior and disabled legal immigrants not eligible for federal Medicaid.[20] The legislature promptly overrode six of the eight gubernatorial section vetoes, on May 4, 2006, and by mid-June 2006 had overridden the remaining two.

I suggest that as a Republican governor in a heavily Dem state, Romney appears to have done what he could to keep the healthcare bill reasonable – given that the Dem legislature could override a veto of the whole thing – and did so on 6 of his 8 section vetos.

dentarthurdent on June 29, 2012 at 11:50 AM

LOVE the graphic!

WannabeAnglican on June 29, 2012 at 11:53 AM

Read my lips

Obama just raised taxes on the poor and middle class more than any president in history

Highest tax increase in history for all Americans

The Democratic controlled House, Congress, and the Obama White House just got and are celebrating the highest Middle Class tax increase in history

When unemployment has been above 8% for the past 3 1/2 years Obama concentrated on passing the highest tax increase in history, NOT working on JOBS!

I hope those “young” voters are paying attention, they are going to be affected by this more than most…. IF they arent in school they cant stay on there parents insurance until 26, and they have to start paying thier tax for their individual health policy (tax) that will be the higher now to cover for the aging population. I wonder if this is the change that the young turned out for in 2008?

DustInCa on June 29, 2012 at 11:57 AM

Love the graphic. Oh for Ackbar to hyperspace into near-earth orbit, with a fleet of MC-90′s backing him up.

MelonCollie on June 29, 2012 at 12:11 PM

The Affordable Health Care Tax on working families.

OxyCon on June 29, 2012 at 12:15 PM

The WH will just come back and say it wasn’t them who raised your taxes it was that “righty CJ Roberts!”

geramy2012 on June 29, 2012 at 10:49 AM

And the response will be: so don’t raise taxes, repeal the law.

txmomof6 on June 29, 2012 at 12:17 PM

It’s worth noting that if the republicans had agreed to modest tax increases for those making over 250K during last years debt ceiling legislative battle and further codified Obama’s promise of no tax increases for those making under 250K into law; Obamacare would now be repealed.

meci on June 29, 2012 at 12:19 PM

ObamaTax™

Certified by the United States Supreme Court.

Moesart on June 29, 2012 at 12:34 PM

Working every legal avenue to reduce my tax burden to “nothing”. You should too. Let the progressives pay for the free ride for a while.

hawkdriver on June 29, 2012 at 12:34 PM

Other than Queen Botox’s “Victory Dance”, the fact that the WH & DNC in general are being very subdued on their “victory” tells you a lot. Why not celebrate it?

Because now they have to defend it – and they really don’t want to.

Why? Because they know the more this giant turd sees the light of day (and now it’ll have to), the more they realize it’s a loser politically.

In reality, they were fully expecting to lose, and received an early Christmas present from Roberts, who now fancies himself as a legislator worried about SCOTUS’ reputation. Didn’t seem to bother the 4 lefty loons on the Court, Roberts, but thanks for that.

The point needs to be hammered home repeatedly – not only were the American people explicitly lied to, not only is this no more than a enormous tax, but it – along with the repeal of the Bush tax cuts in January – will further damage an already crippled economy. Expoe the whole thing for what it is – a sham.

Look, we’ve been “fundamentally transformed”. Is this the Hope and Change you were looking for in ’08?

ICanSeeNovFromMyHouse on June 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM

It’s worth noting that if the republicans had agreed to modest tax increases for those making over 250K during last years debt ceiling legislative battle and further codified Obama’s promise of no tax increases for those making under 250K into law; Obamacare would now be repealed.

meci on June 29, 2012 at 12:19 PM

That is horsefeathers as best. Obama has not and will not keep any promise made to either Republican legislators or voters.

His relevant title should be the Panderer in Chief, as he promises to a group whatever they want to hear until he is out of earshot.

Ask the greens how that keystone deal is working out…

Tenwheeler on June 29, 2012 at 12:41 PM

I’d expect a lot more of this over the next few weeks, and not just from the RNC and Team Romney. Here’s a new graphic from Reason, via Power Line:

My thought yesterday was that a picture of Admiral Ackbar with the line, “It’s a Tax!” would make a great bumper sticker.

As would: “Repeal ObamaTAX!”

Or, two lines:
Repeal ObamaTAX!
Repeal Obama in November!

AZfederalist on June 29, 2012 at 12:43 PM

It’s worth noting that if the republicans had agreed to modest tax increases for those making over 250K during last years debt ceiling legislative battle and further codified Obama’s promise of no tax increases for those making under 250K into law; Obamacare would now be repealed.

meci on June 29, 2012 at 12:19 PM

Nonsense. Little Bammie believes in taqqiya when it comes to dealing with Republicans.

slickwillie2001 on June 29, 2012 at 12:44 PM

It’s not just a tax, it’s rationing and death panels. PSA tests and mammograms are still safe for the moment– the election isn’t til November, after all.

obladioblada on June 29, 2012 at 1:01 PM

Is the term d**th panel forbidden at HA now? Can’t figure out why my comment was yanked.

obladioblada on June 29, 2012 at 1:03 PM

Oops. Sorry. A bit of an emotional time.

obladioblada on June 29, 2012 at 1:04 PM

The link in my 1:01 post did get disappeared. Here it is again:

obladioblada on June 29, 2012 at 1:06 PM

The the Obama/Romneycare mandate is a tax then that means Romney raised taxes in Massachusetts a lot higher than people thought.

FloatingRock on June 29, 2012 at 11:17 AM

I thought the Dems would be the first, but I guess its the ABR crowd who decided to jump on the right taxed you not us!

geramy2012 on June 29, 2012 at 1:08 PM

A horrible painful ineffectual ad.
Honest truth. For many, by playing O saying taxes will not be raised for people making over 250k it just makes O look good, and then the people are going to see this as splitting hairs.
A boring hideous ad. I can barely watch the whole thing. Quit with the semantic hair splitting, and start going after O with true gusto, with fire, with a brutal attack that will really score some points. Not this rubbish.

anotherJoe on June 29, 2012 at 1:12 PM

Via Fellowship of the Minds, here is a list of the 21 taxes. Click here
Americans for Tax Reform for the details on each tax.

1. A 156% increase in the federal excise tax on tobacco
2. Obamacare Individual Mandate Excise Tax
3. Obamacare Employer Mandate Tax
4. Obamacare Surtax on Investment Income
5. Obamacare Excise Tax on Comprehensive Health Insurance Plans
6. Obamacare Hike in Medicare Payroll Tax
7. Obamacare Medicine Cabinet Tax
8. Obamacare HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike
9. Obamacare Flexible Spending Account Cap – aka “Special Needs Kids Tax”
10. Obamacare Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers
11. Obamacare “Haircut” for Medical Itemized Deduction from 7.5% to 10% of AGI
12. Obamacare Tax on Indoor Tanning Services
13. Obamacare elimination of tax deduction for employer-provided retirement Rx drug coverage in coordination with Medicare Part D
14. Obamacare Blue Cross/Blue Shield Tax Hike
15. Obamacare Excise Tax on Charitable Hospitals
16. Obamacare Tax on Innovator Drug Companies
17. Obamacare Tax on Health Insurers
18. Obamacare $500,000 Annual Executive Compensation Limit for Health Insurance Executives
19. Obamacare Employer Reporting of Insurance on W-2
20. Obamacare “Black liquor” tax hike
21. Obamacare Codification of the “economic substance doctrine”

stukinIL4now on June 29, 2012 at 1:13 PM

November 6th is OUR time.

kingsjester on June 29, 2012 at 9:26 AM

NOVEMBER 6TH: OUR TURN!

The War Planner on June 29, 2012 at 1:24 PM

Obama, taxing middle class families to death. Obama is threatening to veto the defense bill unless health care costs are raised for military families.

jqc1970 on June 29, 2012 at 1:31 PM

obladioblada on June 29, 2012 at 1:06 PM

It may be you were trying to post a CNN link. HA has determined that CNN is too unreliable a source to allow linking.

slickwillie2001 on June 29, 2012 at 1:56 PM

Why can’t these pieces of $hit in the RNC castigate Roberts?

libertarianlunatic on June 29, 2012 at 10:38 AM

Because the average voter knows nothing about Roberts, how the decision was made, the constitution, etc, etc, etc. All they know is that it’s getting more expensive to buy gas and food. If we very explicitly tell them now they are going to have to pay more tax, that’s all they will hear.

If you’re looking to see blank looks and glazed eyes, then by all means go on some vengeance seeking mission about Roberts. I’ll stick with working on the low information voters, which is what the GOP needs to do.

kim roy on June 29, 2012 at 2:11 PM

JIZYA TAX - kill, tax or convert infidels!

Pole-Cat on June 29, 2012 at 2:40 PM

Why can’t these pieces of $hit in the RNC castigate Roberts?

I’d go farther. Since it is baldly and clearly unconstitutional for Obamacare to be cleared as a tax, shall we try to impeach Roberts? After Romney wins, of course… but seriously. Being a liberal isn;t a crime, but a Chief Justice should follow the constitution, and he emphatically did not.

What is needed to impeach, and wouldn’t it be easy with the senate AND the house in 2013?

Dirty Creature on June 29, 2012 at 4:07 PM

Where is the death panel adds and the special needs family health saving account dismantle adds

Conservative4ev on June 29, 2012 at 4:12 PM

Where is the death panel adds and the special needs family health saving account dismantle adds

Conservative4ev on June 29, 2012 at 4:12 PM

Watch for little Bammie’s “congenial disease” ad. It’s a hoot.

slickwillie2001 on June 29, 2012 at 6:36 PM

Rev. William John Henry Boetcker was a Presbyterian minister

Abraham Lincoln

Bambi on June 29, 2012 at 10:45 AM

FIFY.

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on June 29, 2012 at 10:59 PM

More fuel for the ObamaCare is a TAX argument:

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2012/06/how-chief-justice-roberts-reenvisioned.html

mountainaires on June 30, 2012 at 7:52 AM

Largest tax increase in history. Now repeat that to everyone you come across. Repeatedly.

Bmore on June 30, 2012 at 11:14 AM

Comment pages: 1 2