Jindal, McDonnell attack Obama, Supreme Court decision on ObamaCare

posted at 10:00 am on June 29, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

The RNC just concluded a conference call for the national media with two high-profile surrogates for the Mitt Romney campaign — Governors Bobby Jindal of Louisiana and Bob McDonnell of Virginia.  Both men have been prominently mentioned as potential running-mate choices for Romney, and both pledged today to fight the implementation of ObamaCare in their states.  Jindal especially insisted that his state would never implement the exchanges or the Medicaid expansion, while McDonnell hedged on the latter, saying that Virginia would have to “evaluate” the program.  “Our hope,” McDonnell explained, “is that we will have a new President and Congress in 125 days.”

McDonnell told reporters that Obama has had “a rough 24 hours in Virginia.” Lost in the shuffle yesterday was a decision to block off-shore drilling in Virginia, which McDonnell reminded participants would cost the state jobs.  On top of that, McDonnell said, ObamaCare is already “hurting the ability of small businesses to hire people.”  The law would impose “$2.2 billion in unfunded [federal mandates] on Virginia” alone, McDonnell said, and it also “represents one of the largest tax increases on the middle class that we’ve ever seen.”  McDonnell said that he’s going to have to figure out where to find that $2.2 billion if ObamaCare isn’t repealed, and “to replace ObamaCare, you’ve got to replace Obama.”

Jindal expects that the Supreme Court decision won’t help Obama politically.  “I expect that opposition to this bad law will escalate,” Jindal said, and blasted the court for keeping it in place.  “The court should have protected our constitutional freedoms,” Jindal told reporters on the call, “but it was the President who forced this law on us.” The decision leaves the door wide open to more federal assertions of power over individual choice.  “What’s next?” Jindal asked.  “Taxes on people who refuse to eat tofu or drive a Chevy Volt?”

The celebratory attitude of the Obama administration on this bill and on other entitlement programs shows how much out of step Obama has become from mainstream American experience, Jindal also claimed. “Success used to be measured by how many people we could get off of the government dole,” Jindal said.  “There used to be a stigma associated with government assistance.  Now we celebrate it.”  The entitlement expansion under ObamaCare and other federal programs is “unsustainable,” Jindal said.  “We’re going to see more people riding in the cart than pulling it.”

Both men gave a good accounting for themselves as surrogates, and potentially as running-mate choices.  Jindal seemed more at ease in the conversation, and expressed the most passion, getting off the best attack lines.  He neatly sidestepped a question about whether Romney could make the tax argument when his own law in Massachusetts had a penalty component as well, but don’t be surprised to see that issue keep coming up.

Breaking on Hot Air



Trackback URL


I never said I wasn’t voting, however, I am now firmly of the belief that voting in the hopes that Obamacare will be repealed is futile.

It very well may be futile. Neither you nor I will know unless Romney is elected. We can agree on one thing, though. If Obama is reelected, any chance of repeal is nil.

There is a lot more to this than whether or not I think Jindal is the man, but it is my opinion that picking Jindal as VP is ridiculous. I guess we’re all entitled to one.

quiz1 on June 29, 2012 at 10:26 PM

Although I’ve been lobbying for Jindal to be VP, it really doesn’t matter to me, in the end, who he picks. I just think he would be the best pick. I’ll be doing whatever I can to help the ticket irrespective of the VP.

GOPRanknFile on June 29, 2012 at 10:31 PM

He neatly sidestepped a question about whether Romney could make the tax argument when his own law in Massachusetts had a penalty component as well, but don’t be surprised to see that issue keep coming up.

Some people actually are concerned about these issues instead of playing at being brain dead cheerleaders for the corrupt-o-crat filled party of their choice. Who would have thunk it! /s

Yes Wilbur, character does count.

DannoJyd on July 1, 2012 at 1:41 AM