Exclusive: Inside story on how Team Romney rode the online SCOTUS wave
posted at 2:01 pm on June 29, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
By now, everyone knows that Mitt Romney and the RNC raised a whole lot of online cash in the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court decision on ObamaCare. How did they make it happen? The big campaign haul came in part from the decision itself, but Team Romney’s early decisions on organizing and preparation for fighting the online battle put the campaign and the RNC in position to capture lightning in a bottle when it struck. I spoke with Leonard Alcivar and Zac Moffatt, two key members of the Romney campaign’s digital efforts, to get some background on the story.
With the general-election campaign in full operation, it’s sometimes difficult to remember that Romney only wrapped up the nomination two months ago. At the time, the entire Romney campaign effort consisted of 87 people. In contrast, the Obama campaign had been in general-election mode for over a year at that point and employed over 700 people, many of which were dedicated to handling Team Obama’s digital efforts in-house, Moffatt told me. Today, Moffatt estimates the campaign staff to be between 350-400, with 80 dedicated to managing digital issues, including state-based personnel. In order to ramp up quickly and efficiently for general election effort, Team Romney relied on building relationships with outside providers for key digital services, including donation processing — a decision that would pay dividends when the court’s decision prompted an avalanche of both visitors and especially donors.
The court’s decision itself sparked considerable traffic and donations, with the Romney campaign raising roughly what they’d see in online donations in a day within the first hour. Naturally, a great deal of interest erupted in Mitt Romney’s expected statement on the decision, and Alcivar says that conservative activists reached out to campaign yesterday to tell the campaign what they wanted to hear from Romney: a passionate commitment to full repeal and an articulation of how ObamaCare erodes freedom and damages the economy. Romney delivered with this four-minute speech:
The campaign also released this web video as part of their fast response effort:
At that point, what had been a flood of traffic on the campaign and RNC websites turned into a deluge. Within an hour, the campaign had to expand their infrastructure from eight servers to 24 in order to keep the donation pages running — a contingency that might only happen once in a campaign, but for which Team Romney had prepared from the beginning. Traffic increased to five times what the sites would normally experience, but more critically, donations exploded to something close to twenty times their normal rate. The infrastructure decisions made two months ago played a critical role in keeping up with demand. As Moffatt explained, normal web-page hits don’t put a lot of stress on servers, but the secure donation transactions require many times more in server resources. Donor pages had three to four thousand simultaneous transactions at times in the rush following Romney’s statement, and the sites stayed up to take advantage of them all.
In the end, the Romney and RNC campaign websites had 200,000 unique visitors in the 24-hour period following the Supreme Court decision — with 47,000 donations. That’s a conversion rate of nearly 25%, far above the normal rate for campaigns. The success wasn’t limited to just the campaign websites, either. Obama has a 5-year head start on Facebook, and has 27 million followers already, while Romney had 2.1 million before the court decision. Despite that, Team Romney beat Team Obama on Facebook “engagements” in the first 24 hours after the decision, 493,400 to 464,000, when Obama supporters had more to celebrate. Romney picked up three times as many supporters in the period as well, 28,713 to 9,600.
Moffatt, who quarterbacked the digital efforts this week, says that this shows not just how Team Romney’s preparation and organization succeeded, but how Romney himself engaged the conservative outrage over the court’s ObamaCare decision, and how conservatives embraced the campaign as an outlet for it. That is exactly what Moffatt envisaged when the campaign shifted its focus from the primary to the fight against Barack Obama. Team Romney intended to “move from a campaign to a cause,” and when the Supreme Court gave them the opportunity to make that a reality, they were fully prepared to take advantage of it.
Update: I got the communication backwards on the conservative outreach yesterday; it was conservatives who reached to to Team Romney, not the other way around. I had it incorrect from my interview notes, and I’ve corrected it above.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Bobby Jindal: Paternalistic, big-government liberalism is the biggest loser here

Super Nannies: EU bans olive oils, Germany ponders Autobahn speed limit






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
As I just posted HotairLib has their whole head up their six o clock.
hamradio on May 24, 2013 at 2:43 PM
Who wrote the speech? Or are you just praising the messenger?
mixplix on May 24, 2013 at 2:57 PM
Connect the dots: journolist meeting by invitation only at the White House on, what Tuesday?, “big”speech by Obama on Thursday, lame stream media fawning over speech on Friday. Who would have seen that coming, huh?
parke on May 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM
They need the “war on terror” in order to further erode our Constitutional freedoms and to deflect criticism from the administration’s and Federal government’s ongoing corruption.
They are just trying to massage it so that they don’t offend the Muslims, international Libtards and their own sensibilities anymore than necessary.
A few Muslim terrorists here and there are quite expendable to this Administration despite their sympathies for them. These drone attacks also do much deflect any potential criticism that the Administration is weak in dealing with such matters.
Dr. ZhivBlago on May 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM
MSNBC is nothing but a left wing propaganda machine serving their master, Obama.
rplat on May 24, 2013 at 3:07 PM
I believe that he was officially nominated 10 days after he was sworn in. Wow! The WON really worked long hours that week and a half to earn that POS medal. During those ten days he ordered NO DRONE STRIKES to keep his peaceful record clean.
fred5678 on May 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM
Obama: Don’t worry about that Ben Ghazi guy. I killed Bin Laden, and Bush didn’t!
And Obummer still wants to close Gitmo? Good luck with that–not even Upchuck Schumer was willing to hold trials in New York!
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:24 PM
They just changed the definition of terrorist. They used to be jihadis from the Middle East–now they’re Minutemen in Arizona and Tea Partiers in Ohio.
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM
Erika, sometimes your writing shows signs of rivaling even the Master of Snark himself, Allahpundit. Good work!
KS Rex on May 24, 2013 at 3:45 PM
I love how crazy Al invoked the Nobel Peace Prize in praise of a speech that spoke about dropping bombs on people’s head. Maybe it was the “fewer” bombs than before that raised this to historic levels.
Do they even know or care that they are morons.
marnes on May 24, 2013 at 3:46 PM
His speech made less sense than Bluto’s Animal House Speech and was far less entertaining. Nothing less than base rallying time. Never thought I would say this, but Code Pink was the best part.
DDay on May 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM
Sperling posted this at the Examiner on May 23 about this “historic speech of Obysmal’s:
You see, we are just not working hard enough to “work with the Muslim American community” who are a “fundamental part of the American family.” Watch out, too, because Obysmal is again trying to limit the impact of the Internet.
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:22 PM
That Chris Hayes is a bit of a twink, isn’t he?
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM
Obama apparently gave two speeches yesterday and I watched the other one.
myiq2xu on May 24, 2013 at 5:03 PM
Nah. I’d detest the little pissant s.o.b. if he was white…or Asian…or any one of the myriad of made-up racial divisions.
Solaratov on May 24, 2013 at 11:00 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2