Oh, great: More fracking rules are definitely happening by 2013

posted at 6:41 pm on June 25, 2012 by Erika Johnsen

As if we didn’t already have ample enough reasons to not reelect Barack Obama this November, here’s yet another dagger to our nation’s economic energy outlook: Try as they might to insist that an “all of the above” strategy is their primary energy agenda, the Obama administration has consistently gotten in the way of affordable, traditional energy with unnecessarily crippling regulations.

Despite its moneymaking and fewer-carbon-emissions potential, natural gas just can’t catch a break, either. The environmental lobby hates the very idea of “fracking,” the practice often used to extract natural gas from the ground, and Team Obama needs the environmental lobby for their reelection bid. Ergo:

Heather Zichal, the top White House energy aide, told reporters that she expects the Interior Department rules regulating hydraulic fracturing, dubbed fracking, to be completed by year’s end.

“We are committed to doing the rule and we are committed to finalizing it,” Zichal told reporters after remarks at the think tank NDN.

Advocates of tougher “fracking” oversight will have their eyes on the calendar, especially if President Obama loses the White House to Mitt Romney, his GOP rival. …

In her wide-ranging remarks on energy to the group, Zichal touted White House plans to spur development of both traditional and alternative sources, including natural gas.

Here’s the thing: The Interior Department, the EPA, et al, rolling out new fracking regulations would be totally legitimate… if they had managed to produce any definitive evidence condemning the practice (because right now, irreversible groundwater contamination and earthquakes are leading them nowhere).

But fracking has suffered from a steady and well-monied campaign of misinformation from the environmentalist lobby, which doesn’t like the idea of cheap fuel available to the masses (even though natural gas is relatively cleaner than traditional sources), and unfortunately, the Obama administration knows well enough to keep the greenies appeased.

Natural gas has already demonstrated a great aptitude for fitting in with our infrastructure, and investors are going absolutely bonkers over its potential without any pushing from the federal government necessary. We could all be starting our natural-gas engines in the foreseeable future, if the government would just quit dithering and provide some certainty:

The recent deluge of low-cost shale gas is already changing the way the country runs. Electric utilities are turning to gas to power their turbines, and chemical companies that rely on the fuel are coming back to the U.S. after years of investing overseas.

But the holy grail is transportation.

Every day, we consume 70% of our oil getting from place to place—and produce more than 30% of our greenhouse gases along the way. If we could run our vehicles on natural gas, it could kill two birds with one stone: Not only is natural gas a lot cheaper than oil right now, but its emissions are much cleaner than gasoline or diesel.

“This abundance of natural gas is something we weren’t expecting as a country, but it’s here now, and it’s a gift we should take advantage of,” says Steven Mueller, chief executive of Houston-based natural-gas producer Southwestern Energy Co. “There’s huge savings here and a way to help to environment.” …

“It’s attractive to customers because it’s a domestic product, there’s a steady supply, and the price is right,” says John McHugh, Kwik Trip’s communications manager. “If we can offer the consumer a value, we know people will jump on the bandwagon.”

But alas, the environmental lobby just keeps providing excuses for the federal government to grab power and stick their noses where they don’t belong, one chimerical ecological catastrophe at a time.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

They need time for the IRS to go after all people opposed to Obama’s views on this and silence them….

albill on May 15, 2013 at 4:58 PM

Why is it his decision?

newportmike on May 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM

Gee, late November or December of 2014, I can’t imagine why!!

Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM

POTUS isn’t involved in this. This is all lower level functionaries. Rogue agents off the reservation. 2 of them. In Cincinnati, or something.

aquaviva on May 15, 2013 at 5:02 PM

$4.05/gal in So. Cal…

… Food even worse.

It’s ‘Paradise’…!

Seven Percent Solution on May 15, 2013 at 5:03 PM

This will help make the senate R in 2014.

‘Smart’ move, lefties.

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 5:03 PM

Why is it his decision?

newportmike on May 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM

Exactly. Who died and made him Congress?

oldroy on May 15, 2013 at 5:03 PM

Now there there’s no there there.

mjbrooks3 on May 15, 2013 at 5:05 PM

This is the power of a dictator.

The people and his own government agencies approve of the pipeline, yet he does not, personally, and thats more important than the rest of the nation.

BobMbx on May 15, 2013 at 5:07 PM

This is Rush Limbaugh’s fault. And Bush’s.

de rigueur on May 15, 2013 at 5:07 PM

“The president has to be able to show that the administration looked under every stone to ensure it knew as much as it possibly could about the impact of Keystone,” said the official, who did not want to be named given the sensitive nature of the project.

How convenient. Too bad last time he looked under every stone, it was the stone for every Conservative group looking for 501(c) status.

I have an idea, why not let the underlings handle the pipeline, or better yet, let private industry help get the country back on it’s feet!

kirkill on May 15, 2013 at 5:08 PM

“The president has to be able to show that the administration looked under every stone to ensure it knew as much as it possibly could about the impact

Where was that effort in protecting those 4 souls in Benghazi?

hillsoftx on May 15, 2013 at 5:09 PM

Now there there’s no there there.

mjbrooks3 on May 15, 2013 at 5:05 PM

so There!

kirkill on May 15, 2013 at 5:10 PM

The “transformation of the USA” will continue unabated. Getting caught trying to silence the opposition by one agency doesn’t mean its not going on with others. They can make a lot of trouble behind the scenes.

RADIOONE on May 15, 2013 at 5:12 PM

Why is it his decision?

newportmike on May 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM

Same reason Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho decides whether to use water or Brawndo to water the crops.

forest on May 15, 2013 at 5:20 PM

We fought and won World War II in 1,366 days, meanwhile Obama has dithered on this for over 1,600 days and counting..

Speaks volumes about his ability to lead.

itsspideyman on May 15, 2013 at 5:21 PM

We fought and won World War II in 1,366 days, meanwhile Obama has dithered on this for over 1,600 days and counting..

itsspideyman on May 15, 2013 at 5:21 PM

Well, we were only fighting against two imperial fascists that wanted to take over the world…wait…yikes!

kirkill on May 15, 2013 at 5:29 PM

Nah, he’ll delay this decision till after the midterms. He wouldn’t want to insult the enviro-crazy base. But would it finally be approved. You betcha!

tommy71 on May 15, 2013 at 5:40 PM

I’m just wondering how long Canada will wait around for Obama to make a decision before it decides to sell its oil to China?

hopeful on May 15, 2013 at 5:45 PM

I strongly support the Citizens United decision but am disgusted and frustrated that a very deep pocketed, micro-minority of radicals has enough power to deny Americans access to cheap energy. These eco-Nazis are driving up the cost of everything for everyone and they don’t care. Obama doesn’t care. The Democrat party doesn’t care.

How do we shut down these groups? One way would be for the GOP to cut EPAs funding, 50% of which they dole out in grants to radical environmentalists. They could also strip these groups of standing to sue on behalf of the public.

Charlemagne on May 15, 2013 at 5:46 PM

Charlemagne on May 15, 2013 at 5:46 PM

Make the EPA advisory instead of regulatory.

hopeful on May 15, 2013 at 5:49 PM

Price of gas went up over 30 cents in Minnesota and a dem legislature looking to raise state gas tax….right before summer lake season…..whos aid they were bright….who said those that vote for them are any brighter..

crosshugger on May 15, 2013 at 6:19 PM

I’m just wondering how long Canada will wait around for Obama to make a decision before it decides to sell its oil to China?

hopeful on May 15, 2013 at 5:45 PM

Maybe when the slovenly Warren Buffett decides he’s made enough money hauling oil on his railroad?

slickwillie2001 on May 15, 2013 at 6:32 PM

The decision may not be made until November, December or even early 2014

TRY THE “TWELFTH OF NEVER” – you’d be closer to the correct date.

GarandFan on May 15, 2013 at 6:36 PM

Won’t happen until after the 2014 midterms, if then, with obaka…

ladyingray on May 15, 2013 at 6:38 PM

Hey, let’s not take multi-tasking to the extreme.

He’s got his plate full with campaigning (immigration), vacations, golf, fundraising…
cut ‘im some slack, wouldya?

socalcon on May 15, 2013 at 6:43 PM

…delay…delay…delay!

KOOLAID2 on May 15, 2013 at 7:07 PM

2014… Yep. As expected he’s punting the decision to President Biden.

Gingotts on May 15, 2013 at 7:32 PM

BUILD THE DAMNED PIPELINE YOU IDIOT!!

JayVee on May 15, 2013 at 7:54 PM

So the big stinking turd really is a POS!

OldWeaselKeeper on May 15, 2013 at 7:54 PM

He’s kind of slow, isn’t he?

MNHawk on May 16, 2013 at 8:47 AM

The red tape for this BS is so wide and long, it could be used as runways for airplanes.

ZachV on May 16, 2013 at 10:16 AM

I would like to see every single opponent of the Keystone XL pipeline forced to wait at a railroad crossing, twice each day, for a 200-car train of tank cars carrying crude oil from Canada to refineries in the US.

Okay, make that three or four times a day.

J Baustian on May 17, 2013 at 12:51 AM