New report: You can all calm down about fracking and earthquakes
posted at 3:31 pm on June 16, 2012 by Erika Johnsen
For some peculiar and irrational reason, the environmental lobby has perpetuated a particularly fierce campaign against hydraulic fracturing, a.k.a. fracking, the practice of using high-pressure injections of water, chemicals and sand to extract natural gas from underground. Greenies seem to take umbrage with anything that even apparently violates our ancient Mother Earth, but fracking has been around for decades and natural gas is a cheap, abundant, and relatively clean form of energy that fits well in our infrastructure — even the EPA admits that “natural gas plays a key role in our nation’s clean energy future.”
The natural gas jobs-and-investment scene is going gangbusters, but despite the boon to our economy and energy portfolio, environmentalists just can’t abide forms of energy that a) make money, and b) provide affordable energy to the masses. They’ve got all sorts of projects going to shoot the whole industry down.
The battle plan is called “Beyond Natural Gas,” and Sierra Club executive director Michael Brune announced the goal in an interview with the National Journal this month: “We’re going to be preventing new gas plants from being built wherever we can.” The big green lobbying machine has rolled out a new website that says “The natural gas industry is dirty, dangerous and running amok” and that “The closer we look at natural gas, the dirtier it appears; and the less of it we burn, the better off we will be.” So the goal is to shut the industry down, not merely to impose higher safety standards.
This is no idle threat. The Sierra Club has deep pockets funded by liberal foundations and knows how to work the media and politicians. The lobby helped to block new nuclear plants for more than 30 years, it has kept much of the U.S. off-limits to oil drilling, and its “Beyond Coal” campaign has all but shut down new coal plants. One of its priorities now will be to make shale gas drilling anathema within the Democratic Party. …
The federal Energy Information Administration reports that in 2009 “the 4% drop in the carbon intensity of the electric power sector, the largest in recent times, reflects a large increase in the use of lower-carbon natural gas because of an almost 50% decline in its price.” The Department of Energy reports that natural gas electric plants produce 45% less carbon than coal plants, though newer coal plants are much cleaner.
I know — go figure. Part of the environmentalists’ main argument against natural gas is that fracking causes a whole host of ills, from contaminating groundwater to causing earthquakes. Well, that contaminating-groundwater thing turned out to be a bust, and now there’s a new study out that oh-so-cautiously reports that, actually, fracking is not causing horrible humanity-ending tremors within the earth’s crust.
The controversial practice of hydraulic fracturing to extract natural gas does not pose a high risk for triggering earthquakes large enough to feel, but other types of energy-related drilling can make the ground noticeably shake, a major government science report concludes.
Even those man-made tremors large enough to be an issue are very rare, says a special report by the National Research Council. In more than 90 years of monitoring, human activity has been shown to trigger only 154 quakes, most of them moderate or small, and only 60 of them in the United States. That’s compared to a global average of about 14,450 earthquakes of magnitude 4.0 or greater every year, said the report, released Friday.
The state of New York was under such an advanced state of environmentalist-influence that they went so far as to enact a fracking-moratorium pending further review. With the evidence decrying the hydraulic fracturing quickly wearing thin, however, Gov. Cuomo is considering allowing the practice in selective areas — a proposal that could never be considered without outrageous outrage from those greenie-types, of course.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Liars – the gov’t began this process last year.
Schadenfreude on May 13, 2013 at 7:33 PM
They did this last summer.
Schadenfreude on May 13, 2013 at 7:34 PM
Simply disband the Bureau of Indian Affairs. They are worthless and have done little to protect Native Americans.
originalpechanga on May 13, 2013 at 7:34 PM
Hey Obama Admin, yeah, probably not a great time to do the sequestration fear mongering with Scandalpalooza going on and all.
kerrhome on May 13, 2013 at 7:34 PM
The obvious intent of this government to harm people for Obama’s gain is just plain wrong.
CW on May 13, 2013 at 7:35 PM
Hard to believe that 3% of the budget paid for so many vital services.
myiq2xu on May 13, 2013 at 7:35 PM
Obama will make sure any cuts are to vital organs of the government, not irrelevant, ineffectual, redundant bureaucratic appendixes.
His aim is pain.
profitsbeard on May 13, 2013 at 7:35 PM
Only the average Obama vote would.
CW on May 13, 2013 at 7:38 PM
Oh well – it was all obama’s idea – let it BURN (literally) – while obama continues to golf, and vacation, and party, and fiddle.
Pork-Chop on May 13, 2013 at 7:40 PM
Well y’know – maybe if they cut back on the IRS spying on Americans and leaking that information (for personal profit) to political organizations and paying for fake investigations into you tube videos the state would have more money…
Skywise on May 13, 2013 at 7:42 PM
Wait just a second here. Who the hell is Sally Jewel? And when did she replace Ken Salazar?
Key West Reader on May 13, 2013 at 7:43 PM
*voter
CW on May 13, 2013 at 7:44 PM
When was Sally Jewel appointed, who confirmed her and when did this take place?
/Just a dumb country bumpkin lookin for info
Key West Reader on May 13, 2013 at 7:45 PM
Then Obama…
Don’t lower the oceans just yet…
Geez..
/
Electrongod on May 13, 2013 at 7:54 PM
Declined flexibility??
This is reserved for Obama in his second term..
Electrongod on May 13, 2013 at 7:59 PM
Since sequestration is only a reduction of the increase( down from 107% to 105%), that means the discontinuing some of the old spending is to pay for some new spending.
I want to know what new spending is more important than (simply) continuing this part of the old spending?
jhnone on May 13, 2013 at 7:59 PM
There will be a slowdown at the National Parks management for the May long weekend, bet on it.
slickwillie2001 on May 13, 2013 at 7:59 PM
Why doesn’t it mean less I R S, and E P A ?
listens2glenn on May 13, 2013 at 8:01 PM
President pain strikes again.
tom daschle concerned on May 13, 2013 at 8:02 PM
Yes and I vaguely remember fk Texas back a few years ago when firefighting planes were not used because of
safetycontract dispute issues. There was no sequester at that time.Just like the Russkies made sure the Ukraine was no longer good farmland back in the Uncle Joe days.
arnold ziffel on May 13, 2013 at 8:04 PM
But we can afford millions and millions more
illegal immigrantsilliterate, unskilled citizens and the foodstamps, welfare, Obamacare, schooling and all the other associated costs.Nincompoop, please.
M240H on May 13, 2013 at 8:06 PM
Fear not. Firefighting in the Glade will not be effected.
-Fire Marshall Spark
SparkPlug on May 13, 2013 at 8:14 PM
And red states like my beautiful Idaho will just burn, baby, burn. Feds, kiss my a$$.
idalily on May 13, 2013 at 8:16 PM
Move South, ID …
We just get all the smoke..
Electrongod on May 13, 2013 at 8:21 PM
Good. Let them burn. Quit stocking up fuel.
Dry lightning has been around longer than the Feral gubmint.
wolly4321 on May 13, 2013 at 8:23 PM
That’s ok. God does it for free. It’s called wildfires. It worked since the beginning of time. The happy trees and animals all grew back. Now that man is here, he thinks it is his responsibility to put out fires and manage forests. Just like it is his responsibility to control the climate. Some things are bigger than man. It is easier to live with it than to fruitlessly fight it.
tdarrington on May 13, 2013 at 8:27 PM
Holy crap.
/I’m almost afraid to say anything at this point. And I ain’t no AP.
Did they mean AllahPundit, or the deified AP as in Associated Press?
Key West Reader on May 13, 2013 at 8:29 PM
The DOD commissaries are not having their May case-load sale because of…sequestration! Make the military families feel the pain!
tdarrington on May 13, 2013 at 8:29 PM
Tdarrington-
Yep.
It balances itself.
wolly4321 on May 13, 2013 at 8:31 PM
Associated Press. Kinda surprised as they’ve been lap dogs for O as well as other MSM outlets. Btw, how goes it?
chewmeister on May 13, 2013 at 8:37 PM
First BIG fire, homes going up in smoke. You can bet the last word you’ll hear will be “Sequestration” when folks break out the pitchforks and torches.
GarandFan on May 13, 2013 at 8:38 PM
Doesn’t this just make ya sick and mad!
I wanna smash somthing and hard!
3% of a flucking budget causes so much problems, what the hell are they doing with ALL OUR MONEY?
Scrumpy on May 13, 2013 at 8:51 PM
Worth reiterating, with boldface added for emphasis.
Why wouldn’t we continue to have the same level of fire-fighting capability as last year? The only “cut” made by the sequester was $1 out of every $6 of discretionary spending increases since 2008.
This guts our ability to fight wildfires?
de rigueur on May 13, 2013 at 9:38 PM
Maybe if all the useless under-secretaries in Washington with all their perks were fired, then there would be a whole lot more money for hiring firefighters. The problem is not a shortage of money, it is a shortage sound management.
bartbeast on May 13, 2013 at 9:47 PM
That sad excuse for an office should have been dissolved yesterday if not sooner. A good many of the people they ostensibly protect would very much like to play William Tell with the apple taped to their chest.
MelonCollie on May 13, 2013 at 10:02 PM
Let’s also lay off any government employee with ‘diversity’ in their job title.
slickwillie2001 on May 13, 2013 at 10:26 PM
Forest fires are a natural part of the ecological process… Long before we were here fires raged and forests were born anew. Long after we are gone it will continue. Don’t build a house in the forest if you don’t want it to eventually burn down to the ground.
I design homes for a living…You want a home in an extreme location… Prepare for extreme problems.
Kaptain Amerika on May 13, 2013 at 10:41 PM
Nobody wants to know about it, but there is a long-term fire danger in the San Francisco Bay Area that exists, in great part, to the fact that the DOI (in the form of NPS/Golden Gate National Recreation Area) is an instigator through the purchases and additions of particularly moribund and unkempt, dangerous stands of eucalyptus adjacent to the only water supply to 6 million people in the region:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5e4vAcUpKHraC1MNjh1YU1ZSG8/edit?usp=sharing
Shaughnessy on May 13, 2013 at 10:44 PM
I believe that I read that our foreign aid programs are exempt from sequestration. Am I wrong about that? If I am right, I can’t understand why that isn’t thrown in the face of these politicians more often.
Paco on May 14, 2013 at 8:40 AM
You are absolutely right! We should instruct our congressmen to restore the 3% and eliminate the other 97%. Who’s up for that?
Old Country Boy on May 14, 2013 at 2:59 PM