Obama: I’m offended that my hyperpolitical administration is being accused of leaking classified info for electoral gain

posted at 3:21 pm on June 8, 2012 by Allahpundit

Via Mediaite, profound righteousness from a guy who’s been zealous in prosecuting lower-level bigmouths but somehow hasn’t cracked down on the one two three four five major leaks in the past year that conveniently burnished his campaign image as an ass-kicking, Osama-killing, Iran-hacking James Bond of a C-in-C. In fact, he’s so offended that he’s not even going to entertain the idea of an independent prosecutor to find out where these curiously politically helpful stories keep coming from.

“No,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said when asked if Obama would yield to congressional requests that an “independent counsel” investigate a recent series of intelligence leaks to the media. “I refer you to agencies that are tasked with investigating these kinds of matter. And, again, this is something that the President insists that his administration take all appropriate and necessary steps to prevent leaks of classified information or sensitive information that could risk our counterterrorism operations.”

Carney also couldn’t agree to a congressional investigation. “I know there was a press conference today and I just don’t have enough information about it,” he told reporters. “But this President is fully committed to preventing leaks of classified information, as well as sensitive information that could jeopardize our counterterrorism efforts.”

Here’s how I think they’re doing this. They don’t want a leak to originate from the inner circle because it’d be too politically dangerous to them if that was found out. So instead they get some political appointee further down the totem pole to leak the basics of the story to a reporter and maybe float the names of a few midlevel advisors who might be willing to talk about it. The reporter then dials up those advisors and says “the cat’s out of the bag, here’s what I know, you might as well help me get this right,” and then the advisors fill in some of the blanks. Then, when the story’s coming together, the reporter takes it to the White House and says “we’re running with this, would you care to comment?” At that point the inner circle has the best of both worlds: Plausible deniability that the leak started with them plus a good excuse for why they should now go ahead and talk to the reporter about it (“we wanted to make sure their account didn’t contain any damaging errors”). For example, remember that big NYT scoop on Obama’s terrorist “kill list”? The Times claimed to have spoken to three dozen current or former advisors about Obama’s role in the process. Hard for me to believe that all of them were eager to talk, but between quiet encouragement from the White House and/or the “here’s what I already know” rap from the reporter, they probably ended up feeling obliged.

Here’s a bit from the Times’s Stuxnet expose. How far inside the inner circle are we here? Far enough to be a fly on the wall in the Situation Room:

At a tense meeting in the White House Situation Room within days of the worm’s “escape,” Mr. Obama, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and the director of the Central Intelligence Agency at the time, Leon E. Panetta, considered whether America’s most ambitious attempt to slow the progress of Iran’s nuclear efforts had been fatally compromised.

“Should we shut this thing down?” Mr. Obama asked, according to members of the president’s national security team who were in the room

“From his first days in office, he was deep into every step in slowing the Iranian program — the diplomacy, the sanctions, every major decision,” a senior administration official said. “And it’s safe to say that whatever other activity might have been under way was no exception to that rule.”

Dean Baquet, the NYT’s managing editor, told Politico, “I can’t believe anybody who says these are leaks. Read those stories. They are so clearly the product of tons and tons of reporting.” What’s the difference? Of course there was reporting involved; some of that reporting involved national security honchos blabbing about what was said at Obama’s briefings. Is a leak not a leak if it’s printed alongside other independently corroborated facts? Besides, the charge here isn’t that leakers fed every detail of these stories to the media, it’s that they nudged them by tipping them to the basic narrative that the administration wanted to push — “did you know that President Bad-ass is personally delivering the thumbs down on jihadis?” — and then let them handle things from there.

This is revealing too, but not surprising:

“Our job is to report issues in the public interest, and this piece certainly meets that standard,” Dean Baquet, the Times managing editor, said in a statement to POLITICO. “As always with sensitive stories, we described the piece to the government before publication. No one suggested we not publish. There was a request to omit some highly technical details. We complied with the request after concluding it was not a significant part of the piece.”

I’ll bet they didn’t. And in case you’re tempted to conclude that it’s not O’s political team that’s pushing these leaks out there but rather career intel types who are simply seeking glory in the pages of the newspaper for their more impressive exploits, here’s what national-security reporter Marc Ambinder has to say: “Reality is that virtually all ‘leaks’ of this sort come from political appointees. 99.9 percent of govies w TS clearances never say a word.” Makes you wonder who those “members of Obama’s national security team” were who blabbed. Was it some upper-tier CIA apparatchik who happened to be in the room to assist with the briefing? Or was it, say, John Brennan or Tom Donilon, whose positions as national security top dogs depend on O being reelected?

Anyway, he’s offended.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

O’Butthead’s offended. That’s rich.

Still making friends everywhere I see – now even Feinstein & Levin are pissed off. Nice work.

I’m (still) laughing at the “superior intellect”.

ICanSeeNovFromMyHouse on June 8, 2012 at 4:30 PM

I’m offended that my hyperpolitical administration is being accused of leaking classified info for electoral gain

This whole thing has the MO of Valerie Jarrett. Do something offensive, lie or exaggerate or misrepresent, commit an egregious leak, slander someone’s reputation or even figuratively stomp on their foot and scream “stop thief” or “racism” when the aggrieved party (parties) protest (in this particular case the aggrieved party is the entire nation.)

MaiDee on June 8, 2012 at 4:31 PM

Not going away

Schadenfreude on June 8, 2012 at 4:29 PM

One of the few times, if not the only time, I am in agreement with Carl Levin and Dianne Feinstein on anything.

totherightofthem on June 8, 2012 at 4:32 PM

Great piece, AP!

d1carter on June 8, 2012 at 4:18 PM

Ditto

Go RBNY on June 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM

O: I’m offended by the leaks that make me look sooo good.

Reporter: Are you going to investigate?

O: What? I couldn’t hear you. You’re breaking up. Listen, guys. I gotta run.

Go RBNY on June 8, 2012 at 4:35 PM

Leaking classified info for political gain? The Obama Administration? Under the leadership of Dr. Hopenchange Himself, the Lightbringer, the Dear Leader, the Chicago Jesus, the Mulatto Messiah?

Nah.

spiritof61 on June 8, 2012 at 4:37 PM

Obama: I’m offended that my hyperpolitical administration is being accused of leaking classified info for electoral gain

Of course Barry; Were I you, I’d be offended too.. Anyone with a lick of sense knows that you would leak classified information to intentionally harm this nation, even if you got absolutely no electoral gain out of it.

That you think it might help you get elected is just a bonus. It is the weakening and eventual of the USA that is your primary goal.

Who (besides Putin and the Muslim Brotherhood leaders that have received it) knows what more you have leaked, but kept secret because it would not make you look good to anyone but the people who agree that the USA should be destroyed.

LegendHasIt on June 8, 2012 at 4:38 PM

It is the weakening and eventual * of the USA that is your primary goal.

Sorry, left out a word. * = destruction.

LegendHasIt on June 8, 2012 at 4:42 PM

Excellent takedown Allahpundit. Well done.

gwelf on June 8, 2012 at 4:43 PM

NO ONE in this current administration leaks anything without Barry’s okay.

GarandFan on June 8, 2012 at 4:28 PM

Because if they did the NYT and WaPo would snitch them out to Barry.

Barry to NYT/WaPo: I didn’t authorize that leak. Who gave it to you.

NYT/WaPo to Barry: Sorry Your Majesty, so-and-so told us.

After which Barry destroys so-and-so’s career and life. He might even sic Holder on him/her.

farsighted on June 8, 2012 at 4:46 PM

I’m offended that he’s offended.

MrX on June 8, 2012 at 4:52 PM

Here’s the catch: If it’s approved, it’s not a leak.

It’s all in the definitions, folks.

EdmundBurke247 on June 8, 2012 at 4:53 PM

It’s our fault for not being more understanding. He’s offended but he doesn’t directly refute the assertion that the WH leaked it. You’d say he was being ultra careful about what he says so he doesn’t have to walk it back someday (or later today.) But considering the “private sector is just fine/not just fine” fiasco today you can’t even give him that much miniscule credit for knowing the meaning of his own words.

curved space on June 8, 2012 at 4:54 PM

In agreement with others’ suggestions of Jarret/Axel, etc.
BUT .. Hill/Bill ??? Holy cr*poli !!
eh?

pambi on June 8, 2012 at 5:00 PM

Prostitute: Just what kind of woman do you think I am??

CurtZHP on June 8, 2012 at 3:29 PM

We’ve already established that. Now, it’s just a matter of price.

kingsjester on June 8, 2012 at 3:31 PM

…still waiting for the higher bidder :)….anybody???

jimver on June 8, 2012 at 5:02 PM

soros: 1 million from moi :)..

jimver on June 8, 2012 at 5:03 PM

Here’s the catch: If it’s approved, it’s not a leak.

It’s all in the definitions, folks.

EdmundBurke247 on June 8, 2012 at 4:53 P

… it’s ‘controlled leak’ :)…

jimver on June 8, 2012 at 5:05 PM

Any day now Obama will start sporting a cod piece.

Terrye on June 8, 2012 at 5:07 PM

Come on, President Obama.

Patrick Fitzgerald is available to give us another Fitzmas.

MayBee on June 8, 2012 at 5:07 PM

He really does think we’re stupid.

I guess we can’t blame him. A lot of us are stupid; otherwise, this sleazy amateur never would have been elected in the first place.

AZCoyote on June 8, 2012 at 4:22 PM

Remember, he got 70% of the high school dropout vote. No candidate had ever done that before.

At this rate, he’ll need the other 30% in addition.

Del Dolemonte on June 8, 2012 at 5:07 PM

In his ignorant, halting manner, O’Bonehead only confirms the gravity of leaking top secret national security information – not the reality of the fact that his political skanks leaked it. And his stupid mumbling begs the question again:

“Did the NY Slimes make up the stories out of whole cloth and why, or did your national security team leak the information to them and why?”

Simple question, O’Bozo — answer it.

Jaibones on June 8, 2012 at 5:08 PM

“People need to have a better sense of how I approach this office …”

Oh, we know exactly how you approach the office, President Kardashian. Exactly how.

Jaibones on June 8, 2012 at 5:12 PM

Obama said “we don’t play with that”

tee hee

Slade73 on June 8, 2012 at 5:17 PM

Of course it’s coming from inside the administration. These people are egotistical dogs, the nation and the lives of others are to them pawns, just like all the other psychopaths in history. The O is a bona fide America hater, just another reason he was good friends with Bomber Bill Ayers.

arand on June 8, 2012 at 5:20 PM

He’ll get Eric Holder on the case. He’ll get to the bottom of it, no problem. SNORT.

Philly on June 8, 2012 at 3:39 PM

Yeah, right. One year after Operation F&F killed hundreds of Mexican civilians and a US border guard and Holder still doesn’t who in his department authorized it. The only thing he’s certain about is that the high-ranking DOJ officials who signed the approvals for the tactics that led to those deaths were completely ignorant of what was going on because nobody in the DOJ ever reads those things before they approve them. Case closed.

Socratease on June 8, 2012 at 5:28 PM

“Should we shut this thing down?” Mr. Obama asked, according to members of the president’s national security team who were in the room…

So, Axelrod was there?

Makes you wonder who those “members of Obama’s national security team” were who blabbed.

My money is on Axelrod, probably through an underling.

novaculus on June 8, 2012 at 5:33 PM

Of course it’s coming from inside the administration.

arand on June 8, 2012 at 5:20 PM

In GWB’s admin the leaks came from his enemies within the executive branch who wanted to make him look bad. GWB tried to stop them because of the damage they did to national security.

In Teh One’s admin the leaks are coming from his supporters who are trying to make him look good — tough and gutsy, and probably with a wink and a nod of encouragement from him, national security be damned.

farsighted on June 8, 2012 at 5:38 PM

Impeach now, and impeach hard.

Pork-Chop on June 8, 2012 at 5:45 PM

“Should we shut this thing down?” Mr. Obama asked, according to members of the president’s national security team who were in the room…

So, Axelrod was there?

Makes you wonder who those “members of Obama’s national security team” were who blabbed.

My money is on Axelrod, probably through an underling.

novaculus on June 8, 2012 at 5:33 PM

Of course it was him. Whatever the f…he was doing being present at a national security meeting anyways…but then it looks like he interfered with the other ‘genius’ ( i just named the AG Holder) running of the DOJ., according to Maraniss book…and they have the guts to say that this is not political..

jimver on June 8, 2012 at 5:50 PM

One of the few times, if not the only time, I am in agreement with Carl Levin and Dianne Feinstein on anything.

totherightofthem on June 8, 2012 at 4:32 PM

I know what you’re saying, and far be it from me to praise a Dem, but, we’ve gotta admit they aren’t all built equally! Look at the difference between the PUMAs and 0bamessiah’s thugs in 2008 – generally speaking, PUMAs weren’t/aren’t completely bereft of civility, imo.

I don’t like Feinstein or Rendell, but I dislike them less than I dislike someone like Pelosi or O’Malley, whom I dislike less than someone like Boxer or Waters – not every Dem is toxically angry and/or a Marxist who hates this country, and/or wants to fundamentally transform it…

Bizarro No. 1 on June 8, 2012 at 6:27 PM

farsighted on June 8, 2012 at 5:38 PM

THIS

ergo, no special prosecutor

cmsinaz on June 8, 2012 at 6:40 PM

The sad fact is that we now have as President a man who, because of his lifetime of associations with anti-American zealots, would not, if he weren’t actually President, ever be able to pass a security clearance investigation for even the lowest security clearance available. As President he is exempt from being required to pass such an investigation, but traditionally his minions at lower levels of his administration would not share such an exemption. Since most of them share his dubious life history one has to wonder how any of them have been granted the kind of security ratings necessary for them to do the jobs he has given them

djaces on June 8, 2012 at 6:42 PM

Breaking…according to the AP, Eric Holder has appointed two attorneys to investigate the leaks from “Obama’s White House. No special prosecutor?

d1carter on June 8, 2012 at 6:53 PM

I’m offended that Obummer seems to be able to get away with security violations that would put any of us DoD peopns in prison for life.

dentarthurdent on June 8, 2012 at 6:58 PM

BTW these are the folks who in the aftermath the OBL takeout had, within days and almost within hours, Hollywood dodos circulating in the most secure environs of the White House so that they could get a jump start on the largest in kind campaign commercial in history for the Bamster, in order to have it ready for release just before the November election. The release has been moved out to a date past the election after a large public stink was raised, but the underlying violation of security protocols has yet to be explained or investigated.

djaces on June 8, 2012 at 7:07 PM

In a statement, the attorney general says Ronald Machen, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, and Rod Rosenstein, the U.S. attorney for the District of Maryland, will direct separate probes that are currently being conducted by the FBI.

d1carter on June 8, 2012 at 7:08 PM

You know what I’m offended by Obama? You! I’m offended by everything you stand for..how you’d purposely leak sensitive information for political gain..how you’d out a Pakistani dr. for political gain…how you’d out seals team 6 for political gain….how you’d out us and Israel in stuxnet…btw, Israel has to be furious at that leak….

Independent Special prosecutor or bust!

sadsushi on June 8, 2012 at 7:17 PM

This is typical for Obama he does not care if releasing this information threatens notional security, it is all about him and making himself look tough, he knows the fawning liberal media will cover for him as usual. Obama dislikes America anyways, so if releasing this information does America harm, the way he sees it, equals so much the better, and it will help energies his liberal base for the upcoming election.

Beastdogs on June 8, 2012 at 7:23 PM

Leaking classified information/data? Humm, could be costly to the perp. To be granted access to classified info you have to sign a ‘contract’ and be ‘read in’ to the program. The ‘contract’ … usually under a DD250 has penalties of 10 years in an FCI &/or a $250K fine (or both) for a violation this agreement/oath. Oh, and here is the fun part … there is NO TIME LIMIT on being prosecuted. Many S/TS programs run with the standard 25 year coverage. So, there’s lots of time to gather up evidence and prosecute your ass if you are guilty of a classified leak.

Slightly OT … I recall the LSM claiming that Valerie Plame was a (so called) WMD expert while at the CIA. If anyone sees her will they ask her: What is Aerozine 50, and where is it used? If she is an expert in the field of WMD’s she’ll certainly be familiar with LPRE’s … right? Yea, sure.

Missilengr on June 8, 2012 at 7:29 PM

This is how they get rid of Crazy Uncle Joe Biden and any other person deemed undesirable prior to the election. Maybe Zero will find a way to deal with Holder, too.

Philly on June 8, 2012 at 7:35 PM

Obama: I don’t think so. Homie don’t play dat!

Christien on June 8, 2012 at 8:01 PM

“When……..a ….uhh……leak….uhh……
is…..uhh…..put…
…uhh…..out……….uhh……..
my…….uhh…….
administration………uhhh…..
….will……..
.uhh……..find out….
…..uhh……where…..
….uhhh…….it……..uhh……came……uhhh…….from……..all right?”

Gee, sure sounds to me like he’s telling the truth.

NOMOBO on June 8, 2012 at 8:14 PM

“Attorney General Eric Holder on Friday appointed two U.S. attorneys to lead a pair of criminal investigations into possible unauthorized disclosures of classified information.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/08/holder-names-2-prosecutors-to-lead-leak-investigation/#ixzz1xFc3WYzv

So. Holder no longer playing fall guy for B. Hussein Obama?

starboardhelm on June 8, 2012 at 8:22 PM

Holder, you ignorant offensive slut.

starboardhelm on June 8, 2012 at 8:23 PM

Just rolling in!!!

Jun 8, 8:21 PM EDT
Holder appoints 2 prosecutors to lead leak probes
****************************************************

WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General Eric Holder on Friday appointed two U.S. attorneys to lead a pair of criminal investigations into possible unauthorized disclosures of classified information, authorizing the two prosecutors to follow all appropriate investigative leads within the executive and legislative branches of government.

Ronald Machen, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, and Rod Rosenstein, the U.S. attorney for the District of Maryland, will direct separate probes that are currently being conducted by the FBI.(More…)
===================

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_AG_HOLDER_LEAK_PROBES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

canopfor on June 8, 2012 at 8:33 PM

“Attorney General Eric Holder on Friday appointed two U.S. attorneys to lead a pair of criminal investigations into possible unauthorized disclosures of classified information.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/08/holder-names-2-prosecutors-to-lead-leak-investigation/#ixzz1xFc3WYzv

So. Holder no longer playing fall guy for B. Hussein Obama?

starboardhelm on June 8, 2012 at 8:22 PM

Not at all, they want to block the appointment of an special independent prosecutor. The two attorneys Holder appointed can now dawdle along for six months until the Jackass is out of office.

slickwillie2001 on June 8, 2012 at 8:42 PM

Butt hurt.

mchristian on June 8, 2012 at 8:46 PM

Of course these criminals are going to block a special prosecutor. Yeah, they think we are all really dumb.

Philly on June 8, 2012 at 8:46 PM

this is the guy whose administration could not wait to tell every detail about the operation in which Seal Team 6 took down OBL…to the point where they told 5 different versions in less than 48 hours. A bi-Partisan group of Legislators told of how allies don’t trust us because of these leaks. That probably has a lot to do with the fact that a Pakistani Doctor secretly provided information about OBL’s whereabouts & Obama’s administration blabbed it to the world…resulting in the Doctor being jailed in Pakistan & his family threatened! Maybe is has something to do with Obama’s administration revealing the source of the STUXNET Virus thatr set back Iran’s ability to build a nuclear bomb. The proof that these leaks came DIRECTLY from Obama’s administration is out there – Obama’s administration spilling details about the OBL mission is on video /news highlights for anyone who cares to dig them back up….and this man has the NERVE to fein offense at being called ut for leaking classified information and damaging our nationalsecurity in the process?!

People who leak classified information, at the very least, lose their Security Clearance. Continued release of such information, and depending on the severity, results in jail time. This clown has been releasing information for personal and political gain. The NYT even reported Obama intentionally leaked the fact that HE had personal input on who was placed on the drone strike ‘Kill List’ to give the impression to the American people that he is personally involved in protecting Americans from terrorists. PROTECTING us? This j@ck@ss is damaging national security & turning away allies in order to stroke his own ego 7 get a few votes.

The GOP pointed out in 2008 that he was unprepared to be the President, and THIS performance is a massive demonstration that they were more right than they could have imagined. barak Obama has continuously violated the Constitution, broken the War Powers Act, dragged this nation into the middle of a civil war to help al-Qaida-backed rebels overthrow Qadaffi & seize Libya as their own, helped the Muslim Brotherhood seize power in Egypt, & even as Executive Order to eliminate the bi-partisan Palestinian Accountability Act in order to free $192 million to go to the PLO, who refuses to acknowledge Israel’sx right to exist, & their terrorist ally HAMAS! STUPID is amusing most of the time, but when the STUPID person hasd this much power he is extremely dangerous. Barak Obama is a threat to National Security! He has about as much ability to keep classified information Secret as a screen door has the ability to hold back water on a submarine!

easyt65 on June 8, 2012 at 8:58 PM

Hey Holder, forget those two toadies you appointed. Patrick Fitzgerald may be looking for a new gig.

farsighted on June 8, 2012 at 9:30 PM

Allowing the Justice Department to investigate these leaks tells me nobody is taking this serious. A little noise and no action.

savage24 on June 8, 2012 at 10:15 PM

AYE!! Laddie —

mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!
mmmBUT DO YA HAAATE mmmMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH?!!

williamg on June 9, 2012 at 2:45 AM

So for months Israel left Iran to wonder and point fingers but never gave them any real proof that Stuxnet was anything but a random bug, until President Obama opened his mouth.
Iran had a way to avoid retaliation and still save face but that is now gone…

Gwillie on June 9, 2012 at 10:26 AM

What the Democrats won’t say, but the hard Left will ..
the Times’s Stuxnet expose was designed to start the war drums with Iran

J_Crater on June 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM

Obama is offended, not to mention angry and upset. And Lt. Renaud is shocked. Wow. I feel much better now.

UnrepentantCurmudgeon on June 9, 2012 at 1:15 PM

“ACTS OF TREASON”.

There is a growing sentiment that Obama should be impeached for “High Crimes and Misdemeanors,”

as well as. Treason!

we have a President who allows our borders to be violated by illegals of any country while we are at war.

There is enough evidence presented to Congress to arrest him and prosecute him for an Act of War against the nation of Mexico, accessory to murder of thousands of innocent citizens in Mexico and America as well as the murder of/ United States Border Patrol agent Brian Terry..(rip).

Besides sending illegal guns to Mexico, Holder and Obama sold guns to criminal street gangs inside the United States where the guns will be used inside the United States. It will take years to find the thousands of guns these criminals sold to killers.

Eric Holder and his criminal operatives in his office and the Department of Justice need to be dragged out in handcuffs, jailed with no bail and put on trial with a jury of American citizens who are not federal government employees.

ALSO:: Aid and comfort to the Enemy..

Obama Administration’s collaboration with Islamic Lobbyists, Muslim Brotherhood.

Obama is a traitor: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUaGe63Aqv4.

See 18USC, Part 1, Chapter 115, sec.1281 and Articloe 906.106 of the UCMJ.

The Enemy is now inside our Executive Branch, SCOTUS, POTUS, Congress and many Law Enforcement Agencies like ATF, HS and ICE.

OBAMA & THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD.

The Brotherhood’s credo was and is, “God is our objective; the Quran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations.”

The Brotherhood’s English language website describes the “principles of the Muslim Brotherhood” as including firstly the introduction of the Islamic Shari`ah as “the basis controlling the affairs of state and society;”.

And so Obama gives the Muslim Brotherhood positions within his administration. Especially highly classified position in Homeland Securutiy.

Does this sound like aiding & abedding the enemy?

Barack Hussein Obama has crossed the line!, and under Article III, Section 3 of our Constitution is guilty of treason by giving aid and comfort to the enemy and attempting to overthrow our government from within.

Now is the time for members of Congress, to finally do your Constitutional duty and hold Barack Hussein Obama accountable for his crimes against America.

Mr. Obama is a fraudulent president who is selling out America.

It’s time Mr. Obama is called accountable for his treasonous actions.

http://thecaptiansquarters.blogspot.com/2012/02/aid-and-comfort-to-enemy.html

Ha.. don’t ask me how I feel.. I’m Disgusted, I’m to old for this crap..

Treason Law & Legal Definition.

A person commits the crime of treason if he levies war against his state or country or sides to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

Treason is a crime under federal and some state laws. Treason is made a high crime, punishable by death, under federal law by Article III, section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: “Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”

Under this article of the Constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court. Treason requires overt acts such as giving sensitive government security secrets to other countries, even if such countries are not enemies.

Treason can include spying on behalf of a foreign power or divulging military secrets.

See my blogg, I’m running out of wind.. lol..

God Help the USA!—…SOS..CAPT-DAX OUT.

http://thecaptiansquarters.blogspot.com/

Capt-Dax on June 9, 2012 at 7:37 PM

I’m offended the choomer is POTUS

RedInMD on June 10, 2012 at 5:19 PM

Comment pages: 1 2