CBO: Taxmageddon is real, people

posted at 2:41 pm on May 23, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

It’s not new, either.  Thanks to the compromise cobbled together in the lame-duck Congress after the 2010 midterms, everyone knew that the big issues on tax rates got punted to after the 2012 elections.  The same thing was true of spending cuts in last summer’s debt-ceiling fight.  Both parties planned to run on their approach to solving the problem, and then hashing it out after this election before time ran out.  A new CBO report might put pressure on Congress to address it before the election:

Tax hikes and spending cuts set to take effect in January would suck $607 billion out of the economy next year, plunging the nation at least briefly back into recession, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Tuesday.

Unless lawmakers act, the economy is likely to contract in the first half of 2013 at an annualized rate of 1.3 percent, the CBO said, before returning to 2.3 percent growth later in the year.

Canceling those tax and spending policies would protect the recovery in the short run and encourage more vibrant growth, around 4.4 percent, in 2013, the CBO said. However, unless lawmakers adopt policies that would reduce budget deficits by a comparable amount down the road, the CBO said, the national debt would continue to climb, imperiling future economic growth.

The problem with waiting it out is that businesses have to calculate investments in the near term based on best estimates of demand in the next year.  They already face a bewildering array of ambiguities on the regulatory front, from whether ObamaCare will exist at all and what forms the still-missing regulations will take, to energy prices thanks to regulatory attacks on coal and natural-gas extraction, labor-organizing rules, and the heavy burdens of Dodd-Frank, among many others.  The economy appears to have slipped deeper into stagnation already, and continued ambiguity on taxes will only make that situation worse.

Sen. John Thune told Fox News that Congress simply can’t wait to act, if they want to avoid significant economic damage:


Don’t expect an early resolution to the issue.  Both sides want to run on tax policy in this election.  The only way this might get resolved is if the White House decides it needs a boost to the economy this summer, which a definitive resolution might produce.  After all, once businesses see a light at the end of this particular tunnel, they can put some investment back into their operations and plan for a non-recessionary 2013.  If the economy and job creation continue to drag in May and June, Democrats might be willing to cut a deal — or at least kick the can down the road for another couple of years, allowing everyone to still debate the topic until November without damaging the economy.

It’s not just Taxmageddon that we should fear, either, as Suzanne McGee argues at The Fiscal Times. We may have to deal with Drachmageddon, too:

It’s a stark dilemma – how to properly balance growth and fiscal health – and it is one that already is making investors extremely uneasy. The closer we come to the November elections, the more it is likely that those jitters will shape the direction of the stock market, regardless of who seems likely to win the White House or end up dominating Congress, since neither party seems prepared to give way on these issues, which already have come close to shutting down the federal government.

Not ominous enough? Well, there is the ticking time bomb now being referred to as “drachmageddon,” or the prospect that Greece will abandon – or be forced out of – the Eurozone in the near future. European politicians, including British Prime Minister David Cameron, have taken to the airwaves to huff and puff about the apparent wish of Greek voters to possess and simultaneously devour their cake. “They cannot just vote for saying, ‘could people just carry on giving us some money so we do not have to change anything,’” Britain’s Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke (a former chancellor of the exchequer) pointedly warned, cautioning the Greeks against the ramifications of electing “cranky extremists.”

The news on “drachmageddon” – or the possibility that the Greeks will wake up one morning this summer to find that the Euros in their bank accounts have been swapped back into drachma, their pre-Euro currency – wasn’t any better today. An EU summit is scheduled to take place in Brussels, but leaders aren’t speaking with a single voice in the discussions with Greece. German Chancellor Angela Merkel has signaled some willingness to compromise, but her views still remain poles apart from those of her newly elected French colleague, French President Francois Hollande.

At least we have the ability to right our own ship … for the moment.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Only solution to this for Dems and RINOs, for tax ‘expenditures’ –

Tax Ireland!

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Shouldn’t O’bama be able to talk to some of his relatives over there and sort things out?

rightmind on May 21, 2013 at 8:09 PM

That is called “competition’. Something Obama understands about as well as he spells or pronounces common words.

pat on May 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM

Abolish the corporate tax. It isn’t even close to being worth having. Just make dividends part of income.

Count to 10 on May 21, 2013 at 8:11 PM

Don’t touch the Guinness…

d1carter on May 21, 2013 at 8:11 PM

Don’t touch the Guinness…

d1carter on May 21, 2013 at 8:11 PM

Tax it like hell!

It’s costing American liberals spending money.

What are you — anti-American?

I bet you’d shoot a guy you might catch raping a woman, without knowing his circumstances and how he feels.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:15 PM

Since some of my companies do business offshore, I am as guilty as Apple, albeit on a comparatively infinitesimal scale, in setting up Irish holding companies that place company funds in American banks and other American-based financial vehicles. All perfectly legal.

Why, because I don’t wish to pay a single penny more in taxes, no matter to which government that’s involved. Why does Apple do it or, for that matter, any other huge publicly traded entity do it? Well, if they didn’t, they’d be open to shareholder suits for “wasting corporate assets” or shareholder “Change of Management” proxy fights at their next annual meeting, which would be prosecuted by some multi-billion dollar investment fund holders.

A publicly held company has a lot more scrutiny, due to its board’s fiduciary duty to shareholders, than does a simple, greedy bastard like me.

TXUS on May 21, 2013 at 8:18 PM

I bet you’d shoot a guy you might catch raping a woman, without knowing his circumstances and how he feels.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:15 PM

lol, He was just socially awkward and didn’t know how to ask politely.

arnold ziffel on May 21, 2013 at 8:19 PM

A publicly held company has a lot more scrutiny, due to its board’s fiduciary duty to shareholders, than does a simple, greedy bastard like me.

TXUS on May 21, 2013 at 8:18 PM

I hope you get filthy rich.

And never hire liberals.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:19 PM

I love to mention this sort of stuff to my Apple using lib friends.

How Apple uses foreign labor (toss in exploit for extra effect) and minimizes their tax exposure thru perfectly legal means.

Fun to watch them squirm.

Hill60 on May 21, 2013 at 8:20 PM

Ban St Patrick’s Day parades !!

burrata on May 21, 2013 at 8:20 PM

lol, He was just socially awkward and didn’t know how to ask politely.

arnold ziffel on May 21, 2013 at 8:19 PM

Kill a rapist, offend a liberal.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:21 PM

Ban St Patrick’s Day parades !!

burrata on May 21, 2013 at 8:20 PM

No! We can’t do THAT!

Tax it instead! See — a level playing field.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:23 PM

If following the law to avoid paying taxes is wrong, can we impeach Obama on the fact that he claimed deductions on his 1040?

malclave on May 21, 2013 at 8:27 PM

If following the law to avoid paying taxes is wrong, can we impeach Obama on the fact that he claimed deductions on his 1040?

malclave on May 21, 2013 at 8:27 PM

That’s funny. When Clinton made one of his returns public years ago, he wrote off his used undershorts at $2.50 each.

I don’t file a long form any more. But when I did, I never claimed my charitable donations. What I return to God does not leave me room to try getting back a piece of it.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:31 PM

I’d like to travel back into the past and bitchslap everyone involved in setting up LoN/UN

dmacleo on May 21, 2013 at 8:33 PM

I hope you get filthy rich.

And never hire liberals.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:19 PM

Well, when your choice is paying the Irish 12.5% on offshore earnings vs. the IRS’s 35% on same, almost three times as much, this Texan’s ready to share a pint and a “top ‘o the mornin’ to ye.”

TXUS on May 21, 2013 at 8:33 PM

Tax it instead! See — a level playing field.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:23 PM

Great !
Now let them try to tax Cinco de Mayo parade ,
you know for a level playing field !!

burrata on May 21, 2013 at 8:33 PM

Well, when your choice is paying the Irish 12.5% on offshore earnings vs. the IRS’s 35% on same, almost three times as much, this Texan’s ready to share a pint and a “top ‘o the mornin’ to ye.”

TXUS on May 21, 2013 at 8:33 PM

Long as ye buy the first pint, we celebrate!

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:35 PM

Great !
Now let them try to tax Cinco de Mayo parade ,
you know for a level playing field !!

burrata on May 21, 2013 at 8:33 PM

That would be racist, man. What is wrong with you?

The Irish aren’t a minority.

Why do I hang out with you people? /

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:37 PM

Long as ye buy the first pint, we celebrate!

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:35 PM

Nigh a problem, William. I’ll buy the pints, you bring the lassies.

TXUS on May 21, 2013 at 8:47 PM

Nigh a problem, William. I’ll buy the pints, you bring the lassies.

TXUS on May 21, 2013 at 8:47 PM

Deal!

I have a thing for redheads. That okay there?

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:49 PM

Éirinn go Brách (or for my English friends, Erin go Bragh)

IrishEyes on May 21, 2013 at 8:52 PM

Éirinn go Brách (or for my English friends, Erin go Bragh)

IrishEyes on May 21, 2013 at 8:52 PM

From an American of Scot lineage: Ciamar a tha thu?

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:55 PM

Tax Bono.

Ronnie on May 21, 2013 at 8:55 PM

I don’t file a long form any more. But when I did, I never claimed my charitable donations. What I return to God does not leave me room to try getting back a piece of it.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:31 PM

That’s one way of looking at it, the other way of looking at it, is that by claiming the deduction, it provides more to give. i.e, if you are in the 28% bracket, if you don’t take the deduction, for every dollar you donate, you have to earn $1.39.

AZfederalist on May 21, 2013 at 8:57 PM

Tax Bono.

Ronnie on May 21, 2013 at 8:55 PM

+1000

Out his a$$!

He’s nothing but an international panhandler in a Bond Street suit.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 8:58 PM

That’s one way of looking at it, the other way of looking at it, is that by claiming the deduction, it provides more to give. i.e, if you are in the 28% bracket, if you don’t take the deduction, for every dollar you donate, you have to earn $1.39.

AZfederalist on May 21, 2013 at 8:57 PM

I’m no longer in position to itemize. But I have a personal religious view. I worked from there.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 9:01 PM

But I have a personal religious view. I worked from there.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 9:01 PM

I do, too. If I get $100 bill from a bank (I hate $100 bills) I put it in the first charity box I see, wrapped in a $1. We’re not rich, rich. We just have a little breathing room. My philosophy is good deeds don’t count if you tell someone or claim it as a deduction. My accountant hates me… lol.

Fallon on May 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM

I do, too. If I get $100 bill from a bank (I hate $100 bills) I put it in the first charity box I see, wrapped in a $1. We’re not rich, rich. We just have a little breathing room. My philosophy is good deeds don’t count if you tell someone or claim it as a deduction. My accountant hates me… lol.

Fallon on May 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM

I’m of the view, as according to Scripture, that for what we do in private with the Lord, He will reward us openly.

I believe as you do.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 9:10 PM

I do, too. If I get $100 bill from a bank (I hate $100 bills) I put it in the first charity box I see, wrapped in a $1. We’re not rich, rich. We just have a little breathing room. My philosophy is good deeds don’t count if you tell someone or claim it as a deduction. My accountant hates me… lol.

Everybody needs to do what their conscience tells them. I think where one would get off track is if one were to give because it is tax deducttible.

AZfederalist on May 21, 2013 at 9:10 PM

… as far as giving without publicizing it; up until this week, I was under the impression that my charitable donations were completely private and that the IRS would keep those records private.

AZfederalist on May 21, 2013 at 9:13 PM

Everybody needs to do what their conscience tells them. I think where one would get off track is if one were to give because it is tax deducttible.

AZfederalist on May 21, 2013 at 9:10 PM

THAT describes a liberal.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 9:13 PM

Everybody needs to do what their conscience tells them. I think where one would get off track is if one were to give because it is tax deducttible.

AZfederalist on May 21, 2013 at 9:10 PM

Think about it — Bill Clinton deducted from his $2.50 a pair for his ‘donated undershorts, and we’re expected to think he’s somehow a ‘nice guy’?

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 9:18 PM

I’m in a bad mood all day.

Give me a troll to chew on.

Liam on May 21, 2013 at 9:21 PM

We do a lot of things wrong in Ireland
but the corporate tax rate was one of the things we did right
now the eurocrats want to take it away

breffnian on May 21, 2013 at 9:29 PM

Apple: “Hey Ireland how about a low tax rate?”

Ireland: Brilliant!

Apple: Brilliant!

BKennedy on May 21, 2013 at 9:56 PM

Hill60 on May 21, 2013 at 8:20 PM

Good. That’s my only problem with Apple doing this; that they are a bunch of hypocritical progs.

As to declaring taxes, I’ve considered the doing in private aspect, and really respect those who chose that route, but when I consider all the pure evil the government does with my tax dollar, I chose to keep as much out of their wicked hands as legally possible. I still fear it won’t be enough to wash me of the guilt I have in continuing to fund that evil.

pannw on May 21, 2013 at 10:31 PM

While Ireland misses out on some tax revenue, analysts say its economy more than makes up for this in other ways, including the tens of thousands of jobs that American technology companies have created there – and the income taxes that well-paid programmers and executives contribute to the Irish treasury.

The proggie lib hears only “misses out on … tax revenue” and says, “That’s not fair! You’re not paying your fair share!”

When asked about the jobs, the proggie lib responds indignantly, “Well, since you won’t give EVERYONE a well-paying programmer or executive job, then THAT’S NOT FAIR either!”

When told life isn’t fair, the proggie lib snarls, “Once the government controls everything, IT WILL BE!”

Marcola on May 22, 2013 at 12:26 AM

Letting too many snakes onto the Emerald Isle in P.C. stupidity.

O’Sharia.

profitsbeard on May 22, 2013 at 3:49 AM

Say there wasn’t anyone on that panel that has a rich heiress wife that shelters her NINE-figure fortune in a Trust, is there?

Cough-Cindy-Cough-McCain…

Tekov Yahoser on May 22, 2013 at 4:57 AM

I guess the Senate Democrats figured they’d found a pot o’ gold.

Odysseus on May 22, 2013 at 7:27 AM

The nerve of those Irish.

Not taxing everyone that wants to do business in their country over 50%. To not support their ruling elite with well earned compensation and benefits such as “seperate but equal” healthcare, pensions/social security, immunity from tax and regulations as well as most non felonious law.

They are obviously infidels and heathens unworthy of our fearless leaders support.

acyl72 on May 22, 2013 at 7:31 AM